Do we know for sure that the vaccines won't cause issues later in life?

19,872 Views | 189 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by Trucker 96
beerad12man
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Irwin M. Fletcher said:

If you want this thing to go away and not become seasonal like the flu then we need to vaccinate as many as possible including younger people who are highly unlikely to have a negative outcome from COVID. Using science as you suggest then that is what we should aim for. I have a feeling we will not get there because there is so much misinformation out there and we won't vaccinate enough. So be prepared to get a Covid vaccine annually like the flu as they adjust it based on the prominent variant. It's not creepy, it is science but there are enough morons out there to keep this thing around forever.
I've already conceded that this isn't going away, and it's not because of morons. It's because it's a respiratory illness in full circulation across the globe right now. A few misinformed people in America aren't the difference in eradicating this thing. We could all but eradicate this from America, but you still have 7+ billion elsewhere to worry about. Any of which could travel to America at any given moment. It's not going away.

I also don't see an issue with a yearly, or every 2-3 year vaccine? Is that really such an inconvenience? Seems like a best case scenario to me. Get 60% of the population vaccinated yearly, with 70-80% of the elderly, and move the f*** on.

Also, since this covers all variants, and coronavirus don't mutate as much as the flu, I'm not sure you'd have to worry about the prominent variant, unless it mutates to attacking people an entirely different way. But at the end of the day, the technology we have seems to block it at it's source, and therefore logic suggests it should cover all variants. But I might be wrong here.
01agtx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This is why I deleted my comments. We aren't going to change each other's mind and that's ok. These are conversations that need to be had in person or on the phone.
Proposition Joe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BadMoonRisin said:

Proposition Joe said:

BadMoonRisin said:

Not sure. I've never seen the medical establishment and media so thirsty to get everyone vaccinated though. It's odd.

Society has basically been on hold for a year and you find it odd that everyone wants to get back to normal?
Due to bad policy, yes. Life could continue as normal if we focus on vaccinating the at risk groups, not necessarily everybody in the same way life could have gone back to normal 9 months ago if we isolated the at risk groups, and not everybody.

HTHs.

Isn't that what we did? Everything I have been seeing was the vaccine was rolled out to certain high risk groups first, only opened up to the commoner after they were taken care of.

The media really wants us scared and in our homes. The media really wants us vaccinated and out and about. Which is it?
Charpie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Everyone wants to blame the media for everything. At some point, you have to use your mind and make decisions for you and your family...not because the media told you to, but because YOU decided to do it.
beerad12man
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The media wants to profit off of viewership and good news doesn't sell.
Charpie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
beerad12man said:

The media wants to profit off of viewership and good news doesn't sell.
Time spent watching - $$$

However, we, as the consumer, have the power to change the channel
coolerguy12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The media (and certain medical professionals) want you vaccinated and scared and in your home. That's why we might be lucky to have a small outdoor gathering with our family on the 4th of July if you follow the rules and our leaders tell us it's ok.

F that noise. I'll continue hosting and attending any damn event that I feel like. And I won't be wearing a mask either.
Proposition Joe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So the media wants you scared and in your home.

And they want you vaccinated.

And they have a counter on their websites pushing big vaccination numbers (thirsty for more vaccinations!).

So mass vaccinations will result in people leaving their homes... But the media doesn't want you to leave your home... But the media is also pushing for people to get vaccinated.

That logic is absolutely astounding.
Petrino1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Im a Covid long hauler and have had lingering Covid symptoms for 9.5 months. Most likely I will keep experiencing symptoms for up to a year. I think chances are that you will experience long term side effects from covid as opposed to the vaccine lol. Better to just get vaccinated.
PerpetualLurker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
beerad12man said:

Irwin M. Fletcher said:

If you want this thing to go away and not become seasonal like the flu then we need to vaccinate as many as possible including younger people who are highly unlikely to have a negative outcome from COVID. Using science as you suggest then that is what we should aim for. I have a feeling we will not get there because there is so much misinformation out there and we won't vaccinate enough. So be prepared to get a Covid vaccine annually like the flu as they adjust it based on the prominent variant. It's not creepy, it is science but there are enough morons out there to keep this thing around forever.
I've already conceded that this isn't going away, and it's not because of morons. It's because it's a respiratory illness in full circulation across the globe right now. A few misinformed people in America aren't the difference in eradicating this thing. We could all but eradicate this from America, but you still have 7+ billion elsewhere to worry about. Any of which could travel to America at any given moment. It's not going away.

