Given my position on this topic this strikes me as pretty ironic and funny. The current popular suggestion is that the visitors are interdimensional. Who knew that Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull would be a documentary? They look and act right out of that movie. But I'm certainly willing to listen to the arguments today and going forward.TCTTS said:Call to action for #ufotwitter - as we head into tomorrow’s hearings remember that you are already “woke” to far more than the general populace, this hearing is taking place to acclimate those who haven’t been paying attention to the UFO reality. There will be information…
— richard butt (@conterammundi) July 26, 2023Quote:
Call to action for #ufotwitter - as we head into tomorrow's hearings remember that you are already "woke" to far more than the general populace, this hearing is taking place to acclimate those who haven't been paying attention to the UFO reality. There will be information presented that will challenge the zeitgeist's worldview. Remember, our nation has been lied to for 70+ years and brainwashed to think our reality is a fantasy. People will have a difficult time digesting the truth.
Our democracy relies on a functioning democratic government beholden to the people, you deserve the truth, and not a distorted and comfortable truth but the total truth. Disclosure is a process and this is the biggest milestone we've reached since 2017 - the people you will hear from are patriotic risk takers, altruistic people who have put their lives on the line to bring truth to power. These people have lost more than they will gain out of a duty to you. Their opposers should be held accountable for contempt. Pay attention, support, and demand better from your government.
*** UAP THREAD ***
436,080 Views |
5225 Replies |
Last: 21 hrs ago by Eliminatus
Some Junkie Cosmonaut
Joined:
Apr 13, 2004
Posts:
44,877
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:
Thank you for your concern.
So lame…
You post something from a dude who was literally caught lying and universally mocked.
I point out that the guy is probably not the most trustworthy source.
You throw a fit, try to downplay your feelings on Cuomo then call me a psycho.
Never change.
I didn't post it because it was "from" Cuomo, and he wasn't a "source." The whole point was that it was an objective interview with the highly reputable Chris Mellon, on News Nation, in which new insight was shared. The Cuomo mention was clearly a secondary point. And now you've been hounding me about that secondary point out of some trolling, bullsh*t "concern" that I'm not doing the subject any favors, when all you've really been looking for is any excuse to give me sh*t, seeing as you have some weird vendetta against me.
This is one of my favorite threads on TexAgs. "Aliens have probably been here and we might have some of their stuff and there's been a massive coverup for like 75 years but YOUR media outlet is full of ****"
Some Junkie Cosmonaut
Joined:
Apr 13, 2004
Posts:
44,877
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:
I didn't post it because it was "from" Cuomo, and he wasn't a "source." The whole point was that it was an objective interview with the highly reputable Chris Mellon, on News Nation, in which new insight was shared. The Cuomo mention was clearly a secondary point. And now you've been hounding me about that secondary point out of some trolling, bullsh*t "concern" that I'm not doing the subject any favors, when all you've really been looking for is any excuse to give me sh*t, seeing as you have some weird vendetta against me.
How do you know it was an "objective interview" when the guy doing the interview is highly questionable. I don't watch any news so I have no clue what "News Nation" is but I guess I'll take your word that they're some kind of bastion of journalism.
I certainly don't have a "weird vendetta" against you. I just think it's strange watching you pick and choose what is "credible" based on the subject and then throwing a temper tantrum when someone disagrees or questions you. I'm just pointing out you could use a little more discernment regarding the topic and you meltdown and claim everyone is after you and picking on you. It's wild to watch.
Just FYI - there were some last minute changes as to who will be chairing the hearing.
I was just informed along with @realannapaulina that I will NOT be chairing the #UAP hearing.
— Tim Burchett (@timburchett) July 25, 2023
Rep. @RepGrothman, who typically chairs this specific subcommittee, will chair the UAP, UFO hearing tomorrow.
— Joe Khalil (@JoeKhalilTV) July 26, 2023
Burchett, like many of us, expected he’d lead it given he and @realannapaulina have been so out front on the UAP issue https://t.co/7Y8KU6MuMm
Now that the hearing has started, can we dispense with the personal back-and-forth and focus on the hearing? TIA.
Some Junkie Cosmonaut said:TCTTS said:
I didn't post it because it was "from" Cuomo, and he wasn't a "source." The whole point was that it was an objective interview with the highly reputable Chris Mellon, on News Nation, in which new insight was shared. The Cuomo mention was clearly a secondary point. And now you've been hounding me about that secondary point out of some trolling, bullsh*t "concern" that I'm not doing the subject any favors, when all you've really been looking for is any excuse to give me sh*t, seeing as you have some weird vendetta against me.
