Who knows? Maybe Kanye West is an alien plant to distract us from the truth! Hmmm?!?!?

"Y'all don't want to hear me, you just want to dance" -OutKast.

Kanye's song Power was a dope entrance song. The beat was awesome.

TJaggie14 said:

---

"Y'all don't want to hear me, you just want to dance" -OutKast.

Kanye's song Power was a dope entrance song. The beat was awesome.

---

It was a blight that had to be removed.

Trust the data..

Bjork died for Power's sins

TKEAg04 said:

---

Leonard H. Stringfield said:

---

TJaggie14 said:

---

"Y'all don't want to hear me, you just want to dance" -OutKast.

Kanye's song Power was a dope entrance song. The beat was awesome.

---

It was a blight that had to be removed.

Trust the data..

---

---

lol....yup. The data says we are no longer associated with it. Si?

Whats the latest on this really important thread topic? Any new data?

AgBQ-00 said:

---

Can we not derail this thread with this brain dead BS about a song?

---

Indeed!!

C'mon Spydey, derailing threads is what you do best on TexAgs.

jkag89 said:

---

C'mon Spydey, derailing threads is what you do best on TexAgs.

---

BenFiasco14
In reply to Leonard H. Stringfield 6:17p, 1/15/24

AG

The reality of A&Ms entrance song must be too troubling for you.
CNN is an enemy of the state and should be treated as such.




PM from here on concerning the song...thanks

Been enjoying looking at some of the older interviews. What think ye regarding David Adair?

Area 51 whistleblower David Adair

The data also shows that the new entrance song is like a Walmart version knock off of Power. It's like they paid the first beat maker they found on SoundCloud or something to make their new intro.

Came across another good one...10 yrs before Lazar and what..43 prior to
Grusch:

"In Search of..." UFO Coverups, 1980

Leonard H. Stringfield said:

---

jkag89 said:

---

C'mon Spydey, derailing threads is what you do best on TexAgs.

---

BenFiasco14
In reply to Leonard H. Stringfield 6:17p, 1/15/24

---

I'm not talking about this particular derailment. You have a habit dropping paranormal/UAP BS on any thread that you take a fancy to if in your imagination the topic being discussed gives you an opening. See the SpaceX thread on F16 or a number of threads on the R&P Board. So I find it rather amusing that you are taking exception to this one.

jkag89 said:

---

Leonard H. Stringfield said:

---

jkag89 said:

---

C'mon Spydey, derailing threads is what you do best on TexAgs.

---

BenFiasco14
In reply to Leonard H. Stringfield 6:17p, 1/15/24

---

I'm not talking about this particular derailment. You have a habit dropping paranormal/UAP BS on any thread that you take a fancy to if in your imagination the topic being discussed gives you an opening. See the SpaceX thread on F16 or a number of threads on the R&P Board. So I find it rather amusing that you are taking exception to this one.

---

Keep laughing? Why do you refer to it as BS? Just trying to create an awareness of the reality where I think it might be appropriate. That's not likely to change. Did Ben's derailment upset you?

What's the latest here on an appropriate thread?

Leonard H. Stringfield said:

---

Came across another good one...10 yrs before Lazar and what..43 prior to
Grusch:

"In Search of..." UFO Coverups, 1980

---

What a great trip down memory lane. The theme music and Leonard Nimoy's narration took me right back to high school. Thanks!

G Martin 87 said:

---

Leonard H. Stringfield said:

---

Came across another good one...10 yrs before Lazar and what..43 prior to
Grusch:

"In Search of..." UFO Coverups, 1980

---

What a great trip down memory lane. The theme music and Leonard Nimoy's narration took me right back to high school. Thanks!

---

welcome

Leonard H. Stringfield said:

---

jkag89 said:

---

Leonard H. Stringfield said:

---

jkag89 said:

---

C'mon Spydey, derailing threads is what you do best on TexAgs.

---

BenFiasco14
In reply to Leonard H. Stringfield 6:17p, 1/15/24

---

I'm not talking about this particular derailment. You have a habit dropping paranormal/UAP BS on any thread that you take a fancy to if in your imagination the topic being discussed gives you an opening. See the SpaceX thread on F16 or a number of threads on the R&P Board. So I find it rather amusing that you are taking exception to this one.

---

Keep laughing? Why do you refer to it as BS?

---

I'm only laughing because of the absurdity of you complaining about a thread derailment. Posting anything and everything about paranormal activity in hopes some of it will stick hurts your cause instead of helping it, hence IMO it is BS. You would do better to be more selective about your sources.

Quote:

---

Just trying to create an awareness of the reality where I think it might be appropriate.

