Randolph Duke

778,783 Views | 3764 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by goodAg80
Hood
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
I just want to know where the registered letters are this god forsaken **** tard said he was sending out.
LIKELY LOST IN THE MAIL FRAUDULENTLY BY A BIASED **** MAILMAN!!!!!
NoneGiven
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
Oh good lord! He's starting to sound like the sovereign citizen / Bundy crowd. It's just as solid legal reasoning, anyways:

quote:
And as far as your comment about the requirements to establish a claim of fraud, you seem to forget TAMU is a governmental entity. The powers of the state government are limited to those granted under the state constitution. All that needs to be proven is that the trademark application was false and that when the state (the university) knowingly filed the false trademark application, doing so was outside the legal powers granted the state.

Since you are such a keen legal scholar, perhaps you can point out where the state is granted the power to knowingly file false attestations under penalty of perjury. If the filing of the trademark application was outside the powers granted the government, the trademark is in big trouble. Fraud does not have to be proven. All that needs to be proven is that the government didn't have the constitutional authority to file the application they filed.

Where in the constitution does it state that Charlie Strong was allowed to lie to Malik about playing Mike LB? Where can I find the provision that allows him to make false promises to McNeal about catching the first pass against Notre Dame. Is there a clause that allows for multiple offensive coordinators to avoid legal damages from our northern neighbors?

These State employees must be held accountable. When Strong swore that Texas would never have a 5 loss season again, I was constitutionally assured that this would be true.
WestAustinAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
Also, I never wrote a post on Good Bull Hunting about this, so I don't know what you're talking about there.
Let's not pretend here. You and he go back a couple of years. That's why he welcomed you once again to his new insane asylum (the new longhorn sports forum). If my memory serves you had a long argument with him and others on Barking Carnival. You gave him and his crackpot theories too much credit and I said so then. He then used your faux-investigative lawyering in his posts for weeks.
Token
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
1000 posts about this guy and y'all claim he's obsessed?

jesus christ
Wildmen03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hundreds of people with a couple of posts, or one guy with thousands of posts.

Clearly the single obsession wins here.
NoneGiven
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
1000 posts about this guy and y'all claim he's obsessed?

jesus christ
dixichkn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
1000 posts about this guy and y'all claim he's obsessed?

jesus christ
It's highly entertaining. It's fun watching Charlie Brown continually run up to that football and having Lucy pull it away every time. Most people have a sense of basic human empathy for those less fortunate, but in this case, it's just straightaway perverse fun watching a human being descend to the brink of insanity. And probably beyond.
Sea Gull
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Token is just trying to remind everyone how level headed and rational he is. He's way cooler than everyone who posted on this thread.
RM1993
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I guess I have never looked at the actual trademark application, but for the life of me I can't see how it would constitute fraud.

That Gill was called to stand at the ready in 1922 is a fact.

That Texas A&M traces its claims to the ownership of the 12thman mark is a fact.

It makes no difference if the term was heavily used from 1922 until the filing, only that we made the filing laying claim to the term and were granted ownership to the mark.

Pat Riley owns the trademark to the term three-peat. He didn't coin the term himself, but he filed for a trademark and was granted ownership of that mark.

The notion that you have to be the first to coin a term or even the one who uses it most prior to a trademark filing is nonsensical.
Aggie Joe 93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So it's NOT about fraud, it's now about Constitutional authority? Randy is this generation's Rosa Parks! Statue... Give it to him.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
The notion that you have to be the first to coin a term or even the one who uses it most prior to a trademark filing is nonsensical.
Bingo! We filed first. We had proof that the term 12th Man had been in use for several decades prior to filing. It has never been required to prove "exclusive use" to get a trademark.

The term "give 'em the hook" or "hook 'em" has been around since the days of vaudeville when bad or too lengthy acts were pulled off of the stage with a shepherd's crook.

Didn't stop the sips from applying.
NoneGiven
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
Token is just trying to remind everyone how level headed and rational he is. He's way cooler than everyone who posted on this thread.
PetroAg87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
I guess I have never looked at the actual trademark application, but for the life of me I can't see how it would constitute fraud.
It doesn't. If you look at the documents, A&M provides "first use" dates of between 1965 and 1984 for the various types of merchandise and services using the term. How the term originated or how it was used in 1922 makes zero difference to begin with, but considering the way in which the application was filed, usage during that time in any matter doesn't even have to be proven.

