BohunkAg said:

---

Gang rape as bonding. Interesting.

---

Baylor, and its sister school......Attica.

At this point, it is just easier to list the crimes they haven't been accused of or committed.

JM13 said:

---

How has the NCAA done nothing about this? I really don't understand it

---

Unfortunately, the NCAA is more concerned about bathroom bills then they are about women's safety.

LHIOB said:

---

From the story in the Waco Trib

Quote:

---

According to the suit, the football team had a system of hazing freshman recruits by having them bring freshman females to parties to be drugged and gang raped, "or in the words of the football players, 'trains' would be run on the girls."

Considered a bonding experience by the players, according to the suit, the rapes were also photographed and videotaped, and the plaintiff confirmed that at least one 21-second videotape of two Baylor students being gang raped by football players had circulated.

---

---

Yo, brah. Let's bond. I wanna stick my dick where your was and repeat. You down?

33 said:

---

JM13 said:

---

How has the NCAA done nothing about this? I really don't understand it

---

I agree. And, how can administrators and educators of a university tolerate an athletic program like that? Why isn't the university screaming for a self-imposed ban of athletics?

---

They do have a stadium to pay for, you know.

If anything has proven the insignificance of baylol football, it's this whole sordid episode. Any other legit program would have been torn apart by now.

But even after CAB's dirty run of success, waco is still the equivalent of a Real Wive's of OC rerun. Small pockets of people will pay attention to watch the train wrecks over and over. But overall, nobody really gives a **** about the low rent wannabes.

Electrical_Ag said:

---

33 said:

---

JM13 said:

---

How has the NCAA done nothing about this? I really don't understand it

---

I agree. And, how can administrators and educators of a university tolerate an athletic program like that? Why isn't the university screaming for a self-imposed ban of athletics?

---

They do have a stadium to pay for, you know.

---

yep, that jewel Toilet Bowl on the Brazos, sitting right there in front of hundreds of thousands of travelers passing through waco. Between that place and the magnolia silos, it's all they got to showcase in that dump of a town.

BohunkAg said:

---

The dog fighting is a new thing right? As is the video taping of said gang rape. How is this sh-t still defendable to some of them? I'd be like "f-ck Briles, get that b-stard as far away from us as we can....go Rhule"

But no, some of these jabronis STILL feel the need to defend that scumbag.

---

At this point I'm not sure they're defending CAB as much as they're defending the only small window of semi-relevance they've known in their lifetimes. Bad enough they grossly overpaid for what they got educationally. They need something to hold onto. "Hey guys, remember when we were actually good enough to have this happen to us in a bowl game an hour and a half up the road?"

Maybe my favorite non-Aggie football game Ive ever attended. Wifes uncle is a big MSU booster. We had a blast.

http://www.foxnews.com/sports/2017/05/17/baylor-university-football-players-recorded-gang-rapes-lawsuit-claims.html

Story is catching fire. Baylor can't hide anymore.

Tweet, Facebook, etc ......

http://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/19403308/woman-reported-gang-rape-baylor-football-players-files-title-ix-lawsuit

http://www.foxnews.com/sports/2017/05/17/baylor-university-football-players-recorded-gang-rapes-lawsuit-claims.html

http://www.latimes.com/sports/sportsnow/la-sp-baylor-rape-lawsuit-20170517-story.html

http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/17/us/baylor-university-gang-rape-lawsuit/index.html


Of course, the DMN, Chron, and AAS aren't on it yet .... from what I could find.

Quote from foxnews.com article.

"[Jane Doe's] account lines up with previous legal filings by Baylor's Board of Regents that allege Briles, when showed a list of names of players allegedly involved in the woman's case, replied: "Those are some bad dudes. Why was she around those guys?"

Baylor gets the death penalty or major scholarship limits and it's the death of the Big 12.

BESCo91 said:

---

Quote from foxnews.com article.

"[Jane Doe's] account lines up with previous legal filings by Baylor's Board of Regents that allege Briles, when showed a list of names of players allegedly involved in the woman's case, replied: "Those are some bad dudes. Why was she around those guys?"

---

Because you enabled them you POS

BESCo91 said:

---

Quote from foxnews.com article.

"[Jane Doe's] account lines up with previous legal filings by Baylor's Board of Regents that allege Briles, when showed a list of names of players allegedly involved in the woman's case, replied: "Those are some bad dudes. Why was she around those guys?"

---

Uhh, because you recruited them, because you hid their crimes, because you did not remove them from the team.

AlaskanAg99 said:

---

Baylor gets the death penalty or major scholarship limits and it's the death of the Big 12.

---

This is a legal matter not an NCAA matter.

AlaskanAg99 said:

---

Baylor gets the (1) death penalty or (2) major scholarship limits and it's the (3) death of the Big 12.

