2023 Postseason Discussion

12,302 Views | 117 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by BassCowboy33
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Imagine finishing 14 games ahead of another team in back to back years, yet that team is somehow your daddy.
bearkatag15
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Farmer1906 said:

Imagine finishing 14 games ahead of another team in back to back years, yet that team is somehow your daddy.




Not many teams can. Astros know the feeling though
Fightin' Texas Aggie and Sam Houston State Bearkat
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bearkatag15 said:

Farmer1906 said:

Imagine finishing 14 games ahead of another team in back to back years, yet that team is somehow your daddy.




Not many teams can. Astros know the feeling though


Except we only beat them in 2005.
bearkatag15
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Well go figure that ESPN gets a stat wrong.
Fightin' Texas Aggie and Sam Houston State Bearkat
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's right. We had 10+ fewer both times. It says only Philly won both.
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bearkatag15
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Pretty crazy how even these teams are over their recent history
Fightin' Texas Aggie and Sam Houston State Bearkat
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hoping this thread or the trash talk picks up during the series. Much better than the "safe spaces" threads
Flatlander
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Now through two rounds of playoffs, and 8 teams have been sent packing.

Those 8 teams include 5 division winners.
They include three 100-win teams.
They only had a combined 4 wins across 22 total games played.
They averaged 2.09 runs per game.
(And those stats are somewhat propped up by the Twins, who had 3 of the 4 wins and won their WC series).

The losing teams didn't just lose; they lost badly.
The Lost
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Booma94 said:

The Anchor said:

AgPediRPh said:

I'm surprised at the 100 win teams getting spanked this postseason!
Braves fan here. I am not making excuses. But, it seems like taking so much time off has affected these teams and got them out of rhythm.

Look at the Braves post season schedule:

Final game of season - 10/1
Five days off
First game of playoffs - 10/7
Day off
Second game
Day off
Third game

It has to be hard to maintain a rhythm with that jacked up schedule.

Since the Wild Card began in 1993, 43 teams have won 100 or more games. 22 of those (51%) have lost in the Division Series or sooner.

The post-season has had different formats for the Wild Card, but the numbers have held constant.

Since 2017 there have been 20 teams who have won over 100 games and 11 of those (55%) have lost in the Division Series or sooner.

The regular season is about the deepest rosters. The post-season is about who is hot at the right time.
That's also the most days they've gone without real games all year. You've never played baseball/hit if you don't think that matters. You can't simulate real games.

Also doesn't help all 3 that lost were on cruise control, the Astro's Almost didn't make the playoffs so they were prepared for the urgency too.

Regardless it's a ****ty system. Might as well just make it 8 and get rid of the byes.
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
94chem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Dodgers rolled out Clayton Kershaw in game 1. They were a paper tiger built to beat up on the back end of rotations. There are no back ends in the playoffs.

The Astros are in their 7th LCS in a row. No surprise.

The Rangers were on pace for a historic run differential, have had solid starting pitching all season, had some bad injury luck, had about 7 all-stars. No surprise.

The Phillies were the runners-up last season. No surprise.

The Braves are the only surprise who didn't make it.

Re-seeding after the wild card round would be an easy fix. Atlanta-Arizona might have produced a different outcome.

Shall we take away the Twins' 1987 title since they were 87-75, had homefield advantage in the WS, and didn't win a single game on the road?

94chem,
That, sir, was the greatest post in the history of TexAgs. I salute you. -- Dough
tjack16
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think if the Diamondbacks beat Philly, whoever wins the ALCS will beat them in the World Series. But if Philly wins the NLCS, they will probably win it all.
Eso si, Que es
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Lost said:

Booma94 said:

The Anchor said:

AgPediRPh said:

I'm surprised at the 100 win teams getting spanked this postseason!
Braves fan here. I am not making excuses. But, it seems like taking so much time off has affected these teams and got them out of rhythm.

Look at the Braves post season schedule:

Final game of season - 10/1
Five days off
First game of playoffs - 10/7
Day off
Second game
Day off
Third game

It has to be hard to maintain a rhythm with that jacked up schedule.

Since the Wild Card began in 1993, 43 teams have won 100 or more games. 22 of those (51%) have lost in the Division Series or sooner.

The post-season has had different formats for the Wild Card, but the numbers have held constant.

Since 2017 there have been 20 teams who have won over 100 games and 11 of those (55%) have lost in the Division Series or sooner.

