*****ColleyvilleAg06 Bubble Watch*****

67,313 Views | 698 Replies | Last: 13 hrs ago by LouisvilleAg
ColleyvilleAg06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

Updated Sunday 4:30 PM Final Update


1 Seeds

1) Auburn (Lock) 2 weeks ago this was probably the most dominant profile ever. Lost 3 of the last 4 and the case for the #1 overall seed is a lot more interesting. I still give the nod to Auburn based on an insane 16 quad 1 wins vs.9 for Duke. Duke did beat them head to head and has significantly better quality metrics so it would not shock me to see Duke #1 overall (Regular Season Over)

2) Duke (Lock) Number 1 in all the quality metrics but lack the elite wins to surpass Auburn for #1 overall. Locked into the 1 seed line and perhaps an outside shot at #1 overall. (Regular Season Over)

3) Houston (Lock) Locked in as a 1 seed. (Regular Season Over)

4) Florida (Lock) Strong finish to the year #3 in all resume counts and #4 in all quality metrics. Beating Alabama twice down the stretch should be good enough to hold on to the last #1 seed (and arguably #3 overall) (Regular Season Over)


2 Seeds


5) Alabama (Lock) Bama makes it interesting for the last 1 seed spot by winning at Auburn to get the best win of anyone all season. It feels strange that it wouldn't move them up a single spot and it feels downright absurd that a team with 11 Quad 1A wins would not be a 1 seed. Looking at the 4 one seeds I am not sure who you take it away from and they had their chance vs. Florida twice down the stretch to stay ahead of them and couldn't get it done. (Regular Season Over)

6) Tennessee (Lock) Vols are truly deserving of a 1 seed also, having beaten both Florida and Alabama in the regular season and beating Auburn in the tournament, but the profile from a numbers standpoint is clearly a step behind. Locked in as a 2 seed. (Regular Season Over)

7) Michigan State (Lock) MSU is locked into the 2 seed line, anything else would be truly shocking. (Regular Season Over)

8) St. John's (Lock) I have had St. John's as the last 2 seed for going on close to 3 weeks now and they just keep winning to justify it. Won 9 in a row including beating Creighton twice, UConn and Marquette twice both away from home. They don't have the quantity of elite wins but 18-4 vs. Quad 1 +2 is better than anyone else below them. (Regular Season Over)

3 Seeds



9) Texas Tech (Lock) Great quality metrics, better than St. John's . They can be elite when healthy. 9-4 vs. Quad 1 is eye opening. (Regular Season Over)

10) Kentucky (Lock) Elite resume numbers 8 quad 1A wins, 11 quad 1. #9 in WAB should keep them as a 3 seed with an outside chance at a 2. (Regular Season Over)

11) Wisconsin (Lock) Not much separates the 2nd tier Big 10 teams but the Badgers getting the win over Michigan State vaults them up to the 3 seed line (assuming the committee is still paying attention. (Regular Season Over)

12) Texas A&M (Lock) 5 quad 1A wins, top 10 in the resume ranks, Wisconsin's Big 10 tournament performance squeaks them past A&M. I am still very confident that A&M is ahead of Iowa State.

Final confidence chances of each seed line based on the very scientific gut read:
2 seed 0.5%
3 seed 78%
4 seed 20%
5 seed 1.5%


4 Seeds

13) Iowa State (Lock) Only 2 quad 1A wins, and down to #25 in KPI. They also have some injury concerns the committee may be factoring in. (Regular Season Over)

14) Maryland (Lock) Great quality numbers, big win at Michigan to close the year and then pounded Illinois in the Big Ten Tournament to cement their spot on the 4 line. (Regular Season Over)

15) Arizona (Lock) Faded a bit down the stretch with 5 losses in the last 9 games but a strong performance in the Big 12 tournament. (Regular Season Over)

16) Oregon (Lock) Predictive metrics still stink but they have racked up some great wins this year 8 quad 1. #12 in WAB but quality #s in the mid 30s. 13th best pure resume numbers. (Regular Season Over)

5 Seeds

17) Clemson (Lock) lack of high-end wins (4 quad 1) and a Q3 loss cap the ceiling for this profile. That quad 3 loss to Georgia Tech in 3OT is their only loss since January 7th before falling in the ACCT. That may speak more to how weak the ACC is than anything though. Losing to Louisville puts their spot as the last 4 a bit in jeopardy especially with Arizona coming on. (Regular Season Over)

