*** MARVEL CINEMATIC UNIVERSE *** [Staff message on OP]

3,576,970 Views | 27882 Replies | Last: 2 days ago by C@LAg
C@LAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
toucan82 said:

Sea Speed said:

Holy ****, wolverine is finally in the yellow suit? Its like my childhood coming to life.
brown suit >>>> yellow suit
how can you live being so wrong so much of the time?

#yellow4lyfe
toucan82
How long do you want to ignore this user?
practice
Brian Earl Spilner
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Madame Web tickets on sale! Who's got their opening night tickets?
jokershady
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Brian Earl Spilner said:

Madame Web tickets on sale! Who's got their opening night tickets?
id rather watch the Star Wars holiday special…..
Brian Earl Spilner
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think No Way Home's opening weekend is in serious trouble.
redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Brian Earl Spilner said:

I think No Way Home's opening weekend is in serious trouble.
There are that many 50 Shades fans frothing at the mouth to see this actress in a super hero movie?
Phat32
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Brian Earl Spilner said:

Madame Web tickets on sale! Who's got their opening night tickets?


I know someone who was planning on it but they were in the Amazon with my mom when she was researching spiders right before she died
fig96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TIL this is the same actor:



C@LAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Phat32 said:

Brian Earl Spilner said:

Madame Web tickets on sale! Who's got their opening night tickets?


I know someone who was planning on it but they were in the Amazon with my mom when she was researching spiders right before she died
given the lack of commas and whatnot.

who died? your mom or the person who was planning on seeing MW?
Sea Speed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
C@LAg said:

Phat32 said:

Brian Earl Spilner said:

Madame Web tickets on sale! Who's got their opening night tickets?


I know someone who was planning on it but they were in the Amazon with my mom when she was researching spiders right before she died
given the lack of commas and whatnot.

who died? your mom or the person who was planning on seeing MW?


Probably both.
MooreTrucker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I just discovered this last night myself.
MASAXET
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
fig96 said:

TIL this is the same actor:




Kingsley Ben-Adir. I think he's terrific, personally. Also plays Malcolm X in One Night in Miami. And he's in Barbie too.
bluefire579
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MASAXET said:

fig96 said:

TIL this is the same actor:




Kingsley Ben-Adir. I think he's terrific, personally. Also plays Malcolm X in One Night in Miami. And he's in Barbie too.
No shortage of wasted talent in Secret Invasion
jokershady
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Brian Earl Spilner said:

Madame Web tickets on sale! Who's got their opening night tickets?
read an article that currently it's tracking to be worse in the box office than Morbius….

Also it was discovered that the two main actresses in this may (emphasize the word MAY) have been confused or mislead on this movie….when they announced it on Twitter both of them tagged Marvel Studios in their tweet…except marvel studios has nothing to do with this film….makes you guess that they thought they were joining the official MCU and now they are not….
Sea Speed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If you're a star of a movie and don't even know what studio it is a part of you deserve all the dumb stuff that happens to you anyways.

In reality, they probably just tagged the wrong marvel. Or rather, their publicist did.
jokershady
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
See I'm inclined to believe that it was a genuine accident….however…..given the fact that the people making it screwed up the timeline and couldn't figure out which Spider-Man was going to be around when shooting and had to change a bunch of stuff because of that….seems a little more likely…..
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Dakota Johnson changed agencies a week after the trailer debuted. And is now saying so much of it was filmed in front of green screens that she has no idea what to expect or if the movie is even going to be good or not. This whole thing is a glorious train wreck.
swimmerbabe11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
that..kinda makes me want to see it in theatres.
Like what if it is this decades version of The Room..don't you want to be able to see you saw the original trainwreck?
double aught
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

Dakota Johnson changed agencies a week after the trailer debuted. And is now saying so much of it was filmed in front of green screens that she has no idea what to expect or if the movie is even going to be good or not. This whole thing is a glorious train wreck.
If I'm Sony, I don't think I'm happy with Johnson. I'm sure she had no problem taking their money, but now she wants to distance from the movie.


