How disingenuous of him once again. He has a killer down on the 40 acres and not a peep from him. Instead the psycho spend his time slamming the Corps as a whole and not the individuals.

quote:

---

It is a seriously $#@!ed up culture that looks at possession of firearms as a crutch for their individual low self esteem problems. I have pointed out for months the **** culture thrives on perpetuating low self esteem and offering cult membership as the core of one's identity. This kid is dumb enough to make the Pope reconsider his position on abortion. He has fake military written all over him. **** was made for behavioral problems like this.

I'm guessing he signs up for the on-line poultry farming degree track, makes it about three semesters and then spends the rest of his life bleating "Once an ****, always an ****."

I defy anyone to name a single university that has done less with anything close to the level of funding **** has been allocated because of their status as a branch of The University of Texas. No other university in the nation has pissed as many billions down the drain to produce such a poorly educated group of alumni as has ****. This kid has "turdition" written all over him.

---

He is really either going to start a repeat of Whitman or die of an aneurysm!

Holy **** he's coming undone. What is he even talking about? Doesn't matter, that ***got's gonna blow soon.

Who the F is he even talking about?

He's even swinging back to the "branch of The University" BS that's been disproved dozens of times.

Branch of tu is my favorite. One school, a federal land grant college, is a branch of a State school, created decades later. Lmao.

So no Texas students posses firearms? He realizes his school is still in Texas, right?

quote:

---

So no Texas students posses firearms? He realizes his school is still in Texas, right?

---

Did Charles Whitman kill all those people with a pea shooter or a slingshot?

I honestly have no clue what he's talking about.

quote:

---

Holy **** he's coming undone. What is he even talking about? Doesn't matter, that ***got's gonna blow soon.

---

I believe he is referring to the picture of the CTs that left the dead dog on the BQ field. I do agree he is getting worse.

I feel sorry for you guys still on campus, as I agree with what many of you have stated repeatedly, this guy has "active shooter" written all over him. Someone needs to track this nut job down. Soon.

On page 143854 of their "we're not obsessed about A&M" thread on shaggggy, there is some random photo of a young man in overalls holding a shotgun. Looks like he had been dove hunting or the like. Either way they are salivating over the fact that he isn't going to tu, IS going to A&M, and tweeted about it.

That Randolph Duke dude is a menace and potential danger to society. Someone needs to start proceedings to have him committed to the Rusk State Hospital.

Thought Charles Satterfield might have hooked a hose to his tailpipe by now!

quote:

---

The ****s were claiming $20 million per school in year one at a bare minimum and stratospherically upwards after that. $28 million per school just from revenues of the SEC footprint. Its a game changer!

If the SECN is making it rain, the rain is redneck tears. SECN isn't pulling in anything close to the numbers Clay Travis promised.

Travis was claiming subscriber revenues of $400 million from year 1 just from the SEC footprint. last year, total SECN subscriber revenues nationally were barely $400 million. Add in ad sales, subtract operating expenses and they were left with $200 million to split between DIS and SEC. The $100 million SEC cut worked out to be roughly $6 mil/school (the SEC office did not take a full equal cut of SECN revenues).

ESPN is losing subscribers at a rate of about 3.5%/year, so matching Y1 SECN subscriber revenues isn't going to happen. They may make up the lost $3 million to the conference in optimized ad sales, but it would be a struggle to do so.

The ags have some redneck accounting impression that initial expenses required to launch SECN were expensed and in Y2, those expenses will not be taking away from the bottom line. They believe this adjustment will deliver them to the financial holy land.

Sadly, while capital expenses may be expensed in redneck accounting, in the real world, capital assets are purchased and either amortized or depreciated over the life of the asset. There will be no massive reduction in expenses in Y2 that results in a financial windfall to SEC schools. In reality, because ESPN launched LHN first and learned various operating lessons on a smaller scale before transferring the LHN model to SECN, SECN was launched without a lot of inflated expenses. Cutting expenses at SECN to inflate bottom line revenues isn't going to happen.

The simple truth is Clay Travis didn't have a clue what he was talking about when he was promising wildly inflated SECN numbers. Kristi Dosh was just as clueless. Their lack of integrity as "reporters" explains why they have purposely avoided the subject of actual SECN revenues.

Clay Travis learned long ago that hagiographic stories concerning **** are clickbait the idiot rednecks fall for every time. And, in the case of SECN revenues, not a single **** alumnus, nor a single **** beat writer nor a single blogger had the intellectual wherewithal to recognize the flaws in Travis' "projections."

