*** UAP THREAD ***

435,660 Views | 5225 Replies | Last: 5 hrs ago by Eliminatus
Rocagnante
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Lazar can't even prove he went to college where he said he did
Joes
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aztec1948 said:

Rocagnante said:

TCTTS said:

Agreed.

(Now, prepare for a dozen posts telling you how it's going be blue balls for eternity.)


Grusch appears willing to discuss behind closed doors with anyone with sufficient clearance. The more he does then things will begin to leak. Which will hopefully force things with those controlling access to the proof.

I still can't shake this feeling the past 4-5 years is all a big ruse but it's certainly becoming harder to keep my marker there.
Bob Lazar wasn't lying back in 1989.
That guy is literally surrounded by deceit and criminal activity. The more I see Lazar and Greer and the rest held up as the patron saints of this whole thing the more it all sucks.
Michael Cera Palin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Just finished watching the whole thing.

Pretty much went how I expected, Fravor and Graves retold their stories which I've already heard in detail through their interviews with Rogan.

Grusch couldn't answer anything of real substance in an open meeting but seems more than willing to do so in a classified setting so it's a start. Didn't seem like he waffled or backed down from anything he originally stated in his News Nation interview.

I knew today would be tame, but the good news is it's making the rounds on Twitter. I've had multiple friends who are tired of hearing me talk on this subject send me clips from the testimony so seems like more and more people will start hearing about this.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Brian Earl Spilner
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
How about one picture of said alien?
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aztec1948
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rocagnante said:

Lazar can't even prove he went to college where he said he did
Horse, here is water:

"I have been told that we have recovered technology that did not originate on this".-Former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Intelligence-Chris Mellon

“Behind the scenes, high-ranking Air Force officers are soberly concerned about UFOs. But through official secrecy and ridicule, many citizens are led to believe that unknown flying objects are nonsense.” Former CIA Director, Roscoe Hillenkoetter, public statement, 1960.
Joes
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Brian Earl Spilner said:

How about one picture of said alien?
Oh come on, extraordinary claims require.. uh.. some circumstantial evidence and testimony.

Sometimes I think the very people closest and most invested in these claims are the ones who don't actually appreciate the extreme nature of the claims. It's like it's really just a fun hobby and we're asked to just play along because what we've heard should be good enough.

The guy in that tweet who's being sarcastic needs to realize that yes, a claim like this requires absolutely testable tangible concrete proof. FAR beyond anything we've seen.

Some Junkie Cosmonaut
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:




This is an easy answer…ummm…some actual evidence?
Joes
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TCTTS said:


I didn't expect him to present anything today, I don't think most people did. In my opinion they did all they could and that's great, most of the people disappointed are actually the believers who were hoping to shock the world, not the skeptics.

But today alone if there were no follow-up certainly wouldn't move the needle. Let's see where it goes from here. Today had to happen first, but the evidence to come is what will matter.
Rocagnante
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aztec1948 said:

Rocagnante said:

Lazar can't even prove he went to college where he said he did
Horse, here is water:




Dude that's like an hour and a half. Tell you what let's get thru these Navy pilots claims and Grusch claims first then I'll go revisit Lazar.

I graduated from A&M. Even if the school erased all records and mentions of my existence at the school, I'm pretty sure between me and my parents I could offer proof I actually attended.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rocagnante
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:




[gif][/gif]

If this gif gets removed again it's proof TexAgs is part of the coverup.
Michael Cera Palin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wrec86 Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Brian Earl Spilner said:

How about one picture of said alien?


Or one picture of the craft?

In fairness though, pictures can be doctored in incredible ways now. I probably would still be a little skeptical, but any evidence whatsoever would be a giant step in the right direction.
Redstone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Today was a day of disclosure.
Michael Cera Palin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
G Martin 87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'll continue watching to see what Congress does, not what Congress says. If Burchett et al is successful in getting Grusch into a SCIF to hear the rest of his testimony and then starts shaking Lockheed down, we'll know Grusch was right, pictures or no pictures.
Teddy Perkins
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm seeing a lot of folks clamoring for "evidence" but ignoring that testimony is a form of evidence. You can take issue with the credibility of the witness providing testimony but that does not change the fact that testimony, under oath, is evidence in and of itself.
Joes
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So many of the famous stories in UFO lore involve people, before camera phones, right up next to the aliens and ships. Can any of you explain why this stopped happening once cameras became common?