I also don't see an issue with a yearly, or every 2-3 year vaccine? Is that really such an inconvenience? Seems like a best case scenario to me. Get 60% of the population vaccinated yearly, with 70-80% of the elderly, and move the f*** on.

Also, since this covers all variants, and coronavirus don't mutate as much as the flu, I'm not sure you'd have to worry about the prominent variant, unless it mutates to attacking people an entirely different way. But at the end of the day, the technology we have seems to block it at it's source, and therefore logic suggests it should cover all variants. But I might be wrong here.


I think I agree. This isn't my field at all, but it makes sense. I dont see how we will eradicate it unless we hit very high vaccination targets and babies are born with antibodies. But if we get it to seasonal flu levels and have vaccines available, I think that has got to be good enough. And I have been a "doomer" all along.

One thing I think i read about the variants and vaccines. Even though vaccines covers existing variants, there could be other variants that mutate from the existing variants and are sufficiently different from the original virus such that the main vaccine wouldn't confer immunity, but a variant booster might. So its just an additional step to prevent another outbreak, which seems just fine to me. Could be wrong though.

This article from Nature seems like a reasonable take on how the pandemic might end and what SARS CoV 2 will look like afterwards.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-00396-2
coolerguy12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Proposition Joe said:

So the media wants you scared and in your home.

And they want you vaccinated.

And they have a counter on their websites pushing big vaccination numbers (thirsty for more vaccinations!).

So mass vaccinations will result in people leaving their homes... But the media doesn't want you to leave your home... But the media is also pushing for people to get vaccinated.

That logic is absolutely astounding.


I agree there isn't a lot of logic in it. Can't figure out why we're being told we might be lucky to have a small outdoor family gathering on the 4th if vaccines will be available to most people by May. If the vaccines actually worked (I believe they do) why aren't people being released from Covid prison once they have it?
Windy City Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

That means people without an understanding of human biology have been spreading false rumors about the vaccine.
Yeah, Dunning Kruger for sure.

BadMoonRisin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Proposition Joe said:

So the media wants you scared and in your home.

And they want you vaccinated.

And they have a counter on their websites pushing big vaccination numbers (thirsty for more vaccinations!).

So mass vaccinations will result in people leaving their homes... But the media doesn't want you to leave your home... But the media is also pushing for people to get vaccinated.

That logic is absolutely astounding.
Wanna tell me the logic of why I have to wear a mask, with no proven science behind it, when I have been vaccinated, smart guy? Im not even anti-vaccine. I got the J&J 3 weeks ago.

Regarding the media, I'm just saying its yet another goalpost moved. "two weeks to stop the spread", "5000 deaths a day" (deaths tank), "xxxx cases per day" (cases tank), "number of people over 16 vaccinated", "you gotta keep wearing a mask even if you are vaccinated, wouldnt want people to think that we can go back to normal now!" -- next will undoubtedly be "ZOMG Variants!" -- they are already starting to trot that one out. This will never end and it has not been about public health messaging. It's fear porn.

And its not only the media, its policy. There are states out there that still have schools closed. That's not the media telling people to stay in their homes. Its the government forcing a non-at-risk-population to stay home, to the detriment of their education and mental health. More 15-24 year olds have killed themselves in the last year than have died from COVID19.

Logic left the conversation a year ago.
It's not the severity of the punishment that deters crime; it's the certainty of it.
ORAggieFan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
One can realize that many things we've been told have been bad policy, yet understand vaccines are still safe and the best way out of this.
Proposition Joe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BadMoonRisin said:

Proposition Joe said:

So the media wants you scared and in your home.

And they want you vaccinated.

And they have a counter on their websites pushing big vaccination numbers (thirsty for more vaccinations!).

So mass vaccinations will result in people leaving their homes... But the media doesn't want you to leave your home... But the media is also pushing for people to get vaccinated.

