And no one in their right mind wants to open up the debate on PUF funding anyway. Every other University will want a cut.CanyonAg77 said:
He's definitely at least a half bubble off level. And he's a liar or can't Google. Our share of the money from the PUF also supports the Ag and Engineering Extension and Experiment systems.
p_bubel said:And no one in their right mind wants to open up the debate on PUF funding anyway. Every other University will want a cut.CanyonAg77 said:
He's definitely at least a half bubble off level. And he's a liar or can't Google. Our share of the money from the PUF also supports the Ag and Engineering Extension and Experiment systems.
While a benefit obviously, the fund isn't a large chunk of the overall budget.
p_bubel said:And no one in their right mind wants to open up the debate on PUF funding anyway. Every other University will want a cut.CanyonAg77 said:
He's definitely at least a half bubble off level. And he's a liar or can't Google. Our share of the money from the PUF also supports the Ag and Engineering Extension and Experiment systems.
While a benefit obviously, the fund isn't a large chunk of the overall budget.
twk said:That's why you have to hope it happens on a weekday. Meals on Wheels doesn't deliver on the weekend, and he might get a little ripe by the time they come around.Hood said:
Actually, no one will know.
This is not a person with friends or family.
Will he discover that there never was a relationship and declare victory?DeepEastTxAg said:
His most recent undertaking is to "sever the branch relationship between tu and A&M." What a deranged lunatic...
Not going to happen, he's too far into this fairy tale to back off now. He's claimed this for many years. Every time the lege is in session, he claims there is someone who is "about to bring a bill forward" to severe the Ag, tsip ties. Just like all his other wild ass claims, "tomorrow" or "coming soon" or "just wait" is always his answer and he gives Ags crap about "wait 'til next year.CanyonAg77 said:Will he discover that there never was a relationship and declare victory?DeepEastTxAg said:
His most recent undertaking is to "sever the branch relationship between tu and A&M." What a deranged lunatic...
Smithjg said:Not going to happen, he's too far into this fairy tale to back off now. He's claimed this for many years. Every time the lege is in session, he claims there is someone who is "about to bring a bill forward" to severe the Ag, tsip ties. Just like all his other wild ass claims, "tomorrow" or "coming soon" or "just wait" is always his answer and he gives Ags crap about "wait 'til next year.CanyonAg77 said:Will he discover that there never was a relationship and declare victory?DeepEastTxAg said:
His most recent undertaking is to "sever the branch relationship between tu and A&M." What a deranged lunatic...
For a long time, I thought his rants were hilarious and looked forward to reading his lunacy on line, it was always good for a laugh or three. I was amazed at the simple things he took time to delve into and write about, right or wrong, truth or lies. Lately though, he has shown signs that he really is losing it, I just hope when he completely goes off the deep end, he does it alone, not Whitman style in B/CS
How many falsehoods can one obsessed Charles M Satterfield III have in one post.Quote:
The reality is that the supporters of the farm school desperately wanted **** to actually be The University of Texas.
The PUF was created in 1858 when the university was originally established. Because of the Civil War, operations were never established and after the war, the PUF was down to $0.57 in cash and a bunch of IOUs whose value took years to sort out (Confederate debts had to be repudiated, the PUF held mostly Confederate debt, the legislature insisted the PUF funds were actually spent for Indian Frontier Debt, not to fund the rebellion).
When the farm school was established in 1871, its supporters had it established as a branch of the university so the school could tap into the PUF. When the farm school opened its doors in 1976, the university was still being organized and since the university wasn't in operation, the farm school supporters pushed for the university not to be made a reality and the farm school be designated The University of Texas. Governor Coke wanted nothing to do with that and shut that **** down, clearing the way for the university to become a reality.
The games played by the farm school supporters over the next few years to try to stymie the university and steal the PUF royally pissed off the supporters of the university. It was this bad blood that started the animosity between the university and the farm school. The rednecks claim it was the university supporters wanting to shut down the farm school that started it all, but that is just another **** fabrication. It was the **** directors trying to play political games to the detriment of the university that started the bad relations between the two institutions.
In short order, the farm school faction pissed off the people to the point there was significant popular demand to shut down the farm school, move its operations to Austin and turn the farm school lands into an asylum. The farm lobby was able to prevent that from happening. Then came the unsuccessful attempts to pass the constitutional amendment to end ****'s branch college status and make it an independent institution. Then Santa Rita #1 hit. After Santa Rita came in, **** remained a branch of the university, but they were more or less swept aside to wallow in the mediocrity that continues to this day.
**** missed its chance to become "Texas State University" because it remained a branch college of the university. The "Agricultural and Mechanical College of Texas" name that lasted until 1963 was such a part of their culture, they had enough trouble changing the school from "college" to "university." Had they ended their branch college status when the amendments were voted on in 1915 and again in 1919, they could have then started that chapter as the "Texas State Agricultural and Mechanical College" which would have naturally had them known as "Texas State."
You know what amazes me Charles M Satterfield III is that when you have your heart attack your life's work will mean nothing. A&M will not change one iota because of you. You will have spent thousands of hours consuming yourself on every level and guess what? Nothing will change. You are pathetic on so many levels and wrong on so many more!Quote:
Its always interesting when the idiot rednecks use fish camp fairy tales as the foundation of their argument concerning what changes will and will not be allowed.
It amazed me that the leaders of an institution of high education remove factual and historical information from managerial decisions and instead let fabrications and ignorance dictate decisions.
The **** corps unquestionably not created to train students for military service. Those idiots simply cannot wrap their minds around the fact the corps was never intended to allow civilian students to play army games.
Michigan State was the model institution for all Land Grant schools, including ****. Kansas State was the first institution created from scratch under the Land Grant Act. If neither of those schools, both which have far stronger connections to the ideals of the Land Grant Act, were created to train students for military service, how did **** supposedly get created for the express purpose of training students for military service? The answer is **** wasn't created to train students for military service. Which explains why from the founding of the school until 1918, only 702 people who graduated from aTm served in the military. This also explains why **** uses "former students" as opposed to graduates in their promotional bull$#@!. The only reason the corps was created at **** was for the farm boys who attended the school to have a standard of behavior. The other Land Grant schools didn't have to resort to the reform school tactics because they admitted a higher caliber of student than did ****. In Texas, students seeking a legitimate education were able to attend the main university in Austin.
The ags cannot wrap their little minds around the fact that their school was never intended to be a military institute and isn't today a military institute. It is a school with a ROTC program and a civilian fraternity focused on playing fake army and wearing silly costumes. But they insist any changes take into account their mission is, in their minds, to train students for military service.
If any of them ever went to the library and read about the origins of their school or of their corps (or even went to ****pedia) their little heads would asplode. They have been lied to for their entire lives about what the **** corps why it was created. But ****s don't want to learn, they want to life in a world of ignorance. Because ignorance at **** is a turdition.
Anyone else look at this photo and think his calling in life should be regional manager for Dunder Mifflin?goodAg80 said:
What a smarmy looking dill do. It makes me happy knowing he is the goofy **** that writes the **** he spews on the internet.
He also avoids follow up questions as well. He just dumps his verbal diarrhea and then books it for the door. He's the blogger version of a sucker punch.ClassOf17 said:
This dude sure does avoid sources like the plague
Quote:
He's the blogger version of a sucker punch.
More like the pile of flaming dog poo on the front porch.Wildmen03 said:He also avoids follow up questions as well. He just dumps his verbal diarrhea and then books it for the door. He's the blogger version of a sucker punch.ClassOf17 said:
This dude sure does avoid sources like the plague
