ghollow said:Did they steal that off of Big Tex?Dr. Nefario said:huisachel said:
The students drive BMWs
Found one.
I believe it's actually a mold from some dude named Reservoir Dog.
Texas University has the sh**iest looking college campus in the state
20,248 Views |
123 Replies |
Last: 4 yr ago by Jack Cheese
I believe it's actually a mold from some dude named Reservoir Dog.
Oh, such a manly person you are. I know for a fact you would never say that to my face. I'm guessing if I met you in person you would be pretty cool as you would likely be trying to sell me car insurance.David_Puddy said:Chosen One said:
Most campuses are functional but not beautiful. Rice is a beautiful campus as is SMU, even Baylor is beautiful. Today most schools are looking for functionality over beauty. UTSA being a prime example. In 2008 when I lived in Utah I went to a BYU/TCU game in Provo. The back drop was amazing as the school is built on the side of a mountain, but the campus was very plain, it was well maintained but plain. When my wife taught at Tulsa, they had a mixture of beautiful buildings with amazing architecture and building that looked horribly plain.
Nobody gives a f-ck, you tights wearing queer
A&M's new music building is disappointing.
Don't listen to him, Chosen One. We all really appreciated hearing about the five or six college campuses a Minnesota State dip**** has visited. Thanks for your valuable input.
Texan1976 said:
We were going to use tan brick and 60s Eastern Bloc architecture, but you guys beat us to the punch.
Typical sip. They all just assume our campus looks so bad and theirs so great. Because they're texas, right?
Your **** hole is an eyesore.
Chosen One said:Oh, such a manly person you are. I know for a fact you would never say that to my face. I'm guessing if I met you in person you would be pretty cool as you would likely be trying to sell me car insurance.David_Puddy said:Chosen One said:
Most campuses are functional but not beautiful. Rice is a beautiful campus as is SMU, even Baylor is beautiful. Today most schools are looking for functionality over beauty. UTSA being a prime example. In 2008 when I lived in Utah I went to a BYU/TCU game in Provo. The back drop was amazing as the school is built on the side of a mountain, but the campus was very plain, it was well maintained but plain. When my wife taught at Tulsa, they had a mixture of beautiful buildings with amazing architecture and building that looked horribly plain.
Nobody gives a f-ck, you tights wearing queer
He couldn't say it to your face without stooping way down. Puddy is about 6'6" and would certainly have no problem calling you a ***** and slapping your ***** while he's at it.
BVAg85 said:
When I was a student, we would go to Austin and their campus didn't look too bad then. When my oldest son attended school there, I was surprised at how run-down everything looked.
What in the world, Ags? Allowing your kids to attend that cesspool in Austin.
Muy said:BVAg85 said:
When I was a student, we would go to Austin and their campus didn't look too bad then. When my oldest son attended school there, I was surprised at how run-down everything looked.
What in the world, Ags? Allowing your kids to attend that cesspool in Austin.
Oldest went to tu, his brother went to Florida. We let them choose. Both graduated from good schools so I won't complain.
Chosen, I respectfully think you are missing the entire point of this thread. Folks are simply pointing out that the campus of the school you choose to identify with is land locked, not well maintained, has health issues (i.e. mold on buildings), not ADA friendly, and has been trending downward in recent years with respect to overall appearance. "Functional" does not have to be trashy or in need of repair, something your chosen campus seems to be.Chosen One said:
Most campuses are functional but not beautiful.
BVAg85 said:Muy said:BVAg85 said:
When I was a student, we would go to Austin and their campus didn't look too bad then. When my oldest son attended school there, I was surprised at how run-down everything looked.
What in the world, Ags? Allowing your kids to attend that cesspool in Austin.
Oldest went to tu, his brother went to Florida. We let them choose. Both graduated from good schools so I won't complain.
Now UF is a beautiful campus I thought.
Daughter almost went there too.
BernArnold said:BVAg85 said:Muy said:BVAg85 said:
When I was a student, we would go to Austin and their campus didn't look too bad then. When my oldest son attended school there, I was surprised at how run-down everything looked.
What in the world, Ags? Allowing your kids to attend that cesspool in Austin.
Oldest went to tu, his brother went to Florida. We let them choose. Both graduated from good schools so I won't complain.
Now UF is a beautiful campus I thought.
Daughter almost went there too.
It is a nice campus plus when he was going there my dad and his wife lived in Cocoa Beach so he had family that wasn't too far away.
Chosen One said:Oh, such a manly person you are. I know for a fact you would never say that to my face. I'm guessing if I met you in person you would be pretty cool as you would likely be trying to sell me car insurance.David_Puddy said:Chosen One said:
Most campuses are functional but not beautiful. Rice is a beautiful campus as is SMU, even Baylor is beautiful. Today most schools are looking for functionality over beauty. UTSA being a prime example. In 2008 when I lived in Utah I went to a BYU/TCU game in Provo. The back drop was amazing as the school is built on the side of a mountain, but the campus was very plain, it was well maintained but plain. When my wife taught at Tulsa, they had a mixture of beautiful buildings with amazing architecture and building that looked horribly plain.
