Cinco Ranch Aggie said:
For those suggesting a reboot, what exactly does that mean? If that means new actors portraying Luke, Leia and Han at the characters' age when we first met them (i.e., not younger/older versions of the characters), then nope. That should NEVER happen. If we mean an all new Star Wars with absolutely no characters that we have seen before, set either before the PT or after the ST, then absolutely yes. Which I am thinking the movie that the Logan/Dial of Destiny director is making would fall into that category.
I think generally the reboot crowd is advocates for 9 movies they can tell a coherent story and aesthetically fits together. Hopefully with one vision.
Recasting being the biggest hurdle.
Personally, I think the Skywalker Saga is dead. I don't think Disney is capable of inventing a new villain that will work for Rey movies. The decisions of the ST are pretty damaging to the brand overall. The future of Skywalker Saga characters is probably Grogu. With him you can fast forward a couple hundred of years and set up a new conflict.
But if I was the head of Disney, I wouldn't do that.
I would announce a new set of movies, I would either tell one of the following four stories:
1. Jedi vs Mandalorian wars.
2. Ulic Qel Droma
3. The Sith Emperor
4. New Old Republic Era story.
Then I would do as DC/WB did/does and start up an animation arm to bring as much of the EU back as animated stories on Disney+. Do things like the Thrawn trilogy/Shadows of the Empire/Infinities/Tales/Rogue Squadron/New Jedi Order, etc.
Let the merch sponsors have a field day.