That logic is absolutely astounding.
Wanna tell me the logic of why I have to wear a mask, with no proven science behind it, when I have been vaccinated, smart guy? Im not even anti-vaccine. I got the J&J 3 weeks ago.

And its not only the media, its policy. There are states out there that still have schools closed. That's not the media telling people to stay in their homes. Its the government forcing a non-at-risk-population to stay home, to the detriment of their education.

Logic left the conversation a year ago.

I'm not supporting the logic of some of the policy decisions we've made in regards to the virus, though I do understand that with a novel virus, lack of any firm direction from the top, and a million different local/state government subsets that it's not a surprising that not everyone is on the same logical page.

Where I'm referencing logic is attributing the media and it's "vaccination counter" as somehow either fear-mongering or profit-based... Ya know, it may just be a counter.
Windy City Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Not sure. I've never seen the medical establishment and media so thirsty to get everyone vaccinated though. It's odd.
So we as a global society vaccinate children for a host of maladies at birth and we scramble for flu vaccines every year and we are constantly searching for vaccines to ongoing illnesses like Malaria and you are just realizing that the medical establishment is motivated to get everyone vaccinated?
tysker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ORAggieFan said:

One can realize that many things we've been told have been bad policy, yet understand vaccines are still safe and the best way out of this.
Vaccines cant unwind bad policy
tysker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Where I'm referencing logic is attributing the media and it's "vaccination counter" as somehow either fear-mongering or profit-based... Ya know, it may just be a counter.
Why not both? What news or informational value to does having a vaccine counter add? There's no clear number we're trying to reach so it has no context or discernible purpose.
ORAggieFan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tysker said:

ORAggieFan said:

One can realize that many things we've been told have been bad policy, yet understand vaccines are still safe and the best way out of this.
Vaccines cant unwind bad policy
I'm not suggesting they are. But just because people that have backed bad policy are backing a vaccine does not make the vaccine bad.
Irwin M. Fletcher
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BadMoonRisin said:

Irwin M. Fletcher said:

If you want this thing to go away and not become seasonal like the flu then we need to vaccinate as many as possible including younger people who are highly unlikely to have a negative outcome from COVID. Using science as you suggest then that is what we should aim for. I have a feeling we will not get there because there is so much misinformation out there and we won't vaccinate enough. So be prepared to get a Covid vaccine annually like the flu as they adjust it based on the prominent variant. It's not creepy, it is science but there are enough morons out there to keep this thing around forever.
Interesting how the goal went from "two weeks to flatten the curve" to "we must completely eradicate the virus from planet earth".

Spoiler alert, that will never happen. It's a respiratory virus, not malaria. You cant kill the infection vectors to reduce cases.

You're both wrong and right. We could actually eradicate it or make it so small it's irrelevant. Measles is also a respiratory virus that was fairly irrelevant for years until the anti vax morons came about. You're right however in that this will become seasonal because not near enough will get vaccinated. So it will become part of life. I'm not for locking down anything but the media will sensationalize this thing as long as people die from it and that will happen. In my opinion that's their problem for not getting vaccinated. Ideally I wish enough would her this thing that it basically goes away but I realize that's wishful thinking.
Proposition Joe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tysker said:

Quote:

Where I'm referencing logic is attributing the media and it's "vaccination counter" as somehow either fear-mongering or profit-based... Ya know, it may just be a counter.
Why not both? What news or informational value to does having a vaccine counter add? There's no clear number we're trying to reach so it has no context or discernible purpose.

People are interested in knowing how vaccinations are going. It's as simple as that.

I mean, yes fear sells but the end game is always "more eyeballs/clicks". The common joe wanted to know how many people were dying from corona, and the common joe wants to know how quickly we are vaccinating.

There's a lot of ulterior motives out there, a counter for vaccinations isn't some big conspiracy.
Capitol Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BadMoonRisin said:

Proposition Joe said:

So the media wants you scared and in your home.

And they want you vaccinated.

And they have a counter on their websites pushing big vaccination numbers (thirsty for more vaccinations!).

So mass vaccinations will result in people leaving their homes... But the media doesn't want you to leave your home... But the media is also pushing for people to get vaccinated.