18) Purdue (Lock) Resume slipped a bit down the stretch, and looks a step behind the Wisconsin/ Maryland/Oregon trio. (Regular Season Over)

19) Michigan (Lock) Lost the last 3 games of the regular season and the quality numbers took a huge tumble (now sitting at 30+ across the board). Making up for it in the Big 10 tournament but still stuck on the 5 line. (Regular Season Over)

20) Ole Miss (Lock) 6 Quad1A wins, only Alabama, Auburn and UK have more. Only 1 loss outside of Quad 1. Quality numbers lack a bit but there is enough here to be a 6 seed or perhaps even a 5. (Regular Season Over)




6 Seeds

21) Louisville (Lock) Their resume avg is 13.7 which is higher than Maryland, Iowa State, Arizona, and everyone below a 4. That is a bit surprising given they are 0-3 vs. Quad 1A. They do have 4 quad 1 wins and no bad losses though. Only 1 loss since December 14th. The 23 point loss to Ole Miss (and going 0-4 vs. the SEC) may be what keeps them off the 5 line. (Regular Season Over)

22) BYU (Lock) The hottest team in college basketball, racking up elite wins lately after they had started the season 0-7 vs. quad 1. Made that 6-7 before losing in the Big 12 semis to Houston. (Regular Season Over)

23) UCLA (Lock) Impressive 5-3 vs. quad 1A and 9 Quad 1 wins. All of the resume numbers are in the 20s so there isn't too much of a compelling case to go higher than a 6. (Regular Season Over)

24) Illinois (Lock) Impressive close to the year blowing out Michigan in Ann Arbor and then beating Purdue. Illinois should be a 6 or 7. (Regular Season Over)




7 Seeds

25) St. Mary's (Lock) Poor scheduling and how strong the 6 line is slips the Gaels back to a 7. (Regular Season Over)


26) Kansas (Lock) 6 quad 1 wins, #18 in the quality metrics, 7 feels like an underseed but with the quality of the 5 and 6 lines I am not sure who you displace. (Regular Season Over)

27) Gonzaga (Lock) Gonzaga had 1 quad 1 win 2 weeks ago but pick up 3 quad 1 wins in their last 4 games to go along with elite (top 10) quality metrics. Their resume will still lag, and you have to wonder if they will get full credit for the tournament wins, but I also believe the committee doesn't want to make a 1 seed play Gonzaga in the 1st weekend. (Regular Season Over)

28) Memphis (Lock) Quality numbers (Avg. 49.7) and 3 quad 3 losses cap this profile as a 7 seed. Wouldn't surprise me at all to see them as an 8. (Regular Season Over)


8 Seeds


29) Missouri (Lock) They probably wish they didn't play 8 quad 4 games (more than anyone else in the top 9 seed lines other than St. Mary's. That really hurts their overall profile. Under .500 vs quad 1+2 also pushes them down a bit. There is still so much good on this resume but I wouldn't be shocked at all to see them land as low as an 8 seed given how strong the 6 and 7 lines are. (Regular Season Over)

30) Marquette (Lock) Lose the last 2 to UConn and St. John's to end the year. Should be a 7 or 8 on Selection Sunday. (Regular Season Over)

31) Mississippi State (Lock) MSU is not that far behind the 5 seed line yet could conceivably could wind up as a 9. If they do they can thank their non conference SOS as being not quite at the same level as their Big East peers around them. (Regular Season Over)

32) UConn (Lock) There is a large gap between 33 and 34. UConn/Miss St/Creighton all very close and someone has to be a 9. Even though Creighton beat UConn twice, I give the nod to UConn based on the non conference.. (Regular Season Over)

9 Seeds


33) Creighton (Lock) Solidly an 8 or 9 seed. 6-5 vs. quad 1 with no bad losses. A little too much of the resume is built on quad 3 and 4 success to be more than an 8. Very close to UConn and Miss St. but someone has to be the 9. (Regular Season Over)

34) New Mexico (Lock) The win over UCLA and winning the MWC regular season will earn the Lobos a 9 seed. (Regular Season Over)

