***** 2024 Houston Astros Season Thread ***** [Staff Warning]

3,947,082 Views | 67710 Replies | Last: 4 days ago by jkag89
tjack16
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
EastCoastAgNc said:


I guess it could always be worse


2024 is looking worse and worse for Boras
The Porkchop Express
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AggiEE said:

I definitely don't think we should be sellers.

This team has had a disastrous start for various reasons that shouldn't be expected to repeat next year and we have the offseason to address issues

We can be competitive in 2025 even if 2024 is a bust
Thank your for a sane take. The Astros went to the playoffs in 97-99, were a train wreck in 00, and won the division title again in 2001.

You dont implode a roster because of one bad year.
Life is better with a beagle
MaxPower
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Who is our Roy Oswalt or Wade Miller in 2025?
iamtheglove
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"As an analytics heavy organization, his long term downward trend can't be making them feel a long deal is a good idea with Bregman."

Was wondering if 2015 could weigh in on this? Are we really an analytics heavy organization? Just seems like we are more about the eye test and less about data these days.








The Porkchop Express
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MaxPower said:

Who is our Roy Oswalt or Wade Miller in 2025?
If I could predict the future (other than in the 2022 post season), I wouldn't be wasting time with you guys.

If Crane and the others are idiotic enough to spread the roster to the 4 winds for 1 bad season, they're too spoiled to deserve this team.
Life is better with a beagle
W
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
so the task for Josh Miller in New York...

come up with a plan to keep Juan Soto from dominating the series

in the 4-game series in March...

Soto had 9 hits and 3 walks in 20 plate appearances

have to figure something out
MaxPower
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FWIW, Oswalt was the #13 prospect going into the 2001 season.

I'd say you are oversimplifying. The roster is going to throw itself into the wind by 2026 (and starting this offseason). The only question is if you want to plan for the future or just be ok with taking a huge step back.
W
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I would implode the coaching staff before imploding the roster

but the plan for 2025 has to be more than just "everyone play better"
The Porkchop Express
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MaxPower said:

FWIW, Oswalt was the #13 prospect going into the 2001 season.

I'd say you are oversimplifying. The roster is going to throw itself into the wind by 2026 (and starting this offseason). The only question is if you want to plan for the future or just be ok with taking a huge step back.
Get a real hitting coach in there and I'd say we're 5 games better this year.
Life is better with a beagle
GigEM96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The bullpen is just lol bad.

They'd be at or close to .500 without the blown saves, holds, whatever.

Too early to give up on the season, certainly way too early to be selling off Tucker, but otherwise things should be on the table. Bregman needs to be moved down. He is a boat anchor in the 2 and 4 spots. Dubon needs to play every day. Pena should be batting higher. Espada needs to challenge the entitlement that keeps Bregman in the upper tier of the order despite poor performance. A 5th of the season has passed and you're ten games under.

Pena seems a natural fit to take that 2 spot based on performance.

GigEM96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big Jon keeps producing and you move him up and Diaz down

GigEM96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I mean, the more blown saves the bullpen has the less you are paying on average for each one, so there's that.

texasaggie2015
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
EastCoastAgNc said:


I guess it could always be worse


Dodged bullet here. The Astros seriously considered flipping Bregman for assets and signing Chapman this past offseason.
texasaggie2015
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yep. But Crane doesn't trust the people who crunch those numbers all day near as much as he did Lunhow and his people.

All of those people who built the dynasty are no longer with the team. They still use analytics- but people use them and interpret them differently if that makes sense. And I don't think they're nearly as advanced as they were at one point.

Lunhow and his people were incredibly smart and ahead of their time. I don't think we'll ever have another GM that comes close. Lunhow was all about data and analytics. Dana Brown's strong suit is scouting and development.
texasaggie2015
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FWIW- the lineup construction is 100% Espada's decision.
All I do is Nguyen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Until the playoffs right?















We will make the playoffs.....right?
tjack16
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
All I do is Nguyen said:

Until the playoffs right?















We will make the playoffs.....right?


If we make drastic improvements in starting rotation, bullpen, offensively, baserunning, and all other facets of the game then yeah it's possible
aggiedata
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You are being paged.

https://texags.com/forums/67/topics/3459099
MaxPower
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Porkchop Express said:

MaxPower said:

FWIW, Oswalt was the #13 prospect going into the 2001 season.

I'd say you are oversimplifying. The roster is going to throw itself into the wind by 2026 (and starting this offseason). The only question is if you want to plan for the future or just be ok with taking a huge step back.
Get a real hitting coach in there and I'd say we're 5 games better this year.
Hilarious
MaxPower
How long do you want to ignore this user?
texasaggie2015 said:

Yep. But Crane doesn't trust the people who crunch those numbers all day near as much as he did Lunhow and his people.

All of those people who built the dynasty are no longer with the team. They still use analytics- but people use them and interpret them differently if that makes sense. And I don't think they're nearly as advanced as they were at one point.

Lunhow and his people were incredibly smart and ahead of their time. I don't think we'll ever have another GM that comes close. Lunhow was all about data and analytics. Dana Brown's strong suit is scouting and development.
Luhnow's analytics were instrumental in smart free agent moves. I have no doubt we wouldn't have signed Abreu, Hader or Montero if he were here. In that regard, I hope Crane learns his lesson.