That logic is absolutely astounding.
Wanna tell me the logic of why I have to wear a mask, with no proven science behind it, when I have been vaccinated, smart guy? Im not even anti-vaccine. I got the J&J 3 weeks ago.

Regarding the media, I'm just saying its yet another goalpost moved. "two weeks to stop the spread", "5000 deaths a day" (deaths tank), "xxxx cases per day" (cases tank), "number of people over 16 vaccinated", "you gotta keep wearing a mask even if you are vaccinated, wouldnt want people to think that we can go back to normal now!" -- next will undoubtedly be "ZOMG Variants!" -- they are already starting to trot that one out. This will never end and it has not been about public health messaging. It's fear porn.

And its not only the media, its policy. There are states out there that still have schools closed. That's not the media telling people to stay in their homes. Its the government forcing a non-at-risk-population to stay home, to the detriment of their education and mental health. More 15-24 year olds have killed themselves in the last year than have died from COVID19.

Logic left the conversation a year ago.
(some of my rambling thoughts on all of this. Skip down to the bolded part if TL;DR)

The goal posts, honestly, weren't "moved" as much as misrepresented. Maybe many in charge of calling for the shut downs intended for it to be a 2 week thing, but many others had no intention of it being 2 weeks or short term. While it was supposed to be about hospitals not being overfilled, taxing healthcare for all, there were way too many that intended this to be about getting to a point that no one can contract this virus. I also think a lot of this was an opportunity to certain leaders to push their political agenda forward that had nothing to do with the virus. What else explains the absolute divide between red and blue states? Of course this became political from the very start and its a shame. Also, it is extremely difficult to place the responsibility to not spread the virus upon individuals who are not at risk. It is screwy logic. It sounds fantastic, but is not realistic or really even effective. Way too many have died. Would more have died if there were no restrictions? Probably so and so I do not have a problem with a certain amount or level of restrictions. But the evidence of open states vs closed states shows that restrictions were not really a determining factor in all of this. Heck, these same restrictions and the finger pointing/making people feel guilty for gathering outside just had the effect of pushing more inside where the virus did spread more. People were always going to socialize. Especially when this virus is not a death sentence nor even a long term situation for the vast majority who contract it.

So what have we learned from all of this? Messages need to be clear and only change if science truly dictates a need for change. Masks were a great example. Nothing changed in terms of the science and knowledge behind their usage. What changed was the message when the real reason to discourage the public from stocking up on them initially was so that medical personnel would have access to PPE. So just say that. Don't say masks don't work and then turn around and tell us to mask up. Then turn around and say we need to double mask (lol, wat?!?!?!). Do not shut schools and people's livelihoods down without a real plan. Businesses are not operating on the notion that there could be a pandemic in the future so have that "pandemic day" fund ready for when we shut down your business for "2 weeks" only for it to stretch out, in some cases, for over a year. Find a way to allow the healthy to be out, and the at risk to stay home. And once vaccinated, let these people be able to be accounted for so that they can resume a normal life in total. Obviously, there's a lot more I missing on all of this. This whole thing has been an absolute failure. From the top to the bottom and on both sides of the aisle.

And someone NEEDS to hold the media accountable for their messages. Freedom of the press is vital, but unfortunately, the press is more about getting clicks for advertisers than about disseminating correct information. They can push agendas and be as dangerous as any regime of government and have been for years, whether encouraging a war with Spain in the early 1900's or one in Nam in the mid 60's to working to position which ever political party through agenda laden stories that the masses "trust" in. They have done almost nothing but use fear and misrepresent the dangers of this virus from the start and to this day these "disturbing" videos of college students and young people doing what young people will do and honestly need to do. These folks NEED to be able to freely socialize. The virus will not kill them much at all and I have to say that even if it does effect the older generations to a certain degree with virus transmission, so be it. Hey, I hate that but it's just how I feel. Greater good is accomplished by letting youth and younger people be open and free vs shut out and locked down. Open the schools, the playgrounds, the bars and clubs, the world to these people. Again, it's just my opinion here and I get others will not agree, but I have to take the stance I truly believe in. The media has people in such fear over this that we see people wearing masks outsude by themselves or driving in cars alone. We see my new neighbor who is young and healthy wearing gloves to get his mail and leaving all his packages outside his house for days to "kill the virus" and not letting his young daughter play with all our children. She is 5 or 6 and sees all these kiddos playing and running around and he and his wife won't let her say hi. The media and their messaging are to blame here. Not my neighbor in my mind. It's sad./rant over. Sorry if this derailed anything.

