Jesus. Cheap hit after cheap hit
*****Official Texas Rangers 2023 Season Thread***** [Staff Warning]
2,591,983 Views |
40589 Replies |
Last: 1 yr ago by LeagueCityAg
Damn. Just a ton of seeing eye grounders.
Won't make it deep in the game at this rate. Perez better start warming up
Did I hear that right that Scherzer hasn't given up more than 4 in any game this year?
PatriotAg02 said:
Did I hear that right that Scherzer hasn't given up more than 4 in any game this year?
He has a 4+ ERA, so that would be... difficult.
Isn't ERA calculated based on 9 innings?Proposition Joe said:PatriotAg02 said:
Did I hear that right that Scherzer hasn't given up more than 4 in any game this year?
He has a 4+ ERA, so that would be... difficult.
PatriotAg02 said:
Did I hear that right that Scherzer hasn't given up more than 4 in any game this year?
lol. No. He's given up 5 or more 6 times this season.
This has been textbook from the Sox on simply putting the ball in play.
Yes, but if he has a 4+ era and no games of 5 or more runs then it would mean he averaged like 5 innings a start.
I'd venture to guess that most starts after you've been traded aren't terrific for anyone. Just a lot going on with a lot of upheaval, and pitchers are creatures of habit.
I keep seeing people reference his 4+ ERA but it was 4.01 coming into this game. Yeah, that's over 4, but a little different than 4.99, which is also 4+.
Regardless, go out and throw a "quality start" of six innings and three runs every outing and you're sporting a 4.50 ERA.
Just keep us in position to win.
Regardless, go out and throw a "quality start" of six innings and three runs every outing and you're sporting a 4.50 ERA.
Just keep us in position to win.
But if he gave up 4 runs in 6 innings, that's an ERA of 6. The more innings pitched, the larger the denominator and the longer it takes to bring it down.Proposition Joe said:
Yes, but if he has a 4+ era and no games of 5 or more runs then it would mean he averaged like 5 innings a start.
Not trying to argue...maybe my math skills are off.
Just looked it up to avoid actually working.
48 earned runs in 107.2 innings pitched this year (before today).
Average of 2.23 runs per actual inning pitched, but an ERA of 4.02.
(Sorry for any derail...)
48 earned runs in 107.2 innings pitched this year (before today).
Average of 2.23 runs per actual inning pitched, but an ERA of 4.02.
(Sorry for any derail...)
Gotta swing the bat Mitch
Smith!!!
Tony Beasley sucks. Going to get Jankowski killed.
Your math skills are fine, my point wasn't that it was statistically impossible to do - just highly unlikely to have a 4 ERA and no games with more than 4 er... especially if you are a TORP.
Tksymm7 said:
Tony Beasley sucks
Is there no other option?
Send Jankowski. Ball wasn't in anyone's glove. He scores easy.
Got it.
Should have sent him
Beasley is awful. There are two outs man! WTF
You have that backwards. It's 1 run per every 2.23 innings pitched.dvldog said:
Just looked it up to avoid actually working.
48 earned runs in 107.2 innings pitched this year (before today).
Average of 2.23 runs per actual inning pitched, but an ERA of 4.02.
(Sorry for any derail...)
Oh yea. Oops.
It seems like this year his errors have been glaring. Haven't noticed it the past few years as much. (Probably cause he didn't have that many times to send runners)Tksymm7 said:
Tony Beasley sucks. Going to get Jankowski killed.
Only if you are cherry-picking stats.Proposition Joe said:
Important to remember while he is a big name, he's also a 4+ ERA pitcher this year to date.
3.15 Career ERA. He'll get back to his career avg. Or so I'm told.
I love Beasley but can we try switching him with Ragsdale or someone just to see what happens lol
Legal Custodian said:You have that backwards. It's 1 run per every 2.23 innings pitched.dvldog said:
Just looked it up to avoid actually working.
48 earned runs in 107.2 innings pitched this year (before today).
Average of 2.23 runs per actual inning pitched, but an ERA of 4.02.
(Sorry for any derail...)
9*ER /innings pitched = era.
Yup, he's just viewing it in a different way.Jimtim1216 said:Legal Custodian said:You have that backwards. It's 1 run per every 2.23 innings pitched.dvldog said:
Just looked it up to avoid actually working.
48 earned runs in 107.2 innings pitched this year (before today).
Average of 2.23 runs per actual inning pitched, but an ERA of 4.02.
(Sorry for any derail...)
9*ER /innings pitched = era.
So if he pitches on average what he has so far this season, he should get through 6.2 innings this game without giving up another ER.
Nice inning that time for Scherzer <<apologies for interrupting the math tutorial in progress>> 
Got a bouncer to find a hole.
Just don't K here
DallasAg 94 said:Only if you are cherry-picking stats.Proposition Joe said:
Important to remember while he is a big name, he's also a 4+ ERA pitcher this year to date.
No, he is literally a 4+ ERA pitcher this year to date.
Spend less time trying to correct me, more time studying basic statistics.
Son of a
PatriotAg02 said:
Just don't K here
Featured Stories
See All
Presenting Texas Aggies United's 'Florida Slam Dunk' Sweepstakes!
by Texas Aggies United
41:06
9h ago
2.9k
Scouting Report: No. 13 Texas A&M at South Carolina
by Tom Schuberth
8:17
9h ago
3.0k
'I'm ready': Freshman Terrence Kiel II excited for the 2025 opener
by Ryan Brauninger
El Mero Mero 14
Rich Get Richer - Dick Sports and Texas Athletics
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
71