It's so weird, when you look at this list, not a single cited incident took place that wasn't a sighting in the sky or at night or on radar since the 90s.

List of reported UFO sightings - Wikipedia


But before that, when people conveniently didn't have cameras, they were often rubbing shoulders with the aliens. Just a sampling from the 50s to the 90s:



Over sixty students reported seeing a silver craft land in a field near the school. They described occupants dressed in all black that exited the silver object.

Polish farmer Jan Wolski reported that while returning home, two "short, green-faced humanoid entities" wearing black overalls jumped onto his horse-drawn cart and started speaking an incomprehensible language. After about 1000 ft (300 m), he reported seeing a white flying object, from which an alien creature came out and invited Wolski inside. The farmer said that they examined him once inside

Logger Travis Walton disappeared for over 5 days resulting in a police investigation of his coworkers. When questioned on where he had been, Walton said that he had been taken aboard a spacecraft by nearly human creatures.

Charles Hickson and Calvin Parker were fishing from a pier on the Pascagoula River when they say that they heard whirring sounds and witnessed a craft over 30 feet long with flashing lights. Both men say they were paralyzed and then taken by humanoids with "robotic slit-mouths" and "crab-like pincers"

A 13-year-old boy and his younger sister reported an incident to their father, local police, and investigators. According to police reports, they witnessed a brilliant sphere and four small black occupants while herding cattle outside their village

French farmer, Maurice Mass, witnessed a spherical vehicle in his lavender field. He noticed and approached two individuals that he observed near the vehicle, but after one pointed a tube in his direction, he stood still feeling paralyzed. He described the beings as child-sized, pale, large-headed, with only holes where a mouth should be. Mass said that after they left in their vehicle, he was never again able to grow a healthy plant in the area where the craft had landed. He did not personally comment on the effect this had on him, saying, "One always says too much." His wife reported that the man was plagued with exhaustion for months, that he had confessed some type of communication to her, and that it was a "spiritual experience" for her husband

The Hills reported the first alien abduction experience to be widely spread in English-language publications. While driving home, they observed a light move through the sky and land ahead of them. Barney Hill said that, against his will, he turned the car down a side road towards the light, where he found six small humanoid beings waiting for them. Betty Hill reported that they inserted a needle through her navel among other vaguely medical tests

Three local boys followed a bright object into the forest to what they believed was a UFO landing. They went to the nearby home of Kathleen May who accompanied them back to the spot along with 2 other children and teenage National Guardsman Eugene Lemon. In the forest, they smelled a foul odor and saw what May described as a tall figure with claws and "a head that resembled the ace of spades

Anyway, there are a ton more as you go back in time. But the last one describing up close encounters with aliens or their ships was in 1994. I'm sure that's not every sighting of course, but that only further emphasizes my point. For some reason in the last 30 years there's not one instance where we have a photo of creatures walking around in front of the witnesses. Billions of cell phones, security cameras, traffic cameras, doorbell cameras, etc. and not one. They conveniently happened only up until they could be easily photographed.

B.S.







Joes
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Teddy Perkins said:

I'm seeing a lot of folks clamoring for "evidence" but ignoring that testimony is a form of evidence. You can take issue with the credibility of the witness providing testimony but that does not change the fact that testimony, under oath, is evidence in and of itself.
Dude, no.

This is not a courtroom; it's supposed to be science. Einstein didn't swear under oath that he figured out relativity and to take his word for it. Scientists don't skip peer review because the claimant "seems credible".

Fenrir
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Teddy Perkins said:

I'm seeing a lot of folks clamoring for "evidence" but ignoring that testimony is a form of evidence. You can take issue with the credibility of the witness providing testimony but that does not change the fact that testimony, under oath, is evidence in and of itself.


It's not being ignored, it simply isn't sufficient in the minds of most people especially when half of the testimony revolved around the allegation that physical evidence does exist.
Teddy Perkins
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Joes said:

Teddy Perkins said:

I'm seeing a lot of folks clamoring for "evidence" but ignoring that testimony is a form of evidence. You can take issue with the credibility of the witness providing testimony but that does not change the fact that testimony, under oath, is evidence in and of itself.
Dude, no.

This is not a courtroom; it's supposed to be science. Einstein didn't swear under oath that he figured out relativity and to take his word for it. Scientists don't skip peer review because the claimant "seems credible".


