Why is King's Landing still showing the Baratheon stag on the intro? Why no lion?
Negative, then they'll just get pissy and start spoiling all over the place, or at a minimum, posters will be able to connect the dots to the rest of their "projections".CapCityAg89 said:BowSowy said:Yep, I've seen a couple of "predictions" posts that were every single major plot point from the leaks.OnlyForNow said:
One of the biggest events in the series to (if the spoilers are believed to be true) occur was "guessed" correctly a while back
So... ya.
Which ones? Seriously - the events that have occurred on screen aren't spoilers any more so call out the posters.
Brick Tamland said:
Why is King's Landing still showing the Baratheon stag on the intro? Why no lion?
Hey don't look at me, the HBO Directors said as much in the post-show discussion. They literally said "he's as big as a 747".Deputy Travis Junior said:
"but Drogon is the size of a 747"
So there's no reason for me to nitpick here but it's the internet where everyone's supposed to be pointlessly argumentative so I'm gonna do it anyway.
A 747, depending on the layout, can hold 4-600 people. That dwarfs drogon.
Thanks for coming to the show's defense with enthusiasm!Zombie Jon Snow said:
This is stupid.
If you wanted the show to continue on forever sure
a. the characters would continue to evolve and the plots would be character driven
b. you would feel like the characters were still more interesting than the plots
b. none of the important ones would die or not very often anyway
c. you'd end up with a GOT universe based soap opera (call it "Days of Our Westerosi Lives")
However this show has and always had an end game to play out. So instead the characters were well developed over 4-5 seasons and now the end game is playing out so
a. the characters are well established at this point and you mostly understand their actions based on their character
b. the episodes spend more time now playing out the plot (the literal "Game of Thrones")
c. and not developing characters further or introducing new ones
Personally I would have tuned out a while ago if it weren't for the promise of the end game. I'm not interested in an ongoing soap opera. The characters are developed and I like them or loathe them...but it's time for the game to play out.
If you expected anything else well....I'm not sure why. we always knew what this was about and that it would play out this way.
Brick Tamland said:
No leaks today?
Yeah..but in Season 6 Episode 10 she was crowned as Cersei of the House Lannister..and sent a letter to Jon as Cersei of House Lannister.EagleFordEarl said:
Cersei is still Roberts Widow
Aggie Joe 93 said:
If these last two seasons weren't truncated, then maybe they'd have more time to develop characters through dialogue.
There becomes a time where actions speak louder than words.
Bron's leaving his gold behind mid battle and saving Jamie is a clear development point that was communicated through an action sequence.
I heard this addressed in a podcast and apparently it was an oversight that they admitted.Brick Tamland said:
Why is King's Landing still showing the Baratheon stag on the intro? Why no lion?
I think a big part of it is that we're just misinterpreting WHO is driving the story. The first 3-4 seasons, the story was driven by the actions of Littlefinger, Ned, Joffrey, Catelyn, and Tywin, but none of those characters were actually the central characters. So we watched all the young characters developing into themselves while dealing with the actions of the aforementioned. Now Jon, Dany, Tyrion, Jamie, Cersi, Sansa, and Arya finally have control over their own lives and can drive the story instead of just deal with the decisions made by their fathers and mothers.JJxvi said:
I mentioned this last season in the thread. The disconnect is that what we are watching is now much more plot driven drama as the writers try to fill the outline framework they have been given. The characters have roles they are supposed fill, and so they go do what they are supposed to do to "make the story happen." That's not how Martin wrote the books. The book plot-lines are much more character driven, and the first 4 to 5 seasons of the show were likewise very character driven more so than plot driven. Robb Stark gets killed not because Robb Stark needed to die for the story, but he died because of the decisions his character made and other characters made in response, etc. Much of the "character driven" decisions are being stripped away now, so it feels very different, and it has allowed the pace to increase a lot as well. Character driven slows things down because you have to understand a characters motivations and reasoning before you have them act. So now we are basically just living on previous character development, having the characters do what they need to do, and hope it all makes sense. It leads to some moments where I've been like, wait, why the **** would this character do that? Esp with the Arya stuff last season. Her escape from the faceless men was very contrived just because it needed to happen.
