Randolph Duke

777,941 Views | 3764 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by goodAg80
80s Guy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Chosen One said:

Everyone raise your hand if you got a piece of that big pie, or did you pay into giving that big pie?

Seriously, I don't pay for TV anymore, If I want to watch a game, I head to my local Buffalo Wild Wing and catch it with my friends.

Listening to you guys brag about which school is making more money is akin to listening to Yankee fan brag about how much money the yankees make or how much money the Lakers make.

Don't get me wrong, I used to talk this smack all the time, I just wised up.

What next bragging about which school charges more tuition? Who pays more for season tickets?


This is akin to a guy with a 3" deek and an eternal hardon bragging that he doesn't need viagra.
MooreTrucker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
80s Guy said:

Chosen One said:

Everyone raise your hand if you got a piece of that big pie, or did you pay into giving that big pie?

Seriously, I don't pay for TV anymore, If I want to watch a game, I head to my local Buffalo Wild Wing and catch it with my friends.

Listening to you guys brag about which school is making more money is akin to listening to Yankee fan brag about how much money the yankees make or how much money the Lakers make.

Don't get me wrong, I used to talk this smack all the time, I just wised up.

What next bragging about which school charges more tuition? Who pays more for season tickets?


This is akin to a guy with a 3" deek and an eternal hardon bragging that he doesn't need viagra.
Well, TBH, if it's eternally hard, he DOESN'T need Viagra. V helps get it up, but can't make it longer or bigger.
80s Guy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It reminds of the old Eddie Murphy routine about the white guy modeling underwear in the news paper....

CajunAg86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dermdoc said:

Chosen One said:

Everyone raise your hand if you got a piece of that big pie, or did you pay into giving that big pie?

Seriously, I don't pay for TV anymore, If I want to watch a game, I head to my local Buffalo Wild Wing and catch it with my friends.

Listening to you guys brag about which school is making more money is akin to listening to Yankee fan brag about how much money the yankees make or how much money the Lakers make.

Don't get me wrong, I used to talk this smack all the time, I just wised up.

What next bragging about which school charges more tuition? Who pays more for season tickets?
Who the **** are you?


Sip. Username says it all
Squadron7
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

This is akin to a guy with a 3" deek and an eternal hardon bragging that he doesn't need Viagra.

Why are you dragging me into this?
SidetrackAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
80s Guy said:


This is akin to a guy with a 3" deek and an eternal hardon bragging that he doesn't need viagra.


Here.
Ag03 CQE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
80s Guy said:

This is akin to a guy with a 3" deek and an eternal hardon bragging that he doesn't need viagra.

He should contact a doctor immediately for that erection lasting longer than 4 hours.
Chosen One
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Seriously, for me to get the LHN, I have to either pay about 70 bucks a month to Spectrum or about 65 a month to Direct TV.

It ain't that important to me.

If your program is making good money in the SEC, then fantastic, by all means be happy, but I sure as heck won't be paying 850 bucks a year to watch the LHN or any other game again.

And for the person that asked why do I watch the game, well, last I checked the game is played in the fall between college kids, not for money but because they love the game and want a chance to play professionally.

The biggest problem with college football is that money has become the most important part, well if any of you, (speaking to all college football fans) want to give your money away for this, then I'm in no place to tell anyone how to spend their money, but I just wanted to point out that it's stupid.

And FYI, Texas is still #1 in total revenue. Now I'm off to celebrate our national championship in people buying t-shirts.
DeepEastTxAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That was the most stereotypical burnt orange post I think I've ever seen.
ac04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
you sound poor.
Bobby Petrino`s Neckbrace
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

And FYI, Texas is still #1 in total revenue.

You do understand that revenue != profit, right?
BiochemAg97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Chosen One said:



And FYI, Texas is still #1 in total revenue.


Still living in the past I see. Didn't A&M surpass Texas revenue this year what with the Kyle field renovation money?

Or are we claiming donations don't count as total revenue?

Btw, since we are talking about the revenue crown, the accounting oddity of booking revenue when it comes (now) in and booking the expense as the bonds are paid (later) doesn't come into play.
Aggie Joe 93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Apparently, we are all dupes, if we don't do all our sports broadcast viewing at the local wing place. That's what the smart people do.
BiochemAg97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aggie Joe 93 said:

Apparently, we are all dupes, if we don't do all our sports broadcast viewing at the local wing place. That's what the smart people do.
I didn't have cable for a while, just netflix/hulu. After 1 football season, figured that wasn't the best approach.