Nobody gives a f-ck, you tights wearing queer
I'd say it to your face. Anyone who spends their adult life habitually internetting in the ways you do should be studied by medical professionals and ridiculed by everyone else
That's an old photo of a&m. At a pretty good distance too. University drive is all high rise dorms now. Some of those buildings have been razed and replaced. Campus looks completely different than it did just a few years ago. East campus has some new buildings but west campus has really built up.
Haha, what an embarrassing contribution. Your post shows nothing, argues nothing, and concludes nothing. And, obviously, it does nothing to remedy the sad state of the horn campus.
Of course, I can imagine your motivation, but you've fallen way short. Do you know what you're doing?
No objective person could drive around both campuses for 10 minutes and not conclude that the t-sips campus Is trashy and in a sad state of disrepair, and also that Texas A&M's campus is modern thriving and gorgeous
An Aggie engineer had been working on a highly developed oil processing complex in the Middle East. On completion of the project, the Sheik was so overjoyed that he offered the Aggie whatever he wanted.
"To show my gratitude, I'd like to give you a million dollars," said the Sheik.
After some thought, the Aggie declined, saying, "There's no place in College Station to spend it."
"How about seven chauffeured limousines?" offered the Sheik.
"No, thanks," said the Aggie, "I've got a pickup truck."
"A luxury liner?"
"No place to float it," countered the Aggie.
"A customized 747?"
"No place to land it."
The frustrated Sheik finally asked, "Well, what exactly would you like to have?"
The Aggie pondered the question. "Well, ever since I was a little kid, I've wanted a Mickey Mouse outfit.
The Sheik bought him the University of Texas.
"To show my gratitude, I'd like to give you a million dollars," said the Sheik.
After some thought, the Aggie declined, saying, "There's no place in College Station to spend it."
"How about seven chauffeured limousines?" offered the Sheik.
"No, thanks," said the Aggie, "I've got a pickup truck."
"A luxury liner?"
"No place to float it," countered the Aggie.
"A customized 747?"
"No place to land it."
The frustrated Sheik finally asked, "Well, what exactly would you like to have?"
The Aggie pondered the question. "Well, ever since I was a little kid, I've wanted a Mickey Mouse outfit.
The Sheik bought him the University of Texas.
Did you make the extra effort to find the smallest pictures possible?Texasteasipper said:
LOL
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRkZJ4A_dxjnjXGlYlLro6b6_q6-CuVtrbyqK8CkrYpD53K0cmj
https://media.gettyimages.com/photos/university-of-texas-ut-austin-campus-aerial-view-from-helicopter-picture-id165698942
He's a T-shirt sip that rolls out of mom's basement bed, grabs his sign and heads out to his job.Caesar4 said:Oh, forgot to mention that I'm not surprised that you're so intimately familiar with TDC. How's the parole going?Texan197 said:
The Texas Department of Corrections has better architecture.
We've all seen him, wife passes him otw to the only real college in Austin, St. Edwards.
Good for him, we would be looking pretty close to eye to eye as I'm 6'3. But like I said, he would never say it to my face.txjortsagent said:Chosen One said:Oh, such a manly person you are. I know for a fact you would never say that to my face. I'm guessing if I met you in person you would be pretty cool as you would likely be trying to sell me car insurance.David_Puddy said:Chosen One said:
Most campuses are functional but not beautiful. Rice is a beautiful campus as is SMU, even Baylor is beautiful. Today most schools are looking for functionality over beauty. UTSA being a prime example. In 2008 when I lived in Utah I went to a BYU/TCU game in Provo. The back drop was amazing as the school is built on the side of a mountain, but the campus was very plain, it was well maintained but plain. When my wife taught at Tulsa, they had a mixture of beautiful buildings with amazing architecture and building that looked horribly plain.
Nobody gives a f-ck, you tights wearing queer
He couldn't say it to your face without stooping way down. Puddy is about 6'6" and would certainly have no problem calling you a ***** and slapping your ***** while he's at it.
BBAg74 said:Chosen, I respectfully think you are missing the entire point of this thread. Folks are simply pointing out that the campus of the school you choose to identify with is land locked, not well maintained, has health issues (i.e. mold on buildings), not ADA friendly, and has been trending downward in recent years with respect to overall appearance. "Functional" does not have to be trashy or in need of repair, something your chosen campus seems to be.Chosen One said:
Most campuses are functional but not beautiful.
I've been to UT several times, met my wife there and often have company meetings there. I've found it to be a charming University even if I didn't go there. I'm sure it has buildings that need repair but I'm sure you can say the same for A&M. And for the record, U of Colorado is my favorite school as far as beauty goes, but I love boulder.
Spending your weekend trying to "tough guy" me, you Minny State goof? I'd say whatever the hell I wanted to your face, but let's be honest here I have no desire to ever be in the same vicinity as some dork who spends his days on a message bird defending a school he didn't go to.
