Good insight. I see us making a big trade sometime this season if we look like a decent team during the year.
Our New Year's Resolution: Perfect power rankings throughout 2024.
— MLB (@MLB) January 2, 2024
1-for-1. đŸ˜‰ pic.twitter.com/3T8msi1VCL
The @Braves have a new look to their starting five.
— MLB (@MLB) January 2, 2024
Is there a better rotation in baseball? pic.twitter.com/mKjENVNx6t
I agree with all that, with one caveat. In some markets (Baltimore not being one of them), it's not as simple as opening up the owner's wallet. I'm not comfortable with the notion of telling someone else, who put up their money to buy a team, how much profit is acceptable. There are a lot of things to factor in that make it not so black & white. I think what the Oakland ownership has done, for example, is shameful. They don't even really try to be competitive. Maybe moving to LV will loosen the purse strings, but they're really the extreme example of prioritizing profit over performance on the field, and I think they're more the exception than the rule. Markets like Pittsburgh & KC don't have the ability to enhance revenue with big TV contracts, sponsorships, etc that teams like the Red Sox, Yankees, Dodgers, etc do.Water Boy said:
Just sad you have so many owners look at their team primarily as a business. I fully understand that it is a business and you need to make money to keep the team going but if you can't afford to invest a minimum of 150 million a year in pay roll you need to sell the team. Think about how much joy was brought to Texas because Ray Davis opened up his wallet. Imagine the feeling of that moment being taken away so the billionaire can make a few extra bucks.
Mike Bacsik on The Fan indicated the MLBPA projects teams average between $100-200M in net profit. So, the "need to make money" is believed to be there. That is part of the tension between owners and the PA.Water Boy said:
Just sad you have so many owners look at their team primarily as a business. I fully understand that it is a business and you need to make money to keep the team going but if you can't afford to invest a minimum of 150 million a year in pay roll you need to sell the team. Think about how much joy was brought to Texas because Ray Davis opened up his wallet. Imagine the feeling of that moment being taken away so the billionaire can make a few extra bucks.
We have our first set of predictions for 2024.
— MLB (@MLB) January 3, 2024
Who do you think will take home the hardware?đŸ”® pic.twitter.com/VY5xMiJzwh
investorAg83 said:We have our first set of predictions for 2024.
— MLB (@MLB) January 3, 2024
Who do you think will take home the hardware?đŸ”® pic.twitter.com/VY5xMiJzwh
Not Carter?? Hmm…going to be difficult for either to win if they were to split votes.
It is as concerning as it is impressive.investorAg83 said:
<clip>
He's producing exit velocities in excess of 110 mph on a regular basis, which is crazy for a guy that young.
<clip>
The exit velocity comment is insane…
Wow……that actually is pretty cool.GrapevineAg said:
For anybody interested in a badass Peagle-themed Dallas Stars sweater, buy tix to the theme night here.
The most likely guy to get traded before next season IMHO is Taveras. MLB ready center fielders are only behind MLB shortstops in value (we got one of those too, but we may need him).DallasAg 94 said:
It would be hard to imagine Carter getting beat out by Langford. Carter just went through the World Series and should have a tremendous amount of confidence and experience.
The key might be concerns about hitting LHP.
If Langford is RoY... he will have had to beat out Carter, Taveras, or Adolis for an OF spot. Let that sink in. I can't see him at full time DH.