The regular season is about the deepest rosters. The post-season is about who is hot at the right time.
That's also the most days they've gone without real games all year. You've never played baseball/hit if you don't think that matters. You can't simulate real games.

Also doesn't help all 3 that lost were on cruise control, the Astro's Almost didn't make the playoffs so they were prepared for the urgency too.

Regardless it's a ****ty system. Might as well just make it 8 and get rid of the byes.
Why stop at 8 teams from each League, let's put in 15 teams from each league and force the bottom team to take the bye, putting them at a huge disadvantage by putting them straight through to the 2nd round.

The 162 game season is already being diluted in importance by allowing 6 out of 15 teams into the post season, which is 40% of franchises. The best overall team doesn't always win the WS, it is a combination of putting together a solid season and earning your spot and being hot in October. Your proposal is 8/15 (53%) teams from each league make the playoffs and your team may lose to the 8 seed and not even make it to the NLDS versus getting a bye and not being prepared for 5 days rest.

Same argument occurred last year when Braves and Dodgers stunk up the NLDS series, maybe the organization should change their approach to the off days, maybe they are just cold, but the Astros (and Yankees last year) had no issues responding to 5 days off. I am assuming they didn't sit around eating Cheesy Puffs and playing Fortnight thinking they were destined for a WS.
Panama Red
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Why not give the two highest seeds in each league the option:

1-wild card games at home or
2-five days off

How many pick option 2?



tjack16
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think the format is perfectly fine. If you told teams in April they could get 5 days off before the playoffs they would all say "wow that's awesome, we need the rest"

Next year if all the top seeds go 4-0 in the DS then everybody will be fine with it.
jkag89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Panama Red said:

Why not give the two highest seeds in each league the option:

1-wild card games at home or
2-five days off

How many pick option 2?




None. No team would risk its postseason life on an additional three game series.
91AggieLawyer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Would there be anything wrong with having the two division winners who aren't playing in the wild card round play the opposite league's team one game each? In other words, this year Atlanta would have played Minnesota at home and Baltimore on the road (for example) and the Dodgers would have played at Minnesota and home against Baltimore. Play the games Tuesday and Thursday or Wednesday and Friday. None of the games would have counted for playoff purposes, but they would have allowed the teams to play and go through regular rotations -- or use whoever they want, at their choosing. Obviously, the games would have been televised.

These games wouldn't have been much different, competition wise, as late season games involving teams out of the race.
BassCowboy33
How long do you want to ignore this user?
91AggieLawyer said:

Would there be anything wrong with having the two division winners who aren't playing in the wild card round play the opposite league's team one game each? In other words, this year Atlanta would have played Minnesota at home and Baltimore on the road (for example) and the Dodgers would have played at Minnesota and home against Baltimore. Play the games Tuesday and Thursday or Wednesday and Friday. None of the games would have counted for playoff purposes, but they would have allowed the teams to play and go through regular rotations -- or use whoever they want, at their choosing. Obviously, the games would have been televised.

These games wouldn't have been much different, competition wise, as late season games involving teams out of the race.
If I'm a manager, why would I risk my starters before the playoffs in what effectively amounts to a preseason game? Nothing good can come of it. Take the rest 10/10 times.
AgBQ-00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gallen has not been the same since the all star break
AgBQ-00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Phillies pouring it on now
toucan82
How long do you want to ignore this user?
damn, this is ugly
kyledr04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I didn't watch any of the Arizona and LA series but watching the NLCS makes me wonder how AZ even got here.

Also, Phillies are going to be tough in the WS.
AgsMnn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Phillies and Rangers are hot right now for sure.
Gyles Marrett
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Are we really going to miss some baseball tonight to listen to Joe slur words in a national address?

We should have the option opt out and watch baseball lol
Carlo4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
kyledr04 said:

I didn't watch any of the Arizona and LA series but watching the NLCS makes me wonder how AZ even got here.

Also, Phillies are going to be tough in the WS.
I watched game 1 and 2 being up with a sick 2 year old. AZ was pounding the ball and getting good pitching. The starting pitcher for game 1 had never beaten the Dodgers in like a dozen tries... but did that night! Just random stuff like that.

They played like a team with nothing to lose. I think making it this far is pretty great for AZ.
dvldog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Game is on FS1, so it shouldn't be affected.
Out in Left Field
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Pool ball
Out in Left Field
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Imagine closing out a game after going up in dramatic fashion
jkag89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG




Astros were +650 just 3 days ago.
Aggie1205
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Arizona up 3-2 top of the 7th.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.