it would have to be field treated and dehydrated and there would still be a condensate issue.Bibendum 86 said:
That project is to move wet gas out of the Permian. That's an entirely different prospect than processing in basin and exporting the liquids and residue from there, and I am highly skeptical this gets built in that configuration.
And condensate will be an interesting operational hurdle. Alliance was able to solve it, but there's lots more infrastructure in the Permian these days than McMurry in 2000.Ragoo said:it would have to be field treated and dehydrated and there would still be a condensate issue.Bibendum 86 said:
That project is to move wet gas out of the Permian. That's an entirely different prospect than processing in basin and exporting the liquids and residue from there, and I am highly skeptical this gets built in that configuration.
GentrysMillTX10 said:
Anyone know where to get a better map of this pipeline project? We are landowners in Mills county and this is the only map provided in the letter we received in the mail. There's no way to tell if it is actually on, borders, and/or will divide our property. We have reached out to the provided contacts this week with no success. Any help will be appreciated
What he saidaduey06 said:
I think if there is not an NGL takeaway at each compressor station you will have to have slug catcher and then blow case or pump it down the pipeline. Putting a stabilizer at all those multiple points seems excessive. Unless they are going to pig daily and keep any liquid hold up to a minimal. Some equipment company is going to have a nice project with a bunch of auto launchers. I still don't see why they are trying to move the rich gas unless they really will bypass the Waha deduct or there is a ton of spare capacity in Louisiana. It originates in loving county so I have to think most of that acreage is already dedicated to processing in the area. If they were avoiding FERC to get gas out of the basin I could understand but they are still crossing state lines so need FERC approval.
aduey06 said:
I think if there is not an NGL takeaway at each compressor station you will have to have slug catcher and then blow case or pump it down the pipeline. Putting a stabilizer at all those multiple points seems excessive. Unless they are going to pig daily and keep any liquid hold up to a minimal. Some equipment company is going to have a nice project with a bunch of auto launchers. I still don't see why they are trying to move the rich gas unless they really will bypass the Waha deduct or there is a ton of spare capacity in Louisiana. It originates in loving county so I have to think most of that acreage is already dedicated to processing in the area. If they were avoiding FERC to get gas out of the basin I could understand but they are still crossing state lines so need FERC approval.
nosoupforyou said:
Nat Gas up to $2.21!! What's that all about?
Can it sustain above $2?
Freeport LNG back online, 2Bcf/d demand - Production drop from 104Bcf/d to 97Bcf/d - helping to rebalance storage.Comeby! said:nosoupforyou said:
Nat Gas up to $2.21!! What's that all about?
Can it sustain above $2?
I wish I knew what was driving it, but I'll take it.
I mean if a bunch of old retiring oil field operators convinced some random PE to back small, old assets in brazos county on the idea these super sharp PE guys could flip it - more power to them.Cyp0111 said:
Yes, its always that but they;re backed by PE and sooner or later you have to exit to bring forward the value to get the hurdle/payout for mgmt.
With that, curious on how new mgmt. teams are looking at profit splits given change in market dynamics.
Double Eagle is always for sale. FANG would make sense, they could get it done.jetch17 said:
anyone heard the rumor or Diamondback making a move on Double Eagle? Surely not with the pending EER merger?
pure rumor mill.
one MEEN Ag said:I mean if a bunch of old retiring oil field operators convinced some random PE to back small, old assets in brazos county on the idea these super sharp PE guys could flip it - more power to them.Cyp0111 said:
Yes, its always that but they;re backed by PE and sooner or later you have to exit to bring forward the value to get the hurdle/payout for mgmt.
With that, curious on how new mgmt. teams are looking at profit splits given change in market dynamics.
I think it's more lucrative than that. They have some very long laterals in BrazCo and there still plenty pumped there. Granted, a lot of this went in during the early to mid 2010s.one MEEN Ag said:I mean if a bunch of old retiring oil field operators convinced some random PE to back small, old assets in brazos county on the idea these super sharp PE guys could flip it - more power to them.Cyp0111 said:
Yes, its always that but they;re backed by PE and sooner or later you have to exit to bring forward the value to get the hurdle/payout for mgmt.
With that, curious on how new mgmt. teams are looking at profit splits given change in market dynamics.