35) Georgia (Lock) 4 straight big wins to end the year including beating Florida sent the Bulldogs soaring up the seed lines. An early exit in the SECT shouldn't hurt too much. I am a bit higher on Uga but I think a lot of that is folks waking up to see how much the numbers improved over the last 2 weeks. (Regular Season over)

36) Baylor (Lock) Baylor should be breathing a bit easier after beating K State in the Big 12 tournament and probably has done enough to avoid Dayton. With a KPI of 48 though don't be surprised to see them seeded a bit lower though. (Regular Season Over)




10 Seeds


37) Utah State (Lock) - Quality metrics around 50 are a bit scary for an at large team but 9-7 vs. quad 1 + 2 and no bad losses means they are a lock and should be safe enough to avoid Dayton. (Regular Season Over)

38) Oklahoma (Lock) A roller coaster ride for Sooner fans after starting 13-0 non-conference, then 4-12 in conference, felt like they needed to win each of their last 2 conference games vs. Mizzou and Texas and they did just that. 7 Q1 wins with non-conference wins over Michigan, Arizona and Louisville feels like it will be enough. (Regular Season Over)

39) Drake (Missouri Valley Auto bid Secured) Drake avoids all drama associated with Selection Sunday and clinches the auto bid. Should be near the 10 line. 2-0 vs. Quad 1 beating Vanderbilt on a neutral court and winning at Kansas State. Only 3 losses all year and they are all quad 3 losses. Terrible quality numbers in the mid-60's (Regular Season Over)

40) West Virginia (Lock) 4 quad 1A wins, 6 quad 1, and no bad losses. Always a great recipe for avoiding Dayton. Quality metrics in the mid 40s will keep WVU in the 10 seed range even after the early exit to the Big 12 tournament. (Regular Season Over)


11 Seeds

41) Arkansas (Lock) Back-to-back big wins over Vanderbilt and Miss State to end the year moves the Hogs to lock status. 4 Quad 1A wins @Michigan, @Kentucky, @Texas and vs. Mizzou. (Regular Season Over)

Last 4 at large In

42) Vanderbilt (Lock) The loss to Texas in the 1st round of the SECT means that Vandy may be an 11 seed and potentially could wind up in Dayton. Quality numbers into the 40s look very Daytonesque. I am still confident their 5 quad 1 wins and no bad losses have them dancing. (Regular Season Over)

43) UC San Diego Big West Auto Bid At 30-4 they may not have needed the auto bid but they got it anyways. Winners of 15 straight (Regular Season Over)




44) San Diego State - Struggled in conference play including an early exit to the MWC tournament. If they ultimately get in it feels like they can thank that November win vs. Houston as the difference. (Regular Season Over)

45) Colorado State MWC Auto Bid CSU removes all doubt by dominating Boise State and punching their auto bid ticket. (Regular Season Over)

12 seeds

46) VCU Atlantic 10 Auto Bid Final projection is they would have been last team in if they didn't get the auto bd but they took the drama out of the selection. Would not be surprised to see VCU as an 11, part of the reason for them being a 12 is me betting on the committee laziness of not wanting to create a contingency bracket. (Regular Season Over)

47) Indiana The win at Michigan State feels like the difference maker. Also beat Purdue and was 5-0 in quad 2. (Regular Season Over)

48) Xavier Winners of 7 straight to end the year to be on the right side of the bubble going into the conference tournament but they went 0-1 there to leave them very vulnerable to other teams jumping over them and/or a bid thief or 2. (Regular Season Over)

Auto Bids:
49) Liberty - Conference USA
50) McNeese St. - Southland

13 Seeds
51) High Point - Big South
52) Akron - MAC
53) Yale Ivy
54) Grand Canyon WAC

14 seeds
55) Lipscomb Atlantic Sun
56) Troy Sun Belt
57) UNCW Coastal
58) Robert Morris Horizon


15 Seeds
59) Montana Big Sky
60) Wofford Southern
61) Norfolk State MEAC
62) Omaha Summit

16 Seeds

63) Bryant America East
64) SIUE - OVC
Dayton
65) American Patriot League
66) Mount St. Mary's MAAC
67) Alabama State - SWAC
68) S. Francis (PA) NEC




Bid Thieves (Teams that are not already in and would take away a spot from a team in now by getting an at large)