Regarding the vaccine: I think the risks long term of the vaccine are outweighed by the opportunity the vaccine presents to getting society back to a healthy normal existence.
coolerguy12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Just add this to the list of lies fed to us about CV19. And people wonder why there is distrust among people around the vaccine and other measures.
tysker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Proposition Joe said:

tysker said:

Quote:

Where I'm referencing logic is attributing the media and it's "vaccination counter" as somehow either fear-mongering or profit-based... Ya know, it may just be a counter.
Why not both? What news or informational value to does having a vaccine counter add? There's no clear number we're trying to reach so it has no context or discernible purpose.

People are interested in knowing how vaccinations are going. It's as simple as that.

I mean, yes fear sells but the end game is always "more eyeballs/clicks". The common joe wanted to know how many people were dying from corona, and the common joe wants to know how quickly we are vaccinating.

There's a lot of ulterior motives out there, a counter for vaccinations isn't some big conspiracy.
Instead of conspiracy how about a coincidence that profit-seeking media outlets are using to their advantage?
Online and television media is using well-known and well-established psychological manipulation techniques to maximize engagement and thus their profits. Gaming companies and gambling companies have been doing this for decades. Obviously its our choice to engage or not, but as know, once you are engaged it's much harder to disengage. And I think that's fine but I think it's daft to dismiss concerns about our news outlets acting more like a slot machine than unbiased information sources. Especially when manipulation and misinformation results in policy and governance.
Duncan Idaho
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Since the vaccines use a small fraction of the virus's mRNA, the odds of the vaccine causing problems are a fraction of the risk of the virus causing long term problems.

So if you are afraid of the vaccine, you should be terrified of the virus
Carlo4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
beerad12man said:

Irwin M. Fletcher said:

If you want this thing to go away and not become seasonal like the flu then we need to vaccinate as many as possible including younger people who are highly unlikely to have a negative outcome from COVID. Using science as you suggest then that is what we should aim for. I have a feeling we will not get there because there is so much misinformation out there and we won't vaccinate enough. So be prepared to get a Covid vaccine annually like the flu as they adjust it based on the prominent variant. It's not creepy, it is science but there are enough morons out there to keep this thing around forever.
I've already conceded that this isn't going away, and it's not because of morons. It's because it's a respiratory illness in full circulation across the globe right now. A few misinformed people in America aren't the difference in eradicating this thing. We could all but eradicate this from America, but you still have 7+ billion elsewhere to worry about. Any of which could travel to America at any given moment. It's not going away.

I also don't see an issue with a yearly, or every 2-3 year vaccine? Is that really such an inconvenience? Seems like a best case scenario to me. Get 60% of the population vaccinated yearly, with 70-80% of the elderly, and move the f*** on.

Also, since this covers all variants, and coronavirus don't mutate as much as the flu, I'm not sure you'd have to worry about the prominent variant, unless it mutates to attacking people an entirely different way. But at the end of the day, the technology we have seems to block it at it's source, and therefore logic suggests it should cover all variants. But I might be wrong here.
I always figured from the beginning that the end game of this would be "get your flu and COVID shots free at Tom Thumb" advertisements at the seasonal time. Hopefully, that's all it is.

What I have NEVER understood is why aren't we doing an antibody test with the vaccine push? Isn't this a great chance to collect data and find out how many people have really had this thing? With the US at 10% known infection rate, I'm guessing the actual rate is pretty close to 40-50% already with tens of millions showing no symptoms.
beerad12man
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Irwin M. Fletcher said:

BadMoonRisin said:

Irwin M. Fletcher said:

If you want this thing to go away and not become seasonal like the flu then we need to vaccinate as many as possible including younger people who are highly unlikely to have a negative outcome from COVID. Using science as you suggest then that is what we should aim for. I have a feeling we will not get there because there is so much misinformation out there and we won't vaccinate enough. So be prepared to get a Covid vaccine annually like the flu as they adjust it based on the prominent variant. It's not creepy, it is science but there are enough morons out there to keep this thing around forever.
Interesting how the goal went from "two weeks to flatten the curve" to "we must completely eradicate the virus from planet earth".

