How Does The Medical Community Defend This?

11,224 Views | 104 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by sleepybeagle
Get Off My Lawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bay fan said:

There is plenty of information on how the vaccine works (consequently the lack of long term effects) if you are willing process it.

Why do any of you care what others choose to do? You're all about personal choice and liberty but freak out a vaccine becomes available as a choice?
A. I'd love to see these "long term studies" that track childhood inoculated individuals through puberty, into adulthood, and through subsequent reproduction on vaccines which became 'available' 1 year ago. I'd flag that as a lie, but this board's moderation only "combats disinformation" in one direction.

B1. As mentioned already, we see where these stepping stones will lead. Public universities are already require it and there are teachers zealously exuberant about pushing for K-12 requirements.
B2. It's also a conservative value to advocate for preservation of innocents as part of the non-aggression principle. That's the theme behind anti-abortion, anti-genital-mutilation, anti-child-abuse, and anti-child-experimentation: standing up for those who cannot against undeserved external harm. It's not tricky logic.
coolerguy12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bay fan said:

There is plenty of information on how the vaccine works (consequently the lack of long term effects) if you are willing process it.

Why do any of you care what others choose to do? You're all about personal choice and liberty but freak out a vaccine becomes available as a choice?


Because we're paying attention and remember when we were told the vaccine would never be mandated and always a choice. And now people are losing their jobs over it.

You're naive if you think mandates for kids aren't coming.
DFWTLR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bay fan said:

DFWTLR said:

bay fan said:

DFWTLR said:

The vaccine caused >104 degree fever in 2% of the kids, that is overwhelmingly worse than if a child gets covid.
It's a choice parents will make. I don't know, how many died?


Lrss than 0.0000% of that age group have died of covid. 2% of that age group.is half a million, how many kids will die from high fever from the shot. I'm willing to bet more than 0.0000%
Well zero deaths for that age range is complete bs so no point continuing here.



Where did I say zero, I said statically 0.0000%, which clearly is not emergency levels.
WesMaroon&White
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This is a political angry thread that is usually on F-16 and should be on that forum. I agree we don't need to vaccinate kids unless they have health issues that would benefit them. And only those parents of such children would seek that vaccine out.
Get Off My Lawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I disagree. Covid has become tainted with politics on all sides, and if mods relocate all uncomfortable conversations you'll never have any that matter. Peoples' lives and health are heavily impacted by the consequences of Covid policy in myriad ways - so any insulated analysis/discussion is an incomplete one.

Emergency Authorization for childhood vaccination is absolutely a Covid topic that should be possible to discuss on this forum just as much as any other Covid related policy or study or data or treatment.
DadHammer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
There isn't.
DadHammer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SamHou said:

I'll get my child vaccinated. I'm not concerned about death or hospitalization from COVID, but I am more concerned about cognitive deficits and long haul symptoms.

What? For a child you should be more concerned with the vaccine. The vaccine is for old people.

My grand kids will never get that vaccine.
traxter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DFWTLR said:

bay fan said:

DFWTLR said:

The vaccine caused >104 degree fever in 2% of the kids, that is overwhelmingly worse than if a child gets covid.
It's a choice parents will make. I don't know, how many died?


Lrss than 0.0000% of that age group have died of covid. 2% of that age group.is half a million, how many kids will die from high fever from the shot. I'm willing to bet more than 0.0000%
It would be cool if you'd be willing to provide evidence instead of just being willing to bet.
fightingfarmer09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bay fan said:

Old Buffalo said:

My kid had COVID. We thought it was an ear ache.

Lasted like 2 days.
So your school district allowed your kid to miss 2 days of school only? You guys are having a hard time following here, nobody said your kid was feeling the physical symptoms, simply that someone must stay with that child for what, 7-10 days?


Umm. The kid gets better, you send them back to school. The schools don't require negative tests or any reporting.
FlowCtlr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Where I live (outside US), they are mandating the vaccine for everyone. 0-12 year olds are the only ones left exempt. I'm afraid this development will change it for 5-12, which means my kids will soon fall under that requirement.
Ag06Law
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So, middle of the second page, and the only "emergency" justification we have from anyone is that parents might have to miss work? Just trying to keep track here.