A year after 5 true bid thieves, it looks increasingly likely we have the opposite this year,

Clinched
MWC: Colorado State

Possible:
American: UAB

--------------------------------------------


69) North Carolina What a way to lose and potentially end the season. Getting blown out by 24, come all the way back with a chance to win it at the line, clank one and a lane violation on the 2nd. Absolutely brutal. Fall to 1-12 vs. quad 1. They also have a quad 3 loss. I think ultimately UNC will be in the first 5 out Feels like they probably need to beat Duke to stay in. We will see how the rest of the bubble does the next 2 days to see how many spots are still available but looks like ultimately the Tar Heels will be just out. (Regular Season Over)

70) Texas Horns had the #285 non-conference and took 2 losses. Then they went 6-12 in the SEC. With those 6 wins and the 2 in the tournament they did get to 7 quad 1 wins which is clearly the highlight of the resume. Minnesota also has 7 quad 1 wins and they won't make the NIT though. Ultimately this just feels like a resume that would typically be a first four out resume, but someone needs to play their way in to get those last spot or 2. (Regular Season Over)

71) Boise State Tough break for Boise State getting 2 good wins over SDSU and New Mexico in the tournament only to fall to CSU. They did beat St. Mary's and Clemson in the non-conference, but they also picked up a quad 3 and quad 4 loss in the process. They would be 5th in the pecking order out of the Mountain West and it's hard to see the committee going that way over a 4th ACC team. (Regular Season Over)

72) Ohio State Lose the first game of the Big 10 Tournament to Iowa to fall to 17-15 on the season. I think had they won that game they would have snuck into Dayton but just 11-15 vs. quad 1 + 2 + 3, Even with 6 quad 1 wins typically you don't get an at large if you can't go .500 vs the top 3 quads. Buckeyes likely headed to the NIT. (Regular Season Over)

73) UC Irvine UCI will be one of the first few teams out but I don't think putting them in as an at large will be a lengthy discussion. 94h in the BPI and 80 in Torvik. They are 39th in KPI and got a Q1A win at UC San Diego but beyond that there just isn't much too this resume other than a gaudy record and this type of profile never gets in.(Regular Season Over)

74) Wake Forest Faded badly down the stretch with the resume numbers falling to near 50 and the quality numbers near 70. The neutral court win over Michigan carried them for a bit but with Michigan also fading this looks like a NIT resume. (Regular Season Over)




Eliminated in the last week:
Nebraska (Sunday 3/9)
San Francisco (Monday 3/10)
Dayton (Friday 3/14)
ColleyvilleAg06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ColleyvilleAg06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
panhandlefarmer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Awesome! Been waiting for this!
Topher17
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Thanks for putting this together. You always do a great job!

I posted the same in the other games thread, but the cut line for the SEC teams involved will be fascinating to watch and I'm sure glad we aren't involved!
Texas and Vandy might come to regret their non-con scheduling at 7-11, while I'm not sure OU and Georgia can win enough games. Arkansas may have the best chance just based on remaining schedule and I don't love their chances.
Jonah2012
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Thanks for all your work on this!

It's interesting to think what would the SEC prefer. All of the top five teams trade wins with each other and take care of the bubble teams and have five 1 and 2 seeds and less teams in. Or those bottom four all sneak some wins in and get 14 teams in, regardless it's the strongest conference ever it seems.
Marsh
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm curious how the seeding will actually look and if the SEC will take a collective reduction in seed # to prevent so many possible #1 vs #2 seed matchups being from the same conference.

Hasn't the committee historically done everything in their power to prevent a #1 and #2 seed in the same bracket being from the same conference? That's impossible with potentially 5 SEC teams in the top 8. The pessimist in me says one of the five arbitrarily gets dropped to a 3 for no reason other than optics...
WhataMaroon88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Marsh said:

I'm curious how the seeding will actually look and if the SEC will take a collective reduction in seed # to prevent so many possible #1 vs #2 seed matchups being from the same conference.