BUT, I'm not Sony. So I find it enjoyable too.
Definitely Not A Cop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
#releasethegarfieldcut
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I realize this is mostly a joke, but just to be 100% clear, they never filmed any scenes/version with any of the Spider-Men actors...

  • For some reason, at one point early in its development, the movie was going to take place in the Andrew Garfield / The Amazing Spider-Man universe. Why? I have no idea.
  • However, that iteration was scrapped, and Tom Holland's Spider-Man was ultimately chosen as the Spider-Man who would kind of sort be in the peripheral of the movie (but would never make an appearance). In other words, it would technically take place in the MCU, and that's the version of the movie that was filmed.
  • In that version, Adam Scott was/is rumored to play a young Uncle Ben (who would of course be married to a young Aunt May, played by Marisa Tomei 18 years later in-universe, though we almost assuredly wouldn't see her character). Adam Scott's character was/is a paramedic alongside Dakota Johnson's character, who also plays a paramedic.
  • For whatever reason, the filmmakers decided to set the movie in the 1990s - and filmed the movie as taking place in the 1990s. Wherein, as was rumored, by movie's end we would see baby Peter Parker in some kind of cameo. However, he would also likely be connected to Dakota Johnson's mom in some way, who, infamously, "was in the Amazon researching spiders right before she died." In other words, they were going to try and give Tom Holland's Spider-Man some kind of ridiculous lore/backstory, having to do with spiders that connected to Dakota Johnson's character's mom.
  • It wasn't until after the movie was shot, however, that Sony/the filmmakers realized that the timelines didn't add up, seeing as Tom Holland's Peter Parker wasn't born until 2001 in-universe. So, apparently, Sony then not only insisted that all references/hints/clues to Tom Holland's baby Peter Parker be cut, but without a baby Peter Parker there was no longer a point in making it a period piece. So they recut the movie - and apparently did some (very) minimal reshoots as well - to be set in some generic, undeterminable time period sometime between the '90s and now. Watch the trailer and you'll notice that the cars are all from the '90s, as are some of the clothing styles, but apparently this won't be addressed in the movie in any concrete way.
  • As to whether Adam Scott is still playing Uncle Ben, we'll have to wait and see.

How much of this is 100% accurate, I'm not sure, but it all comes from Jeff Sneider, who's one of the most reputable film journalists/scoopers out there, and someone I can vouch for personally. It would also explain why the actors initially thought they were joining the MCU - because, in fact, at one point they were. It wasn't until recently that that apparently changed.

So, yeah. Either way it's a complete sh*t show, and more proof that Disney is forever praying to the Marvel gods that Sony doesn't burn this whole thing down.
fig96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
double aught said:

TCTTS said:

Dakota Johnson changed agencies a week after the trailer debuted. And is now saying so much of it was filmed in front of green screens that she has no idea what to expect or if the movie is even going to be good or not. This whole thing is a glorious train wreck.
If I'm Sony, I don't think I'm happy with Johnson. I'm sure she had no problem taking their money, but now she wants to distance from the movie.


BUT, I'm not Sony. So I find it enjoyable too.
The fact that she changes agents THEN starts to backpedal is intriguing. Maybe they watched the movie and went umm…
MooreTrucker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

So, yeah. Either way it's a complete sh*t show, and more proof that Disney is never not praying to the Marvel gods that Sony doesn't keep f/cking this whole thing up.
I think this is a triple-negative, but I can't interpret it into English......
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ha, changed it.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I just remembered that Garfield's Peter Parker had some super convoluted backstory as well. Where his parents were both scientists, researching super spiders or something, but then they had to go on the run or were killed or something? And that iteration of Parker was more of a "chosen one" kind of thing, where it was kind of sort of hinted that he was always destined to be Spider-Man, or something along those lines.

So, considering Dakota Johnson's character's mom, and HER history researching Spiders, maybe she was originally meant to be working with Peter Parker's parents in the Garfield universe, hence the filmmakers initially wanting to go the Garfield route. That would ALSO explain the 1990s setting, seeing as Garfield's Peter Parker would have been born in the mid-'90s. But then, when they pivoted to it being Holland's Parker, they simply forgot to move the timeline up. Which is still one of the dumbest brain farts ever, but would at least make sense of their initial motivations.
maroon barchetta
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wow. It's like they just started shooting and didn't storyboard out the whole thing and look for any holes first.
Definitely Not A Cop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

I realize this is mostly a joke, but just to be 100% clear, they never filmed any scenes/version with any of the Spider-Men actors...