Spoiler alert, that will never happen. It's a respiratory virus, not malaria. You cant kill the infection vectors to reduce cases.

You're both wrong and right. We could actually eradicate it or make it so small it's irrelevant. Measles is also a respiratory virus that was fairly irrelevant for years until the anti vax morons came about. You're right however in that this will become seasonal because not near enough will get vaccinated. So it will become part of life. I'm not for locking down anything but the media will sensationalize this thing as long as people die from it and that will happen. In my opinion that's their problem for not getting vaccinated. Ideally I wish enough would her this thing that it basically goes away but I realize that's wishful thinking.
I mean, measles is extremely irrelevant in the United States. 1282 cases last year, right? I get that it's up from years previous, but statistically, that's irrelevant.

Again, the virus may very well stick around forever, but this isn't because of anti vaxxers in America. It's because the world has a population of 8 billion. True anti vaxxers right now make up 10-20% that truly won't get vaccinated out of stubbornness, misinformation, or just trying to act like they are stronger than everyone else. Whatever it might be. 60+% seem like they will for sure be willing to get vaccinated, and another 10-20% that seem unsure, but I bet would come eventually around given more time and data. Say, another 3-6 months of vaccine rollouts with minimal to no issues.

In fact, I bet at the end of the day, America has the single highest vaccination rate in the world. Or at least, top 5. I'll be 70-80% by end of 2021.

The good news is, according to some, the vaccine might actually work for multiple years. And even longer for some. So you don't have to get everyone to come around now. Lets say 60% get it in 2021. 60% (with a few different people) in 2022, 60% in 2023, etc. By 2023/2024, you might have 75-80% immune from it through vaccination. And even more so when you add in natural infection to the point where it still fizzles out in the United States even with 20% or so of the population basically refusing.

Again, assuming immunity lasts longer than a year, which based on a lot of research, seems like a good possibility(FOR MOST)
Another Doug
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Carlo4 said:

beerad12man said:

Irwin M. Fletcher said:

If you want this thing to go away and not become seasonal like the flu then we need to vaccinate as many as possible including younger people who are highly unlikely to have a negative outcome from COVID. Using science as you suggest then that is what we should aim for. I have a feeling we will not get there because there is so much misinformation out there and we won't vaccinate enough. So be prepared to get a Covid vaccine annually like the flu as they adjust it based on the prominent variant. It's not creepy, it is science but there are enough morons out there to keep this thing around forever.
I've already conceded that this isn't going away, and it's not because of morons. It's because it's a respiratory illness in full circulation across the globe right now. A few misinformed people in America aren't the difference in eradicating this thing. We could all but eradicate this from America, but you still have 7+ billion elsewhere to worry about. Any of which could travel to America at any given moment. It's not going away.

I also don't see an issue with a yearly, or every 2-3 year vaccine? Is that really such an inconvenience? Seems like a best case scenario to me. Get 60% of the population vaccinated yearly, with 70-80% of the elderly, and move the f*** on.

Also, since this covers all variants, and coronavirus don't mutate as much as the flu, I'm not sure you'd have to worry about the prominent variant, unless it mutates to attacking people an entirely different way. But at the end of the day, the technology we have seems to block it at it's source, and therefore logic suggests it should cover all variants. But I might be wrong here.
I always figured from the beginning that the end game of this would be "get your flu and COVID shots free at Tom Thumb" advertisements at the seasonal time. Hopefully, that's all it is.

What I have NEVER understood is why aren't we doing an antibody test with the vaccine push? Isn't this a great chance to collect data and find out how many people have really had this thing? With the US at 10% known infection rate, I'm guessing the actual rate is pretty close to 40-50% already with tens of millions showing no symptoms.