Hasn't the committee historically done everything in their power to prevent a #1 and #2 seed in the same bracket being from the same conference? That's impossible with potentially 5 SEC teams in the top 8. The pessimist in me says one of the five arbitrarily gets dropped to a 3 for no reason other than optics...
We are in rare territory as far as the number of high seeds from one conference. However, 2/3 is along the same bracket line. A 2/3 seeds plays a 1 seed in the Elite Eight regardless, so no, it won't matter in this case. We would likely get lined up with one of the SEC teams, but if there was only one SEC 2 seed, perhaps we'd be put in Duke's bracket.
Sterling82
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Thanks for the rundown, particularly on the various metrics.
ColleyvilleAg06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Jonah2012 said:

Thanks for all your work on this!

It's interesting to think what would the SEC prefer. All of the top five teams trade wins with each other and take care of the bubble teams and have five 1 and 2 seeds and less teams in. Or those bottom four all sneak some wins in and get 14 teams in, regardless it's the strongest conference ever it seems.


More teams = more money. I am sure they would love it if Kentucky lost in Austin this weekend.
ColleyvilleAg06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The NCAA bracketing rules state that a conferences top 4 teams cannot be in the same region if they are in the top 4 seed lines. There is no rule preventing a 1 and a 2 both being in the south region if that 2 seed is the 5th best team from the SEC.
rhutton125
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bobinator
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Great work as always. Seed Watch and the games of the week may be delayed until tomorrow because I'm dealing with a sick kid situation at home.
ColleyvilleAg06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I was afraid I was going to be too duplicative with yours - looks like I picked a good week to debut the bubble watch
BaytownAg13
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Colleyville and bobinator, among others, help make this board the best on TexAgs imo. Really appreciate ya'll's work.
bobinator
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nah, I was going to start changing it as things narrow down anyway, taking a closer look at team's remaining schedules and which games are the ones to watch that might actually move the needle for us
Charlie Moran
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Love geeking out to this stuff. So looking forward to the next couple weeks
"I didn't come here to lose!" Charley Moran
ColleyvilleAg06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
OP edited with some additional detail on those just missing the cut, I will continue to build this out a bit more as i have time.
LouisvilleAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ColleyvilleAg06 said:


Thoughts on Tuesdays win I still can't believe we were down 9 at half and by the 8 minute timeout I felt completely comfortable and no stress about cruising to a win. The win didn't do much from a metrics standpoint but good to avoid a loss, watch a few more teams around us take an L and keep chugging towards some huge quad 1A opportunities down the stretch to clinch a 2 seed or potentially even challenge for a 1.

If you are looking for a quick primer on A&M's seeding, my prognostication is roughly a finish in the last 7 games would be equal to the following seeds (subject to the rest of the national landscape so +/- 1 seed line

7-0 or 6-1 = 1 seed
5-2 = 2 seed
4-3 = 3 seed
3-4 = 4 seed
2-5 = 5 seed
1-6 = 7 seed
0-7 = 9 seed

Given we are comfortably in the field, I will keep this BW a bit more brief than prior years and focus the analysis on those near A&M's seed and around the last 4 in/out and the rest just list a ranking, but happy to talk more about each individual team in the more detailed posts.

This is just to get the conversation started. I will add some more detail on those near the cut line tomorrow.

1 Seeds

1) Auburn (Lock) clear #1 with an insane 13 quad 1 wins (no one else has more than 8)
2) Alabama (Lock) 6-1 in quad 1A games and a pretty clear #2
3) Duke (Lock) outstanding predictive numbers
4) Florida (Lock) Lacked the non conf SOS and high-end elite wins that the rest of the SEC had, until the last week winning at Auburn and at Mississippi State to for now claim the 4th
5) one seed.fbfb

2 Seeds
6) Tennessee (Lock) Even after losing on Tuesday night Tennessee has both a better resume than A&M and clearly better predictive #s. But the gap has closed considerably
[B}
7) Texas A&M (Lock) Outstanding resume numbers (better than even Duke) but lagging predictive numbers (for a 2 seed). Ultimately it feels like A&M will get rewarded for going out of conference and racking up several high end wins on a neutral court (Purdue, Texas Tech, Creighton).
[/B}
8) Houston (Lock) Predictive metrics darling (#2, #1, #3), it will be interesting to see where the committee has them during the sneak peak reveal on Saturday morning. There are 38 teams that have at least 2 quad 1A wins this season. Houston is not one of those teams. Their lone Q1A is at Kansas which is great but beyond that…they have built their resume on pounding bad teams

9) Purdue (Lock) Very similar overall profile as A&M, A&M has a bit better on the resume numbers, Purdue has better predictives. I am glad A&M owns the head to head on a neutral (Indy) court.