  • For some reason, at one point early in its development, the movie was going to take place in the Andrew Garfield / The Amazing Spider-Man universe. Why? I have no idea.
  • However, that iteration was scrapped, and Tom Holland's Spider-Man was ultimately chosen as the Spider-Man who would kind of sort be in the peripheral of the movie (but would never make an appearance). In other words, it would technically take place in the MCU, and that's the version of the movie that was filmed.
  • In that version, Adam Scott was/is rumored to play a young Uncle Ben (who would of course be married to a young Aunt May, played by Marisa Tomei 18 years later in-universe, though we almost assuredly wouldn't see her character). Adam Scott's character was/is a paramedic alongside Dakota Johnson's character, who also plays a paramedic.
  • For whatever reason, the filmmakers decided to set the movie in the 1990s - and filmed the movie as taking place in the 1990s. Wherein, as was rumored, by movie's end we would see baby Peter Parker in some kind of cameo. However, he would also likely be connected to Dakota Johnson's mom in some way, who, infamously, "was in the Amazon researching spiders right before she died." In other words, they were going to try and give Tom Holland's Spider-Man some kind of ridiculous lore/backstory, having to do with spiders that connected to Dakota Johnson's character's mom.
  • It wasn't until after the movie was shot, however, that Sony/the filmmakers realized that the timelines didn't add up, seeing as Tom Holland's Peter Parker wasn't born until 2001 in-universe. So, apparently, Sony then not only insisted that all references/hints/clues to Tom Holland's baby Peter Parker be cut, but without a baby Peter Parker there was no longer a point in making it a period piece. So they recut the movie - and apparently did some (very) minimal reshoots as well - to be set in some generic, undeterminable time period sometime between the '90s and now. Watch the trailer and you'll notice that the cars are all from the '90s, as are some of the clothing styles, but apparently this won't be addressed in the movie in any concrete way.
  • As to whether Adam Scott is still playing Uncle Ben, we'll have to wait and see.

How much of this is 100% accurate, I'm not sure, but it all comes from Jeff Sneider, who's one of the most reputable film journalists/scoopers out there, and someone I can vouch for personally. It would also explain why the actors initially thought they were joining the MCU - because, in fact, at one point they were. It wasn't until recently that that apparently changed.

So, yeah. Either way it's a complete sh*t show, and more proof that Disney is forever praying to the Marvel gods that Sony doesn't burn this whole thing down.



You just did all of Pitch Meetings work for them.
MooreTrucker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

So, considering Dakota Johnson's character's mom, and HER history researching Spiders, maybe she was originally meant to be working with Peter Parker's parents in the Garfield universe Amazon, hence the filmmakers initially wanting to go the Garfield route.
FIFY
Brian Earl Spilner
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Phat32 said:

Brian Earl Spilner said:

Madame Web tickets on sale! Who's got their opening night tickets?


I know someone who was planning on it but they were in the Amazon with my mom when she was researching spiders right before she died


The Porkchop Express
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If it's really terrible, DC should release Batgirl with it as a double feature.
Life is better with a beagle
jokershady
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Porkchop Express said:

If it's really terrible, DC should release Batgirl with it as a double feature.
critical drinker did a really interesting video on batgirl on why that film wasn't released....but apparently whatever copies of that thing exist will never see the light of day because i believe the studio wrote it off and due to that can never release it...
Quad Dog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Love that a studio's giant plan was undone at the last minute by basic math.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
On one hand I can't imagine them being that stupid, but on the other hand I absolutely can.
Brian Earl Spilner
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Porkchop Express said:

If it's really terrible, DC should release Batgirl with it as a double feature.


Marvel could probably do a film festival at this point.
Quad Dog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

On one hand I can't imagine them being that stupid, but on the other hand I absolutely can.
Although I bet way too many people would think that 1990 was 20 years ago.
First Page Last Page
Page 736 of 797
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.