*** UAP THREAD ***

365,839 Views | 4390 Replies | Last: 6 hrs ago by jkag89
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Full reddit text (which has since been deleted) + Joe's commentary interjected throughout in the second tweet...


TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
G Martin 87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Is there an updated list of people somewhere who have made public claims about UAP? It's a bit frustrating to read the same dismissive comment every time someone else makes a statement like this. "Ho hum, nothing new, we already heard this before, move along, etc" What's new is that the number of people saying the same thing keeps growing. It would be interesting to see a full list, with job titles where appropriate.
AgBQ-00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Honest question because I'm curious: Did you think Gimble and Tic Tac were fake when they first showed up in the zeitgeist?
Redstone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Periodic reminder that we have on video, and with first-hand credible testimonies, of something breaking the known-as-of-now laws of gravity and physics.
G Martin 87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:


So this was actually pretty interesting, if very short. Notes for the folks who will skip right past this tweet:
  • Lynch says he's had "several" classified briefings on UAPs
  • Specifically referred to one also attended by Jim Langevin (D), former congressman RI, as being "notable"
  • Briefing provided by officials from the Navy (no names given)
  • No date given for when the briefing took place, but Langevin retired Jan 2023, so the briefing had to have taken place in 2022 or earlier
  • Briefing described reports from Navy pilots out of Pensacola regarding "technology that no one else has" that was tracked with "new" navigation systems
  • Capabilities similar to Tic-Tac and Gimbal/Go Fast reports (very high speed, extreme maneuverability)
  • "They have real concerns that they brought to Congress."
  • Not sure what this is, but Congress has a responsibility to investigate further
It sounds like Lynch is talking about a different Navy incident than the Tic-Tac (USS Nimitz, San Diego area, 2004) or Gimbal/Go Fast (USS Roosevelt, Atlantic coast between Virginia and Florida, 2014-2015) incidents. I haven't heard about any Navy UAP incidents being reported in the Gulf near Pensacola before.
redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AgBQ-00 said:

Honest question because I'm curious: Did you think Gimble and Tic Tac were fake when they first showed up in the zeitgeist?
I probably have a post in this thread about when I first learned of those, but I don't remember thinking it was fake right off the bat. Mostly because it didn't look fake like that jelly fish does.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Do we have a link to that memo? I didn't watch the video
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/DOC_0000015339.pdf
astros4545
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Thank you
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
While we're at it, the "Twining Memo" is pretty compelling as well...



redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I will say that 2 videos makes it more compelling than just that first jellyfish 1.
Redstone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Drones, built to order for different functions, with largest mobile manufacturing facility on the ocean floor and anchored in the Bermuda Triangle.

https://imgur.com/a/NXjWQaN
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Redstone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
As with mountain facilities such as Mount Hayes in Alaska, the primary purpose is fourfold :

- monitoring, including us potentially dangerous animals
- mining resources
- "protection" such as nuclear disarmament
- sending resources to off-world facilities
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Allegedly.

(Though I'm certainly open to all of those possibilities.)
jkag89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TCTTS said:




So does this mean it was the government's fault Doctor Who has gone in the crapper?
redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
astros4545 said:



Ok, so in the video you link, I think someone altered was actually shown at this talk. Here's a youtube video from another place she talks about it, almost the exact same description, but the video is a lot different. I don't have tiktok so I don't know if she has more than one video of different sightings



edit: well, here's the tiktok from the video in the tweet which is longer than what is shown (and like I said a lot different than what is in the youtube). So, I guess not altered. First posted in 2020

https://www.tiktok.com/@captainkatemccue/video/6836594357194231046

gonna keep digging
astros4545
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Another similar occurrence with orbs around it
redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
a comment on the tik tok mentioned Canada weather balloons, which lead me to this article, which is kind of funny.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-64546767
Quote:

It was a massive thing - the size of a 25-storey building that would cover an area equivalent to five football pitches if deflated, according to a BBC report from the time.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Redstone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Appreciate the Stars and posts that Turn Blue.

There's a lot more reality to post about this essential topic, and if may be best to follow from my profile account / post history, given how quickly this thread can move.
astros4545
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
lunchbox
How long do you want to ignore this user?
G Martin 87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
redline248 said:

TCTTS said:

Care to expand on why you believe so? I'm not saying it's real, but it at least comes from a somewhat trusted source + military officials who have apparently corroborated it.
For starters it looks like it belongs in a transformers movie
I've watched those videos several times, and I'm about 95% the object in these specific clips is a smear on the camera lens.
G Martin 87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
lunchbox said:


He says it didn't descend into the water or shoot upwards, and suggests that the sensor could have been zooming out at the end when it appeared that the object was getting further away. Sounds like crap on the lens.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The footage is being analyzed like crazy. It's definitely a 3D object. Also, if it were a smudge or bird sh*t or whatever, it would remain the same size, yet it fluctuates between being closer and farther away…


G Martin 87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

The footage is being analyzed like crazy. It's definitely a 3D object. Also, if it were a smudge or bird sh*t or whatever, it would remain the same size, yet it fluctuates between being closer and farther away…


I disagree. It looks more like a 2 dimensional, mostly flat object. Sensor movement, automatic exposure compensation, and zooming/cropping could all cause the fluctuations in size, shape, and coloring shown in those clips. Moreover, Corbell mentions that the "weapons system" taking the video was unable to lock on to it. That's another tickmark in the "something on the lens" column.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Eh, I just don't think it makes it this far (as in analyzed, leaked, passed along, etc) if it's simply a smudge on the lens. There are corroborating "witnesses" and other factors that lend to it being a physical object. That of course doesn't mean it's of non human origin, I just find it hard to believe that there would be that many dumbasses along the chain of command who wouldn't have ruled it out as a smudge almost immediately.
G Martin 87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

Eh, I just don't think it makes it this far (as in analyzed, leaked, passed along, etc) if it's simply a smudge on the lens. There are corroborating "witnesses" and other factors that lend to it being a physical object. That of course doesn't mean it's of non human origin, I just find it hard to believe that there would be that many dumbasses along the chain of command who wouldn't have ruled it out as a smudge almost immediately.
Do we know what the chain of custody is for the footage in the clips? Expert analysts may indeed have dismissed it, and dumbasses not involved at all may have stumbled across it and leaked it.
Some Junkie Cosmonaut
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Oh crap this is the Malaysian orb video all over again, huh?
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
According to Corbell, the base itself officially designated the object as an "incursion" and a "UAP." He also mentions multiple "individuals" and "direct eye witnesses" he spoke to who tracked the object. So this wasn't a random, second-hand leak. And again, I just have a hard time believing that expert military personnel would be dumb enough to officially label a lens smudge as an incursion/UAP, but who knows.

That said, to be clear, I think Corbell often handles these kinds of leaks all wrong, as he and Knapp seem to be the only civilians who analyze this kind of footage before they release it, which always leads to easily avoidable controversy. If he would just have a few more experts take a look beforehand, to head-off any obvious debunks that any moron would be able to predict, he could save himself a ton of headaches. Ultimately, I think his heart is in the right place, but he gets way too caught up in playing the "bad boy" of ufology along the way, and seeing/presenting himself in crap like this...

Joes
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Some Junkie Cosmonaut said:

Oh crap this is the Malaysian orb video all over again, huh?


Yep. The mall shopper alien evidently didn't take. This one reminds me so much of Maximilian, the bad-ass floating red robot from The Black Hole. So that's cool.

First Page Last Page
Page 86 of 126
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.