Why do y'all act like I don't know how to baseball?
Farmer1906 said:91AggieLawyer said:akm91 said:From the Regional Preview ArticleCapCityAg89 said:akm91 said:
Stanford has not played a Quad1 team in the season and is a national seed.
Wait? What?! Are you sure you're not misreading something?Quote:
Season record vs. RPI teams
- Quadrant 1: 0-0
- Quadrant 2: 14-9
- Quadrant 3: 14-6
- Quadrant 4: 10-1
That's not true. They are 11-9 vs. Quad 1 RPI teams. They've played the following teams in the top 50 RPI:
Oregon State
OU
tech
Oregon
Washington
Arizona
Plus Arizona State and USC were 52 and 53 respectively. Stanford took 4 of 6 from them.
That is correct. They are 0-0 vs top 25 RPI teams.
They have played 54 games so that math checks.akm91 said:From the Regional Preview ArticleCapCityAg89 said:akm91 said:
Stanford has not played a Quad1 team in the season and is a national seed.
Wait? What?! Are you sure you're not misreading something?Quote:
Season record vs. RPI teams
- Quadrant 1: 0-0
- Quadrant 2: 14-9
- Quadrant 3: 14-6
- Quadrant 4: 10-1
AND I'M ALL OUT OF COCAINEfightintxag13 said:
I'm here to BTHO Fullerton and chew gum...and I'm all out of gum!
The security guard could have reacted faster. Lives would have been saved.hunter2012 said:UnderoosAg said:
"Easiest"
https://www.si.com/college/stanford/softball-baseball/stanfords-regional-viewed-as-one-of-the-easiest-in-the-2023-ncaa-tournament
Texas A&M will start lefty Will Johnston (3-3, 5.16 ERA) tonight against Cal State Fullerton left hander Tyler Stultz (7-4, 4.53 ERA).
— 𝕋𝕣𝕒𝕧𝕚𝕤 𝕃. 𝔹𝕣𝕠𝕨𝕟 (@Travis_L_Brown) June 2, 2023
Johnston threw six innings and allowed three runs in a 5-4 A&M win over LSU in the SEC tournament.
trouble said:
Means he won't be there tonight
94chem said:
History lesson time. A&M played at the Stanford regional in 1997, going 0-2. The first game against Fresno State, they lost to Jeff Weaver, who struck out something like 15 Aggies, and ended up having a 12 year big league career. The second game, under the old 6 team format, the loser of the 3/4 game (us) got the #1 seed. In that game we lost to Stanford's (and Kingwood's) Jeff Austin, who struck out another dozen or so Aggies. Austin also played a few years in the Bigs. Unrelated note: Austin's last MLB appearance began by giving up back-to-back-to-back HR's to lead off the game.
TLDR - last time at Sunken Diamond we struck out 30 times, lost twice, and came home.
txam92 said:94chem said:
History lesson time. A&M played at the Stanford regional in 1997, going 0-2. The first game against Fresno State, they lost to Jeff Weaver, who struck out something like 15 Aggies, and ended up having a 12 year big league career. The second game, under the old 6 team format, the loser of the 3/4 game (us) got the #1 seed. In that game we lost to Stanford's (and Kingwood's) Jeff Austin, who struck out another dozen or so Aggies. Austin also played a few years in the Bigs. Unrelated note: Austin's last MLB appearance began by giving up back-to-back-to-back HR's to lead off the game.
TLDR - last time at Sunken Diamond we struck out 30 times, lost twice, and came home.
Weaver had 21Ks and it was Chad Hutchinson not Jeff Austin. If you're going to give a sanctimonious history lesson, at least get it right.
didn't read sanctimonious to meMcInnis said:txam92 said:94chem said:
History lesson time. A&M played at the Stanford regional in 1997, going 0-2. The first game against Fresno State, they lost to Jeff Weaver, who struck out something like 15 Aggies, and ended up having a 12 year big league career. The second game, under the old 6 team format, the loser of the 3/4 game (us) got the #1 seed. In that game we lost to Stanford's (and Kingwood's) Jeff Austin, who struck out another dozen or so Aggies. Austin also played a few years in the Bigs. Unrelated note: Austin's last MLB appearance began by giving up back-to-back-to-back HR's to lead off the game.
TLDR - last time at Sunken Diamond we struck out 30 times, lost twice, and came home.
Weaver had 21Ks and it was Chad Hutchinson not Jeff Austin. If you're going to give a sanctimonious history lesson, at least get it right.
Why is that sanctimonious?