Typical tu fans, only come out after a win, otherwise never to be seen
TwoTimeAg said:
99.999% chance "Sip" has never set foot on the t.u. Campus.
petey88 said:
Howdy stevo you Dumbass,
Did you have your traditional daily poop tacos to eat for breakfast this morning ?
And even when we beat them is still does not change anything.dermdoc said:
Buddy of mine is a private pilot and flew a party to New Orleans the day after the Sugar Bowl. As one would expect, lots of sips fans at the airport flying back home. He was walking by a mature lady sip all decked in burnt orange and he simply said Congrats on your win. He had an Aggie jacket on and she asked him if he was an Aggie fan. He said yes. She then asked him if he had gone to A&M and he said yes and showed her his ring. She then asked So you are part of the cult? He looked her right in the eyes and said you would think that after sucking for ten years you would lose your arrogance. And then walked off.
Sips will never change. All you can do is win and beat them when you play them.
APHIS AG said:And even when we beat them is still does not change anything.dermdoc said:
Buddy of mine is a private pilot and flew a party to New Orleans the day after the Sugar Bowl. As one would expect, lots of sips fans at the airport flying back home. He was walking by a mature lady sip all decked in burnt orange and he simply said Congrats on your win. He had an Aggie jacket on and she asked him if he was an Aggie fan. He said yes. She then asked him if he had gone to A&M and he said yes and showed her his ring. She then asked So you are part of the cult? He looked her right in the eyes and said you would think that after sucking for ten years you would lose your arrogance. And then walked off.
Sips will never change. All you can do is win and beat them when you play them.
That is why scheduling them is a big mistake for it will just a continuation of 2011.
Stevetex. said:APHIS AG said:And even when we beat them is still does not change anything.dermdoc said:
Buddy of mine is a private pilot and flew a party to New Orleans the day after the Sugar Bowl. As one would expect, lots of sips fans at the airport flying back home. He was walking by a mature lady sip all decked in burnt orange and he simply said Congrats on your win. He had an Aggie jacket on and she asked him if he was an Aggie fan. He said yes. She then asked him if he had gone to A&M and he said yes and showed her his ring. She then asked So you are part of the cult? He looked her right in the eyes and said you would think that after sucking for ten years you would lose your arrogance. And then walked off.
Sips will never change. All you can do is win and beat them when you play them.
That is why scheduling them is a big mistake for it will just a continuation of 2011.
Well let's just say there are politicians that are looking to get the rivalry back on. I think it will happen
Flexbone said:Stevetex. said:APHIS AG said:And even when we beat them is still does not change anything.dermdoc said:
Buddy of mine is a private pilot and flew a party to New Orleans the day after the Sugar Bowl. As one would expect, lots of sips fans at the airport flying back home. He was walking by a mature lady sip all decked in burnt orange and he simply said Congrats on your win. He had an Aggie jacket on and she asked him if he was an Aggie fan. He said yes. She then asked him if he had gone to A&M and he said yes and showed her his ring. She then asked So you are part of the cult? He looked her right in the eyes and said you would think that after sucking for ten years you would lose your arrogance. And then walked off.
Sips will never change. All you can do is win and beat them when you play them.
That is why scheduling them is a big mistake for it will just a continuation of 2011.
Well let's just say there are politicians that are looking to get the rivalry back on. I think it will happen
This isn't 1994. Trying to force that is political suicide in this day and and age. The vast majority of Texans don't give a ***** Politicians are t going to threaten appropriations like they did to make sure Baylor and Tech could go to the Big 12.
99.999% chance this conversation didn't happen.TwoTimeAg said:
99.999% chance "Sip" has never set foot on the t.u. Campus.
AboveGroundPool said:Well, Gack, I'm probably confused, but it looks like today, at 4:30 pm central time, you referred to aTm as the "Texas Aggies."GAC06 said:
I don't think I've ever referred to my school as anything other than Texas A&M University or just A&M. The people that attended or currently attend are the Texas Aggies. Not the Oklahoma Aggies or New Mexico Aggies or Utah Aggies or any of the many other "Aggies" out there. It's a concept so simple I'd expect even a complete dip**** like you to grasp it easily.
New Mexico State are Aggies. Not New Mexico.
Utah State are Aggies. Not Utah.
Oklahoma State WERE the Aggies. Not Oklahoma.
Are Baylor students "Texas Bears?" Are Tech students "Texas Raiders?"
