aggiebird02 said:
Can you please explain a little further with a short synopsis?
First of all, I fully admit that this sounds like a bat**** insane episode of
Ancient Aliens, and I'm not at all going to do Jorjani's argument justice. That said, to expand on it a bit more, this is the basic gist of his (again, way, way out there) theory…
- Future-Earth humans, in order to flee some kind of civilization-ending threat or disaster, traveled back in time, more than 12,500 years ago, and settled on Antarctica.
- Most UAPs likely come from this civilization, and are able to bend space and time in such a way that they're essentially time machines.
- Prior to 12,500 years ago, Antartica wasn't as south as it is now, and thus had a more hospitable climate. The continent eventually shifted, though, due to some kind of cataclysmic crust/pole shift that may or may not tie into/explain the Younger Dryas Impact Theory (I admittedly didn't fully grasp this bit, or the order of potential events, so I'm almost assuredly off here).
- Antarctica was the perfect continent for a future civilization to hide on, so as to not overtly interact with the rest of humanity, seeing as it's so remote, surrounded on all sides by four oceans, and wasn't even discovered by modern man until the 1800s.
- Not to mention, most of present-day Antartica is off limits to the public, with strict no fly zones over the vast majority of it, and Jorjani argues this could be because "Atlantis" is buried underneath it, and to whatever degree is likely still in operation today.
- Ultimately, these Antarctica-dwelling future-humans, in some way, shape, or form, are limiting human potential, so as to keep a certain hierarchy, wherein they remain on top, and in the shadows.
Again…I FULLY realize how nuts this all sounds, and I'm not outright buying any of it. Rather, I'm simply saying that the way Jorjani presents his theory, with so much more context, and so many more facts and figures than I've presented here, along with his matter-of-fact demeanor, makes his theory far more compelling than it has any right to be.
That, and with more and more scholars seemingly subscribing to the idea of an elder race/pre-modern-man advanced civilization (for instance, though I know he has his detractors, see Graham Hancock's
Ancient Apocalypse series on Netflix), this is the only theory I've heard so far that would not only explain how such a civilization came to be, but why we haven't found any remains/evidence of it yet. Heck, it would even explain why "aliens" have so much interest in our nuclear capabilities, in that these "aliens" actually share the earth with us, and have a vested interest in it not being destroyed.
