I've never understood why the fact that Vince throws to his tightends, who happen to be the best receivers on the team, is used as a negative against him. Why wouldn't he do what he had to do to move the team down the field and score? If that means running or throwing to a tight end, then great. Using it as an argument against VY is strange.

Patch, after you got completely b1tchslapped out of the discussion did you cry?

My lip started to quiver, but then I thought about you and instantly felt better.

Guess you're used to it by now, you must hate it when the conversation turns to sports around here.

Talking sports, on a rivarlies board. That just crazy talk.

Right, which is why Patch, Nemesis, and TopGun all disappear at the same time......if there is no hospitable cat topics, you are out of juice

Wow.

I request a discussion comparing Radio and Michael Bishop then all of a sudden, BAM!


Poor sippies have to try and spin it into a Reggie - Radio debate once again.


Quit being so apologetic for your 810 SAT scoring mongy QB and just enjoy the upcoming season.

After all...what in the hell did he need Benson for anyway, right? He is going to become the next incarnation of Donovan McNabb according to you guys.

2004 For The Beer Champion
http://www.forthebeer.com/standings.php

It sucks for you that the team you hate the most owns the team you love the most at just about every single sport.

Most lopsided rivalry in the country.

Discuss.

quote:

---

Most lopsided rivalry in the country.

---

I think if you research more carefully, you will find out that you make Radio look like Stephen Hawking.


So you won't answer the original topic?

Who is a better QB?

Bishop or Radio?


2004 For The Beer Champion
http://www.forthebeer.com/standings.php

quote:

---

Most lopsided rivalry in the country.

---

At some point does a rivalry become so lopsided that it fails to exist? We may soon know.

Discuss.

Bishop or Radio?

2004 For The Beer Champion
http://www.forthebeer.com/standings.php

Young, and it's really not very close.

Why?

its all proven right here

http://www.texags.com/main/forum.reply.asp?topic_id=458595&page=1&forum_id=6

Bishop was a dual threat.

Is Radio?

2004 For The Beer Champion
http://www.forthebeer.com/standings.php

if by dual you mean he has kicked the aggies ass twice, then yes.

"quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Most lopsided rivalry in the country.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



I think if you research more carefully, you will find out that you make Radio look like Stephen Hawking."

Really? Okay. Please tell me the college sports rivalries that are more lopsided... besides, "Radio" is smart enough to win 17 games and be the Rose Bowl MVP. He's dumb because why?

Hmmmm.....

No answer on the thread topic?


That's because you know the truth.



My last quote for you to bookmark for after t+1:


Without a running game, Radio will be exposed for the one demensional fraud he is. Book on it!

Thanks for doing your crayfish impersonation.....

2004 For The Beer Champion
http://www.forthebeer.com/standings.php

quote:

---

JTaylor
posted 3:45p, 07/15/05

Really? Okay. Please tell me the college sports rivalries that are more lopsided...

---

Well I'll try....

t.u. leads A&M 72-34-5 for a 64.8 winning percentage.



Colorado leads Colorado State 56-19-2 for a 72.7 winning percentage.

Nebraska leads Colorado 44-17-2 for a 69.8 winning percentage.

Houston leads Rice 22-9 for a 70.9 winning percentage.

Tennessee leads Kentucky 68-23-9 for a 68.0 winning percentage.

L.S.U. leads Tulane 62-23-7 for a 69.1 winning percentage.


Those are just a few examples, but more than enough info to educate you.

I guess what I'm saying to your brain dead, waste of bandwith ass is shut the fcuk up while you're behind or you will soon push Radio to Einstein heights of intelligence in comparison.





2004 For The Beer Champion
http://www.forthebeer.com/standings.php

[This message has been edited by FrantasticExpectations (edited 7/15/2005 8:48p).]

Young will be a better quarterback. He has only finished his sophomore year.

As for lopsided rivalries, JTaylor said all sports. And do really consider Tulane-LSU a football rivalry? Houston-Rice? Kentucky-Tennessee?

Does it suck to have to point to the Rice, Tulane, and Kentucky football programs to prove that A&M does not suck?

How about all sports? Across the board, Texas-Texas A&M is the most lopsided rivalry in college.

Discuss.

[This message has been edited by MacD (edited 7/16/2005 11:17a).]

The single most lopsided major football rivalry I've seen is 0U/Okie St.

In all sports, it's Texas/A&M.

quote:

---

MacD
posted 11:13a, 7/16/2005

Young will be a better quarterback.

---

What evidence do you have that leads you to buy into this?

