htxag09 said:
Honest question, what's credible to you? A doctor coming out and say they've seen patients with it twice? Ok, that's been done.
This is just one of those things that people latch onto and will always have an excuse to argue. Well those are just internet stories. Oh, that was just the same case, not two separate cases. Ah yeah, that was just a false positive.
What is credible to me is what the data from the studies is showing coupled with what I am seeing and hearing in real life. Not every study is perfect nor is my anecdotal interactions with people.
However, if you continue to read about extremely low (1% or less on some) reinfection rates based on several studies and combine that with not hearing/seeing it happen in real life, I find that pretty compelling. Does that meet the definition of credible? Maybe - maybe not. Do I discount what a doctor is seeing with their patients? No.
The point about the internet stories is they're almost all identical. One confirmed positive test and then one symptomatic "infection" prior to testing or after the initial infection that is assumed to be Covid but not confirmed.
So to answer your question, if the data indicates secondary reinfection is common and it is apparent in e real life that people are consistently catching it again, I would say that is credible. As of right now, the two have not aligned, from my perspective…. Which is all of my family
members, coworkers, friends and kids at my wife's school.
And I am following this board and this data because I want to be up to date on it - I'm not here to troll or disparage anyone.