I got vaccinated. My wife got vaccinated. Neither of us can see a reason in hell to get our kids vaccinated, and the complete inability of anyone on this board to identify an actual emergency justifying the use of this vaccine only drives that point home even deeper.
Irish 2.0
How long do you want to ignore this user?
In defense of the actual MDs on this board, none of them have chimed in yet.
strohag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I got covid December 15th 2020. My wife never got it but tested positive for the antibodies. In the meantime my 3 year old and 5 year old both tested positive after one had a fever for a couple hours so doc said they should be tested. They both were bouncing off the walls and their normal selves. It was a blip on the radar for the kids. Also had a 2 week old newborn at the house during this time. Never tested him but willing to bet he had it too. Point being don't waste your time with getting young kids this vaccine that doesn't prevent anyone from getting it. This is a joke. People seem to forget how the immune system works. If my 3 and 5 year old handled it fine why wouldn't your 5 to 11 year old?
willtackleforfood
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think we can all agree that v1 of SARS CoV-2 is gone? https://nextstrain.org/ncov/gisaid/global . Minus a small number of cases, it isn't circulating. So what are we chasing now and are the vaccines aimed at the right target? No, they aren't.

Boosters and new age group vaccine participants do not make any sense at all. The vaccines have not changed - the virus has. I know many TLDR, but read this article.

Quote:

In August, the companies began a trial of a multivalent vaccine that targets both the Delta and Alpha variants.

"We're not doing that because we actually think we need a new vaccine for those strains," says Philip Dormitzer, vice-president and chief scientific officer of viral vaccines and mRNA at Pfizer, based in New York City. "We want to practise all aspects of executing a strain change the preclinical research, the manufacturing, the clinical testing and the regulatory submissions so that if we do see a variant out there that truly escapes vaccine immunity, we're ready to go fast." Dormitzer says Pfizer currently has no plans to deploy its Beta or Delta vaccines among the public.
COVID vaccine makers brace for a variant worse than Delta

This article should REALLY concern everyone. There is no new vaccine for what is out there...NOW. A 10/20 article - they are broadcasting what is coming. It's a historically observable outcome of leaky vaccines.

There are serious consequences to imperfect "vaccines" that are missing the broad array of clinical tests, deployed at the height of a pandemic. The evolutionary pressures a leaky vaccine place on a virus have been known for a very long time.

This has been posted before, but it worth posting again.

Marek's Disease

Quote:

Because vaccination does not prevent infection with the virus, Marek's is still transmissible from vaccinated flocks to other birds, including the wild bird population. The first Marek's disease vaccine was introduced in 1970. The disease would cause mild paralysis, with the only identifiable lesions being in neural tissue. Mortality of chickens infected with Marek's disease was quite low. Current strains of Marek virus, decades after the first vaccine was introduced, cause lymphoma formation throughout the chicken's body and mortality rates have reached 100% in unvaccinated chickens. The Marek's disease vaccine is a "leaky vaccine", which means that only the symptoms of the disease are prevented. Infection of the host and the transmission of the virus are not inhibited by the vaccine. This contrasts with most other vaccines, where infection of the host is prevented. Under normal conditions, highly virulent strains of the virus are not selected. A highly virulent strain would kill the host before the virus would have an opportunity to transmit to other potential hosts and replicate. Thus, less virulent strains are selected. These strains are virulent enough to induce symptoms but not enough to kill the host, allowing further transmission. However, the leaky vaccine changes this evolutionary pressure and permits the evolution of highly virulent strains. The vaccine's inability to prevent infection and transmission allows the spread of highly virulent strains among vaccinated chickens. The fitness of the more virulent strains is increased by the vaccine.

The evolution of Marek's disease due to vaccination has had a profound effect on the poultry industry. All chickens across the globe are now vaccinated against Marek's disease (birds hatched in private flocks for laying or exhibition are rarely vaccinated). Highly virulent strains have been selected to the point that any chicken that is unvaccinated will die if infected.
Buy stock in Moderna, Pfizer and J&J if you haven't.

More about Marek, but what if the same scenario played out in human vaccines. t.u. receives a shout out - great for them, with their system ties to Wuhan it is fitting.

This chicken vaccine makes its virus more dangerous

Quote:

"Our concern here, primarily and foremost, is whether this is going to happen with any of the vaccines that we give to people," said molecular biology of the University of Texas Austin, who specializes in the evolution of viruses and bacteria. "But there is a lot we don't know about how the scenario with Marek's could apply to newer human vaccines."

