*** MARVEL CINEMATIC UNIVERSE *** [Staff message on OP]

3,713,687 Views | 28722 Replies | Last: 22 min ago by rhutton125
fig96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MBAR said:

tysker said:

TCTTS said:

It's a we're-running-....A-list-actors problem,
I would think a person's limited age/gender/physique window in combination with role options make it hard for many actors. But why can't they use talented up-and-comers? And how many A-listers end up rejecting roles in the MCU? It seems like taking on one of these roles would require a serious time and energy commitment. While it's a steady gig, I imagine it can also be unforgiving in how it controls your other work projects and commitments.

Do you think there is also an A-list director problem?


I mean they had such a good chance with Simu to have an up and comer and they've just completely botched that.

And as for directors, they've NEVER gotten A list directors. Actual good directors weren't in a rush to fall into line with Marvel during the peak because of teh control they demand and they sure as hell aren't running over now.
What I'd give for Edgar Wright's Ant-Man.

(Also I think Kenneth Branaugh would have a word here, Taika has an Oscar, possibly a few others depending how we're defining "A list".)
maroon barchetta
How long do you want to ignore this user?
swimmerbabe11 said:

Forever, I'm the only one who enjoyed the Eternals.


I've tried to watch it twice and fell asleep twice
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm probably the only one over here wondering who "Gus" is.
Sea Speed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
YouBet said:

I'm probably the only one over here wondering who "Gus" is.


Gus fring from breaking bad.
FightinTexasAg15
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Easily one of the most forgettable, bland, low effort movies I've seen in a long time.

The dialogue is terrible and there is way way way too much exposition.

If they believed in this movie at they wouldn't have shown red hulk in the marketing materials, and the movie would have been slightly better for it.

CGI and visual, absolutely distractingly bad. Even by Marvel standards.

Positives: Giancarlo Esposito as always, but he was underutilized. And Harrison Ford is always great.

I don't feel like the movie did anything to build on the existing characters or really move the MCU forward at all. The end credits scene was even a huge nothing burger.

I would classify it as a wait until streaming movie, watch it once and be mildly entertained, and then never watch it again kind of movie.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sea Speed said:

YouBet said:

I'm probably the only one over here wondering who "Gus" is.


Gus fring from breaking bad.


That's why. Never saw Breaking Bad.
MBAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
fig96 said:

MBAR said:

tysker said:

TCTTS said:

It's a we're-running-....A-list-actors problem,
I would think a person's limited age/gender/physique window in combination with role options make it hard for many actors. But why can't they use talented up-and-comers? And how many A-listers end up rejecting roles in the MCU? It seems like taking on one of these roles would require a serious time and energy commitment. While it's a steady gig, I imagine it can also be unforgiving in how it controls your other work projects and commitments.

Do you think there is also an A-list director problem?


I mean they had such a good chance with Simu to have an up and comer and they've just completely botched that.

And as for directors, they've NEVER gotten A list directors. Actual good directors weren't in a rush to fall into line with Marvel during the peak because of teh control they demand and they sure as hell aren't running over now.
What I'd give for Edgar Wright's Ant-Man.

(Also I think Kenneth Branaugh would have a word here, Taika has an Oscar, possibly a few others depending how we're defining "A list".)


Taila wasn't an a list director when he made Ragnarok and as much as I like him I don't think he's one now. I don't think he's at the level of a Spielberg camareron or Nolan for instance.
An L of an Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
YouBet said:

Sea Speed said:

YouBet said:

I'm probably the only one over here wondering who "Gus" is.


Gus fring from breaking bad.


That's why. Never saw Breaking Bad.

Brian Earl Spilner
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
YouBet said:

Sea Speed said:

YouBet said:

I'm probably the only one over here wondering who "Gus" is.


Gus fring from breaking bad.


That's why. Never saw Breaking Bad.


Embarrassing.
AgfromHOU
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I just got out of the movie.

I actually liked it more than I thought I would. There were a lot of moments where the reshoots were obvious and painful, but I appreciated what they were going for. I'm not much of an Anthony Mackie fan, but he was good in this.
jokershady
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This is regarding the Thunderbolts….my son found a video online where they think they've figured out that asterix in the title and it sounds good enough that I'm going to spoiler tag their explanation and reasoning….here it goes….

theres a movie poster that's black with the asterix being really big and each character taking up a "point" of the asterix….and at the bottom of the poster the asterix appears again and next to it states, "the avengers are not available."

