quote:LIKELY LOST IN THE MAIL FRAUDULENTLY BY A BIASED **** MAILMAN!!!!!
I just want to know where the registered letters are this god forsaken **** tard said he was sending out.
quote:LIKELY LOST IN THE MAIL FRAUDULENTLY BY A BIASED **** MAILMAN!!!!!
I just want to know where the registered letters are this god forsaken **** tard said he was sending out.
quote:Where in the constitution does it state that Charlie Strong was allowed to lie to Malik about playing Mike LB? Where can I find the provision that allows him to make false promises to McNeal about catching the first pass against Notre Dame. Is there a clause that allows for multiple offensive coordinators to avoid legal damages from our northern neighbors?
Oh good lord! He's starting to sound like the sovereign citizen / Bundy crowd. It's just as solid legal reasoning, anyways:quote:
And as far as your comment about the requirements to establish a claim of fraud, you seem to forget TAMU is a governmental entity. The powers of the state government are limited to those granted under the state constitution. All that needs to be proven is that the trademark application was false and that when the state (the university) knowingly filed the false trademark application, doing so was outside the legal powers granted the state.
Since you are such a keen legal scholar, perhaps you can point out where the state is granted the power to knowingly file false attestations under penalty of perjury. If the filing of the trademark application was outside the powers granted the government, the trademark is in big trouble. Fraud does not have to be proven. All that needs to be proven is that the government didn't have the constitutional authority to file the application they filed.
quote:Let's not pretend here. You and he go back a couple of years. That's why he welcomed you once again to his new insane asylum (the new longhorn sports forum). If my memory serves you had a long argument with him and others on Barking Carnival. You gave him and his crackpot theories too much credit and I said so then. He then used your faux-investigative lawyering in his posts for weeks.
Also, I never wrote a post on Good Bull Hunting about this, so I don't know what you're talking about there.
quote:
1000 posts about this guy and y'all claim he's obsessed?
jesus christ
quote:It's highly entertaining. It's fun watching Charlie Brown continually run up to that football and having Lucy pull it away every time. Most people have a sense of basic human empathy for those less fortunate, but in this case, it's just straightaway perverse fun watching a human being descend to the brink of insanity. And probably beyond.
1000 posts about this guy and y'all claim he's obsessed?
jesus christ
quote:Bingo! We filed first. We had proof that the term 12th Man had been in use for several decades prior to filing. It has never been required to prove "exclusive use" to get a trademark.
The notion that you have to be the first to coin a term or even the one who uses it most prior to a trademark filing is nonsensical.
quote:
Token is just trying to remind everyone how level headed and rational he is. He's way cooler than everyone who posted on this thread.
quote:It doesn't. If you look at the documents, A&M provides "first use" dates of between 1965 and 1984 for the various types of merchandise and services using the term. How the term originated or how it was used in 1922 makes zero difference to begin with, but considering the way in which the application was filed, usage during that time in any matter doesn't even have to be proven.
I guess I have never looked at the actual trademark application, but for the life of me I can't see how it would constitute fraud.
quote:
bunch of motha****ing silky johnson's in here
quote:quote:Let's not pretend here. You and he go back a couple of years. That's why he welcomed you once again to his new insane asylum (the new longhorn sports forum). If my memory serves you had a long argument with him and others on Barking Carnival. You gave him and his crackpot theories too much credit and I said so then. He then used your faux-investigative lawyering in his posts for weeks.
Also, I never wrote a post on Good Bull Hunting about this, so I don't know what you're talking about there.
quote:
I guess I have never looked at the actual trademark application, but for the life of me I can't see how it would constitute fraud.
That Gill was called to stand at the ready in 1922 is a fact.
That Texas A&M traces its claims to the ownership of the 12thman mark is a fact.
It makes no difference if the term was heavily used from 1922 until the filing, only that we made the filing laying claim to the term and were granted ownership to the mark.
Pat Riley owns the trademark to the term three-peat. He didn't coin the term himself, but he filed for a trademark and was granted ownership of that mark.
The notion that you have to be the first to coin a term or even the one who uses it most prior to a trademark filing is nonsensical.
quote:Token drives a suped up Nissan Rogue or something...
Token is just trying to remind everyone how level headed and rational he is. He's way cooler than everyone who posted on this thread.
quote:GBH loves them some clicks...and will make fun of our school, our fans, this website and just about anybody associated with A&M if it means more knee-slapping fun addled clicks.
GBH loves them some UTx.
quote:
That's true. We'll always make fun of people doing stupid things. Pretty much the same thing I do each time you post.
quote:Have you guys ever played Mario Cart with the character "Wario?"
At least he has A supporter
quote:You two should take your pissing match elsewhere.
That's true. We'll always make fun of people doing stupid things. Pretty much the same thing I do each time you post.