3 Seeds
10) Iowa State (Lock) 7-4 vs quad 1, 9th in SOR, solid overall resume but still behind the top 8, the last team that feels currently in the same league as A&M if this was selection Sunday
11) Arizona (Lock) great predictives, subpar resume #s, didn't do much in non conference but has been elite in the Big 12
12) Michigan (Lock) - rocketing up the seed list particularly after knocking off Purdue, predictive numbers wont give them consideration for anything more than a 3 seed right now
13) Kentucky (Lock) 7 quad 1A wins ties Auburn for the most in the country. That number alone hides a lot of warts with this resume which otherwise would be a few spots lower.

4 Seeds
14) Wisconsin (Lock)
15) Texas Tech (Lock)
16) Kansas (Lock)
17) St. John's The loss to Villanova on Wednesday knocks them down a full seed line and they only have 1 quad 1 game left on the schedule


5 Seeds
18) Marquette
19) Ole Miss
20) Illinois
21) Michigan State

6 Seeds
22) UCLA
23) Missouri
24) Memphis
25) Clemson

7 Seeds
26) Louisville
27) UConn
28) Maryland
29) Creighton

8 Seeds
30) St. Mary's
31) Mississippi State
32) Baylor
33) Oregon

9 Seeds

34) Gonzaga
35) Utah State
36) New Mexico
37) Nebraska

10 Seeds
38) Ohio State
39) West Virginia
40) San Diego State
41) Drake (Missouri Valley Placeholder if they lose and drop out it does NOT open up a slot for someone else as MVC will still have a bid)


11 Seeds
42) Vanderbilt
43) Oklahoma

Last 4 in
44) SMU It is very rare a "power" conference team will have NCAAT worth numbers (top 45 across the board in resume and predictive, yet has not yet scored a single quad 1 win. But then again is the ACC really still a power conference?

45) Arkansas 3 quad 1A wins against Michigan, Kentucky and Texas all away from home, for now have the pigs in. Just 4-7 in the SEC, and if the magic number is 7 wins it is hard to find 3 more wins on this schedule without stealing one somewhere.

46) BYU pretty good predictive numbers for a bubble team, 3 quad 1 wins look nice but not all quad 1 are created equal UCF, West Virginia and Baylor don't exactly move the needle.

47) Georgia similar boat as Arkansas. The wins over Kentucky and St. John's are nice but the losses are piling up and at 4-8 in the SEC you have to squint a bit to see where they can pick up at least 2 more wins needed to have a case.


Projecting 22 one bid leagues regardless of conference tournaments, for spots 47-68 (will be adjusted for stolen bids and some at large bids above this line will go away)

One bid leagues
48) Atlantic 10 -note, several bubble teams that are out now could work their way in to make this a 2 bid league
49) Atlantic Sun
50) America East
51) Big Sky
52) Big South
53) Big West Note, 2 bubble teams that are OUT right now but could possibly win out and get at large consideration
54) Conference USA
55) Coastal
56) Horizon
57) Ivy
58) MAAC
59) MAC
60) MEAC
61) NEC
62) OVC
63) Patriot League
64) SWAC
65) Southern
66) Southland
67) Summit
68) Sun Belt
69) WAC


--------------------------------------------
70) Texas The horns have much better predictive number (29th in BPI!) than Georgia, Arkansas or even Vanderbilt but at a certain point it has to translate to wins and so far there haven't been enough of them for Texas. Really only 3 good wins to hang their hat on vs. A&M, Mizzou and at Oklahoma and not much even in the decent win category. The path here is to win the 3 @South Carolina, Georgia and Oklahoma, if they can do that they will be in the hunt. Given their lack of results in non conference, the magic number for Texas to get a bid may be 8 SEC wins however which means they may need 1 more in addition to those 3.

71) Wake Forest They were hanging their hat on the "no bad losses" thing and then they took a horrible loss on Wednesday night to Florida State on their home court. Those are the kind of losses that get brought up on Selection Sunday as the reason you are headed to the NIT. The resume numbers are not bad…the predictives are horrendous (71 in KenPom, 71 in Torvik). The rest of the schedule has 2 difficult games @SMU and @Duke, and a ton of just can't take a bad loss games. They need to go 5-1 in these last 6 to feel any kind of comfortable on Selection Sunday.

