***1883 Season 1***

103,571 Views | 832 Replies | Last: 11 days ago by Mr.Bond
ChoppinDs40
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Once they hit the red river (which I'm sure Sheridan just wanted to show to be Texan) and then… head to Abilene… I knew this was loosely based on anything historic. Only us Texans would complain about that lol and this is a show for all of America.

Texags doing what texags does… map a mythical wagon train and wonder why they're going in certain directions. Lol
TXAGFAN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's a good show, but if we could get a cutting horse scene it would be GREAT!
CrottyKid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They probably just started with the idea that it would be Amarillo and then realized that Amarillo didn't exist in 1883.
$3 Sack of Groceries
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TXAGFAN said:

It's a good show, but if we could get a cutting horse scene it would be GREAT!


MsDoubleD81
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I love love love Elsa and Ennis together and hope that preview scene with the Indians was just a dream!!!
combat wombat™
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MsDoubleD81 said:

I love love love Elsa and Ennis together and hope that preview scene with the Indians was just a dream!!!


I'm thinking of ways she doesn't die. Dream/ nightmare is one.
denied
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nope… pretty sure she is dead based on everything (can it even be called foreshadowing?) that has already been revealed. Add in from Yellowstone that "Dutton" women don't live very long. Plus the song she was singing to the cows, it is a song across life/afterlife.
combat wombat™
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I knew that in the first episode, but I don't want it to be the case.
CondensedFogAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
denied said:

Nope… pretty sure she is dead based on everything (can it even be called foreshadowing?) that has already been revealed. Add in from Yellowstone that "Dutton" women don't live very long. Plus the song she was singing to the cows, it is a song across life/afterlife.

Quote:


"The song tells of a lover serenading a "Beautiful Dreamer" who is oblivious to worldly cares and may actually be dead. Foster's works feature many dead young women, including his sister Charlotte"

1.
Beautiful dreamer, wake unto me,
Starlight and dewdrops are waiting for thee;
Sounds of the rude world, heard in the day,
Lull'd by the moonlight have all passed away!
Beautiful dreamer, queen of my song,
List while I woo thee with soft melody;
Gone are the cares of life's busy throng,
Beautiful dreamer, awake unto me!
Beautiful dreamer, awake unto me!

2.
Beautiful dreamer, out on the sea,
Mermaids are chanting the wild lorelei;
Over the streamlet vapors are borne,
Waiting to fade at the bright coming morn.
Beautiful dreamer, beam on my heart,
E'en as the morn on the streamlet and sea;
Then will all clouds of sorrow depart,
Beautiful dreamer, awake unto me!
Beautiful dreamer, awake unto me!

Interesting
CondensedFogAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is a stretch, but Shea Brennan in his dream is attacking confederate artillery positions. Dutton looked like he was commanding one at Antietam in the flashback.

Wonder if they were on the same field.
$3 Sack of Groceries
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CondensedFoggyAggie said:

This is a stretch, but Shea Brennan in his dream is attacking confederate artillery positions. Dutton looked like he was commanding/defending one at Antietam in the flashback.

Wonder if they were on the same field.


Yeah I've been waiting for that "twist".
Would seem a little too lazy but who knows?
CondensedFogAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SWC Ag said:

CondensedFoggyAggie said:

This is a stretch, but Shea Brennan in his dream is attacking confederate artillery positions. Dutton looked like he was commanding/defending one at Antietam in the flashback.

Wonder if they were on the same field.


Yeah I've been waiting for that "twist".
Would seem a little too lazy but who knows?

Could be why the show has them antagonizing each other currently, only to find common ground later.
$3 Sack of Groceries
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CondensedFoggyAggie said:

SWC Ag said:

CondensedFoggyAggie said:

This is a stretch, but Shea Brennan in his dream is attacking confederate artillery positions. Dutton looked like he was commanding/defending one at Antietam in the flashback.

Wonder if they were on the same field.


Yeah I've been waiting for that "twist".
Would seem a little too lazy but who knows?

Could be why the show has them antagonizing each other currently, only to find common ground later.

Both being Civil War vets is common ground enough. Having them on the same battlefield just feels trite to me.
MsDoubleD81
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Maybe they can replicate the Clint Eastwood movie where he used gunpowder to push it through. Tho I think his was just in the shoulder!
CondensedFogAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SWC Ag said:

CondensedFoggyAggie said:

SWC Ag said:

CondensedFoggyAggie said:

This is a stretch, but Shea Brennan in his dream is attacking confederate artillery positions. Dutton looked like he was commanding/defending one at Antietam in the flashback.

