Some look for all the measurable (similar to mlb scouts), some look for players. Some get caught up in the PG ratings, which can be solid if they are seen by PG but misguided if they're not. Put it this way, some programs only go after the diamonds while others look for the diamond in the rough. I give you an example of three outfielders I was very aware of in my sons class. Two were very highly rated prospects by mlb scouts and PG, the other was a lightly recruited player. He had some interest from Baylor but that was about it as far as Texas D1 schools went. One of the top prospects was Ryan Johnson and the other I won't name but both had all the measurable. Tall, strong arm, fast and could hit and hit for power. The lightly recruited player was a switch hitting contact hitter, fast with a strong arm but only 5'11". A recruiter was at one of our games talking to me about the prospects and I told him simply that I understood the love fest for the top guys but that this player was a better player and if I had to have one of the three at bat in a do our die situation, I take the lesser player every time. I had watched this kid demoralize the Texas pitcher of the year in one at bat where he went down 0-2, watch or fouled off 9 other pitches to work it to a 3-2 count. The pitcher's shoulders were slumping and he was looking to the dugout trying to figure out what pitch I can throw this kid to get him out. On the 12th pitch, he throws a thigh high slider that was drilled to the left field gap for a leadoff double. The team proceed to score 4 runs that inning because the pitcher was completely rattled. We know Ryan's story and with any luck he's still has a great future. The other top prospect, that was offered by everyone including A&M and went to a power house ACC program, is out of baseball. The lesser was offered by that recruiter and has been a two year starter and we faced him last night in the 5 hole for Arkansas.