72) VCU Only 1 quad 1 win, earlier this year at Dayton, no quad 1 games left. Realistically they need to win out, including beating Dayton again and beating George Mason, both home games. If they do that they should be in as an at large. The predictive numbers (mid 30s) are already good enough to get in if they can boost the SOR (53) and WAB (57).

73) Indiana The Hoosiers got their biggest win of the year at Michigan State this week. No losses outside of Quad 1 but there are still some real stinkers in there (losing by 25 to Iowa, 28 to Louisville, 17 to Nebraska, 9 to Northwestern). The profile has some good to it (38th in KPI, and some bac 60th in Torvik). Hard to see this one NOT being one of the last 4 in/first 4 out.

74) North Carolina Similar profile as Indiana, 1 pretty good win (neutral court vs. UCLA) but ultimately just too many losses. They don't have as many bad blowout losses like the Hoosiers (except for this weeks stinker at Clemson) but they do have one black eye of the loss at home to Stanford (Quad 3). Only 1 Quad 1 game left, to end the season at home vs. Duke. The rest of the schedule is 4 quad 3s, a quad 4 and a quad 2. Vs. that weak schedule they probably need to win out to have a realistic chance.

75) Kansas State K State was left for dead in late January with a 7-11 record with only 1 of those wins better than quad 3. Since then they have won 6 straight including picking up 4 quad 1 wins. The profile has gotten a lot better but is still in the mid 50s across both resume and predictive numbers (2 quad 3 losses will do that) so they still have a ways to go. Not an easy remaining schedule with 4 quad 1 games left, but if they can split those and win the other 3 to get to 19 wins I like their chances.


76) UC San Diego Only played 4 games all year above quad 3, splitting with UC Irvine, winning at Utah State and losing at San Diego State. They also picked up 2 quad 3 losses along the way. They do have 1 quad 2 game left at CSUN. They absolutely have to win out to have any chance at an at large but if they do, their resume numbers which are currently in the mid 50s, may get good enough to give them a chance.

77) UC Irvine Similar situation as UCSD. In addition to splitting the season series with UCSD the lost their other quad 1 game at Oregon State and picked up 2 quad 2 wins at UNI and at CSUN. All quad 3 and 4 the rest of the way so they have to win out to have any chance. They are up to 35 in KPI but that feels like an anomaly (56 in SOR, 52 in WAB) and significantly worse in the predictives (99 in BPI. 68 in KenPom, 85 in Torvik).

78) San Francisco
79) George Mason
80) Cincinnati
81) USC
82) Boise State
83) UCF
84) Pitt
85) Xavier
86) Arizona state
87) Dayton
88) Villanova
89) Santa Clara
90) Iowa
91) TCU
92) Rutgers
93) Oregon State
94) Colorado State
95) Georgetown




These teams are not really in the same category as those above them, there is a considerable gap in profile strength but they are still technically alive since they have so many elite wins left on their schedule if they were to win out, but effectively there is no realistic path. Not eliminating them quite yet, since they can technically get to an at large

96) Northwestern
97) LSU
98) Utah
99) Washington
100) Penn state
101) Minnesota
102) Oklahoma State
103) South Carolina

I pretty much agree on everything you posted. I was very surprised you have Gonzaga and Saint Mary's at the 8/9 seed line. I assume they will move up as carnage continues to happen around them. I have them there too and thought my model was off.
LouisvilleAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Right now, I have three teams that are in play for the final 1 seed: Houston, Purdue, and Florida. Can A&M put themselves in that discussion? Absolutely. We have the schedule in front of us that will propel us forward if we do very well.
ColleyvilleAg06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
St. Mary's is close to the 7 line. 31st in SOR and 30th in BPI with limited top end wins i think will hurt them. Best win is over Gonzaga on their home floor...other than that...beating Nebraska on a neutral court

They can move up quite a bit if they win at Gonzaga next weekend. If they lose that i think a 7 is the absolute cap of where they can get to.

