htxag09 said:
Lol. Goalposts effectively moved. You said "You have firsthand knowledge and they ignore your experience." Then proceed to call the world crazy. I point out how you ignored someone else's experience. Sure, you can say it's secondhand, whatever. Fact is you ignored their experience and believe someone else on an anonymous message board.
I then point out multiple posters left detailed, day by day experiences, including when they took ivermectin and when they were admitted to the hospital and for how long. Your replies are then 1) ivermectin didn't put them in the hospital and 2) data shows it works.
1) I never said it did. I know it didn't. I'm pointing out first hand experiences of it not helping.
2) i agree data is more important. You're the one who went on about people ignoring first hand experiences of ivermectin helping and how that makes the world crazy. Wouldn't the same apply to firsthand experiences when ivermectin obviously didn't help people? I mean it's easier to prove it didn't help in these cases.
Again, this is the specific wording you provided that I bolded in the quote.
Do you understand the difference between firsthand and secondhand?
I have no firsthand knowledge of covid. I take ivermectin prophylactically and haven't gotten it that i know of.
The poster with 4 loved ones had secondhand knowledge. I need more details.
Two posters unvaxef took ivermectin and were hospitalized. I'm not sure how soon they took it, has to be early to be effective.
Several other posters have gotten covid, taken Ivermectin immediately and recovered in a few days.
The website i provided has more studies and data showing ivermectin efficacy than you caould read or watch in a week..
Ivermectin works. Maybe not 100%, but what does? Some doctors claim that when prescribing ivermectin early enough to covid patients, they've had zero hospitalization. Feel free to visit that site.