*** UAP THREAD ***

365,844 Views | 4390 Replies | Last: 6 hrs ago by jkag89
TCTTS
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:08p, 1/11/24
AG
Reply Quote
Some Junkie Cosmonaut
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:41p, 1/11/24
AG
Quote:
'Safe Airspace for Americans Act'


Goodness…
Reply Quote
6
redline248
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Some Junkie Cosmonaut • 4:00p, 1/11/24
AG
Some Junkie Cosmonaut said:
Quote:
'Safe Airspace for Americans Act'


Goodness…
I wonder if it will include more diligent hiring practices of qualified air traffic controllers
Reply Quote
1
redline248
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:01p, 1/11/24
AG
As for the jellyfish video from Iraq...aren't they saying it was moving along invisibly and the sensor could only track it using thermal imaging?

If so, how could there be eye witnesses?
Reply Quote
1
TKEAg04
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:48p, 1/11/24
AG
I have been listening to a new podcast called "Point of Convergence" lately. I'm in a plane all the time traveling for work so I thought I would give it a go.

It's completely full of 'woo', but it also intermingles science and other physics/meta-physics to try and explain as much as we can of everything going on.

Give it a go! I found it on Amazon Music.
Reply Quote
TCTTS
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:30p, 1/11/24
AG
Reply Quote
1
redline248
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TCTTS • 8:23p, 1/11/24
AG
I'm sure threats are gonna work.

I wonder what the hard way is
Reply Quote
1
TCTTS
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to redline248 • 8:40p, 1/11/24
AG
Corbell, Coulthart, etc have been talking about "the hard way" quite a bit since the Schumer bill was introduced. I guess technically, yeah, it's a threat, but they're all pretty much saying the same thing. Either the government can be honest, via the bill (didn't happen), the ICIG in tomorrow's meeting (likely won't happen), etc - or - all of these whistleblowers are going to start blowing their whistles publicly. This is something we all want, yes?
Reply Quote
2
1 edit
redline248
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TCTTS • 9:11p, 1/11/24
AG
Yes. Do it already!
Reply Quote
1
TCTTS
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to redline248 • 9:24p, 1/11/24
AG
I agree. It's time. Though, I get them wanting to be strategic, get their ducks in a row, giving the government every possible chance first, etc.
Reply Quote
1
G Martin 87
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TCTTS • 10:30p, 1/11/24
AG
TCTTS said:
I agree. It's time. Though, I get them wanting to be strategic, get their ducks in a row, giving the government every possible chance first, etc.
It's a crossing the Rubicon decision. There is no going back, and the consequences could be severe. I wouldn't want catastrophic disclosure to be Plan B if I was a whistleblower. Maybe Plan E or F. Better still, Plan Z.
Reply Quote
Some Junkie Cosmonaut
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to redline248 • 7:53a, 1/12/24
AG
redline248 said:
Some Junkie Cosmonaut said:
Quote:
'Safe Airspace for Americans Act'


Goodness…
I wonder if it will include more diligent hiring practices of qualified air traffic controllers


All I know is we have far too many grays flying these days. We need some more green guys and jellyfish to reflect the alien population at large.
Reply Quote
3
Some Junkie Cosmonaut
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:56a, 1/12/24
AG
Quote:
all of these whistleblowers are going to start blowing their whistles publicly. This is something we all want, yes?


Yes we would love for them to finally stop talking in circles about it and just do it already. My guess is these are just empty threats though. It's all part of the game.
Reply Quote
4
G Martin 87
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Some Junkie Cosmonaut • 8:05a, 1/12/24
AG
Some Junkie Cosmonaut said:
redline248 said:
Some Junkie Cosmonaut said:
Quote:
'Safe Airspace for Americans Act'


Goodness…
I wonder if it will include more diligent hiring practices of qualified air traffic controllers


All I know is we have far too many grays flying these days. We need some more green guys and jellyfish to reflect the alien population at large.
Sudden thought: if there really are many species, or factions, of aliens, wouldn't there be conflict between them? We're all one species occupying a single, little planet, and we have constant disagreements at every size of community. It's not just us, either. There is conflict at every level of life, from viral, fungal, and bacterial to whales and sequoias.

Again, just a random musing over my coffee this morning.
Reply Quote
Some Junkie Cosmonaut
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to G Martin 87 • 8:12a, 1/12/24
AG
Reply Quote
2
G Martin 87
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Some Junkie Cosmonaut • 8:17a, 1/12/24
AG
Some Junkie Cosmonaut said:
That one on the far right looks a lot like our HOA board chairperson. Would explain a lot.
Reply Quote
Some Junkie Cosmonaut
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to G Martin 87 • 9:32a, 1/12/24
AG
UFOs/HOAs/UAPs…

Makes sense!


Reply Quote
2
TCTTS
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:36p, 1/12/24
AG






Reply Quote
TCTTS
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:40p, 1/12/24
AG







Reply Quote
1 edit
TCTTS
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to G Martin 87 • 12:46p, 1/12/24
AG
Reply Quote
TCTTS
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:18p, 1/12/24
AG



Reply Quote
1
3 edits
G Martin 87
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TCTTS • 1:51p, 1/12/24
TCTTS
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:03p, 1/12/24
AG


Reply Quote
1
Agristotle
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:12p, 1/12/24
AG
just how do y'all envision "disclosure" taking place?


