*** UAP THREAD ***

392,156 Views | 4775 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by Coppell97
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If this translates to how he's going to treat UAP/NHI in general (save for the shooting down part), as much as I hate the man on a personal level, what a welcomed change of pace this would be.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TKEAg04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

Redstone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DISCLOUSRE

We can handle it. Seriously.

The hang up IMO is the past and maybe very recent permanent bureaucracy evil, with some grain of legitimacy in their minds to better understand consciousness.

Well - detail it, apologize, and let's go.

(They never will disclose with trash like MK Ultra, because as Kubrick told us in Eyes Wide Shut, when Alice allows their daughter to be taken in the toy store …. and that's obvious IMO …. the government can be extremely evil.)

But, with aliens and inter- / -extra dimensional consciousness… let's be prepared, reading our Howard Storm, Seraphim Rose, Anne Catherine Emmerich, Michael Heiser…..

We religious can handle it. The non can also.

It's time.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It doesn't appear that the game was actually stopped *because* of these objects, but still pretty wild nonetheless...

Agristotle
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They are going to have to be forced to "disclose". They are not going to show their cards because "it's the right thing to do" or because "the public deserves to know."

And I don't see how they can be forced to do so.
Eliminatus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Agristotle said:

They are going to have to be forced to "disclose". They are not going to show their cards because "it's the right thing to do" or because "the public deserves to know."

And I don't see how they can be forced to do so.
You mean the admin is going to stay mum the entire time all the way up to aliens landing on front lawns and saying hi to everyone?
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Agristotle said:

They are going to have to be forced to "disclose". They are not going to show their cards because "it's the right thing to do" or because "the public deserves to know."

And I don't see how they can be forced to do so.

If convincing enough videos were to be leaked, of NHI bodies/craft, backed by credible sources and their confirmation, with an accompanying narrative, witnesses, paperwork, etc - that made national headlines - IMO, the gatekeepers would be forced to disclose, in some way, shape, or form. Not everything, of course, but at least an acknowledgment.

Otherwise, a mass, relatively close-up sighting caught on camera, of a large, unmistakably NHI-controlled craft, would probably do the trick as well.

A fever-pitch 100x what we're seeing now would erupt in the wake of either, and there's no way the gatekeepers would be able to stay silent.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mr President Elect
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Community Note proposal's saying it is CGI
Eliminatus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:




This is where a lot of my frustration comes from. They we don't do intercepts because of collateral. Fine. I can accept that (begrudgingly). But we know these things have a presence over the sea and we know these coast guard has been ready and willing to work on it. We also know there is a pattern of them coming and going to sea.

Sooooooo


Maybe do an intercept at sea? exactly like we did with the China Balloon. Or one of them at least. I know, common sense, right? So why is it not being done? And so begins the same argument anew.

It's the one thing I just can't make up my mind on. Is the federal government actually trying to do anything about this or not? Officially they are. By action they are not. Behind the scenes, who knows.

Just rehashing the same things again I know, sorry, but this wrinkle of local resources actively trying to do something while feds seem to be playing hands off has me wondering….
AgBQ-00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I believe the "gunfire" was added in post processing
You do not have a soul. You are a soul that has a body.

We sing Hallelujah! The Lamb has overcome!
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mr President Elect said:

Community Note proposal's saying it is CGI


Good to know. At this point it's officially pointless to keep posting these videos.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Coppell97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Eliminatus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

Mr President Elect said:

Community Note proposal's saying it is CGI


Good to know. At this point it's officially pointless to keep posting these videos.
Just like any other event, fake news floods the internet. I always take a few seconds at least to watch the videos to spot easy fakes now. This one the gunfire is looped. Looks overlaid onto the lights video.

And this is what the government and naysayers latch onto of course.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Totally. The gunfire looked so wonky to me that it felt real, if that makes sense. That, and I really like Matthew Pines, who retweeted it/gave it a bit more credibility. Seems we were both duped.
Eliminatus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

Totally. The gunfire looked so wonky to me that it felt real, if that makes sense. That, and I really like Matthew Pines, who retweeted it/gave it a bit more credibility. Seems we were both duped.
Here's the original gun video. The faker chopped it up a little bit to spread over duration of lights video but it's the source material 100%.