To test the imperfect vaccine hypothesis in humans, you would need monitor the vaccine response for either a large or isolated population for a long time. Doing this would allow a researcher to gauge how the vaccine interacts with the virus and if that relationship is evolving. Does the vaccine merely reduce symptoms, or does it also keep patients from getting infected and transmitting the virus?

We know the answer to the question. So what's the next move?

Bay fan asked, "Why do any of you care what others choose to do?"

Did I answer it for you?
setsmachine
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Irish 2.0 said:

In defense of the actual MDs on this board, none of them have chimed in yet.

Couple of docs have stated previously that they see no reason for mass vaccination, but were hopeful for this EUA so kids with serious health risks could get the shot.
cone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm not opposed to child vaccination full stop although EUA authorization is somewhat ridiculous

that said, I'd wait for early adopter VAERS data before injecting my kids. The trial wasn't even close to being big enough. It was embarrassing.
Troglodyte
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This thread gives me some hope that the majority now sees that things have gone too far. A mandate to vax kids may be what we need to end all vax mandates.
cone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
the reality is that the PTB are going to use this vaccination as a way out for kids masking in schools

so in that respect it's going to be a de facto mandate for those kids in those districts
cone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
it's hard to overstate how embarrassing the clinical trial was that was used to get this EUA

you can argue that the EUA is situational justified for some kids and that the trial was pure garbage
coolerguy12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Irish 2.0 said:

In defense of the actual MDs on this board, none of them have chimed in yet.


Their silence is deafening. Can't be seen going against the official narrative.
aggierogue
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bay fan said:

Old Buffalo said:

My kid had COVID. We thought it was an ear ache.

Lasted like 2 days.
So your school district allowed your kid to miss 2 days of school only? You guys are having a hard time following here, nobody said your kid was feeling the physical symptoms, simply that someone must stay with that child for what, 7-10 days?


No. You're having a hard time following. Getting vaccinate doesn't stop your kid from getting Covid. Therefore they'd still miss school days and parents would have to take off work. Why is this so difficult?



We are officially to the point that the only reasoning for forced vaccination is for you to tell me that I won't get really sick. How about, I'll make my own decision regarding my health? Me being vaxxed or unvaxxed doesn't make you any safer.
AggieBiker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
willtackleforfood said:

I think we can all agree that v1 of SARS CoV-2 is gone? https://nextstrain.org/ncov/gisaid/global . Minus a small number of cases, it isn't circulating. So what are we chasing now and are the vaccines aimed at the right target? No, they aren't.

Boosters and new age group vaccine participants do not make any sense at all. The vaccines have not changed - the virus has. I know many TLDR, but read this article.

Quote:

In August, the companies began a trial of a multivalent vaccine that targets both the Delta and Alpha variants.

"We're not doing that because we actually think we need a new vaccine for those strains," says Philip Dormitzer, vice-president and chief scientific officer of viral vaccines and mRNA at Pfizer, based in New York City. "We want to practise all aspects of executing a strain change the preclinical research, the manufacturing, the clinical testing and the regulatory submissions so that if we do see a variant out there that truly escapes vaccine immunity, we're ready to go fast." Dormitzer says Pfizer currently has no plans to deploy its Beta or Delta vaccines among the public.
COVID vaccine makers brace for a variant worse than Delta

This article should REALLY concern everyone. There is no new vaccine for what is out there...NOW. A 10/20 article - they are broadcasting what is coming. It's a historically observable outcome of leaky vaccines.

There are serious consequences to imperfect "vaccines" that are missing the broad array of clinical tests, deployed at the height of a pandemic. The evolutionary pressures a leaky vaccine place on a virus have been known for a very long time.

This has been posted before, but it worth posting again.