WC94 said:
Puff paint overalls v. ASS-LESS CHAPS
All-male cheerleaders v. TRANSGENDER PLAYERS
Bizarre exclamations v. BIZARRE EVERYTHING
Weird fingerguns v. THAT'S TECH DUMMY
Compulsory nut grabbing v. DILDO PARADES
AboveGroundPool said:
Thanks for the google image search. What is it you think you're proving? I know that you refer to YOURSELVES as "Texas Aggies." That is not in dispute. My point is simply that, no matter how many times you do it, it remains incorrect.
LSU are not the "Louisiana Tigers."
Nor are Clemson the "South Carolina Tigers."
Nor are Auburn the "Alabama Tigers."
Missouri ARE the "Missouri Tigers," and the reason why should be obvious.
No matter how many times you do it, it remains incorrect.AboveGroundPool said:
Thanks for the google image search. What is it you think you're proving? I know that you refer to YOURSELVES as "Texas Aggies." That is not in dispute. My point is simply that, no matter how many times you do it, it remains incorrect.
LSU are not the "Louisiana Tigers."
Nor are Clemson the "South Carolina Tigers."
Nor are Auburn the "Alabama Tigers."
Missouri ARE the "Missouri Tigers," and the reason why should be obvious.
AboveGroundPool said:
Thanks for the google image search. What is it you think you're proving? I know that you refer to YOURSELVES as "Texas Aggies." That is not in dispute. My point is simply that, no matter how many times you do it, it remains incorrect.
LSU are not the "Louisiana Tigers."
Nor are Clemson the "South Carolina Tigers."
Nor are Auburn the "Alabama Tigers."
Missouri ARE the "Missouri Tigers," and the reason why should be obvious.
AboveGroundPool said:
Here's a conversation that's never taken place:
"Hey, we're playing Texas this Saturday."
"Which Texas? There's two. Are you talking about the Texas Longhorns or the Texas Aggies?"
"Oh, right. My apologies. That was super unclear. Everybody knows there are two Texases."
usmcbrooks said:Johnny2Fan said:
Sip to me: Texas is back.
Me to sip: How? You lost four games?
Sip to me: So did ****!!
Me to sip: Never said we were back.
Sip to me: We beat Georgia!
Me to sip: We beat Lsu who also beat Georgia.
Sip to me: That means nothing, you didn't play Georgia.
Me to sip: Moving on, explain that seven point win over mighty Kansas?
Sip to me Texas players didnt care to be there.
Me to sip just like Georgia didn't care to be in the sugar bowl.
Sip to me: that sounds so stupid. Stop making excuses for them.
Me.........ok buddy have a nice trip, walk off.....
blazing7s94 said:
Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies Texas Aggies
hey dip****, tell me something, is the city of Port Arthur in on the vast TEXAS AGGIE conspiracy?AboveGroundPool said:
Thanks for the google image search. What is it you think you're proving? I know that you refer to YOURSELVES as "Texas Aggies." That is not in dispute. My point is simply that, no matter how many times you do it, it remains incorrect.
LSU are not the "Louisiana Tigers."
Nor are Clemson the "South Carolina Tigers."
Nor are Auburn the "Alabama Tigers."
Missouri ARE the "Missouri Tigers," and the reason why should be obvious.
AboveGroundPool said:
Thanks for the google image search. What is it you think you're proving? I know that you refer to YOURSELVES as "Texas Aggies." That is not in dispute. My point is simply that, no matter how many times you do it, it remains incorrect.
LSU are not the "Louisiana Tigers."
Nor are Clemson the "South Carolina Tigers."
Nor are Auburn the "Alabama Tigers."
Missouri ARE the "Missouri Tigers," and the reason why should be obvious.
AboveGroundPool said:WC94 said:
Puff paint overalls v. ASS-LESS CHAPS
All-male cheerleaders v. TRANSGENDER PLAYERS
Bizarre exclamations v. BIZARRE EVERYTHING
Weird fingerguns v. THAT'S TECH DUMMY
Compulsory nut grabbing v. DILDO PARADES
My apologies. These must be Tech students.
The ones I work with are honest and admit they're not back. Guaranteed he went to UT-Arlington or Devry.TwoTimeAg said:
99.999% chance "Sip" has never set foot on the t.u. Campus.
Don't underestimate the sip grads' d-baggeryTwoTimeAg said:
99.999% chance "Sip" has never set foot on the t.u. Campus.
petey88 said:
honest question ?
where did **** for brains abovegroundpool go ?
he never replied to how old he was