Stock Markets

26,311,555 Views | 236430 Replies | Last: 41 min ago by zgolfz85
El_duderino
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And now NVDA hosting a quantum day. You can't make this up

https://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/gtc-2025-quantum-day/
flashplayer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
El_duderino said:

And now NVDA hosting a quantum day. You can't make this up

https://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/gtc-2025-quantum-day/


I called this **** the day it happened.
BucketofBalls99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
El_duderino said:

And now NVDA hosting a quantum day. You can't make this up

https://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/gtc-2025-quantum-day/

If it can make the stock go up, who cares
EnronAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If Elon did what Jensen did, they'd charge him with market manipulation.
plowe32
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That was helpful. Thanks hargegrok!
zgolfz85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I feel like the quantum quote was completely scripted and planned for. That was some insane market manipulation. Thankfully I didn't chicken out and held most of my stuff, but did sell off half my RGTI (only to see it quickly bounce back). I hate how baseless stock price movement is sometimes…more like all the time. A single quote from a single player sends quantum tanking for a week on one dude' opinion….an opinion that was his and his alone and not widely shared amongst his peers. So stupid.
Heineken-Ashi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
zgolfz85 said:

I feel like the quantum quote was completely scripted and planned for. That was some insane market manipulation. Thankfully I didn't chicken out and held most of my stuff, but did sell off half my RGTI (only to see it quickly bounce back). I hate how baseless stock price movement is sometimes…more like all the time. A single quote from a single player sends quantum tanking for a week on one dude' opinion….an opinion that was his and his alone and not widely shared amongst his peers. So stupid.
Different take - quantum stocks had been pumping on nothing but baseless sentiment to obscene levels. At best, they needed a breather, and Jensen was merely the catalyst. If not him, something else would have happened and been blamed. At worst, what you saw today and maybe with a little continuation is nothing but a relief bounce before they fall farther.
zgolfz85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Heineken-Ashi said:

zgolfz85 said:

I feel like the quantum quote was completely scripted and planned for. That was some insane market manipulation. Thankfully I didn't chicken out and held most of my stuff, but did sell off half my RGTI (only to see it quickly bounce back). I hate how baseless stock price movement is sometimes…more like all the time. A single quote from a single player sends quantum tanking for a week on one dude' opinion….an opinion that was his and his alone and not widely shared amongst his peers. So stupid.
Different take - quantum stocks had been pumping on nothing but baseless sentiment to obscene levels. At best, they needed a breather, and Jensen was merely the catalyst. If not him, something else would have happened and been blamed. At worst, what you saw today and maybe with a little continuation is nothing but a relief bounce before they fall farther.


Yeah I don't disagree. It's just funny that a singular quote from a conference that was a rare opinion can wipe out billions in an industry's aggregate market cap for a few days. Agreed that they were looking for any catalyst to get a breather. If it were a collective of industry experts unanimously voicing that opinion at CES, that would make a lot more sense. I know NVDA is the sacred cow right now, but always amazes me how fragile the market is over silliness. But hey, if the market moved based on stuff that actually made sense, we'd all be rich af.
Heineken-Ashi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This seems insane, but UPST might hit $115-$120 within a month or two.

August 5th low - $19.95. Earnings Aug 6th.
August 29th post earnings high - $45.54 - over 2x

Nov 4th low - $47.11. Earnings Nov 7th.
Nov 11th post earnings high - $86.07 - nearly 2x

Jan 13 low - $55.20. Earnings Feb 11th.
Post earnings high - $119

Maybe it comes lower one more time before earnings. But the wave count fits the earnings schedules and I have a target cluster overhead.

Consider this on the 25 in 25 list. And GTFO if it comes to fruition.

Heineken-Ashi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Boom TSM! Just hang on until morning. $220 right now.
Heineken-Ashi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SMR - Add it to the 25 list and buy under $15, ideally under $12. Target range is big, because we're looking in log mode and I don't like to hone in on one level super high above, so I'll say $47-$72.