---

I have no problem with you using these forums to present the reality as you see it but I don't understand why you just don't start your own threads to present such instead glomming on to whatever thread that takes your fancy.

Quote:

---

That's not likely to change.

---

Oh Boy.

Quote:

---

Did Ben's derailment upset you?

---

No because he doesn't constantly do so and in a way it wasn't really a derailment since it tied into your return.

Quote:

---

What's the latest here on an appropriate thread?

---

Using threads that might sorta kinda have a tangential connections but not really except in loosest sense, not appropriate. Examples:


Bring up ETs and/or UFOs on a thread dedicated to humankind's continuing attempts to go beyond our planet, not appropriate.

Embedding videos claiming proof of alien visitation and time machines hidden in the Vatican Archives just because the thread title happened to use the word Vatican, not appropriate. Start your own thread if you believe the information is worth presenting. This post on another R&P thread just showed you didn't have a clue about the topic, On the other hand, good job here. Why? Because you started your own thread, then again I suspect it was because there was no Taoist thread in which to glom on to.

jkag89 said:

---

Leonard H. Stringfield said:

---

jkag89 said:

---

Leonard H. Stringfield said:

---

jkag89 said:

---

C'mon Spydey, derailing threads is what you do best on TexAgs.

---

BenFiasco14
In reply to Leonard H. Stringfield 6:17p, 1/15/24

---

I'm not talking about this particular derailment. You have a habit dropping paranormal/UAP BS on any thread that you take a fancy to if in your imagination the topic being discussed gives you an opening. See the SpaceX thread on F16 or a number of threads on the R&P Board. So I find it rather amusing that you are taking exception to this one.

---

Keep laughing? Why do you refer to it as BS?

---

I'm only laughing because of the absurdity of you complaining about a thread derailment. Posting anything and everything about paranormal activity in hopes some of it will stick hurts your cause instead of helping it, hence IMO it is BS. You would do better to be more selective about your sources.

Quote:

---

Just trying to create an awareness of the reality where I think it might be appropriate.

---

I have no problem with you using these forums to present the reality as you see it but I don't understand why you just don't start your own threads to present such instead glomming on to whatever thread that takes your fancy.

Quote:

---

That's not likely to change.

---

Oh Boy.

Quote:

---

Did Ben's derailment upset you?

---

No because he doesn't constantly do so and in a way it wasn't really a derailment since it tied into your return.

Quote:

---

What's the latest here on an appropriate thread?

---

Using threads that might sorta kinda have a tangential connections but not really except in loosest sense, not appropriate. Examples:


Bring up ETs and/or UFOs on a thread dedicated to humankind's continuing attempts to go beyond our planet, not appropriate.

Embedding videos claiming proof of alien visitation and time machines hidden in the Vatican Archives just because the thread title happened to use the word Vatican, not appropriate. Start your own thread if you believe the information is worth presenting. This post on another R&P thread just showed you didn't have a clue about the topic, On the other hand, good job here. Why? Because you started your own thread, then again I suspect it was because there was no Taoist thread in which to glom on to.

---

The reason for the complaint was due to the fact the OP and moderators frowns upon that. You and I both have probably crossed that line. I did not laugh. We do not agree on what is "appropriate". That is VERY clear. Can not over stress that. Just accept that and move on. I will. What you say we return to what this thread was designed for? You shouldn't get so worked up about this....just a suggestion.

thanks...I'd bet the OP would appreciate that.

another....

JD Shellnut
4:41p

AG

Who knows? Maybe Kanye West is an alien plant to distract us from the truth! Hmmm?!?!?

give him the business man...


What are the general thoughts on Grusch's testimony?

go...

Redstone said:

---

Yes, glad to be a high-quality content contributor.

Let's keep posting until Disclosure.

---

Red..how close/far do you think our gov is to disclosing the goods?

Quote:

---

. . . say we return to what this thread was designed for?

---

All I ever asked for on the many threads you have or attempted to derail, just saying.

TCTTS said:

---

jkag89 said:

---

Leonard H. Stringfield said:

---

jkag89 said:

---

Leonard H. Stringfield said:

---

jkag89 said:

---

C'mon Spydey, derailing threads is what you do best on TexAgs.

---

BenFiasco14
In reply to Leonard H. Stringfield 6:17p, 1/15/24

---

I'm not talking about this particular derailment. You have a habit dropping paranormal/UAP BS on any thread that you take a fancy to if in your imagination the topic being discussed gives you an opening. See the SpaceX thread on F16 or a number of threads on the R&P Board. So I find it rather amusing that you are taking exception to this one.

---

Keep laughing? Why do you refer to it as BS?

---

I'm only laughing because of the absurdity of you complaining about a thread derailment. Posting anything and everything about paranormal activity in hopes some of it will stick hurts your cause instead of helping it, hence IMO it is BS. You would do better to be more selective about your sources.