There's other things he's drawing from it sounds like in the video but he's theorizing the avengers are not available because the thunderbolts is going to take place AT THE SAME TIME as Avengers Doomsday…and from what I remember there's an idea based on comics where doomsday can take place on some other world I can't remember which would make sense….

Anyways there's the idea….thunderbolts and doomsday are going to take place at the same time….
jokershady
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Brian Earl Spilner said:

YouBet said:

Sea Speed said:

YouBet said:

I'm probably the only one over here wondering who "Gus" is.


Gus fring from breaking bad.


That's why. Never saw Breaking Bad.


Embarrassing.
I don't think it's that embarrassing….

CoachRTM
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Oh boy. A Marvel movie with a black director and a black lead actor and there's racist crap on the thread. Just ridiculous in 2025.

I went in with low expectations and it was fine. Forgettable, but an excuse to get out of the house and eat some popcorn while watching bad guys get hit in the face with a CGI frisbee made out of fictional steel. Agree with others that Ford, Mackie, and Esposito did the best that they could.

I also like Torres' character - the whole "TikTok generation" feel is a little much, but there's A LOT of heart there and he definitely represents the younger generation.

The new female - Ruth - was an interesting character - I think there's is more to be explored there
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Brian Earl Spilner said:

YouBet said:

Sea Speed said:

YouBet said:

I'm probably the only one over here wondering who "Gus" is.


Gus fring from breaking bad.


That's why. Never saw Breaking Bad.


Embarrassing.


I thought your handle was your real name until last year when I learned it's based on a character from Fast and Furious which consists of 37 movies ive never seen.

Come at me.
MooreTrucker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Brian Earl Spilner said:

YouBet said:

Sea Speed said:

YouBet said:

I'm probably the only one over here wondering who "Gus" is.


Gus fring from breaking bad.


That's why. Never saw Breaking Bad.


Embarrassing.
I've never seen it either. Not embarrassed at all.

For examples, I haven't seen LOTR or Game of Thrones or Sons of Anarchy either.

Some things just don't appeal to everyone.
Aggie_Journalist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The larger story since Endgame has been a jumbled mess, but haven't the Avengers been kaput since Stark died and Captain retired? I think the universe is still waiting for someone to form a new Avengers team and that's why "the Avengers aren't coming."
Thanks and gig'em
Definitely Not A Cop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Question for the real nerds, has there ever been a comic run where the Avengers get tasked with putting down all Mutants? Something kind of similar to Captain America: Civil War, but it's the Xmen versus the Avengers basically?
toucan82
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yes, it was creatively titled Avengers vs. X-Men

It wasn't great
FightinTexasAg15
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This is addressed in the new captain America movie
The Original Houston 1836
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Marvel needs to look in the mirror and realize that currently the only thing working for them outside of Guadians of the Galaxy 3 over the past few years have been stunt casting and fan service.

2021
Spider-Man: NO way Home - Zero new characters in the movie, other Spider-men, all their villains, Dr. Strange

2022
Dr. Strange 2 - Wanda, Strange, and stunt casting in the multiverse
Wakanda Forever - a 2-hour love letter to Chadwick Boseman.
Thor 4 - very underwhelming but made good BO with the return of Portman and enormous star power - Bale, Crowe, the cameos

2023
GOTG 3 - everyone's favorites on one last ride

2024
Deadpool & Wolverine - stunt casting and fan service to the extreme with an amazing result.

Fantastic Four needs to be unbelievable and have a plot that ties together a whole lot of BS and makes those characters really memorable. If it's not good, you really fear for what Avengers: Doomsday will be. Either way, they need to wise up and figure out how to cram a lot of Strange, Peter Parker, Starlord, Deadpool, and Wolverine into the future of the franchise.
Cinco Ranch Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I just sat down at the Alamo for BNW. Comments here and Marvel's most recent efforts don't fill me with optimism.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aggie_Journalist said:

The larger story since Endgame has been a jumbled mess, but haven't the Avengers been kaput since Stark died and Captain retired? I think the universe is still waiting for someone to form a new Avengers team and that's why "the Avengers aren't coming."