I like, "Dornish Heat" better than "Targaryen Cocktails".Burrus86 said:
I think that because we see the characters drinking a lot of wine, combined with several episodes with Wildfire as the featured device to mass kill people, that it is only a matter of time before we see it used as a Molotov Cocktail device. Do you know how many hundreds of thousands of empty wine bottles there are in Kings Landing alone? The big hint was the Dornish Red comments during the lesbian scene with Ellaria and Yara. Foreshadowing at its best. They will probably call it Targaryen cocktails.
....oh, and the dragons, of course, will play a role in killing wights and white walkers.
Hurry up and get here, episode five..........
smokeythebear said:I think a big part of it is that we're just misinterpreting WHO is driving the story. The first 3-4 seasons, the story was driven by the actions of Littlefinger, Ned, Joffrey, Catelyn, and Tywin, but none of those characters were actually the central characters. So we watched all the young characters developing into themselves while dealing with the actions of the aforementioned. Now Jon, Dany, Tyrion, Jamie, Cersi, Sansa, and Arya finally have control over their own lives and can drive the story instead of just deal with the decisions made by their fathers and mothers.JJxvi said:
I mentioned this last season in the thread. The disconnect is that what we are watching is now much more plot driven drama as the writers try to fill the outline framework they have been given. The characters have roles they are supposed fill, and so they go do what they are supposed to do to "make the story happen." That's not how Martin wrote the books. The book plot-lines are much more character driven, and the first 4 to 5 seasons of the show were likewise very character driven more so than plot driven. Robb Stark gets killed not because Robb Stark needed to die for the story, but he died because of the decisions his character made and other characters made in response, etc. Much of the "character driven" decisions are being stripped away now, so it feels very different, and it has allowed the pace to increase a lot as well. Character driven slows things down because you have to understand a characters motivations and reasoning before you have them act. So now we are basically just living on previous character development, having the characters do what they need to do, and hope it all makes sense. It leads to some moments where I've been like, wait, why the **** would this character do that? Esp with the Arya stuff last season. Her escape from the faceless men was very contrived just because it needed to happen.
For example, when was the first time Arya was really allowed to make a decision for herself? When she went to Bravos? Even that decision led to another 2 seasons where she had very limited if at all any decisions afforded to her. Well now, she's finally able to do as she pleases and we're finally seeing her storyline become character driven rather than story driven. She decided who and how she wanted to kill at the Freys', she decided to head back to Winterfell instead of head to Kings Landing. She chose to show off in front of her siblings and best a fighter that was once tasked with "saving" her.
Perhaps it's all personal perspective, but to me, the show is finally getting to character driven instead of plot driven because I finally know and understand the driving characters' motivations.
EagleFordEarl said:
i think Dornish heat would have been a good nickname for our dearly departed hot sand sister
EagleFordEarl said:
Cersei is still Roberts Widow
JJxvi said:
I mentioned this last season in the thread. The disconnect is that what we are watching is now much more plot driven drama as the writers try to fill the outline framework they have been given. The characters have roles they are supposed fill, and so they go do what they are supposed to do to "make the story happen." That's not how Martin wrote the books. The book plot-lines are much more character driven, and the first 4 to 5 seasons of the show were likewise very character driven more so than plot driven. Robb Stark gets killed not because Robb Stark needed to die for the story, but he died because of the decisions his character made and other characters made in response, etc. Much of the "character driven" decisions are being stripped away now, so it feels very different, and it has allowed the pace to increase a lot as well. Character driven slows things down because you have to understand a characters motivations and reasoning before you have them act. So now we are basically just living on previous character development, having the characters do what they need to do, and hope it all makes sense. It leads to some moments where I've been like, wait, why the **** would this character do that? Esp with the Arya stuff last season. Her escape from the faceless men was very contrived just because it needed to happen.
JJxvi said:
Oh look, someone else who needed to come to the defense of the show. Btw, character driven does not mean good and plot driven does not mean bad. I didn't insult your beloved show, nor praise the books. Just explained why I think it feels much different now than before.