Agree it could go either way on quad witching...but I'm calling rocket ship up...as just about every day seems to close strong...Fed just threw jet fuel on this thing a couple days ago...
Welcome to the clubhouse.tlh3842 said:
For ProgN and the other pros on here that have suggested pulling out to walk with some gains and not worry about finding the top, are you including everything (I've got QQQM and SWPPX) or just the individual stocks you've been riding up?
Totally new here and trying to soak in what I can without letting too much go over my head. It's been a nice new months, so wouldn't mind taking some official profit I'd it makes sense.
ETA: No retirement, all taxable and cash I've hand on hand in HYSAs before jumping in
If you already have a good cash position that you can put to use when the market pullbacks, then I would not sell those 2. Just leave them alone.ktownag08 said:
Would you guys hold big names like AAPL and AMZN or liquidate those as well? I've already got a decent cash position, but the big players on this thread are indeed making me nervous...
OA's approach would probably be better but I'm reluctant to recommend any use of options. Covered calls or buying protective puts are conservative moves to protect gains but in my experience it leads some to take on more riskier behavior.ktownag08 said:
Would you guys hold big names like AAPL and AMZN or liquidate those as well? I've already got a decent cash position, but the big players on this thread are indeed making me nervous...
ktownag08 said:
Would you guys hold big names like AAPL and AMZN or liquidate those as well? I've already got a decent cash position, but the big players on this thread are indeed making me nervous...
Quote:
How the Federal Reserve gets the money to fund the U.S. national debt has abruptly changed in the last few weeks. The Fed has effectively "pawned" more than a trillion dollars of its most valuable assets - its ownership of U.S. Treasury obligations - through its use of reverse repurchase agreements, pledging the Treasuries as collateral to get the cash to continue to fund the federal government.
This massive pledging of assets to raise money is occurring with unprecedented size and speed. However, many people are unable to see what is happening because they are "watching the wrong crime drama". There is a popular but mistaken belief that the Federal Reserve is using a printing press to fund the government, with the new dollars simply being printed, or created from nothing with a few electronic keystrokes.
Quote:
To extend the pawnshop analogy a step further, the Fed borrowed the money to buy the collateral in the first place, call it the "guitars", and it didn't use a pawnshop, but a credit card, where it hadn't pledged the guitars as collateral. There are problems with the credit card, but the Fed still wants to keep buying guitars. So now, the Fed is pledging the guitars it had bought with the credit card, to take out new secured loans at the pawnshop, to keep the cash coming for buying still more "guitars".
Substitute "U.S. Treasury bonds and notes" for "guitars", and replace the pawnshop with the institutional fixed income marketplace, and the same financial principles apply. The Federal Reserve ran up an enormous amount of debt to increase its ownership of the national debt to over $5 trillion, at least temporary strains are developing with its unsecured borrowings, so the Fed is now taking the assets it bought with borrowed money, and pledging them as collateral to borrow the money to fund still more of the national debt.
Quote:
The numbers involved are so vast as to seem incomprehensible, but it seems like the reaction of the average person at this point - and average investor - is to say "so what?". OK, so it was yet another trillion dollars (yawn), that came from somewhere almost no one understands - who cares?
Quote:
Of course, the time will come when with 20/20 hindsight it will be blindingly obvious just how crazy things got in the early 2020s. The time will come when any person with even a scrap of common sense should have seen that investment markets and currencies that are based on a central bank borrowing unprecedented - but limited - sums of money to finance unprecedented - but unlimited - increases in the national debt would turn out to be one of the worst financial mistakes of all time. It will be abundantly clear with hindsight that having all of one's retirement savings invested in assets that are dependent on the indefinite continuation of these artificial and highly elevated markets would eventually turn out to be the mistake of a lifetime.
The issue is that we aren't living in that time, we're living in the time we are in.
Human nature is that it is just really hard for the average person to go from the times we are currently in, to the place that we are likely going. Human nature and confirmation bias can make it almost impossible for an average person to see what could be called a mass financial illusion. Now, if that illusion is being very actively supported by the most powerful elements of the government and the banking system - as it is - and if it has been in place for long enough to seem normal - as it has - then piercing that facade is going to be very difficult, and therefore will not happen for most people.
Quote:
An analogy for what has been explored in this analysis could be seeing a floor to ceiling crack develop on the back side of a concrete column, in the parking garage beneath a condominium complex - that hadn't been there the week before. Indeed, if we take another look at the "Fed Reverse Repos" graph, that is exactly what the recent weeks look like, an unprecedented crack leaping almost straight upwards.
The crack will not be seen by most. They may drive by it every day. Lives will be lived above it. It will seem entirely irrelevant. This could go on for quite a period of time, perhaps for years. But yet, major cracks like that shouldn't suddenly appear in a structurally sound building, and such a crack appearing has information value when it comes to the eventual future of the building.
The Federal Reserve effectively pawning about a trillion dollars of its ownership of the national debt in order to raise a trillion dollars in new money from new sources within about three months is a major new crack in the structural foundation of our financial system, that didn't exist before the spring of 2021. It simply didn't exist - but now it does.