Some others have posited that some of the more obvious fakes and misidentified are purposely created by government orgs to create doubt and ridicule. Which makes sense of course if there is anything to hide. Stupid cheap and effective. Hell, I would if I were tasked to help hide little green men.
Jugstore Cowboy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
There are a ****load of people seeking attention, clicks, likes & follows who don't need any special instruction from SAP's (I'm using the acronym right now!) to create fake bull**** for gullible people to eat up with their confirmation bias.
Coppell97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Houston Lee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So, was the prediction that there will be an alien "invasion" starting on Dec 3rd, kind of right?
Teddy Perkins
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Texas Gulf Coast residents now spotting mysterious drones too

TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Eliminatus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TURF WARS!
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Eliminatus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Long form news segment of that reporter who went out and captured some footage for those interested. Some good conversation here.



I will be the first to say I will bend my mind as hard as I can to rationalize these occurrences. But there are just some things I can't shake. One commonality I am seeing among the as of yet non-debunked stuff, is how low and how silent these things are. I am very aware of how bad people generally are at estimating distance but when report after report comes out of drones mere hundreds of feet off the ground and flying directly over residential areas that have never had air traffic over them before, you have to take into account I think. Even if you have to append it to "sub 2K feet" for margin of error.

Same thing with the size. Almost unanimous from what I can tell of SUV sized. Mixed with lighting patterns equating to large swept wing aircraft.....just doesn't jive in my head.

I also have experience trying to capture things at night on film and it is extremely difficult. No expert at all and I have never been able to dial in what is clear to my eye even at night but a blurry mess on screen. Infuriating even. So when you have intelligent people who don't deal in hyperbole say "look, I have this footage and it's hard to make out but I can assure you, it was no plane." I can also take that into consideration to an extent. Been in that position before. Not with UAPs though of course.

I do like the theory of training, testing, red teaming, etc. a lot.....but every night this goes on is starting to stretch it IMO. Even if the government was ran by space lizards and Illumanati, there's always been an unwritten rule to not mess with the public too much. Or at all ideally. I just can't see it for this long in one area. Even taking into account any super secret squirrel orgs that no one knows exists. May be wrong on that of course but gut feeling is nah.

Real threat being scanned for by our best tech that may/may not not be public yet? Interesting one.....

Either way, the government response is pissing everyone off at this point. "We don't know what it is" mixed with "there is no threat" ain't cutting it anymore. Even if they know what this is or not. Their messaging sucks and is allaying exactly zero fears or concerns.

Random insomnia thoughts.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Very well said. I'm right there with you, point by point, on all of it.
G Martin 87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:


Seems LARPy to me, but it does check a lot of boxes. The P4 (the drone in the picture) is probably too small to carry detection equipment and "horn antennas". It can only carry a few pounds; it's a technology demonstrator, not a detection or weapons platform. But the P5 and P7 are much bigger with up to 10 times the payload, range, and loiter time.
G Martin 87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:


I can't help being very skeptical of videos claiming to be of energy orbs. I'm very near sighted. The pics and videos of "orbs" look *exactly* like what I see when I look at bright lights at night without glasses or contact lenses. But OTOH, trained cameramen would absolutely not make that mistake.
Ghost of Bisbee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Where is Spyderman//McKelvey's Curse/PowerLover/CharlesHicksonknows/GreersPimp in all of this???
Duckhook
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
G Martin 87 said:

TCTTS said:


I can't help being very skeptical of videos claiming to be of energy orbs. I'm very near sighted. The pics and videos of "orbs" look *exactly* like what I see when I look at bright lights at night without glasses or contact lenses. But OTOH, trained cameramen would absolutely not make that mistake.

Without any context, that just looks like a tight shot of Venus.
lunchbox
How long do you want to ignore this user?
G Martin 87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
lunchbox said:


Yep. I agree completely with this. Our government has proven time and again that they just can't help themselves when it comes to being straightforward and transparent about anything, even when it fuels conspiracy theories that, if left unchecked, erode public confidence even more.
Eliminatus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I like it. Extremely feasible with underlying proof and motivations given.
First Page Last Page
Page 133 of 137
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.