4 hour game at a local wing place or sports bar. I assume you would buy a meal and a couple of drinks, easily $20+/person. Probably closer to 30+. @ 4 games a month, the $80 cable bill and a few cases of beer is likely a better option.

I feel real sorry for the pocket book for those baseball and basketball fans.

Yeah, ok, so there are months without sports, and if all you are interested in is football, then the 4 months of football season probably isn't worth the 12 months of cable bill.
BESCo91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

if all you are interested in is football, then the 4 months of football season probably isn't worth the 12 months of cable bill.
Still worth it, IMO.
13 or 14 glorious Saturday's in the Fall.
Ahhhhh, pure bliss!
realestateguru
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Well I can see that Charles M Satterfield III medication didn't kick in this morning yet.

Quote:

The issue here is that due to a lack of education, the idiot rednecks don't understand how their stadium was financed. The **** athletics report as of January 2017 can be found here https://s3.amazonaws.com/raw.texastr...-2015-2016.pdf

Page 42 is where one can find the recap. **** supposedly had $57 million in "profits" (which, in government accounting are properly referred to as "excess revenues"), but **** also spent $57 million in "athletics related capital expenditures" after had spend $0 the previous year. This isn't difficult math. By the way, Page 42 also shows the almost $300 million in facilities debt **** owes. This doesn't include well over $100 million in additional commercial paper debt **** athletics has outstanding. And, p42 has the actual TAMU College Station endowment figure - $416.8 million. So much for **** being "the wealthiest public university in the nation."

The rednecks also don't seem to understand that no government function, public universities included, should generate any "profit." Government "profits" are more accurately referred to as "excess revenues." Government should take no more money from taxpayers than necessary to fund its activities. The notion that government activities should be conducted to generate "profit" is sheer redneck stupidity. The notion that one government function generating more excess revenues than another government function is something to be proud is more redneck stupidity. A university that matches its expenditures to its revenues is properly managed, not one that can't internally reallocate excess revenues and instead begs to the legislature for millions in additional appropriations.

**** athletics has been in debt to their academic side since 2006. They couldn't pay their bills in 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009 or 2012 so the academic side had to do without and send a total of $21 million over to athletics. That debt, currently in excess of $15 mil, has never been fully repaid and won't be repaid for at least another decade. So **** students pay higher fees, **** classrooms for more crowded, taxpayers are being asked for millions more by ****. Yet, **** athletics supposedly has in excess of $50 million in "annual profits" but refuses to repay the $15 million they owe to the academic side. That's what redneck rich gets you. $400 million in debt, but before paying their bills, they is rich because they has money still in the coin jar!

If **** was truly generating excess revenues they would have an obligation to repay the academic loan so students would benefit. They would arguably have an obligation to improve upon the experience for the students by doing things like taking their band to more than just one or two away games. They would be obligated to follow the lead of schools like Texas and LSU to send excess revenues to support academics. They would be obligated to do something responsible with the revenues, all property of the taxpayers of Texas, not property of the administrators of Texas A&M University or of Texas A&M University.

Government activities should be managed so the people are taxed only enough to fund government activities. John Sharp has come before the legislature insisting TAMU needs additional funds to help manage growth. What the legislature needs to do is cut ****'s state appropriation by $50 million. It won't hurt **** in the least as they supposedly have well in excess of $50 million in "excess profits" they can internally reallocate and their budget will balance.

The legislature's cutting ****'s state appropriation would be an exercise in responsible government. Don't hesitate to send Daniel Figurelli's post to your state representative and insist that TAMU have their funding cut to offset the "excess profits" they are generating. Responsible government. It's the non-redneck thing to do.
ABATTBQ11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BiochemAg97 said:

Aggie Joe 93 said:

Apparently, we are all dupes, if we don't do all our sports broadcast viewing at the local wing place. That's what the smart people do.
I didn't have cable for a while, just netflix/hulu. After 1 football season, figured that wasn't the best approach.

4 hour game at a local wing place or sports bar. I assume you would buy a meal and a couple of drinks, easily $20+/person. Probably closer to 30+. @ 4 games a month, the $80 cable bill and a few cases of beer is likely a better option.

I feel real sorry for the pocket book for those baseball and basketball fans.

Yeah, ok, so there are months without sports, and if all you are interested in is football, then the 4 months of football season probably isn't worth the 12 months of cable bill.


SlingTV. $20/mth, no contract, use it when you need it. You can even get SECN for only $5 more.
goodAg80
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
realestateguru said:

Well I can see that Charles M Satterfield III medication didn't kick in this morning yet.