Wonder if they were on the same field.


Yeah I've been waiting for that "twist".
Would seem a little too lazy but who knows?

Could be why the show has them antagonizing each other currently, only to find common ground later.

Both being Civil War vets is common ground enough. Having them on the same battlefield just feels trite to me.

If we want to trite more, the emancipation proclamation was issued 5 days after Antietam, which may be relevant to Thomas, the other Pinkerton agent.

Doubt the show will go that far.
10Aggie10
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The following post is regarding 1883 scenes seen in a Yellowstone episode (#8 maybe?):

There is a flashback of James rounding up the cattle thieves
in the scene, John (who is a small boy at the beginning of 1883) is a late tween/early teenager. It also appears that the Duttons have had another son; Elsa is not present but I guess that could be because she's married.

Anyways. I think her absence means that she doesn't make it. Also, I've been wondering since I saw that scene if we witnessed James' death before the first episode of 1883 even aired


I spoiler tagged these thoughts because I don't know if Yellowstone material is acceptable fodder for this thread. I just thought it might be relevant to the Elsa discussion
Jason_Roofer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm rewatching every episode now with the kids and with subtitles. From this go round, I'm certain they are heading west to Abilene Tx and then turning north. It's the only way they can hit the Brazos and a city named Abilene and not be ******ed. It was settled in 1881 and it works. I think combat wombat said this already and I'm sure it's right.
_lefraud_
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yea I'm just not buying that a teenage girl from Tennessee is going to know about a newly settled town 150 miles West of Fort Worth even exist.
Jason_Roofer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I suppose we just gotta work with it. I'll say that I'm way more emotionally invested in this show in 4 episodes than I ever was in Yellowstone. I like it too but this is way more relatable to most everyone that's ever experienced any human condition.
$3 Sack of Groceries
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
_lefraud_ said:

Yea I'm just not buying that a teenage girl from Tennessee is going to know about a newly settled town 150 miles West of Fort Worth even exist.

I think there's a safe assumption that some things are being communicated amongst the folks on the trail drive and we don't need it spoon fed to us.
Not unreasonable to think Sam Elliott told them they're headed to Abilene.
combat wombat™
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Elsa is practically marrying age on the trail... and she is being courted by Ennis. While I think it is likely she dies before reaching Montana, her absence in the flashback in Yellowstone doesn't mean anything. She would probably be married and not living in the small cabin with her parents if she did make it there.

I seriously doubt that James would have kept his family in the dark about the intended route. Elsa knowing about Abilene is no surprise.
CyanideJenkins
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Zombie Jon Snow said:


We might need to give up on any geographical accuracy in this story.


If you were heading to Oregon there is no way you would head due West to Abilene, Texas because you are just gonna hit the lower part of the Sante Fe trail and end up well below the rockies with no northbound trail really. I mean you could in theory take the Old Spanish trail up and then cut through the rockies but it's a death wish.

But they crossed the Brazos and you would only do that heading West.

If you were heading north - which you should to join the Oregon trail eventually - then you would never cross the Brazos.

This is circa 1860 but it was not much different in 1883 except there were train options.




All in all - it's a bad plan no matter which way they go. I'm pretty sure everyone but the Duttons and maybe Sam Elliot and the black guy dies and they opt to stay in what becomes Montana.



They really shouldn't have any problems with their plan, Gus and Woodrow already paved the way for these people 10 years prior. Ya know, before the bankers and lawyers got it.
Texmid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Maybe Elsa lives but is unable to have children because of the arrow to her gut?
Anti-taxxer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
10Aggie10 said:

The following post is regarding 1883 scenes seen in a Yellowstone episode (#8 maybe?):

There is a flashback of James rounding up the cattle thieves
in the scene, John (who is a small boy at the beginning of 1883) is a late tween/early teenager. It also appears that the Duttons have had another son; Elsa is not present but I guess that could be because she's married.

Anyways. I think her absence means that she doesn't make it. Also, I've been wondering since I saw that scene if we witnessed James' death before the first episode of 1883 even aired


I spoiler tagged these thoughts because I don't know if Yellowstone material is acceptable fodder for this thread. I just thought it might be relevant to the Elsa discussion

I have been thinking the same thing about this scene and Elsa's absence. I think she's married, though she certainly could be dead.

Didn't that scene conclude with Faith Hill screaming?