Greendale 87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Great call on this one. Like the chart so bought in late yesterday. Thanks for the heads up!!
BucketofBalls99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Heineken-Ashi said:

TSM earnings in the morning. If you joined on the play for the potential upside, it pretty much needs to happen tomorrow. I will be prepared to exit the shares should it spike to $230 somehow.

TSM already up to $215 in pre-mkt
Heineken-Ashi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Heineken-Ashi said:

Heineken-Ashi said:

TSM $206-$209 range and you buy it with stop at $202. Then you will sell between $225 and $230 before earnings. If it plays along leading up to it, the Friday or Monday before earnings you will buy Jan 31 or Feb 7 $200, $205, or $210 puts (wont know the best r/r until we get closer, if we get closer) looking for $195 by expiration. Hopefully we can make some money off this last push and then make a lot more money on the reversal while everyone else is looking in the wrong direction.
$209 was hit.

Zoom out. This is the cycle it is working on completing.



Notice that it is in the 5th wave. Also notice that the 5th wave is not as impulsive, with each move showing heavy volatility and overlap with fourth wave crossing into the territory of the first. That means it's an ending diagonal. I've discussed these a bunch recently. It means bulls are in control but they are failing to move the stock upward with the same force and are unable to stretch it upward before getting slammed back. So zooming in on that..



Not only is the entire 5th wave an ending diagonal, but the (c) wave inside of the 5th wave inside of the larger 5th is setting up as an ending diagonal. I foresaw this yesterday and told you to watch for $205-$209 region and we are here now. The overlap confirms it.



Why does this have me so convicted on both timing and direction? Because when ending diagonals complete they almost always reverse 75%-100% of their structure within the same timeframe that it took them to complete or quicker. For the smaller one, the trendline would have the next move up to $230 complete before earnings. If so, the reversal would take through the first days of February at the very longest, targeting $190-$195.



The larger ED that started back on Aug 5th would take through June and would target $130-$155.



So that's why I say go long here. If it fails to move up one more time, you get stopped for a small loss. But if the thesis plays out, you will gain $20 per share over the next week. And as that final top approaches, we want to position for the end of month reversal by buying puts that would profit handsomely on a reversal to $195, knowing that it could easily stretch lower. But we will want to grab those puts as early as this Friday as earnings volatility will pick up and options will get expensive into next week.

Stay tuned. This still has to go UP one more time before the plan to profit from the downside can be realized.


Don't forget what the plan was on TSM. Once it approaches target, I will be selling and assessing the options chain looking for the best R/R puts for a $190-$195 target below, likely February. If it fails to get over $222 early January high, it CAN breakdown without getting to our target. Moving stop up to $214 as I don't want green to red.
zgolfz85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Damn wish I'd have taken this play
Ag92NGranbury
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Interesting observation....

Over the past few months, we have had so many bankers reach out to us for commercial loans or deposits. I'd say about 20 of them - and ones that we have never talked to before. They are being super aggressive as well in just setting up a meeting.

I've been here 2 decades and have never seen this much interest in local bankers.

So... the questions are...

Do they have too much cash that they need higher interest rate loans?

Are their ratio's off?

Is the banking industry seeing something that we aren't seeing yet?

Just an observation in a behavior change with local banks... (bigger banks as well)
cgh1999
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag92NGranbury said:

Interesting observation....

Over the past few months, we have had so many bankers reach out to us for commercial loans or deposits. I'd say about 20 of them - and ones that we have never talked to before. They are being super aggressive as well in just setting up a meeting.

I've been here 2 decades and have never seen this much interest in local bankers.

So... the questions are...

Do they have too much cash that they need higher interest rate loans?

Are their ratio's off?

Is the banking industry seeing something that we aren't seeing yet?

Just an observation in a behavior change with local banks... (bigger banks as well)
I recently left banking after a 20+ year career. Following the failure of Silicon Valley Bank (and others) in early 2023, the game changed. In my opinion (and following conversations with executives at banks from $1B in assets to $200B both public and private), the regulators are pushing banks to be more homogenous.