Reply Quote
MW03
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:22p, 1/12/24
AG
Anyone want to summarize what was said? I don't have the time to watch all the videos but would like to read a synopsis.
Reply Quote
lunchbox
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to MW03 • 2:28p, 1/12/24
MW03 said:
Anyone want to summarize what was said? I don't have the time to watch all the videos but would like to read a synopsis.
The text in the tweets above each video is your summary.
Reply Quote
2
MW03
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to lunchbox • 2:37p, 1/12/24
AG
lunchbox said:
MW03 said:
Anyone want to summarize what was said? I don't have the time to watch all the videos but would like to read a synopsis.
The text in the tweets above each video is your summary.
Kind of. Lots of them are some version of "their reaction says it all."
Reply Quote
2
lunchbox
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Agristotle • 2:38p, 1/12/24
Agristotle said:
just how do y'all envision "disclosure" taking place?


IMO, something (classified govt doc/report, photo, etc.) is going to 'leak' at some point that breaks it open.

It isn't going to be an intelligence official in a public briefing. It isn't going to be POTUS on a special CNN report.

Its going to be like the prisoner pics from Abu Ghraib showing up on twitter and going wide. This is already picking up steam in the media, but with most of them pissed off about the recent Sec of Defense Austin non-disclosures, this is something they wouldn't ignore.
Reply Quote
1
lunchbox
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to MW03 • 2:40p, 1/12/24
MW03 said:
lunchbox said:
MW03 said:
Anyone want to summarize what was said? I don't have the time to watch all the videos but would like to read a synopsis.
The text in the tweets above each video is your summary.
Kind of. Lots of them are some version of "their reaction says it all."
Some of them you have to click on to see the rest of the text. This is one of the better ones...

Reply Quote
2
TCTTS
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Agristotle • 2:42p, 1/12/24
AG
Agristotle said:
just how do y'all envision "disclosure" taking place?

In short: the whistleblower wave eventually becomes too big for the powers-that-be to ignore. Their hand will finally be forced by either an overwhelming amount of first-hand witness testimony from those involved in "the program," or some undeniable piece of footage leaks from one of them, or both. It's clear that the gate-keepers will gate keep for as long as they possibly can, and aren't going to give up willingly. But eventually, in some form or fashion, my bet is that their hand will finally be forced. Basically, "disclosure" will happen in the form of an undeniable amount of insiders/info coming forward, to the point where the gate-keepers are finally be forced to acknowledge it.

Either that or a foreign country blows the lid off the whole thing first.

However you slice it, our government is backed into a corner, and only comes clean when they literally have no other options.
Reply Quote
1
1 edit
TCTTS
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to lunchbox • 2:43p, 1/12/24
AG
You beat me to it, but yeah, same basic idea.
Reply Quote
1
MW03
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to lunchbox • 2:51p, 1/12/24
AG
lunchbox said:
MW03 said:
lunchbox said:
MW03 said:
Anyone want to summarize what was said? I don't have the time to watch all the videos but would like to read a synopsis.
The text in the tweets above each video is your summary.
Kind of. Lots of them are some version of "their reaction says it all."
Some of them you have to click on to see the rest of the text. This is one of the better ones...

Thanks.
Reply Quote
TCTTS
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:53p, 1/12/24
AG
This.



Quote:
After now having watched all the post-ICIG briefing interviews, I've seen enough.

It's time for Congress to rise to the occasion.

Arguably the biggest factor that has lended credibility to Grusch all this time, and it is something @rosscoulthart has repeatedly pointed to, is the "credible and urgent" designation to his whistleblower complaint given by the ICIG.

The ICIG is in a position to actually verify and/or validate Grusch's claims, and ostensibly has done so.

We've never really gotten any explicit 3rd party confirmation to corroborate this before today's briefing.

Everyone walked out of that briefing today with the same message.

This is real, folks.

We know that in Dec 2022, Grusch provided hours of whistleblower testimony to the House and Senate Intelligence Committees. His appearance was enabled by the "credible and urgent" designation requiring reporting to Congress and the DNI. (The Senate briefing allegedly had limited attendance)

We have not heard a *peep* out of anyone from either HPSCI or SSCI since (other than Rep. Turner who didn't attend that briefing) - but for the silent roll out of the UAPDA.

This was likely an implied but not explicit confirmation of the reality to Grusch's claims from SSCI.

This in combination with under oath testimony to House Oversight last July makes Grusch a "one of one" UFO Whistleblower.

You can't really talk about Grusch and Lazar in the same breath.

What we just saw today was several members in the House, Democrats and Republicans, explicitly confirm there is real substance to many of Grusch allegations and the ICIG's "credible and urgent" designation, and that there is in fact a coordinated cover-up taking place.

It's time to put the "urgent" in "credible and urgent."

Subpoenas need to start flying. This can happen immediately at the committee level. More public details will build support for a Select Committee on UAP.

We know the National Security, the Border and Foreign Affairs Subcommittee is already slated for another public hearing, Grusch needs to be allowed to speak to those members in a SCIF before that hearing.

I'm actually onboard now with @SteveBassett's call for a week (5 days) of public hearings led by SSCI, morning and afternoon sessions, bringing in 10-20 whistleblowers + gatekeepers alike and let them speak.

It time to start actually uncovering the cover up.

If multiple whistleblower really are ready to testify like has been claimed repeatedly, @MarkWarner and @marcorubio you know who they are, and we need you both to step up and call for public hearings immediately.

If SSCI holds public whistleblower hearings, the UAPDA (or a version of it) can be swiftly reintroduced and approved, dealing with the fallout.

The Truth Embargo has never been closer to ending than it is now. This moment requires Congress to rise up.
Reply Quote
3
1 edit
BenFiasco14
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:19p, 1/12/24
AG
Thanks for posting all of this here TCTTS instead of having to wade through X.

This is some encouraging news!
CNN is an enemy of the state and should be treated as such.
Reply Quote
1
TCTTS
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BenFiasco14 • 3:30p, 1/12/24
First Page Last Page
Page 87 of 126 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.