Quote:

---

Just trying to create an awareness of the reality where I think it might be appropriate.

---

I have no problem with you using these forums to present the reality as you see it but I don't understand why you just don't start your own threads to present such instead glomming on to whatever thread that takes your fancy.

Quote:

---

That's not likely to change.

---

Oh Boy.

Quote:

---

Did Ben's derailment upset you?

---

No because he doesn't constantly do so and in a way it wasn't really a derailment since it tied into your return.

Quote:

---

What's the latest here on an appropriate thread?

---

Using threads that might sorta kinda have a tangential connections but not really except in loosest sense, not appropriate. Examples:


Bring up ETs and/or UFOs on a thread dedicated to humankind's continuing attempts to go beyond our planet, not appropriate.

Embedding videos claiming proof of alien visitation and time machines hidden in the Vatican Archives just because the thread title happened to use the word Vatican, not appropriate. Start your own thread if you believe the information is worth presenting. This post on another R&P thread just showed you didn't have a clue about the topic, On the other hand, good job here. Why? Because you started your own thread, then again I suspect it was because there was no Taoist thread in which to glom on to.

---

I've brought up each and every one of these points (and more) with him multiple times, but unfortunately he simply doesn't care. It's damn near impossible to get through to him. He's an older man, I think retired, with an obsessive, one-track mind, who simply has no awareness of social norms and cues, or general message board banter, with zero desire to ingratiate himself in any way, shape, or form. Even if doing so meant his "message" would be more effective/reach more people. To the point where this thread is so much worse when he's active in it, as evident of the past 24 hours. I already miss the last couple of months.

---

What have I posted here in the past 48hrs to illicit such response? I do care... What is "my" message? I wasn't the one to originate the derailing and am trying pretty hard to get things back on track after responding to those.

jkag89 said:

---

Quote:

---

. . . say we return to what this thread was designed for?

---

All I ever asked for on the many threads you have or attempted to derail, just saying.

---

You need to respond to the 2 (maybe more?) folks who derailed this one. Think I copied and pasted.

I've made a real effort not to derail threads as of late picking and choosing where the information is at least somewhat related. There is nothing wrong with stimulating some alternative thought process IMO as long as it's not on Taylor Swift thread or such. At least I would hope this to be the case. Now on Facebook, that's an entirely different story lol.

I am curious what I've said/posted here in the past couple of days to get folks in such a tizzy.

Michael Herrera....another guy like Grusch..anybody familiar with his testimony?

redline248 said:

---

---

I'm going to post this again because I think some of you didn't see it.

Easier said than done. Because when he's active, he's REALLY active, and it's just so much awkward nonsense to sort through. I've said my piece, though, will shut up now, and try the ignore feature once more, as ineffective as it might be.

I missed it. I don't think the pic was large enough.

Sorry about my part in the derail,

TCTTS said:

---

We've had this discussion a thousand times. It's your posting style, the way you can't read the room, how you force questions no one answers, how you push some of the most out there theories/videos, which for this thread is saying something, etc. Put simply, you have a way of actively turning people off of this subject, everyone and their dog has tried telling you that, and it just kind of sucks that you won't listen.

---

So its taboo to discuss the sworn testimony of a former Marine? Is it that much of a sin not to answer someones question as you say? Choice. "Force".... How can you say that? I think what you are perceiving and what is reality might be 2 different things here. You don't agree with everything I might think is true..whats wrong with that? It is very much related to the subject matter (UAP).

I am curious what I have posted here in the last 48hrs to violate the law of the thread? Other than responding to the derailers.. What have I said in regards to the subject to actively turn people off in the last 48hrs. I assume they are grown up...l would love to hear those.. Still would like to know what my message is. If I have offended any...sorry.

all ears...

TCTTS said:

---

My comments on the significance of the House Oversight Committee secret hearing with the Intelligence Community Inspector General Thomas Monheim today. Indisputably, Reps heard enough to convince them that Grusch's complaints are credible. https://t.co/asVcHjiqYd

— Ross Coulthart (@rosscoulthart) January 12, 2024

---

This is very important going forward. Kudos to Ross and News Nation for providing this information. One of the few media outlets to do this.

Some Junkie Cosmonaut said:

---

Saw 31 new replies to this thread and got excited.

Then I clicked on it…

---

SITREP: Still waiting for the other shoe to drop. It's like playing a gigantic game of Jenga; another piece gets pulled out, but the structure isn't really wobbling just yet.

I'm a little worried that the momentum we're seeing is going to get derailed by the freaking election. Just have a bad feeling after the caucuses. Hope I'm wrong.