one MEEN Ag said:At its base level, IEA doesn't gain anything by reporting accurately and doesn't suffer any consequences for being wrong. Your supermajors have their own internal models and trackers, your minor players are beholden to the price makers in trading and just use the commodity prices.nu awlins ag said:
"IEA and OPEC are engaged in a battle of the experts, but the market always gives more credence to OPEC since this is the group that actually produces and trades oil, and therefore has better market insight," Manish Raj, managing direct at Velandera Energy Partners, told CNBC.
For those concerned with supply/demand for 2024. I believe the IEA is always more politically driven than anyone else.
OPEC is incentivized to push numbers that increase the price of oil. IEA is incentivized to push numbers that decrease the price of oil. Being in oil is like being a landlord, whats good for you isn't seen as whats good for the largest swath of lowest information voters. Everyone always talks their book. IEA is allowed to be wrong in ways that reduce oil prices.
Well, I have spread sheet covering 10 years that points in a more political direction is terms of their weekly reporting. You can't and shouldn't be that off like they are. If my estimates were that off, I wouldn't have a job. OPEC protects their own but their numbers a way more valid than the IEA's numbers. You can't be wrong 63% of the time on your estimates. Traders use this as a signal as I'm sure you know. I trust the data from OPEC more than the IEA.