JCA1 said:
Yeah, unless something changes, I don't see the MacDonald brothers selling to Constellation any longer than they are legally required to. Wonder how long the lease is for. Is there a "typical" lease length in these things?
JCA1 said:
Yeah, unless something changes, I don't see the MacDonald brothers selling to Constellation any longer than they are legally required to. Wonder how long the lease is for. Is there a "typical" lease length in these things?
Please don't start that one...752bro4 said:
This sounds like a chicken fajita food board type argument.
Austintm said:
I can't disagree with you more strongly. I agree that soil conditions are overrated, but the rate at which the grapes ripen (depends heavily on temperature, temperature variations, sun, etc.), moisture, etc. directly affect the fruit. And different fruit = different taste.
Under your theory, for example, wine made from valley floor fruit in 2011(which was heavily affected by frost, cold weather and late heavy rain) would taste the same as wine made from 2011 High Plains fruit 9or Howell Mountain, etc), assuming constants in the other items.
But it's like knowing how many licks it takes to get to the center of a Tootsie Roll Pop. The world may never know.
Chickens don't have fajitas.752bro4 said:
This sounds like a chicken fajita food board type argument.
But aren't those physical properties - sand v. clay, humidity- part of terroir? It may be "farming issues" but still have an impact on the grapes that have to be accounted for.Quote:
Certainly the physical properties of the soil will alter farming, and sand that can't retain any water or clay that can't drain any won't work. However the chemical composition of the soil is irrelevant to grape flavor. Too much humidity (think Gulf Coast), the mold, mildew problems are too severe. But those are farming issues, not grape flavor issues.
That's the point, they CAN be accounted for. The concept of terroir implies fixed parameters based upon location that can't be accounted for. E.g. "our terroir produces better grapes". If those fixed parameters can be accommodated via farming to produce the same grapes, then why even mention terroir? The issue is whether or not great grapes that accurately show varietal/clonal characteristics are dependent upon the location of the vineyard. They are not. They are not even necessarily reflective of the location if they are farmed appropriately.Quote:
But aren't those physical properties - sand v. clay, humidity- part of terroir? It may be "farming issues" but still have an impact on the grapes that have to be accounted for.
Tough range for good cabs. That said, try Josh Cellars and Hess Select. Also try Catena from Argentina (they make a cab and a Malbec for under $20).Aggie7156 said:
Just discovered this thread. Too much to look through the whole thing. Looking for opiniones on good cabs that are in the 15- 20 dollar range. Thanks
I think you are right that we are not that far apart. When I think of wine from particular vineyards, it's typically because I've become familiar with a particular grower. MacDonald, for example, but also places like Vine Hill Ranch. The Phillips family has turned out great fruit for a long time; yes, it's a great plot of land that backs up to the Mayacama range, but the care and passion that Bruce Phillips uses is what makes the fruit special (IMO). Oh, and the wine they make under their own label is outstanding.cecil77 said:Austintm said:So if you were able to take the same vines, place one group in, say, Howell Mountain, one in the Valley floor, one in the Texas High Plains, and one in Washington, harvest the fruit when ripe (which is going to vary), use the same winemaker, use the same methodology, same steel, then French oak barrels from the same maker, age each 21 months in oak, bottle in the same bottles and leave in the bottle the same amount of time, all would taste the same?cecil77 said:
Old farts don't get "triggered" just shake our fists at clouds and run children off our yards.
More and more you read and the word is in flux. Years ago it was literally "dirt and climate". It has morphed into "the way we make wine using this vineyard". The biggest missing piece that is only now being considered as it should are clonal differences, which IMO covers much of what people have long attributed to vineyard differences.
Not happening.
Assuming the same clones, and appropriate crop loads (crucial) for the growing conditions. (and ultimately identical degree days and sun hours, but that changes vintage to vintage no matter where you are) Yup, happening. No, not identical wines, but more the same than if you planted different clones of the same varieties and conducted the same experiment. Happens all over the world. Right now. I know it's heretical and many adherents to to conventional "religion" of wine will never accept. And I understand that, part of the allure of wine is the romance and mysticism that the conventional notions of soil and climate offer. However, more and more, science and technology are proving those notions irrelevant.
That doesn't mean that you can farm grapes anywhere. No, it's farming. You've got to be able to farm the vine. But given a relatively broad range of parameters, humans can farm to accomodate more than one may think. Certainly the physical properties of the soil will alter farming, and sand that can't retain any water or clay that can't drain any won't work. However the chemical composition of the soil is irrelevant to grape flavor. Too much humidity (think Gulf Coast), the mold, mildew problems are too severe. But those are farming issues, not grape flavor issues. If you can farm the clone properly for the conditions it's growing in, and alter crop yields so that phenolic ripeness paces sugar ripeness, the phenolics that the clone is genetically programmed to create will be created. And, there's the appropriate canopy management, leaf pulling schedule and more. The differences in the locations the grapes are grown are minimal to none.
That being said, not two wines are EVER identical, even if they're made from adjacent vines in the same vineyard. And I have no doubt that you can taste the differences in wines grown in different places. However, it's really a case of "correlation doesn't imply causation". Until clonal differences are identified (and current technology doesn't easily allow clones to be back identified) there's no way to be assured that location is crucial.
I enjoy these discussions, and I understand that I'm currently in the minority in the wine world. Not alone, though.
Austintm said:Tough range for good cabs. That said, try Josh Cellars and Hess Select. Also try Catena from Argentina (they make a cab and a Malbec for under $20).Aggie7156 said:
Just discovered this thread. Too much to look through the whole thing. Looking for opiniones on good cabs that are in the 15- 20 dollar range. Thanks
Take a trip to Costco and see what they have usually have some decent California cabs and French Bordeaux in that range.
Forgot about this one.jh0400 said:
I seem to recall Educated Guess being pretty good in that range.
You must really like Herman StoryBigAg95 said:
Heading to Paso tomorrow! Dinner at six test Kitchen and Somm's Kitchen, and tasting at Epoch, Booker, Tablas Creek, Justin, Herman Story, Derby, linne Calodo, and Herman story.
Same...thanks BSD for the suggestion...JCA1 said:
Just got the William & Mary save the date notice. Release coming Oct. 1.