Use coupon code texags23 for a discount on your purchase
Final count.DallasAg 94 said:
Looks like we're going a tad heavy on P.
1 - C
3 - OF
9 - P
So far.
1) Well, having lots of pitchers and no fielders might create an issue. Maybe with the Int'l signings they think we are well stocked. It makes zero sense to take 1 Catcher and no other IF. Even 2 Catchers. You have 14 P and 1 C.Dwb22 said:
1) very content casting a wide net with pitchers. Lots of lower level bats in the system to begin with, and efficiency and developing pitchers are not two things that go together for the rangers. Want to throw a lot of darts at the board there
2) I know many complained about the pitchers we took (high ERA, small sample size, etc) but I like that they are prioritizing "stuff". I feel like we have leaned into the "doesnt overwhelm batters with his stuff, but he knows how to sequence his pitches and he commands the zone" type of guy in the past. I think if you look around at the elite pitching orgs that is the opposite of what has been working for them.
Not that low 90s guys can't get by/don't have a place on the roster this year has shown us that they work but I am VERY pleased that we are loading up on guys that throw gas and have nasty secondary offerings, enough to where I can excuse some crooked college stats. Maybe we'll ruin their development, too, but I am glad to inject those types arms into the system and see what happens.
DallasAg 94 said:
Could have used that catch a few years ago.
Lt. Joe Bookman said:
A miced up pitcher. That's weird.
Not at the ASG. Get in. Get out.Tksymm7 said:
Eovaldis Velo being 94-95 I don't love. I know his stuff fluctuates more than most, but I'd like to see him 96+ on every pitch.