How do you know it was an "objective interview" when the guy doing the interview is highly questionable. I don't watch any news so I have no clue what "News Nation" is but I guess I'll take your word that they're some kind of bastion of journalism.
I certainly don't have a "weird vendetta" against you. I just think it's strange watching you pick and choose what is "credible" based on the subject and then throwing a temper tantrum when someone disagrees or questions you. I'm just pointing out you could use a little more discernment regarding the topic and you meltdown and claim everyone is after you and picking on you. It's wild to watch.
Chris Mellon is one of the most reputable individuals in the entire field. He was part of the Senate Intelligence Committee. I used plenty of discernment, but thanks again for your concern, which I'm sure is genuine.
Did I just hear about advanced space propulsion from spacetime engineering? Holy F
Burchett just equated government obfuscation with "the devil". Oh boy.
Good opening statement by Luna.
Just tuned it, I already missed some good stuff?
(quick aside - does anyone find it a little funny hearing members of the government raise concern over faith in the government?)
Opening statements only so far. Burchett entered a document about advanced space propulsion into the public record, which I think was already declassified but hard to get to.redline248 said:
Just tuned it, I already missed some good stuff?
Two "dadgummits" so far..redline248 said:
Just tuned it, I already missed some good stuff?
Fifth opening statement starting. Get on with it.
"This is just the start of years and years of work.." - Garcia.
This will never end.
This will never end.
"When a Russian jet shoots flares near one of our aircraft we have perfect pictures, but when it's a UAP nothing?"
Great question
Great question
I withdraw my objection. Moskowitz is focusing on the national security angle. Calling for Disclosure now.
Graves about to be up first. Swearing in witnesses.
Graves about to be up first. Swearing in witnesses.
Graves claimed that preflight briefings included risk of UAP activity. They were expecting to encounter UAP.
The three witnesses have made an oath to tell the truth. HUGE
— Christopher Sharp (@ChrisUKSharp) July 26, 2023
Man, I wish I could be watching with you guys. Currently on a flight, following along on Twitter and this thread.
lolTCTTS said:The three witnesses have made an oath to tell the truth. HUGE
— Christopher Sharp (@ChrisUKSharp) July 26, 2023
Grusch's opening statement largely as reported earlier.TCTTS said:
Man, I wish I could be watching with you guys. Currently on a flight, following along on Twitter and this thread.
Fravor's statement now. He's retelling the Nimitz - Princeton Tic Tac incident. He's also giving credit to Kean and Blumenthal for helping to remove the stigma around reporting UAP incidents.
Q&A now, no surprise witnesses.
Q&A now, no surprise witnesses.
The description of the tic-tac encounter is by far the most intriguing of all the things I've heard or read about.
I'm curious why at the time, according to Fravor, no one seemed to care about it
I'm curious why at the time, according to Fravor, no one seemed to care about it
Graves and Fravor are pushing for a centralized reporting process that includes commercial pilots as well as military.
Grusch claims 40 witnesses with knowledge of recovered UAPs and has provided the locations of such to the IG. No follow up questions to that.
We have UAP in our possession and we know where they are kept.
Grusch saying that he knows exactly where they are and that he's provided that info was pretty huge. Although I guess if you want to believe the coverup then I don't see why they won't be moved now. But it's still very interesting.
Burchett wasting time with hokey "it's Tic Tac, not Tik Tok".
Grusch just said he directed people with knowledge of murders to the appropriate authorities. Can't say more due to his whistleblower case.
Some Junkie Cosmonaut
Joined:
Apr 13, 2004
Posts:
44,877
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
G Martin 87 said:
Grusch claims 40 witnesses with knowledge of recovered UAPs and has provided the locations of such to the IG. No follow up questions to that.
Dumb question. Why aren't any one of those 40 witnesses with firsthand knowledge speaking and not the guy relaying everything secondhand?
Not a dumb question at all, but all three witnesses have emphasized that the threat of reprisals keeps witnesses from coming forward. Especially commercial pilots.Some Junkie Cosmonaut said:G Martin 87 said:
Grusch claims 40 witnesses with knowledge of recovered UAPs and has provided the locations of such to the IG. No follow up questions to that.
Dumb question. Why aren't any one of those 40 witnesses with firsthand knowledge speaking and not the guy relaying everything secondhand?
Featured Stories
See All
38:51
1d ago
7.7k
77:19
1d ago
1.5k
Video Replay: Student Bonfire 2025
by TexAgs
5 Thoughts: Texas 70, No. 13 Texas A&M 69
by Luke Evangelist
1:29
18h ago
826