2004 For The Beer Champion
http://www.forthebeer.com/standings.php

I believe the pass game will be improved because of the maturation process for our WRs and the fact that our OL is intact. Even the coaches admitted that our WRs screwed us against Missouri and OU last year.

Heck, even in the A&M game, our receivers went 2-18 (Sweed), 1-8 (Jones), and 1-3 (Hardy). Absolutely pitiful, and honestly doesn't have much to do with Vince, because he hit the TEs and RBs fairly well. Probably also has a lot to do with Greg Davis.

And then in Vince's "mediocre" games, he always completed around 60% of his passes for 150-200 yards. Add in his rushing stats, and you got a problem as a defensive coordinator.

We're adding Shipley. Anyone who doesn't recognize how he will contribute is going to be surprised.

quote:

---

What evidence do you have that leads you to buy into this?

---

Of course, nobody knows for sure. It's hard to point to factual evidence if something hasn't happened yet. But I feel that Young will keep improving and progressing, and if he does that, I believe he will become a better quarterback than Bishop by his senior year. But Bishop was pretty good. He was a Heisman finalist. I'm not sure that it's an insult to say that Bishop = Young.

After just his sophomore year, what evidence do you have that Young will not continue to improve and be as good a quarterback or better than Bishop?

I guess I'm basing it on the past developments of your QB's after they set foot on the 40 acres.

2004 For The Beer Champion
http://www.forthebeer.com/standings.php

Past QB's had very different styles, and results.

Vince has already progressed alot since his first action 25 games ago. If he continues at this rate, he will be a rich man in a year or two.

Radio has become a better passer since he started his first game?

I know you aren't seriously going to claim that.


Simms had all the talent in the world. Everyone said just before the draft and right afterward "It'll be interesting to see what he can become with the proper coaching."

Face it, your QB coaches aren't highly thought of.

If Radio went to tceh, then I'd probably be saying he would be the Heisman frontrunner by now. He would be perfect in the short yardage 'run-and-shoot' style of offense.




2004 For The Beer Champion
http://www.forthebeer.com/standings.php

Except he doesn't throw the short routes that well.

I don't know why that's more important than results, though. He's 17-2, and I put more blame on the coaches for those two losses than on Vince.

quote:

---

Except he doesn't throw the short routes that well.

---

Um, yeah.

Bread and butter.


2004 For The Beer Champion
http://www.forthebeer.com/standings.php

How many games do you watch? He's constantly behind on the short crossing patterns, and can't hit the curls and hooks (Roy Williams's standards) with any regularity.

Granted, a majority of this problem probably stems from the fact that our receivers are not Roy Williams. Hoping for a change this season.

What he's good at are the intermediate/deep posts and outs. Some of his greatest passes in college were fades to BJ Johnson and deep throws to Tony Jeffery and Limas Sweed. Which is good if you want to be an NFL QB, however, I think he gets fairly negative ratings for his short game. This would automatically exclude him from my draft list, but I'd like to see what he can bring to the table his Jr. year.

<< Isn't 740 the minimum score allowable to be a qualifier as a freshman for athletics? >>

You get 450 for writing your name.

Gig 'Em, Aggies !!

quote:

---

A&M and U.S.C. torched O.U. through the air when they played because they could burn the Okies over the top.

---

A&M torched Blow U with two fake kicks

quote:

---

Quit being so apologetic for your 810 SAT scoring mongy QB and just enjoy the upcoming season.

---

Where is your proof Vince scored an 810 on his SAT? You do realize A&M football players had two of the worst Wonderlic scores last year, right? It was a Miamiesque performance. The Aggie player that was arrested for drunk driving after cops said they heard him yell the "N" word at some people in front of him at the Whataburger drive in did well on his Wonderlic (at least).


[This message has been edited by Mr. Randy Watson (edited 7/18/2005 10:01a).]

What none of you seem to realize is that it's more than a numbers game to see who's better. Personally, I think Vince is better, but you look at the player as a whole, not just how many yards he threw for one year. For example, Randy Johnson was 16-14 last season. Looking from numbers alone, good pitchers don't lose 14 games a year, but his team sucked, so he did. But you're logic, does that make Randy Johnson a bad pitcher? I think not.

quote:

---

At some point does a rivalry become so lopsided that it fails to exist? We may soon know.

---

It didn't stop between '84-'89 and your still one win shy of that streak.

"My last quote for you to bookmark for after t+1:


Without a running game, Radio will be exposed for the one demensional fraud he is. Book on it!"