Marek's Disease

Quote:

Because vaccination does not prevent infection with the virus, Marek's is still transmissible from vaccinated flocks to other birds, including the wild bird population. The first Marek's disease vaccine was introduced in 1970. The disease would cause mild paralysis, with the only identifiable lesions being in neural tissue. Mortality of chickens infected with Marek's disease was quite low. Current strains of Marek virus, decades after the first vaccine was introduced, cause lymphoma formation throughout the chicken's body and mortality rates have reached 100% in unvaccinated chickens. The Marek's disease vaccine is a "leaky vaccine", which means that only the symptoms of the disease are prevented. Infection of the host and the transmission of the virus are not inhibited by the vaccine. This contrasts with most other vaccines, where infection of the host is prevented. Under normal conditions, highly virulent strains of the virus are not selected. A highly virulent strain would kill the host before the virus would have an opportunity to transmit to other potential hosts and replicate. Thus, less virulent strains are selected. These strains are virulent enough to induce symptoms but not enough to kill the host, allowing further transmission. However, the leaky vaccine changes this evolutionary pressure and permits the evolution of highly virulent strains. The vaccine's inability to prevent infection and transmission allows the spread of highly virulent strains among vaccinated chickens. The fitness of the more virulent strains is increased by the vaccine.

The evolution of Marek's disease due to vaccination has had a profound effect on the poultry industry. All chickens across the globe are now vaccinated against Marek's disease (birds hatched in private flocks for laying or exhibition are rarely vaccinated). Highly virulent strains have been selected to the point that any chicken that is unvaccinated will die if infected.
Buy stock in Moderna, Pfizer and J&J if you haven't.

More about Marek, but what if the same scenario played out in human vaccines. t.u. receives a shout out - great for them, with their system ties to Wuhan it is fitting.

This chicken vaccine makes its virus more dangerous

Quote:

"Our concern here, primarily and foremost, is whether this is going to happen with any of the vaccines that we give to people," said molecular biology of the University of Texas Austin, who specializes in the evolution of viruses and bacteria. "But there is a lot we don't know about how the scenario with Marek's could apply to newer human vaccines."

To test the imperfect vaccine hypothesis in humans, you would need monitor the vaccine response for either a large or isolated population for a long time. Doing this would allow a researcher to gauge how the vaccine interacts with the virus and if that relationship is evolving. Does the vaccine merely reduce symptoms, or does it also keep patients from getting infected and transmitting the virus?

We know the answer to the question. So what's the next move?

Bay fan asked, "Why do any of you care what others choose to do?"

Did I answer it for you?

I am not going t say your concern is unfounded. I read the article you linked and it is interesting and concerning. It shows that a leaky vaccination may lead to a more severe virus. But there is more.

It doesn't conclude with absolute certainty that the more virulent form of Marek's would not have evolved regardless of the leaky vaccine. It does show it is allowed to proliferate because vaccinated hosts do not die from it but rather continue to spread it.

It also doesn't say that all leaky vaccines have led to more virulent forms of their targets. It mentions that vaccines for Malaria, HPV and whooping cough are leaky too and we have not observed more virulent forms.

And finally, the scientist commenting says the leaky vaccine is still currently worthy of use because of the benefits it brings to food security.

Quote:

However, in the end, Read said, leakiness isn't a strike against these vaccines, but more motivation to conduct surveillance of their effects after they exit clinical trials and enter the broader population. Take Marek's disease for example.

"Even if this evolution happens, you don't want to be an unvaccinated chicken," Read said. "Food chain security and everything rests on vaccines. They are the most successful and cheapest public health interventions that we've ever had. We just need to consider the evolutionary consequences of these ones with leaky transmission."
Again, I am not saying your concern should be trivialized but merely pointing out that leaky vaccines are not an absolute reason for vaccine avoidance.

I will add, If I had a child aged 5-11 I would probably not get them vaccinated although I am vaccinated myself. My daughter is an elementary school assistant principal and they have seen no severe effects on their students that have been infected which is reflective of what everybody has stated above. Extremely High percentages of parents and teachers can be vaccinated so I don't think concerns of spreading to them from children is enough to have all children get vaccinated.

I also don't think their is a high probability of risks for children that do get vaccinated. So I respect each person's choice. I don't respect the mandates. And to think they want be a result of the EUA is being disingenuous or dumb.
cbaker20
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm a doc, I just don't care enough to have a badge. My kids pediatrician doesn't think healthy 12 and under benefit enough from covid vaccines to justify the shot either. Unless the risk profile for covid changes significantly in the future, I will not vaccinate my kids. If they had underlying conditions, I would.