Quote:
I've been to UT several times
We know you've spent more time e-defending that school than you've actually spent on campus, but it's nice to hear you say it. The first step to recovery is admitting you have a problem.
A&M's new Music Activities Building. A throwback to 70's architecture.
Jesus Christ. Please kill me if I'm ever claiming a school's campus (that I didn't attend) is "charming" on their non-rivals message board on a Sunday morning. Literally can't stoop much lower on the loser totem pole. Check your t-levels, ******.Chosen One said:BBAg74 said:Chosen, I respectfully think you are missing the entire point of this thread. Folks are simply pointing out that the campus of the school you choose to identify with is land locked, not well maintained, has health issues (i.e. mold on buildings), not ADA friendly, and has been trending downward in recent years with respect to overall appearance. "Functional" does not have to be trashy or in need of repair, something your chosen campus seems to be.Chosen One said:
Most campuses are functional but not beautiful.
I've been to UT several times, met my wife there and often have company meetings there. I've found it to be a charming University even if I didn't go there. I'm sure it has buildings that need repair but I'm sure you can say the same for A&M. And for the record, U of Colorado is my favorite school as far as beauty goes, but I love boulder.
Texas A & M said:
A&M's new Music Activities Building. A throwback to 70's architecture.
ok well the view from the other end is better for sure
and it is meant to blend in with the corps style dorms on that part of campus
and let's at least acknowledge the vast improvement over the band hall building it replaces which was built in 1970:
Ronnie Mund said:Jesus Christ. Please kill me if I'm ever claiming a school's campus (that I didn't attend) is "charming" on their non-rivals message board on a Sunday morning. Literally can't stoop much lower on the loser totem pole. Check your t-levels, ******.Chosen One said:BBAg74 said:Chosen, I respectfully think you are missing the entire point of this thread. Folks are simply pointing out that the campus of the school you choose to identify with is land locked, not well maintained, has health issues (i.e. mold on buildings), not ADA friendly, and has been trending downward in recent years with respect to overall appearance. "Functional" does not have to be trashy or in need of repair, something your chosen campus seems to be.Chosen One said:
Most campuses are functional but not beautiful.
I've been to UT several times, met my wife there and often have company meetings there. I've found it to be a charming University even if I didn't go there. I'm sure it has buildings that need repair but I'm sure you can say the same for A&M. And for the record, U of Colorado is my favorite school as far as beauty goes, but I love boulder.
Bonus points for knowing how totem poles actually work
Texan1976 said:
The Texas Department of Corrections has better architecture.
Show us your sole Presidential Library, Taco Bell Fan.
Chosen One said:Good for him, we would be looking pretty close to eye to eye as I'm 6'3. But like I said, he would never say it to my face.txjortsagent said:Chosen One said:Oh, such a manly person you are. I know for a fact you would never say that to my face. I'm guessing if I met you in person you would be pretty cool as you would likely be trying to sell me car insurance.David_Puddy said:Chosen One said:
Most campuses are functional but not beautiful. Rice is a beautiful campus as is SMU, even Baylor is beautiful. Today most schools are looking for functionality over beauty. UTSA being a prime example. In 2008 when I lived in Utah I went to a BYU/TCU game in Provo. The back drop was amazing as the school is built on the side of a mountain, but the campus was very plain, it was well maintained but plain. When my wife taught at Tulsa, they had a mixture of beautiful buildings with amazing architecture and building that looked horribly plain.
??
Nobody gives a f-ck, you tights wearing queer
He couldn't say it to your face without stooping way down. Puddy is about 6'6" and would certainly have no problem calling you a ***** and slapping your ***** while he's at it.
Because of your goiter? Or your wasted-looking torso? Cops say it's usually the tall, skinny panhandlers you should watch....on and around the grim-looking horn compound.
How do you possibly get your hands in right position to play that guitar?
BVAg85 said:
How do you possibly get your hands in right position to play that guitar?
Oh I can assure you that there are no intentions of playing that thing. As most things associated with that abomination of a program, it's for appearances only.
The University of Houston has the best looking campus in Texas.
Jock 07 said:BVAg85 said:
How do you possibly get your hands in right position to play that guitar?
Oh I can assure you that there are no intentions of playing that thing. As most things associated with that abomination of a program, it's for appearances only.
Lets compare trophy cabinets for each school.... you know, for appearances only.
Featured Stories
See All
31:49
1d ago
5.2k
Elko & Co. remain busy even during a traditional recruiting respite
by Ryan Brauninger
11:09
3h ago
957
Baseball Thoughts: Inside Texas A&M's uncharacteristic series at LSU
by Ryan Brauninger
9:21
4h ago
604
Cowboy Curtis
Props to our collective. Keeping all 3 QB's was a massive win.
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
90
Orlando Ayala Cant Read
Dabo Has Brought in Zero Transfers (Yet Again)
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
84
ConfidentAg
Props to our collective. Keeping all 3 QB's was a massive win.
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
32