Quote:

The issue here is that due to a lack of education, the idiot rednecks don't understand how their stadium was financed. The **** athletics report as of January 2017 can be found here https://s3.amazonaws.com/raw.texastr...-2015-2016.pdf

Page 42 is where one can find the recap. **** supposedly had $57 million in "profits" (which, in government accounting are properly referred to as "excess revenues"), but **** also spent $57 million in "athletics related capital expenditures" after had spend $0 the previous year. This isn't difficult math. By the way, Page 42 also shows the almost $300 million in facilities debt **** owes. This doesn't include well over $100 million in additional commercial paper debt **** athletics has outstanding. And, p42 has the actual TAMU College Station endowment figure - $416.8 million. So much for **** being "the wealthiest public university in the nation."

The rednecks also don't seem to understand that no government function, public universities included, should generate any "profit." Government "profits" are more accurately referred to as "excess revenues." Government should take no more money from taxpayers than necessary to fund its activities. The notion that government activities should be conducted to generate "profit" is sheer redneck stupidity. The notion that one government function generating more excess revenues than another government function is something to be proud is more redneck stupidity. A university that matches its expenditures to its revenues is properly managed, not one that can't internally reallocate excess revenues and instead begs to the legislature for millions in additional appropriations.

**** athletics has been in debt to their academic side since 2006. They couldn't pay their bills in 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009 or 2012 so the academic side had to do without and send a total of $21 million over to athletics. That debt, currently in excess of $15 mil, has never been fully repaid and won't be repaid for at least another decade. So **** students pay higher fees, **** classrooms for more crowded, taxpayers are being asked for millions more by ****. Yet, **** athletics supposedly has in excess of $50 million in "annual profits" but refuses to repay the $15 million they owe to the academic side. That's what redneck rich gets you. $400 million in debt, but before paying their bills, they is rich because they has money still in the coin jar!

If **** was truly generating excess revenues they would have an obligation to repay the academic loan so students would benefit. They would arguably have an obligation to improve upon the experience for the students by doing things like taking their band to more than just one or two away games. They would be obligated to follow the lead of schools like Texas and LSU to send excess revenues to support academics. They would be obligated to do something responsible with the revenues, all property of the taxpayers of Texas, not property of the administrators of Texas A&M University or of Texas A&M University.

Government activities should be managed so the people are taxed only enough to fund government activities. John Sharp has come before the legislature insisting TAMU needs additional funds to help manage growth. What the legislature needs to do is cut ****'s state appropriation by $50 million. It won't hurt **** in the least as they supposedly have well in excess of $50 million in "excess profits" they can internally reallocate and their budget will balance.

The legislature's cutting ****'s state appropriation would be an exercise in responsible government. Don't hesitate to send Daniel Figurelli's post to your state representative and insist that TAMU have their funding cut to offset the "excess profits" they are generating. Responsible government. It's the non-redneck thing to do.

First the legislature should reduce the Texas budget by the amount of profit claimed by The University football program over the last 50 years.
realestateguru
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You don't know what you are talking about because you are "redneck" educated.

Quote:

And on the subject of redneck rich, let's not forget about ****'s "river of cash" flowing from the SECN.

The ags have once more employed redneck math in analyzing the SECN deal and, as usual, have arrived at a comically ignorant conclusion. They is redneck rich!

Supposedly, someone gave SECN an equity valuation of $4.69 B, while BTN is only worth $1.14$ B. Yay rednecks! You redneck rich!

Setting aside the absurdity of those valuations for the moment, let's accept them at face value. In the BTN structure, the Big 10 Conference owns 49% of the equity, so in addition to receiving annual payments for their T3 rights and a profit distribution from BTN, the conference schools, by virtue of their interest in the Big 10 Conference, collective;y own 49% of the BTN equity value, which works out to an additional $35 million/school. So, Big 10 - annual T3 rights payment, BTN profit distribution, $35 million equity.

Now for the SECN. That was a revenue deal where the operating profits are shared 50% - 50% between Disney and the SEC. Neither the SEC Conference, nor any of the SEC member schools were granted an equity stake in SECN. 80% of SECN equity belongs to Disney shareholders. The other 20% belongs to shareholders of The Hearst Corporation. In exchange for providing T3 content, SEC member schools have each school received about $7 mil in 2015 and about the same on 2016, around $15 million total. Because of cord cutting, SECN is struggling to match each previous year's payout. Over the same time, Disney/ESPN has also made about $15 million from the content of each SEC member school. The conference and Disney are equal partners. Mike Slive negotiated a redneck smart deal!