And some people wonder why the state legislature doesn't allow **** to have their own public endowment and instead makes them rely on The University of Texas to handle such issues.

---

hey randal, how's this for redneck accounting? *****

He's going to hang himself when the SEC meetings are done over Memorial Day weekend.

Charles is at it again!

quote:

---

The reality is that it costs $30,000/yr to edumacate a student at **** and $50,000/yr to educate a student at UT Austin (yes, on average it costs in excess of $200,000 plus living expenses for each undergrad degree awarded from UT Austin).

If a student is only going to be a chicken farmer, an Ag Development or Construction Science major and they can be educated sufficiently for those careers at **** at a cost of almost $100,000 less, of course the Higher Educating Coordinating Board is going to work with the legislature to make sure the student will attend **** and not UT Austin. It's easy to have UT Austin not offer certain degrees or only offer a certain number of degrees at UT Austin and the rest have to go elsewhere. As the needs of the state economy change for certain number of degreed professionals in specific fields, the offerings at the various pubic universities are adjusted.

One reason UT Austin is exempt from the 10% rule is because the demographic composition of the leaders in any field is much more important than the demographics of the rank and file worker bees in any field. If the taxpayers are going to spend $100,000 more to educate an individual at one public university as opposed to another public university, there is no way the grads from the two schools are going to be indistinguishable. If they were, the Higher Education Coordinating Board and the legislature wouldn't be serving the interests of the taxpayers. **** just can't grasp this concept.

---

quote:

---

So... His latest Schtick is my school is more overpriced than yours?

---

Well, they are "The Joneses" and all. Have to be number one in most things, including being overpriced.

And valets, and pool cleaners. They have rested on their laurels for so long they are a punch line and don't even know it yet.

quote:

---

If a student is only going to be a chicken farmer, an Ag Development or Construction Science major

---

Just. So. Stupid.

quote:

---

Charles is at it again!

quote:

---

The reality is that it costs $30,000/yr to edumacate a student at **** and $50,000/yr to educate a student at UT Austin (yes, on average it costs in excess of $200,000 plus living expenses for each undergrad degree awarded from UT Austin).

If a student is only going to be a chicken farmer, an Ag Development or Construction Science major and they can be educated sufficiently for those careers at **** at a cost of almost $100,000 less, of course the Higher Educating Coordinating Board is going to work with the legislature to make sure the student will attend **** and not UT Austin. It's easy to have UT Austin not offer certain degrees or only offer a certain number of degrees at UT Austin and the rest have to go elsewhere. As the needs of the state economy change for certain number of degreed professionals in specific fields, the offerings at the various pubic universities are adjusted.

One reason UT Austin is exempt from the 10% rule is because the demographic composition of the leaders in any field is much more important than the demographics of the rank and file worker bees in any field. If the taxpayers are going to spend $100,000 more to educate an individual at one public university as opposed to another public university, there is no way the grads from the two schools are going to be indistinguishable. If they were, the Higher Education Coordinating Board and the legislature wouldn't be serving the interests of the taxpayers. **** just can't grasp this concept.

---

---

He's so full of ****. One, I'm not even quite sure what his point is, and two, he really has no clue why sip auto admission is below 10%. A simple Internet search proves it. For someone who claims to be such a researcher, he should know why. Hell, it only took me about 2 minutes to figure it out.

The reason sip has a less than 10% auto admission requirement is that too many students are applying, and it would take up the entire freshman class, leaving no room for discretionary admissions. So the legislature passed a law for sip so they could cap auto admissions at 75%, leaving discretionary admissions at 25%. (As an aside, Bill Powers' quid pro quo admissions were part of this 25%). This law was later extended to all secondary education institutions in Texas.

quote:

---

quote:

---

If a student is only going to be a chicken farmer, an Ag Development or Construction Science major

---

Just. So. Stupid.

---

And a not so thinly veiled swipe at Von. But the dip**** is too unbelievably stupid to realize that he has a degree in poultry science

quote:

---

So....surely with that vastly better education that no one can possibly compare to, sips should be out earning us poor stupid farmers in terms of average salary by an order of magnitude right? I mean seeing as how A&M only prepares you for less rigorous jobs than the all the captains of industry being produced at THE university there's no WAY stoopid aggsieyegs earn more than mighty By God Longhorns...right?

Can we get some statistics on that Randy? Is that something we can "measure" by?

---

I believe I addressed this already. Randy, where are those statistics I asked for?