I seem to recall the final scene from endgame with some of them back at HQ kicking off the next team up of Avengers and then we never heard about it again.

If that isn't the same team that ends up in this movie then that seems like a big plot hole.
The Original Houston 1836
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YouBet said:

Aggie_Journalist said:

The larger story since Endgame has been a jumbled mess, but haven't the Avengers been kaput since Stark died and Captain retired? I think the universe is still waiting for someone to form a new Avengers team and that's why "the Avengers aren't coming."


I seem to recall the final scene from endgame with some of them back at HQ kicking off the next team up of Avengers and then we never heard about it again.

If that isn't the same team that ends up in this movie then that seems like a big plot hole.
You're thinking about Age of Ultron. That was like 10 years ago. Last scene of Endgame was Cap dancing with his sweetheart back in time.
Bruce Almighty
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Definitely Not A Cop said:

Question for the real nerds, has there ever been a comic run where the Avengers get tasked with putting down all Mutants? Something kind of similar to Captain America: Civil War, but it's the Xmen versus the Avengers basically?


House of M, which leads to the comic Civil War does this a little bit. I haven't read it, but there was an Avengers vs X-Men crossover about 10 years ago.
fig96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Some of yall are seriously missing out on Breaking Bad.
Project Gemini
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Better Call Saul is a much better show
fig96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I've heard it's fantastic, have watched s1 and need to get back to it.
redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Other than Ms. Marvel tracking down Kate Bishop, what else have we had hinting to an Avengers, or Young Avengers, restart?
LeonardSkinner
How long do you want to ignore this user?
redline248 said:

Other than Ms. Marvel tracking down Kate Bishop, what else have we had hinting to an Avengers, or Young Avengers, restart?

Isaiah Bradley's grandson from FTWS, whatever is going to happen with Wanda's kids (I haven't watched Agatha), and maybe Hulk's kid from She-Hulk?
FL_Ag1998
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Project Gemini said:

Better Call Saul is a much better show


Lolol, no. Just no. But let's not derail this thread with nonsense.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Original Houston 1836 said:

YouBet said:

Aggie_Journalist said:

The larger story since Endgame has been a jumbled mess, but haven't the Avengers been kaput since Stark died and Captain retired? I think the universe is still waiting for someone to form a new Avengers team and that's why "the Avengers aren't coming."


I seem to recall the final scene from endgame with some of them back at HQ kicking off the next team up of Avengers and then we never heard about it again.

If that isn't the same team that ends up in this movie then that seems like a big plot hole.
You're thinking about Age of Ultron. That was like 10 years ago. Last scene of Endgame was Cap dancing with his sweetheart back in time.


Ha. Just a bit off.
Cinco Ranch Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Well, that was decently fun.

If I was going to rank the Captain America movies, this one would slot right into last place. But that doesn't mean it was a movie that I didn't enjoy.

What I liked - Harrison Ford's take on a "changed" General Ross was good, even a bit poignant (dad of a daughter talking here) when the conversation turned to Betty; Sam Mackie was about what I expected; the sidekick was a fun character with perhaps some annoying modern-day youth tendencies; and the Widow chick was interesting enough.

What I didn't like or what didn't land for me - the movie really wanted to be the next Winter Soldier with all the political stuff but ultimately didn't pull that off; the visual effects were okay for the most part, but there were some that were jarringly bad; the main villain is a character that we know but have not seen in quite some time, and was largely "meh". But then again, most previous MCU movies suffered from this affliction of poor villains.

I got a good feeling out of seeing Bucky and Betty in this movie, and curious how Bucky running for political office fits into May's Thunderbolts* movie.

I'll add this one to my MCU library and re-watch it on occasion. It's not the worst Marvel movie by a long shot, but nor is it the best.
Claude!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cinco Ranch Aggie said:

I got a good feeling out of seeing Bucky and Betty in this movie, and curious how Bucky running for political office fits into May's Thunderbolts* movie.
Just what we need - another elderly person in Congress.
AgfromHOU
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Claude! said:

Cinco Ranch Aggie said:

I got a good feeling out of seeing Bucky and Betty in this movie, and curious how Bucky running for political office fits into May's Thunderbolts* movie.
Just what we need - another elderly person in Congress.


He's 110 years old!
Cinco Ranch Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Question - is adamantium the same material infused into Wolverine?
First Page
Page 820 of 821
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.