You are one of the people that should have an easier time understanding. I offer up this second piece of reading for everyone, as I think it's more of a background to the first piece, and even more crucial to understanding where we are, why the way it was can not be brought back, and that we are ultimately 100% screwed. It's very sobering and makes you ask the question.. "when I sell my holdings and move to 100% cash in my investment account, a cash account hosted by the brokerage, will that value even be attainable? Will it even be that value when the Ponzi scheme eventually ends?"Red Pear Luke (BCS) said:
Thanks Heineken! Going to book mark it to read this afternoon.
Heineken-Ashi said:
This, my friends, is why you need to be stacking metals and Bitcoin as a hedge against the financial system. Not because it will happen tomorrow, next month, or next year. But because it will happen. And if you are unprepared, you will be decimated.
Heineken-Ashi said:You are one of the people that should have an easier time understanding. I offer up this second piece of reading for everyone, as I think it's more of a background to the first piece, and even more crucial to understanding where we are, why the way it was can not be brought back, and that we are ultimately 100% screwed. It's very sobering and makes you ask the question.. "when I sell my holdings and move to 100% cash in my investment account, a cash account hosted by the brokerage, will that value even be attainable? Will it even be that value when the Ponzi scheme eventually ends?"Red Pear Luke (BCS) said:
Thanks Heineken! Going to book mark it to read this afternoon.
This, my friends, is why you need to be stacking metals and Bitcoin as a hedge against the financial system. Not because it will happen tomorrow, next month, or next year. But because it will happen. And if you are unprepared, you will be decimated.
Counterfeiters, Con Men, Mass Illusions & Funding The National Debt by Daniel Amerman
That's exactly what I was referring to. I f'ing hate Schwab's website and only keep a small trading account there for TOS. I emailed them several times and said they'd have been better off keeping TDA platform/website and just change the name to Schwab and green to blue. Having to hit "refresh" on their website is bull**** in today's world.El_duderino said:
Something like ToS from Schwab for their paper trading for a few months before touching any real money trades? (I'm 95% just buy and hold index funds, this would be just small fart around with money in my case)
Did you read the articles?Brian Earl Spilner said:
What exactly do you think will happen?
Correct, TD is now Schwab and I hate the Schwab website platform.El_duderino said:
TD would be Schwab now though isn't it?
Yes, and their library of educational videos is excellent.El_duderino said:
Yeah that's what I thought. TOS is good though isn't it?
There really is no going back. And a massive rate dropping is only going to fuel a problem that really doesn't have much room to get worse (which is why I've been warning for over a year on here that any attempt to pump stimulus into the system, whether it be through printing press or alternative means outlined in the article, will only kick the can down the road, and every time they kick the can, the road gets exponentially shorter until the next event). The article outlines how this almost happened a couple years ago and it was only the FED using powers given to them in 2008 and firing up an alternative method to short term stimulate the system (reverse repos) that the big crash hasn't happened already. And that was before the banking scare earlier this year that kicked that same stimulus method into a hyperdrive that we wouldn't have believed 2 years ago. Like the article says..Brian Earl Spilner said:
Yeah
Quote:
In the meantime, people believe the government can just create and spend trillions at will, with the money effectively coming from nowhere - but nothing bad happening to them individually as a result. The eyes glaze over and people even stop paying attention. Another trillion dollar deficit over the course of a few months? So what, big deal. The Fed just funded $3 trillion, and then $4 trillion, and then $5 trillion of the national debt? Who cares, they can obviously do it and nothing bad is happening.
The simple act of following the dollars and seeing that there is no magic flow of free money but rather every dollar is being borrowed - is enough to shatter the mass illusion for any reasonable adult. There are no limitless dollars, or even a limitless printing press. It is a new risk every time a new fifty or hundred billion dollars is needed, and getting every additional hundred billion is riskier than the hundred billion before it. The victims (that's all of us) do take another entirely real additional hundred billion dollar round of damage every time a new hundred billion is borrowed and then locked away in the national debt, never to be repaid.
Now, as discussed in the analysis linked here, the "crimes" can merge. If a government is running a shell game, and the moment comes when the game is about to end, then as a government it can indeed flick on the printing presses (or the electronic version thereof) and move to just straight up pure monetary creation to repay the debts. If that happens, then the move to running a printing press will indeed change all of our lives - with the irony being that the people watching printing press dramas may never realize what just happened, when it finally does happen.
Whatever the direction - there is no path back to where we were, too much has happened and too fast. The old normal no longer exists, so much has changed in the last fifteen months that there is no path back to the old normal, or at least not while keeping the current nature and value of the U.S. dollar. This also means that any financial plans that are dependent on the continuance of the former normal - may not fit with what is happening now and what is on the way.
Red Pear Luke (BCS) said:
Fellas I'm in too deep on the bourbon.
Some tell me, can you trade bourbon futures? Or is that too much of a "whisky" bet?
Charismatic Megafauna said:Heineken-Ashi said:
This, my friends, is why you need to be stacking metals and Bitcoin as a hedge against the financial system. Not because it will happen tomorrow, next month, or next year. But because it will happen. And if you are unprepared, you will be decimated.
Plata o plomo?