Except in the SECN deal, while each school has so far received $15 million, Disney/Hearst has benefited from an additional $4.69 billion. Again, the SEC member schools don't participate at all in the SECN equity valuation. Real smart there, you hayseeds. Operating expenses are shared equally, $15 million for each school while "your trusted partner" takes an equal annual cash payment plus $4.7 billion in equity. Lol.

But our redneck farmer brethren are clueless to the fact Disney crushed them on the SECN deal. They have been patting themselves on the back, believing that Disney is giving 100% of their $4.7 billion in equity to the dumb$#@! confederate idiots. **** - dumb as $#@!, redneck rich, and damned proud of it.

Yet another example of the "value" of the **** degree. Why the state of Texas continues to fund that institution escapes me. They are some of the least educated college graduates in the nation.
Tom Doniphon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No one gives a fk. When he dies, he's left exactly dick to the world with the entirety of his obsession.

Sweet life
ac04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
remember, he's only trying to prove to his (completely real and not made up) michigan alum buddy that we're the ones who are obsessed with them. the joke is on us, he doesn't actually care. don't you get it?
titanmaster_race
How long do you want to ignore this user?
part of me feels bad for the guy; what a miserable existence it must be to spend all your free time trying to make up facts and explain away history.
GrapevineAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I don't feel bad for him at all. He made his choices. He sucks at life.
88jrt06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ode to Charles:

"And he's up against your wife, a redneck mother,
Mother who has serviced her so well,
Well, you're 55 and typin' like a maniac,
But your ex, she thinks the redneck's oh-so swell!"
JADE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
As I see it, the valuation is based on estimated future cash flow for the network as if one entity owned the entire network. Ol' Duke is wrong in saying that all the equity valuation belongs to Disney and Hearst. The SEC revenue share is included in the valuation.
JJxvi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Randolph Duke doesn't recognize the fact that the the entities that are entitled to the benefits (profits) are effectively owners of the asset or a portion of its value. He makes the same stupid argument that A&M doesnt "own" any of the PUF because we just get a share of the AUF. But the AUF is just the entity that distributes the proceeds or profits generated by the PUF. We are one of the beneficiaries of the assets, the value of the portion we get the benefits from is effectively owned by us because we ultimately have rights to the proceeds generated.
JJxvi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's not even like Hearst or whoever could hijack all that value because they have the "equity," if they decided not to pay the SEC and and its members their 50% of the profits, the value of their $4B equity stake or whatever goes down to zero because the SEC is the product, its not like they could just put Fake Alabama vs Fake Auburn on the air instead. There is no SEC network without the SEC.
SteveBott
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I stopped reading when tried to claim the AD was a government entity
RDV-1992
How long do you want to ignore this user?
From what I recall ESPN owns the SEC network, but the SEC owns the content.
BESCo91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Tom Doniphon said:

No one gives a fk. When he dies, he's left exactly dick to the world with the entirety of his obsession.
No sh-t!

His gravestone epitaph will read .....

Here lies Charles M Satterfield,
Accomplish dick.

His funeral will be the least attended funeral since Lee Harvey Oswald was buried.
schwack schwack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Seems everybody on the planet - EXCEPT him - is a redneck accountant. Are there any numbers from any source that he would take at face value?
MooreTrucker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
schwack schwack said:

Seems everybody on the planet - EXCEPT him - is a redneck accountant. Are there any numbers from any source that he would take at face value?
And worse than that, he disputes number without any follow-up numbers to back his claims (or be fact checked, which is why he doesn't show them).
goodAg80
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BESCo91 said:

Tom Doniphon said:

No one gives a fk. When he dies, he's left exactly dick to the world with the entirety of his obsession.
No sh-t!

His gravestone epitaph will read .....

Here lies Charles M Satterfield,
Accomplish dick.

His funeral will be the least attended funeral since Lee Harvey Oswald was buried.

realestateguru
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

**** counts donations to the GHW Bush Presidential Library as donations to the university. Seriously.
Once again Charles is disingenuous. The GHW library is run by NARA, constructed and maintained by the George Bush Presidential Library Foundation which is a nonprofit. They lease the property from...wait for it Texas A&M University! Shocking that A&M considers this as revenue.

D U M B A S S Accounting!
SteveBott
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
mooney69 said:

One HUNDRED years ago this month TAMC cancelled graduation ceremonies because THE ENTIRE CLASS OF 1917 was serving in World War I. No snowflakes in that class. Gig 'Em. And BTHO Kaiser Wilhelm

First Page Last Page
Page 61 of 108
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.