A buddy of mine is the CEO of a privately held bank with over 100 years of history. They've lived around 50-55% loan to deposit ratio. Their regulators are "encouraging" them to do more loans, particularly in commercial (non Real Estate). They'd like for them to lend closer to 80% of their deposits.

Other banks have historically been 95% loan to deposit and are now in the 80% range.

Deposits flocked to big banks or other places when the market got "scary". Banks that needed the deposits had to start paying higher interest rates. It significantly impacted the net interest margin for many of them with large securities portfolios and/or fixed rate loan portfolio.

The lesson learned is that diversity of your banks assets were more important than many had considered. EVERY bank I know is hiring business bankers that typically focus on businesses with revenues of $1 - $20MM. These clients typically have "sticky" deposits, come with a relationship with the owner, and have modest loan requests. Banks are also getting more active in searching for retail deposits for the same reason. It gives them stability to go to larger loans.

Additonally, the "easy" growth loans for banks (investor real estate) are harder and harder to get done. The cost to build anything has risen and the ability to increase rents has plateaued and may even be declining in some markets. Between additional equity requirements to make the project "pencil", existing RE "problems", etc the growth engines for the Banks have slowed significantly.

I think the end result will be increased M&A over the next few years. There are over 25 banks in Texas (that i'm aware of) that have older management that had expected to be sold already and because premiums were virtually non-existent they can't/won't sell. Now they have a succession problem. They'll ultimately try to "partner" up with another bank/management team to lower their costs and try to drive value for the next bite at the apple.
MavsAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Super interesting. Appreciate the insight.

My OFS business did $27M in revenue last year and will do $40M+ this year, but banks won't give us the time of day. The big guys certainly don't care about us and the one we are with now barely acknowledges us. Do you think we have a bad bank or is it because we are a young OFS company?
cgh1999
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MavsAg said:

Super interesting. Appreciate the insight.

My OFS business did $27M in revenue last year and will do $40M+ this year, but banks won't give us the time of day. The big guys certainly don't care about us and the one we are with now barely acknowledges us. Do you think we have a bad bank or is it because we are a young OFS company?
I only knew about 2-3 banks that "liked" OFS. They turned down every deal i referred to them over the last 5+ years. The only deals I know that got done were larger and either publicly traded or backed by significant private equity or family office sponsors.

Independents have had a challenge finding bank financing in recent years.

tysker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

The lesson learned is that diversity of your banks assets were more important than many had considered. EVERY bank I know is hiring business bankers that typically focus on businesses with revenues of $1 - $20MM. These clients typically have "sticky" deposits, come with a relationship with the owner, and have modest loan requests. Banks are also getting more active in searching for retail deposits for the same reason. It gives them stability to go to larger loans.
This reads like BofA's growth strategy from the early to mid-00s. Get as much AUM in-house as possible. That included the purchase of Merrill. Do you think we'll see similar acquisition strategies? Of course, the players will be different and much differently sized, but could mid-sized regional banks start to acquire brokers or regional asset managers,
MavsAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
cgh1999 said:

MavsAg said:

Super interesting. Appreciate the insight.

My OFS business did $27M in revenue last year and will do $40M+ this year, but banks won't give us the time of day. The big guys certainly don't care about us and the one we are with now barely acknowledges us. Do you think we have a bad bank or is it because we are a young OFS company?
I only knew about 2-3 banks that "liked" OFS. They turned down every deal i referred to them over the last 5+ years. The only deals I know that got done were larger and either publicly traded or backed by significant private equity or family office sponsors.

Independents have had a challenge finding bank financing in recent years.