In terms of the draft or IFA, I don't think Luhnow was some savant. Most of our talent was acquired through high draft picks and good ol fashioned scouting cheap IFA. Don't forget that Altuve and Springer were actually from the previous regime. My point being I have confidence Brown can rebuild the farm given the right resources.
MaxPower
How long do you want to ignore this user?
texasaggie2015 said:

EastCoastAgNc said:


I guess it could always be worse


Dodged bullet here. The Astros seriously considered flipping Bregman for assets and signing Chapman this past offseason.
Sadly I'm still not convinced. They both suck but what kind of prospect capital would you have gotten for Bregman before the season started?
linkdude
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
texasaggie2015
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That's fine, but those conversations 100% happened.

They wouldn't expect to get top ranked prospects back. The thought process was to improve organizational depth (something that's lacking) or get a big league player back in a position of need (like an arm) while replacing Bregman with someone who will bring in similar production- which is what they expected Chapman to bring.
Bobcat-Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
texasaggie2015 said:

Yep. But Crane doesn't trust the people who crunch those numbers all day near as much as he did Lunhow and his people.

All of those people who built the dynasty are no longer with the team. They still use analytics- but people use them and interpret them differently if that makes sense. And I don't think they're nearly as advanced as they were at one point.

Lunhow and his people were incredibly smart and ahead of their time. I don't think we'll ever have another GM that comes close. Lunhow was all about data and analytics. Dana Brown's strong suit is scouting and development.

I realize that Luhnow is unable to be a GM again, but could we get him in to run the analytics team? If we had Brown running scouting and development with Luhnow running the analytics, we could have it all!
EastCoastAgNc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bobcat-Ag said:

texasaggie2015 said:

Yep. But Crane doesn't trust the people who crunch those numbers all day near as much as he did Lunhow and his people.

All of those people who built the dynasty are no longer with the team. They still use analytics- but people use them and interpret them differently if that makes sense. And I don't think they're nearly as advanced as they were at one point.

Lunhow and his people were incredibly smart and ahead of their time. I don't think we'll ever have another GM that comes close. Lunhow was all about data and analytics. Dana Brown's strong suit is scouting and development.

I realize that Luhnow is unable to be a GM again, but could we get him in to run the analytics team? If we had Brown running scouting and development with Luhnow running the analytics, we could have it all!
I don't think Lunhow would accept that. He's doing quite well in soccer right now. He would be accepting a demotion to come back. Also, if Crane doesn't trust him, there's no way he's hiring him.
Ag_07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Jeff Luhnow will never work for this organization as long as Crane is here.

At least that's what I've gathered.

If Crane has trust problems why would he trust the guy who actually broke his trust?

Best to just appreciate what JL did and let him go.
TRM
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Booma94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
tjack16 said:

EastCoastAgNc said:


I guess it could always be worse


2024 is looking worse and worse for Boras
That's a shame...
EastCoastAgNc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag_07 said:

Jeff Luhnow will never work for this organization as long as Crane is here.

At least that's what I've gathered.

If Crane has trust problems why would he trust the guy who actually broke his trust?

Best to just appreciate what JL did and let him go.
Even if we managed to get a Lunhow-type in control now, Crane's ego and the council of former players would just would get in the way and hinder the vision.
Booma94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
tjack16 said:

All I do is Nguyen said:

Until the playoffs right?















We will make the playoffs.....right?


If we make drastic improvements in starting rotation, bullpen, offensively, baserunning, and all other facets of the game then yeah it's possible
Not saying those things aren't important, but if 6 of the 8 blown saves were converted, the Astros would be near the top of the division. If the bullpen can work its way out of this quicksand, things will improve significantly.
MaxPower
How long do you want to ignore this user?
texasaggie2015 said:

That's fine, but those conversations 100% happened.

They wouldn't expect to get top ranked prospects back. The thought process was to improve organizational depth (something that's lacking) or get a big league player back in a position of need (like an arm) while replacing Bregman with someone who will bring in similar production- which is what they expected Chapman to bring.
Yes, I'm agreeing with that. I'm saying Chapman really hasn't been much worse than Bregman's so even though Chapman has stunk we might still have been better off with the prospects we could have gotten for Bregman. I'm glad we had those kind of discussions because it shows some creativity that we seem to have been lacking.

Now we are in a tough spot. Bregman's value has significantly lowered so we would need him to get hot. But if he gets hot then we should win more games. Will it be enough games to warrant keeping him for the rest of the season though?
Ag_07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
EastCoastAgNc said:

Ag_07 said:

Jeff Luhnow will never work for this organization as long as Crane is here.

At least that's what I've gathered.

If Crane has trust problems why would he trust the guy who actually broke his trust?

Best to just appreciate what JL did and let him go.
Even if we managed to get a Lunhow-type in control now, Crane's ego and the council of former players would just would get in the way and hinder the vision.

Well...I don't agree with this.
The Porkchop Express
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
tjack16 said:

EastCoastAgNc said:


I guess it could always be worse


2024 is looking worse and worse for Boras
Life is better with a beagle
texasaggie2015
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yeah, I've pretty much given up trying to debunk that narrative
EastCoastAgNc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag_07 said:

EastCoastAgNc said:

Ag_07 said:

Jeff Luhnow will never work for this organization as long as Crane is here.

At least that's what I've gathered.

If Crane has trust problems why would he trust the guy who actually broke his trust?

Best to just appreciate what JL did and let him go.
Even if we managed to get a Lunhow-type in control now, Crane's ego and the council of former players would just would get in the way and hinder the vision.

Well...I don't agree with this.
While I know there's plenty of debate over the influence of the trifling trio, even setting them aside, Crane is the main issue. When he took over, he let Lunhow be the guy and run his vision. Given his lack of trust after being burned by JL, I can't see him staying out of the way enough to let a rebuild happen.
First Page Last Page
Page 502 of 1935
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.