Then say "scientific proof," not evidence.
Michael Cera Palin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Joes, I really appreciate you being a skeptic voice on this thread. It's good that someone is here keeping everyone level headed.

But at the same time they have done this. Marines at 21 palms filmed a UAP formation over the base in 2021, and immediately the debunkers went to work telling them it was flares and they're crazy.



A house camera in Colorado caught a strange bipedal creature walking down the driveway and the debunkers told the mom she was crazy and it was her son with underwear on his head walking around in the middle of the night.



The Graves and Fravor experiences literally filmed the craft on their targeting systems (the same ones that successfully put ordinance on terrorists) and the debunkers went to work telling them "oh it's too grainy and they're just stationary objects being distorted by the plane and camera movement".

I want to be clear, I don't look at any of those individual videos as definitive proof (especially the Colorado one) but stuff has been filmed in the modern age, our news cycle just doesn't treat them the same way it did back in the day.

Are there hysterical BS stories that have polluted the UFO/UAP scene over time? ABSOLUTELY. Have some of those stories died down now that people can call BS with respect to cameras? ABSOLUTELY. But that doesn't mean it's all a stink.

And there's a possibility, assuming the aliens are real, that they wised up to some of our photographic capabilities and are being stealthier about it (this is a large stretch by me but it's a possibility).
Joes
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Teddy Perkins said:

Joes said:

Teddy Perkins said:

I'm seeing a lot of folks clamoring for "evidence" but ignoring that testimony is a form of evidence. You can take issue with the credibility of the witness providing testimony but that does not change the fact that testimony, under oath, is evidence in and of itself.
Dude, no.

This is not a courtroom; it's supposed to be science. Einstein didn't swear under oath that he figured out relativity and to take his word for it. Scientists don't skip peer review because the claimant "seems credible".


Then say "scientific proof," not evidence.
Because it's both in sequence, we expect the evidence to be provided first, it doesn't skip ahead to proof, that's a process.
Fenrir
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We've got one guy looking at this from a scientific standpoint asking for evidence and another looking at it like it's a courtroom argument...so now it's a semantics argument about what constitutes evidence.
Buck Compton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wait, those are the videos you chose to link??
Joes
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Michael Cera Palin said:

Joes, I really appreciate you being a skeptic voice on this thread. It's good that someone is here keeping everyone level headed.

But at the same time they have done this. Marines at 21 palms filmed a UAP formation over the base in 2021, and immediately the debunkers went to work telling them it was flares and they're crazy.



A house camera in Colorado caught a strange bipedal creature walking down the driveway and the debunkers told the mom she was crazy and it was her son with underwear on his head walking around in the middle of the night.



The Graves and Fravor experiences literally filmed the craft on their targeting systems (the same ones that successfully put ordinance on terrorists) and the debunkers went to work telling them "oh it's too grainy and they're just stationary objects being distorted by the plane and camera movement".

I want to be clear, I don't look at any of those individual videos as definitive proof (especially the Colorado one) but stuff has been filmed in the modern age, our news cycle just doesn't treat them the same way it did back in the day.

Are there hysterical BS stories that have polluted the UFO/UAP scene over time? ABSOLUTELY. Have some of those stories died down now that people can call BS with respect to cameras? ABSOLUTELY. But that doesn't mean it's all a stink.

And there's a possibility, assuming the aliens are real, that they wised up to some of our photographic capabilities and are being stealthier about it (this is a large stretch by me but it's a possibility).
I appreciate your comments and post, but if we're going to even try to depend on photos then they need to look like that image of the woman on the right. And given all of the incidents in the past that I posted where people were within few feet (several of those featured in the highly-recommended-by-enthusiasts The Phenomenon doc), combined with modern cameras, getting just one like that shouldn't be hard if they exist. I do hear what you're saying, there's different levels of imagery available depending on what your standard is.

But by the same token you can find imagery and video of that quality to justify belief in anything really. you don't have to look too hard to find "photos" of angels, fairies, bigfoot, goblins, sea monsters, Christian miracles, and on and on. Ultimately, I wouldn't even accept super high quality photos only as proof either but I'm saying we don't even have that to start with.
Michael Cera Palin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That's the whole point, people say "nothing is filmed" and I'm saying it is and shoved into lunacy land on YouTube.

I'm not saying it's real or credible (or that I believe it) but stuff does exist, it's just not viewed as serious like it was when people gave eye witness stories back in the day
First Page Last Page
Page 28 of 150
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.