Thanks. That was my suspicion.
cgh1999
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
tysker said:

Quote:

The lesson learned is that diversity of your banks assets were more important than many had considered. EVERY bank I know is hiring business bankers that typically focus on businesses with revenues of $1 - $20MM. These clients typically have "sticky" deposits, come with a relationship with the owner, and have modest loan requests. Banks are also getting more active in searching for retail deposits for the same reason. It gives them stability to go to larger loans.
This reads like BofA's growth strategy from the early to mid-00s. Get as much AUM in-house as possible. That included the purchase of Merrill. Do you think we'll see similar acquisition strategies? Of course, the players will be different and much differently sized, but could mid-sized regional banks start to acquire brokers or regional asset managers,
They could, but the smaller banks always end up screwing that stuff up. I think the comments above reflect more of what you'll see in the next few years. Banks are trying to get away from flashy / aggressive growth and will be focused on core business.
Chef Elko
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Not trying to hijack the thread too much but I started in commercial banking, went to an E&P, now possibly looking to jump back into commercial banking now that I have oil annd gas experience. Is oil and gas commercial banking dead and everything has moved to private equity / private credit deals?
cgh1999
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Chef Elko said:

Not trying to hijack the thread too much but I started in commercial banking, went to an E&P, now possibly looking to jump back into commercial banking now that I have oil annd gas experience. Is oil and gas commercial banking dead and everything has moved to private equity / private credit deals?
There are still banks that will do reserve based lending, but i'm not greatly familiar with all the players.
Chef Elko
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Thanks! Yeah we work with a few but man the pool of lenders shrunk by a good amount. Not fun seeing that with oil and gas lending as a career path.
cgh1999
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Chef Elko said:

Thanks! Yeah we work with a few but man the pool of lenders shrunk by a good amount. Not fun seeing that with oil and gas lending as a career path.
I spoke with a friend who is a well established head hunter in the banking space. He told me that he could place a middle market lender at 10 banks tomorrow if they're halfway decent. If you're open to going back to general commercial, let me know. I can help make some connections for you.
Heineken-Ashi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TSM needs to get going, otherwise, there's a setup to take it to $205. Stop is $213.
Greendale 87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Looks like I finally did something right bailing on $TSM at 220.

Will watch this a bit for a put opportunity. Thanks again for the heads up on this play!
Heineken-Ashi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PLTR - Getting close to invalidating the one more low potential. I need $72.50 and then a hold of $65 range on any retracement.
Chef Elko
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I appreciate the help my friend! I'll be sure to reach out if/when it's time to move back to banking.
HoustonAg2014
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
While on the topic, my company does private loans on real estate (I deal with more of the commercial real estate side, land, retail, office, hospitality, ect). Always open to helping on projects or if someone is getting pushed out from a bank on their real estate and needs a home for it, we do a lot of that!
Heineken-Ashi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BTC could take off at any time. We finally have a reliable bullish setup. Support comes in between $93.5k and $96.275k. No guarantee it even falls into that range. BTC tends to have shallow retracements in bulls. Today's low is immediate support. This setup projects to $120k-$130k. I'm layering in to IBIT in my account that I have no exposure as a trading position. If we can get under $95, I'll likely buy March ATM calls as well.
Heineken-Ashi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HoustonAg2014 said:

While on the topic, my company does private loans on real estate (I deal with more of the commercial real estate side, land, retail, office, hospitality, ect). Always open to helping on projects or if someone is getting pushed out from a bank on their real estate and needs a home for it, we do a lot of that!
Have you talked to Jamie at Red Pear?
frankm01
How long do you want to ignore this user?
H-A, thoughts on UPS?

Earnings at end of the month and stock has been up the last few days. I know you don't always look at external forces, but fires in Cali must have some effect on earnings. Where's this going?

TIA
Heineken-Ashi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
frankm01 said:

H-A, thoughts on UPS?

Earnings at end of the month and stock has been up the last few days. I know you don't always look at external forces, but fires in Cali must have some effect on earnings. Where's this going?

TIA
Hadn't looked in a while. I think it might have bottomed in an ED, though I had $116 range as my expected low. Pretty dang close. You can use $116 as stop.

If bottom is in, the reversal is targeting $160-$165 anytime before March 2026.

First Page Last Page
Page 6727 of 6756
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.