The vaccine push is to get shots in everyone's arms. You don't need to test everyone to get an estimate of how many people have had it, there have been plenty of studies to get that number.
beerad12man
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Carlo4 said:

beerad12man said:

Irwin M. Fletcher said:

If you want this thing to go away and not become seasonal like the flu then we need to vaccinate as many as possible including younger people who are highly unlikely to have a negative outcome from COVID. Using science as you suggest then that is what we should aim for. I have a feeling we will not get there because there is so much misinformation out there and we won't vaccinate enough. So be prepared to get a Covid vaccine annually like the flu as they adjust it based on the prominent variant. It's not creepy, it is science but there are enough morons out there to keep this thing around forever.
I've already conceded that this isn't going away, and it's not because of morons. It's because it's a respiratory illness in full circulation across the globe right now. A few misinformed people in America aren't the difference in eradicating this thing. We could all but eradicate this from America, but you still have 7+ billion elsewhere to worry about. Any of which could travel to America at any given moment. It's not going away.

I also don't see an issue with a yearly, or every 2-3 year vaccine? Is that really such an inconvenience? Seems like a best case scenario to me. Get 60% of the population vaccinated yearly, with 70-80% of the elderly, and move the f*** on.

Also, since this covers all variants, and coronavirus don't mutate as much as the flu, I'm not sure you'd have to worry about the prominent variant, unless it mutates to attacking people an entirely different way. But at the end of the day, the technology we have seems to block it at it's source, and therefore logic suggests it should cover all variants. But I might be wrong here.
I always figured from the beginning that the end game of this would be "get your flu and COVID shots free at Tom Thumb" advertisements at the seasonal time. Hopefully, that's all it is.

What I have NEVER understood is why aren't we doing an antibody test with the vaccine push? Isn't this a great chance to collect data and find out how many people have really had this thing? With the US at 10% known infection rate, I'm guessing the actual rate is pretty close to 40-50% already with tens of millions showing no symptoms.
Some areas have. I believe LA did some studies to suggest 38.4% currently had antibodies(back in February), so that they think over 40% have had it.

In the end, those with antibodies or who have recently had it should be at the back of the line for the vaccine, IMHO. Just based on common sense.
bigtruckguy3500
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tysker said:

Quote:

The only issue is that if a sufficient number of people don't get the vaccine, it increases the risks of variants emerging that are not covered by the vaccine. Then those vaccinated could get reinfected, those unvaccinated could get infected in large numbers, and we again have the problem of overwhelmed ICUs. Is it a likely scenario, no. But is it possible, yes. And if it happens, the odds of being able to truly get on with our lives is a little less likely. At least for those in healthcare that have to deal with it.
Doesnt this assume a lack of durable immunity to both getting covid, getting exposed to covid and/or gettting a vaccine for covid? Also assumes "those vaccinated could get reinfected" and can transmit to enough people that are unvaccinated or otherwise without strong immune response. Also assumes the variants will have similar R0 across communities - If the R0 is bigger is seems highly unlikely it wouldn't result in overwhelmed ICU except maybe in certain specific populations and if the R0 is smaller, then ICU shouldn't be overwhelmed because the vaccine is working. Definitely has a 'so you're saying there's a chance' vibe here.
Yes. Like I said, low probability, unlikely. The thing is that as you increase countermeasures, you essentially increase selective pressures on the genealogy of the virus. It's the same principle behind treating someone with tuberculosis with 3 antibiotics instead of just one. One by itself can work, but you increase the risk that it may develop a random mutation making it resistant to that antibiotic. If that person then infects someone else, and they continue to spread it, then that strain slowly becomes the dominant strain.

If you're familiar at all with small pox and the eradication effort there, the entire world didn't get the smallpox vaccine. In many areas they did something called ring vaccination. Essentially any individual that was found to have small pox would identify anyone they're a contact of, and those people would be vaccinated. And those people would get vaccinated around them. Essentially creating a buffer preventing the virus from escaping.

I agree, it's a chance. I suspect even if variants emerge that bypass the vaccine, the vaccine will still provide some level of immunity and reduce the risk of severe disease, thereby making the ICU getting overwhelmed unlikely. The primary way this virus will escape the vaccine is if someone is infected with both COVID19 and another coronavirus, the two viruses swap DNA material, and the hybrid now has the virulence of COVID19 with a different set of receptors on it other than the spike protein.

