McNeal:

2,791 Passing Yards
14 Passing TDs
4 INTs
8.1 YPA
232.6 YPG
58.1 Completion %
137.4 Passer Rating
781 Rushing Yards
8 Rushing TDs
4.8 YPC
0 Fumbles
3,509 Total Yards

Young:

1,669 Passing Yards
11 Passing TDs
10 INTs
7.5 YPA
151.7 YPG
59.5 Completion %
129.2 Passer Rating
887 Rushing Yards
10 Rushing TDs
6.1 YPC
4 Fumbles
2,556 Total Yards


VY =

10 more turnovers than Daddy Reggie

McNeal: 22 TDs, 4 Turnovers

Radio: 21 TDs, 14 Turnovers

Hmmm.....

Please update stats to include bowl game and post again...

Here are the numbers when you adjust Reggies for the following:
Radio has been in the same offense for 3 years
&

Radio constantly faces 10 man fronts because of "The Ced"


McNeal:

8,791 Passing Yards
44 Passing TDs
2 INTs
29.1 YPA
732.6 YPG
98.1 Completion %
Very High Passer Rating
2,781 Rushing Yards
28 Rushing TDs
14.8 YPC
0 Fumbles
11,572 Total Yards

After Bowl game:

VY: 25 TD, 14 INT

Still not a very good ratio, 1.8:1

But Farmer and Lewis were better than Benson?

Timmy: What?

...as well as 1000+ rushing yards and 14 rushing TD's

Farmer? Who ever said he was a good RB?

Highwayman, please enlighten me how a 1.8:1 TD/turnover ratio is even decent? Most HS QBs can manage 2:1, 3:1 ratios.

quote:

---

After Bowl game:

VY: 25 TD, 14 INT

Still not a very good ratio, 1.8:1

---

Actually, try 26 TD and 10 INT

I know Hostile. Shocking isn't it.

My bad, I meant 14 TO

Timmy, how did you come up with those #s though?

In your 'Fumbles' stat...is that fumbles lost or just fumbles?

Me thinks Patch doesnt understand that 1.8:1 TD/turnover ratio is horrible.

According to ESPN, its fumbles lost.

Me thinks VY's POS recieving corp cancel out the 8 man fronts.

But wait, according to Hornfans, Texas WRs > A&Ms WR

So which is it???

Yeah, and according to forum=5, amc > Texas

VY is better than McNeal at something....



[This message has been edited by Hostile_Aggie (edited 6/14/2005 2:52p).]

Does winning games count for anything?

i beleive the thread is on the topic of reggie v. vince, not their respective teams.

Both are very good college QB's. VY has played on a better team. Reggie has a shot at playing QB in the NFL. VY has a shot at playing in the NFL, but not at QB.

The ONLY stat for a QB is wins and losses. All others are meaningless.

Uva Uvum Vivendo Varia Fit

Just keep telling yourself that and maybe it will come true someday.

HA - It's always been true. Our best was Street - 20-0. According to you, he would have been horrible. The job of a QB is to win games. Ask a coach.

Uva Uvum Vivendo Varia Fit

VY's team wins games, he just happens to be there.

Bye your logic, Trent Dilfer was better than Dan Marino.

You guys are right.

Vince sucks. He's a glorified running back who makes horrible decisions and throws like a girl. Reggie, on the other hand, is Peyton Manning, except with a much better arm and Deion Sanders' type speed. Reggie is faster, smarter, and has twenty times the arm Vince has.

Vince's general crappiness coupled with the loss of DJ and Benson, contrasted with Reggie's greatness and the fact that the rest of the aggies are going to be much improved, leads to the inescapable conclusion that TAMU will slaughter Texas at Kyle, and probably go undefeated. Texas will be lucky to win 5-6 games.

Given these clear facts, I wish we could just throw in the towel right now and concede dominance to reggie and the ags. But, since we must play, I guess us Texas fans will just hope against hope that Vince and the Horns don't embarass themselves too badly. For now, we can only wait and see how it shakes out on the field.

Hook'em

[This message has been edited by West Horn (edited 6/14/2005 4:03p).]

Again, Trent Dilfer > Dan Marino

quote:

---

Bye your logic, Trent Dilfer was better than Dan Marino.

---

Really? Dilfer has a better W-L record?

quote:

---

Does winning games count for anything?

---

Only with fans of teams who actually win.