Thanks for the rec to read Wagons West! I started it last night, and it's pretty great.
Bighunter43
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I don't know why they headed southwest from Fort Worth towards Abilene Tx other than TS wanting to show them crossing the Brazos which I believe is on his ranch! River crossing scene was great and realistic however.....they could have headed north out of Ft Worth on the established Chisholm Trail....gone through Abilene Kansas and intersected the Oregon Trail and turn west.....in those days when people referred to Abilene they were definitely talking about Kansas....I still think that's the Abilene they'll go through,once they turn north.....but we'll see in the next episode most likely!
Zombie Jon Snow
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

If they crossed the Brazos heading west out of Ft. Worth (which is well established) and then turned north to Abilene, KS they would have to cross the Brazos again, plus the Red river which they talked about not crossing.

Makes no sense.




Just like how the immigrants got to Ft. Worth - we are not supposed to care about these details.

He wanted to start from Hells Half Acre regardless of logic.
He wanted to show crossing the Brazos regardless of logic.
He wants them to go to Abilene regardless of logic.




Bighunter43
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Zombie Jon Snow said:


If they crossed the Brazos heading west out of Ft. Worth (which is well established) and then turned north to Abilene, KS they would have to cross the Brazos again, plus the Red river which they talked about not crossing.

Makes no sense.




Just like how the immigrants got to Ft. Worth - we are not supposed to care about these details.

He wanted to start from Hells Half Acre regardless of logic.
He wanted to show crossing the Brazos regardless of logic.
He wants them to go to Abilene regardless of logic.







This is true.....he obviously is going to have them encounter Indians on the trail....regardless of logic....because they were NOT a threat on the Plains by 1883.
In addition, 1883 saw one of the first major fence cutting wars in Texas.....they most likely would have dealt with places filled with barbed wire in 1883 as over half the counties in Texas were fenced by that time....regardless of logic.

I read an article in Parade where Sam Elliot raves about TS "knowing his history and the west"......apparently not quite!! Great show however...I'm truly enjoying it and enjoying the historical discussion that goes along with it! Kudos to TS for at least making a "western!" He also does a great job with the major characters! I appreciate the discussion!!

combat wombat™
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
By the way, let me say that if tough-as-nails but getting-up-there-in-years John Dutton can survive multiple gunshot wounds at the end of season 3 of Yellowstone then young and healthy Elsa can survive a single arrow through the gut. Yes, there was the benefit of modern medicine but we are talking tv.
JPAg88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TXAGFAN said:

It's a good show, but if we could get a cutting horse scene it would be GREAT!
Or worse, that reining horse sliding crap!
Thunder18
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm glad the route bothers some of y'all as well. It really bugged me why they would be crossing the Brazos from Fort Worth
Anti-taxxer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I need someone to explain to me how people could drown in the river if other people could walk across it - while holding a rope. My husband and I went round and round about this last night. He pointed out that Shea said people panic and act wildly, but that doesn't change the fact that the water is shallow enough to walk through…and you're holding onto a rope.
98Ag99Grad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
There was a ledge in the river with a decent drop off. John was showing them the path before they went across where the ledge was. That may have been part of it along with the panic but I agree with you, when Faith Hill stood up in waist deep water I was surprised it wasn't deeper myself.
Anti-taxxer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Right; I knew they had to walk a certain path. My husband kept pointing out that parts of it were deeper. I guess I didn't understand why she let go of the rope.

I'm deathly afraid of deep water. Horrified. But…I feel like if I have a rope and several dozen other people to guide me across, I might just hold onto the rope. It's not like they were in the rapids.

I know this is a stupid thing to nit-pick, but it bothers the hell out of me.
$3 Sack of Groceries
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Anti-taxxer said:

I need someone to explain to me how people could drown in the river if other people could walk across it - while holding a rope. My husband and I went round and round about this last night. He pointed out that Shea said people panic and act wildly, but that doesn't change the fact that the water is shallow enough to walk through…and you're holding onto a rope.

People drown in inches of water. It doesn't take much. Add panic into the mix and it's a recipe for disaster.
The rope is moot at that point. That's why Tim McGraw told Faith Hill not to get close to them
on the horse. Same thing you're taught at the beginning of any lifesaving/lifeguard/water rescue course….the drowning person can drown the rescuer out of sheer panic; there's no logic involved. It's simply about getting their heads above the water and survival.
Ogre09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They're not in the shallow end of the swimming pool, they're in a river. Moving water is strong enough to sweep you off your feet. Then you panic because you don't know how to swim, or even how to hold your breath and float. So you flail around, can't regain your feet, inhale some water, and then you drown.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.