Again, all just a possibility depending on sheer chance. I'm not a doom and gloomer here, just trying to give some education and perspective on the thought processes out there.
hamean02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ea1060 said:

Im a Covid long hauler and have had lingering Covid symptoms for 9.5 months. Most likely I will keep experiencing symptoms for up to a year. I think chances are that you will experience long term side effects from covid as opposed to the vaccine lol. Better to just get vaccinated.


I know multiple people under 55 with no comorbidities that have had this experience. Its not just old fat people impacted.
Counterpoint
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BadMoonRisin said:

Proposition Joe said:

So the media wants you scared and in your home.

And they want you vaccinated.

And they have a counter on their websites pushing big vaccination numbers (thirsty for more vaccinations!).

So mass vaccinations will result in people leaving their homes... But the media doesn't want you to leave your home... But the media is also pushing for people to get vaccinated.

That logic is absolutely astounding.
Wanna tell me the logic of why I have to wear a mask, with no proven science behind it, when I have been vaccinated, smart guy? Im not even anti-vaccine. I got the J&J 3 weeks ago.


EVERYONE hates wearing masks. They suck! But not everyone is lucky enough to be vaccinated. In your scenario, anyone could just SAY they were vaccinated and not have to wear a mask.
BadMoonRisin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Counterpoint said:

BadMoonRisin said:

Proposition Joe said:

So the media wants you scared and in your home.

And they want you vaccinated.

And they have a counter on their websites pushing big vaccination numbers (thirsty for more vaccinations!).

So mass vaccinations will result in people leaving their homes... But the media doesn't want you to leave your home... But the media is also pushing for people to get vaccinated.

That logic is absolutely astounding.
Wanna tell me the logic of why I have to wear a mask, with no proven science behind it, when I have been vaccinated, smart guy? Im not even anti-vaccine. I got the J&J 3 weeks ago.


EVERYONE hates wearing masks. They suck! But not everyone is lucky enough to be vaccinated. In your scenario, anyone could just SAY they were vaccinated and not have to wear a mask.
Yes, and anyone that had a problem with it could just...you know...stay the magical 6 feet away, mind their business, and stop giving into their paranoid delusions that this virus is everywhere and going to kill us all.
It's not the severity of the punishment that deters crime; it's the certainty of it.
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Counterpoint said:

BadMoonRisin said:

Proposition Joe said:

So the media wants you scared and in your home.

And they want you vaccinated.

And they have a counter on their websites pushing big vaccination numbers (thirsty for more vaccinations!).

So mass vaccinations will result in people leaving their homes... But the media doesn't want you to leave your home... But the media is also pushing for people to get vaccinated.

That logic is absolutely astounding.
Wanna tell me the logic of why I have to wear a mask, with no proven science behind it, when I have been vaccinated, smart guy? Im not even anti-vaccine. I got the J&J 3 weeks ago.


EVERYONE hates wearing masks. They suck! But not everyone is lucky enough to be vaccinated. In your scenario, anyone could just SAY they were vaccinated and not have to wear a mask.


I don't believe everyone hates wearing masks. We are repeatedly told by posters here it's not a problem and they are used to it now.
eric76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Salute The Marines said:

Counterpoint said:

BadMoonRisin said:

Proposition Joe said:

So the media wants you scared and in your home.

And they want you vaccinated.

And they have a counter on their websites pushing big vaccination numbers (thirsty for more vaccinations!).

So mass vaccinations will result in people leaving their homes... But the media doesn't want you to leave your home... But the media is also pushing for people to get vaccinated.

That logic is absolutely astounding.
Wanna tell me the logic of why I have to wear a mask, with no proven science behind it, when I have been vaccinated, smart guy? Im not even anti-vaccine. I got the J&J 3 weeks ago.


EVERYONE hates wearing masks. They suck! But not everyone is lucky enough to be vaccinated. In your scenario, anyone could just SAY they were vaccinated and not have to wear a mask.


I don't believe everyone hates wearing masks. We are repeatedly told by posters here it's not a problem and they are used to it now.
I've been wearing masks for years when going up on the grain elevator. It's no big deal.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.