PDEMDHC said:
Did they reverse it and get Craig Robinson, James Franco, and Chris Pine to be the angels and someone like Jennifer Aniston to be Charlie?
PDEMDHC said:
Did they reverse it and get Craig Robinson, James Franco, and Chris Pine to be the angels and someone like Jennifer Aniston to be Charlie?
Urban Ag said:
Don't get worked up about it. It's his schtick to patrol this board and jump on anyone he thinks is to the right of the average sensibility in CA.
Jacqueline Smith will always be the hottest CA in my book.Brian Earl Spilner said:
Can we just talk about how hot Cameron Diaz used to be?
Quote:
She has so much appeal in her eyes and the way she holds her mouth
Have any links? asking for a friend...Urban Ag said:
Kristen Stewart is what I love about women.
And I say that as a very happily married man and father.
I hate that so many women have been brainwashed by a shallow culture to believe they have to be perfect like a Victoria Secret model or an Instagram hooker.
She has so much appeal in her eyes and the way she holds her mouth. It's sexy.
My point is every woman is unique in their own way and sex appeal and beauty comes in many shapes and forms. She never struck me as butch, not even close. So many Hollywood women are not perfect 10's by modeling standards, same for singers, and god bless them for it.
Yeah, that actually sounds pretty good.C@LAg said:i would watch that.PDEMDHC said:
Did they reverse it and get Craig Robinson, James Franco, and Chris Pine to be the angels and someone like Jennifer Aniston to be Charlie?
Interesting to see the OP's opinions on this thread get treated like the politics board treats people with opposing views.CapCityAg89 said:
Absolutely a thread I would expect from a politics board guy. The movie won't bomb because "people don't want to see 'woke' movies" - the movie will bomb if it's not entertaining; it will be a surprise hit if it IS entertaining. That's it. And yes, it can absolutely be entertaining with a "butch" female lead. No doubts.
SlimM said:Interesting to see the OP's opinions on this thread get treated like the politics board treats people with opposing views.CapCityAg89 said:
Absolutely a thread I would expect from a politics board guy. The movie won't bomb because "people don't want to see 'woke' movies" - the movie will bomb if it's not entertaining; it will be a surprise hit if it IS entertaining. That's it. And yes, it can absolutely be entertaining with a "butch" female lead. No doubts.
C@LAg said:
Good. The more money that Sony Pictures loses overall, the more likely they are to sell the Movie business to someone else, and the sooner that Disney can get Spider-Man back.
And all 3 Hunger Games movies ... which she was in. An Ocean's 8, which made $140 m US vs. $70 million budget.TCTTS said:
And now Elizabeth Banks - the film's writer/director - is saying the poor performance "reinforces a stereotype in Hollywood that men don't go see women do action movies." Except for, you know, Wonder Woman, Captain Marvel, Mad Max: Fury Road, Star Wars: The Force Awakens, Star Wars: The Last Jedi, and Rogue One: A Star Wars Story, among many, many others.
TCTTS said:
In that case, I might be down. But I still say the fewer studios there are, the worse the movie business and movie theater business will be in the long run.
Sex Panther said:
Pretty disappointing to hear that from Elizabeth Banks. I've always really liked her, she's always come off as super cool, talented and funny.
That's a complete bull**** excuse though. You made a movie nobody wanted, and put a spin on it that everyone rolled their eyes at. Ultimately, the "wokeness" didn't help but it didn't doom it. It was just a crappy movie, with no real starpower, and didn't look interesting. To blame it on men and saying they should support women is garbage. Olivia Wilde pulled the same crap a few months ago, when she made Supergirlbad.
If anything blame the marketing... if my movie-nerd-self doesn't know about a film, then you did something wrong.
TCTTS said:
I think she came out like three or four years ago.
Counterpoint said:Sex Panther said:
Pretty disappointing to hear that from Elizabeth Banks. I've always really liked her, she's always come off as super cool, talented and funny.
That's a complete bull**** excuse though. You made a movie nobody wanted, and put a spin on it that everyone rolled their eyes at. Ultimately, the "wokeness" didn't help but it didn't doom it. It was just a crappy movie, with no real starpower, and didn't look interesting. To blame it on men and saying they should support women is garbage. Olivia Wilde pulled the same crap a few months ago, when she made Supergirlbad.
If anything blame the marketing... if my movie-nerd-self doesn't know about a film, then you did something wrong.
"Supergirlbad" (love that, by the way) was actually a good movie though, IMO.
It's actually in the works (or at least some kind of Spider-girl/woman film set in the Spider-Verse is).jeffk said:
A Sony animated Spider-Gwen movie would absolutely slay at the box offices, I'd bet.