There are plenty of physicians who still have the ability to examine data and make a reasoned decision but they don't tend to go on about it on social media.
coolerguy12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
cbaker20 said:

I'm a doc, I just don't care enough to have a badge. My kids pediatrician doesn't think healthy 12 and under benefit enough from covid vaccines to justify the shot either. Unless the risk profile for covid changes significantly in the future, I will not vaccinate my kids. If they had underlying conditions, I would.

There are plenty of physicians who still have the ability to examine data and make a reasoned decision but they don't tend to go on about it on social media.


Thank you for speaking up. Maybe others will be as bold.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SamHou said:

I'll get my child vaccinated. I'm not concerned about death or hospitalization from COVID, but I am more concerned about cognitive deficits and long haul symptoms.
I'm trying to process this. but it is difficult to follow your logic here.

This virus doesn't impact children aside from outliers and extreme cases and you acknowledge you aren't worried about it therefore the vaccine is not needed for your child.

What you are really worried about is that by having your non-susceptible child get the vaccine they may suffer from cognitive deficits or long haul symptoms after getting it. Thus, another reason for your child not to get it in your own words.

Yet, you are going to go ahead and get your child vaccinated.

This makes zero sense.
SamHou
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The virus can affect children beyond simple metrics like death and hospitalization (eg, cognitive deficits). From what I've seen, there are not negative side effects from the vaccine (yes, there's not a ton of data yet). So my reasoning is I'll try to prevent what has a higher probability of a negative outcome.
Sea Speed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I believe he is worried about long term effects of a covid infection, not acute illness. Therefore, to ensure his kid won't have long term effects from covid infection, he will get his kid a vaccination. It still doesn't make any sense to me because there is obviously 0 long term study of either, but that is what I read his post to mean.
Irish 2.0
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You're going to ignore the numerous reports of myocarditis amongst people under 18?
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sea Speed said:

I believe he is worried about long term effects of a covid infection, not acute illness. Therefore, to ensure his kid won't have long term effects from covid infection, he will get his kid a vaccination. It still doesn't make any sense to me because there is obviously 0 long term study of either, but that is what I read his post to mean.
Ah, I read that as long-term impacts from the vaccine.
Sea Speed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Which seems more reasonable to be worried about imo. My kids won't be getting it. For all I know they already had covid.

I am still interested in knowing if the baby has antibodies from my wife's pregnancy infection.
SamHou
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yes that's what I meant. Sorry if it didn't come across as clear. Multitasking between TexAgs and coding is not my strength.

I have a daughter so I'm not worried about myocarditis.
Sea Speed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Already expecting her to be a heartless ice queen i see.
Gordo14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Irish 2.0 said:

You're going to ignore the numerous reports of myocarditis amongst people under 18?


There have also been numerous reports of myocarditis from the virus. This was well documented last year before we had vaccines. I saw many people downplay myocarditis last year and now it's the worst thing ever.

I still think the there are benefits to getting the vaccine for children similar to getting any vaccine. Some tangible, some intangible. Some systemic, some personal. However, I don't think child vaccination is nearly as important as it is for adults and don't think it's as big a deal if you don't get it for your kids. I would. But I see we've crossed into being irrationally angry that the FDA has done the research to provide people this option. Just not that interested in the "muh freedoms" discussion because the FDA approved the option to get the vaccine.
thenational
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
We had a 13 year old girl in our softball league that got the vaccine. She died the next night in her sleep. They haven't said a reason of death, but I would be willing to bet the vaccine caused it.
Irish 2.0
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gordo14 said:

Irish 2.0 said:

You're going to ignore the numerous reports of myocarditis amongst people under 18?


There have also been numerous reports of myocarditis from the virus. This was well documented last year before we had vaccines. I saw many people downplay myocarditis last year and now it's the worst thing ever.

I still think the there are benefits to getting the vaccine for children similar to getting any vaccine. Some tangible, some intangible. Some systemic, some personal. However, I don't think child vaccination is nearly as important as it is for adults and don't think it's as big a deal if you don't get it for your kids. I would. But I see we've crossed into being irrationally angry that the FDA has done the research to provide people this option. Just not that interested in the "muh freedoms" discussion because the FDA approved the option to get the vaccine.


The FDA approved the option for adults and now people are losing their jobs for not getting it. I think people have every right to worry about what actions the government may take in trying to force children to get the shot. Hell, California has already said they'll mandate it for schools once authorized.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.