---

(1) No way in hell that happens .... not even a remote possibility.
(2) That won't either .... loss of 5 ships for 3 years is the absolute high end.
(3) It's death to the Big12 when OU and/or tu figure out a way to leave and find a place to go.

jja79 said:

---

AlaskanAg99 said:

---

Baylor gets the death penalty or major scholarship limits and it's the death of the Big 12.

---

This is a legal matter not an NCAA matter.

---

It's both.
Keeping players on the roster that shouldn't have been on the roster to gain a competitive advantage.

Wasn't there something a month or so ago that said Artie and/or boo hoo sue u may have paid for legal counsel for the boys accused? If true and proven, that is another angle the NCAA can use- illegal benefits to a "student" athlete...

Where has little ole bs bear been during all of this? He sure has been Inn hiding since all of this broke.

There's no statute of limitations for crimes like sexual assault is there? Seems like they should actually go after the guys that committed the crime on a criminal basis as well. If there really is a video couldn't they prosecute?

Or at least the plaintiff and her lawyer should list them as defendants along with the school, if for not other reason to call them out.

Just seems weird they wouldn't name them in the civil suit.

not really, baylro has money

Those rapist players are most likely now broke, or they will be probably be dead, or in prison for selling crack on some street corner inside of 5 years

Normally, I'd like to see a separation between NCAA infractions and legal matters.

But this has been a complete and utter lack of institutional control.

DeepEastTxAg said:

---

There's no way an actual human being said that... That school must seriously attract sociopaths.

---

Well it certainly doesn't attract people that could get into A&M or tu

They need to list the names of players

TXAGBQ76 said:

---

Wasn't there something a month or so ago that said Artie and/or boo hoo sue u may have paid for legal counsel for the boys accused? If true and proven, that is another angle the NCAA can use- illegal benefits to a "student" athlete...

Where has little ole bs bear been during all of this? He sure has been Inn hiding since all of this broke.

---

Doesn't tu have a lawyer on retainer who charges the players $1 for his services?

I recall that also; I am guessing as long as he can show he gives this same service/price to all students it is technically okay.

SlackerAg said:

---

They need to list the names of players

---

Is there an attorney on here familiar with Title IX civil cases that can comment on why the players' names would not be listed? I understand listing BU as the defendant so that you can receive the most amount of financial compensation for the immense pain and suffering. They need to have the school on the hook so they can hurt them financially.

But why not put the players' names in the body of the suit filing? She said she knew them. I'm guessing it has to be for some legal reason but I don't understand. These players need to be known. I would think maybe even criminal charges could be brought against them too. We're talking sexual assault here so they need to be in jail.

Thought the Baylor grad DA already decided not to pursue due to the ambiguity and the "she said" VS "multiple he saids."

he's up to his ass with the Twin Peaks shoot out, and all the lawsuits filed against him

petey88 said:

---

he's up to his ass with the Twin Peaks shoot out, and all the lawsuits filed against him

---

McLennan county is going to be broke soon

ABATTBQ11 said:

---

petey88 said:

---

he's up to his ass with the Twin Peaks shoot out, and all the lawsuits filed against him

---

McLennan county is going to be broke soon

---

Unfortunately I live in McLennan County. They are already jacking up property taxes, among other things, to try to soak the residents to cover for all the costs of all this nonsense.

Giggy Smalls said:

---

SlackerAg said:

---

They need to list the names of players

---

Is there an attorney on here familiar with Title IX civil cases that can comment on why the players' names would not be listed? I understand listing BU as the defendant so that you can receive the most amount of financial compensation for the immense pain and suffering. They need to have the school on the hook so they can hurt them financially.

But why not put the players' names in the body of the suit filing? She said she knew them. I'm guessing it has to be for some legal reason but I don't understand. These players need to be known. I would think maybe even criminal charges could be brought against them too. We're talking sexual assault here so they need to be in jail.

---

The Duke lacrosse story comes to mind. Maybe people want to be absolutely sure before they go releasing names?

I can see some parallels with Duke LAX case, and BU did have one of the 2 guys that was found guilty get that verdict overturned already.

But for all of these other Title IX rape cases, only BU is named as defendant. If you use the parallel of Sandusky and Penn State, they went after him personally (criminally) and after Penn State as an institution (civil cases). They got both "parties"

I know here we are dealing with multiple rapists, but let's get some names for these *******s. And i see previous posters points about "he said" vs "she said", and about McLennan County being overwhelmed with biker cases.

But I'm pretty sure the vast majority of sexual assault trials actual come down to accuser's word vs accused's word, and it's whoever the jury feels is more credible. I remember a prosecutor buddy of mine telling me that is how those cases are usually decided.

And on biker stuff, they still are in the process of prosecuting Oakman I know and I think 2 other players are being prosecuted too (don't remember their names).

FWIW, the one overturned is that transfer from Boise St. that briles said he didn't know about his violent past (not true according to former HC Chris Peterson, now at Washington). He supposedly is to be retried.