For Gonzaga they are 41, 49 and 48 in the resume numbers. Outstanding predictives (12, 11, 18 They end the year with 3 straight quad 1 opportunities and will be one of the teams with the wildest range of outcomes going into those 3 games with anything from out of the tournament altogether if they lose all 3 to playing thier way up to a 5 seed by winning out. The predictive models expect them to win out so any losses are going to tank those numbers.
ColleyvilleAg06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
LouisvilleAg said:

Right now, I have three teams that are in play for the final 1 seed: Houston, Purdue, and Florida. Can A&M put themselves in that discussion? Absolutely. We have the schedule in front of us that will propel us forward if we do very well.
If today was selection Sunday i feel very confident Florida would be selected in front of those 2, and we will see them as the 4th #1 seed during the Saturday reveal.

If they are not a one seed on Saturday that is a pretty big blow to the league as it signals that even with a clearly better resume they are not going to put 3 one seeds from the SEC.
LouisvilleAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ColleyvilleAg06 said:

LouisvilleAg said:

Right now, I have three teams that are in play for the final 1 seed: Houston, Purdue, and Florida. Can A&M put themselves in that discussion? Absolutely. We have the schedule in front of us that will propel us forward if we do very well.
If today was selection Sunday i feel very confident Florida would be selected in front of those 2, and we will see them as the 4th #1 seed during the Saturday reveal.

If they are not a one seed on Saturday that is a pretty big blow to the league as it signals that even with a clearly better resume they are not going to put 3 one seeds from the SEC.
I think the one thing that hurts Florida is the SOS. Is this factored in at all? I don't think so.

Florida - 41
Houston - 24
Purdue - 2
ColleyvilleAg06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Strength of Schedule is absolutely a factor but Florida has won more games.

In Strength of record Florida is #3. Houston is #7 and Purdue is #11.

At the end of the day 3 losses vs. the #41 schedule is more impressive than 6 losses vs. the #2 schedule.
GE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Man I would love to be a 2 seed and have the expectation be making the sweet 16
LouisvilleAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Since they are doing the sneak peak on Saturday, might as well add my top teams to Colleyville's:

Definite 1 seeds:
Auburn
Alabama
Duke

Either 1 or 2 seeds:
Florida
Houston
Purdue

2 seeds:
Tennessee
Texas A&M

3 seeds:
Iowa State
Kansas

3 or 4 seeds:
Wisconsin
Texas Tech
Arizona
Michigan

4 seeds:
St. John's
Kentucky
ColleyvilleAg06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
OP updated with Gonzaga/Memphis/Maryland wins and Nebraska/San Francisco losses
ColleyvilleAg06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
OP updated with continuing to build this out with narratives on the 4 and 5 lines.
bobinator
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think because you've got the current state of things so well locked down that seed watch is going to focus a lot more on each team's projections.
LouisvilleAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Missed on Kansas and Kentucky. Had everyone else right.
ColleyvilleAg06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Updated with the games through Saturday night (with the exception of UC Irvine playing in Hawaii)
ColleyvilleAg06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
OP updated as well as the 3rd post to update current metrics.

Lots of eliminations of the fringe bubble contenders the last 2 days. St. John's and Maryland earn lock status.
LPCAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ColleyvilleAg06 said:

The NCAA bracketing rules state that a conferences top 4 teams cannot be in the same region if they are in the top 4 seed lines. There is no rule preventing a 1 and a 2 both being in the south region if that 2 seed is the 5th best team from the SEC.


I did not know this rule. It just highlights the importance of beating and staying ahead of Tennessee.
LouisvilleAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ColleyvilleAg06 said:

OP updated as well as the 3rd post to update current metrics.

Lots of eliminations of the fringe bubble contenders the last 2 days. St. John's and Maryland earn lock status.
To me, there are 6, maybe 7 teams that have a legit shot at the 1 seed.

Obviously Auburn as they are pretty much a lock for a 1 seed and the top 1 seed. After that, there are 5 other teams in my model that are really close to each other:

Alabama
Duke
Houston
Florida
Tennessee

A&M has an outside shot at a 1 seed because they play 3 teams above them. Win all three and there is a legit shot. Win 2 of 3 and they get to go against Duke. Win 1 of 3 or any other result, they will be destined for Auburn's bracket. At this point, barring an absolute collapse, they will not be worse than a 3 seed.
bobinator
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think we've all been sleeping on Wisconsin.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.