Duke is showing once again that he knows absolutely zero about trademark law.
Token
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bunch of motha****ing silky johnson's in here
usmcbrooks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
bunch of motha****ing silky johnson's in here


TelcoAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
quote:
Also, I never wrote a post on Good Bull Hunting about this, so I don't know what you're talking about there.
Let's not pretend here. You and he go back a couple of years. That's why he welcomed you once again to his new insane asylum (the new longhorn sports forum). If my memory serves you had a long argument with him and others on Barking Carnival. You gave him and his crackpot theories too much credit and I said so then. He then used your faux-investigative lawyering in his posts for weeks.


Let's be real here: who gives a ****?
Velvet Jones
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GBH loves them some UTx.
TelcoAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Thanks for reading!
Velvet Jones
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Keep it up! You guys are almost at the EDSBS level!
StephenvilleAg77
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
I guess I have never looked at the actual trademark application, but for the life of me I can't see how it would constitute fraud.

That Gill was called to stand at the ready in 1922 is a fact.

That Texas A&M traces its claims to the ownership of the 12thman mark is a fact.

It makes no difference if the term was heavily used from 1922 until the filing, only that we made the filing laying claim to the term and were granted ownership to the mark.

Pat Riley owns the trademark to the term three-peat. He didn't coin the term himself, but he filed for a trademark and was granted ownership of that mark.

The notion that you have to be the first to coin a term or even the one who uses it most prior to a trademark filing is nonsensical.


That is all true.

Just like it is indisputably true that A&M's dob is in 1876 and our lil brother sip's dob is in 1883.

It is entertaining to repeatedly watch lil bro' paint themselves into corners.
Rusty GCS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The days come and go and my google alert for "Texas A&M" keeps disappointing me every morning
leftcoastaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So let me get this straight. Now that the Blue custody battle is over, we get to keep the 12th Man trademark? Is that right?
ClassOf17
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Has he ever sent his letters to the Attorney General and all that to diminish their careers like he said he would?

This is like a reality show.. So stupid and pointless that it's funny and you can't stop watching
Credible Source
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think my favorite part in all of this will be watching the Colts lawyers have their (laughs hysterically) Bar cards revoked for (deep breaths, more hysterical laughing) unethically allowing public officials to perpetuate fraud! That ***** won't know what hit her! She just thought she surrendered her case to a proven and well defensed trademark. But really, she helped people commit fraud because some guy said some **** on a radio play 80 years ago. She gonna wake up tomorrow and realize she got aspergered DUKED!
NoneGiven
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
How is Sharon Isreal still employed? The men that died at Goliad and The Alamo deserve better!
HtownAg92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Right now Sharon Israel, Judge Sim Lake, John Sharp, Rick Perry, Robert Gates, the BOR, the Federal Patent Office, the AG of the United States, the Southern District of Texas and 5th Circuit, the NFL and the ancestors of Davy Crockett and Sam Houston are hunkered down and collectively "sh**ting their pants", waiting for the inevitable CNN and Al Jazeera breaking news that will bring them down.
WestAustinAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
Token is just trying to remind everyone how level headed and rational he is. He's way cooler than everyone who posted on this thread.
Token drives a suped up Nissan Rogue or something...
WestAustinAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
GBH loves them some UTx.
GBH loves them some clicks...and will make fun of our school, our fans, this website and just about anybody associated with A&M if it means more knee-slapping fun addled clicks.
TelcoAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That's true. We'll always make fun of people doing stupid things. Pretty much the same thing I do each time you post.
"...you are a big shot Twitter personality." - WestAustinAg
Hood
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Collective
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
That's true. We'll always make fun of people doing stupid things. Pretty much the same thing I do each time you post.
Aggie Joe 93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Poor Randy's cigar is going to decay before he can smoke it.
Brazos Ag 1970
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
At least he has A supporter


Have you guys ever played Mario Cart with the character "Wario?"
Phatbob
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I am wondering how he is going to be able to get the Cigar away from Jay Norvell now that he's moved to Arizona State... that should be his next focus.
ebdb_bnb
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
That's true. We'll always make fun of people doing stupid things. Pretty much the same thing I do each time you post.
You two should take your pissing match elsewhere.
First Page Last Page
Page 30 of 108
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.