***** 2023 Houston Astros Season Thread *****

6,525,224 Views | 114825 Replies | Last: 8 mo ago by texasaggie2015
Furlock Bones
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
also given that Dana Brown is a farm system builder, my bet is they don't want to give up what little we have right now. try and get some pieces, make the playoffs, and hope for a run with guys getting healthy. but, focus on rebuilding the farm system, so we can sustain winning.
cone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
i mean that would be extremely wise
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I can come around on the idea that we can just add more bullpen pieces and win by shortening the games. I think Framber-Javier-Brown is good enough for a postseason run.
texasaggie2015
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think that's sort of the thought process. If we add bullpen depth, we won't need our starters to go as deep into games.
tjack16
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So if Maldy is in their because the pitchers feel more comfortable with him how about this solution

- When the veterans (Framber and Javier) start, Maldonado catches
- When the rookies/replacement guys (France, Bielak, Brown, etc) start, Diaz catches

That way you get Maldy 2/5 games, and Diaz 3/5. This also allows Yordan to ease into left field on days Diaz catches and he can DH on the Maldy days.

Either way, all of these guys better get comfortable with Diaz because he's the guy next year.
JDUB08AG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Farmer1906 said:

I can come around on the idea that we can just add more bullpen pieces and win by shortening the games. I think Framber-Javier-Brown is good enough for a postseason run.


Made the WS in 2021 with a similar rotation
EastCoastAgNc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Farmer1906 said:

I can come around on the idea that we can just add more bullpen pieces and win by shortening the games. I think Framber-Javier-Brown is good enough for a postseason run.

You forgot someone...
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sean on 790 brought up the 2015 Royals. That's a fun comp for bullpen heavy team to win it all.
Prosperdick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
tjack16 said:

So if Maldy is in their because the pitchers feel more comfortable with him how about this solution

- When the veterans (Framber and Javier) start, Maldonado catches
- When the rookies/replacement guys (France, Bielak, Brown, etc) start, Diaz catches

That way you get Maldy 2/5 games, and Diaz 3/5. This also allows Yordan to ease into left field on days Diaz catches and he can DH on the Maldy days.

Either way, all of these guys better get comfortable with Diaz because he's the guy next year.
I like that idea but really it should only be Framber who NEEDS Maldy given Framber's fragile psyche. You make Maldy his personal catcher but everyone else gets Diaz.

They are all professionals and can pitch really well to someone not named Maldy. Heck, Javier threw a combined no hitter in the WORLD SERIES to a guy not named Maldy.
MaxPower
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Why are we discussing the frustratingly obvious thing that will never happen?
CoachAg19
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
texasaggie2015 said:

That doesn't solve many of Houston's problems. I cannot stand having Maldy in the lineup every day, but I feel like he's sort of been the scapegoat in that he's far from the biggest problem on this team.

And don't get me wrong. I'm not defending him. I just think the problems start with the rotation and an overworked bullpen.


This.
Maldy is far from the problem. And trust me, as much as anyone, I cannot stand seeing him in the lineup when we have another guy who is CLEARLY better. His "game management" is not making a difference whatsoever. Having said that, the lineup yesterday was as good as it probably can be outside of Maldy. Going up against a borderline AAA arm, our lineup should've put up 5-6 runs yesterday easily.

The rotation hasn't been great, but the defense behind them isn't helping either. The game yesterday was a perfect example. Abreu makes that play in the 1st inning, and it's a totally different ball game. Bregman had two plays yesterday that we've seen him make time and time again. Pena had one yesterday that he typically makes. Overall, the defense has really cost some of the starters here recently. The bullpen is extremely overworked. Made no sense to throw Maton yesterday in a game where you're down 4 runs and your offense hasn't done much all day long.
Down the stretch, the defense HAS to play lights out. Framber and Javier have to figure out life QUICKLY. France…biggest surprise of the season for me. Really think he's been solid. Brown is a stud, but he's young and inconsistent. Bielak…please get Urquidy healthy and get him out of there, although his last two "disastrous" starts were partly due to defensive miscues (mostly by Abreu).
Class of 2010
Prosperdick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

A deal for JV reminds me more of the Grienke trade exactly 4 years ago today.

The Astros gave up their #1 (Seth Beer MLB's #100 ), #4 Bukauskas, #5 Corbin Martin, and #22 Rojas and the D'Backs kicked in a bit less than 1/3 of Zack's remaining salary for 2 years + 1 playoff run.

Greinke was pretty solid-average for the Astros (22-9 w/ 3.89 ERA, 3.5 WAR over 51 starts and 300 innings) and helped get them to 2 World Series (as the favorite) and another ALCS.

Every one of us were on cloud 9 when that (huge surprise) deal was announced. And I bet we are all still happy now that it happened.

Apply the same values to a JV deal this year and the deal is: Gilbert, Clifford, Leon, and Dubin + about $20M w/o the option and $31M w/ it.

I would expect a younger, higher upside prospect than Dubin, like Rhett Kouba who is 23 and having a good season at AA and will undoubtably be on top prospect mid season lists when they come out.

That deal would hurt ( especially Clifford IMO), but prospects are like a box of chocolates.
Taken from another site but thought it was a good, insightful post.
Marvin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
As the saying goes, hope is not a strategy… but it's what we have this year so ok. Let's hope Urquidy offers more than Bielak. Let's hope Maton and Montero figure it out. Let's hope Abreu hits. Let's hope Altuve and Yordan stay healthy. Let's hope Framber and Javier dig out of these slumps. Oh, and let's hope Potato Brain plays the best players.

I'm all in. Let's reign!
I love Texas Aggie sports, but I love Texas A&M more.
Prosperdick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CoachAg19 said:

texasaggie2015 said:

That doesn't solve many of Houston's problems. I cannot stand having Maldy in the lineup every day, but I feel like he's sort of been the scapegoat in that he's far from the biggest problem on this team.

And don't get me wrong. I'm not defending him. I just think the problems start with the rotation and an overworked bullpen.


This.
Maldy is far from the problem. And trust me, as much as anyone, I cannot stand seeing him in the lineup when we have another guy who is CLEARLY better. His "game management" is not making a difference whatsoever. Having said that, the lineup yesterday was as good as it probably can be outside of Maldy. Going up against a borderline AAA arm, our lineup should've put up 5-6 runs yesterday easily.

The rotation hasn't been great, but the defense behind them isn't helping either. The game yesterday was a perfect example. Abreu makes that play in the 1st inning, and it's a totally different ball game. Bregman had two plays yesterday that we've seen him make time and time again. Pena had one yesterday that he typically makes. Overall, the defense has really cost some of the starters here recently. The bullpen is extremely overworked. Made no sense to throw Maton yesterday in a game where you're down 4 runs and your offense hasn't done much all day long.
Down the stretch, the defense HAS to play lights out. Framber and Javier have to figure out life QUICKLY. France…biggest surprise of the season for me. Really think he's been solid. Brown is a stud, but he's young and inconsistent. Bielak…please get Urquidy healthy and get him out of there, although his last two "disastrous" starts were partly due to defensive miscues (mostly by Abreu).
I disagree with the bolded statement. The parts, yes, probably as good as can be outside of obviously Maldy. It's the construction of the lineup that's killing us. We're giving pitchers too many easy outs/breathers between our best hitters.

Our lineups in the past were incredible because they were RELENTLESS. You cannot have the best left-handed hitter in the majors right now batting 5th because it means pitchers can dissect our lineup in easier chunks...it should warrant 25th Amendment treatment for Donkey and I don't understand why Dana and Crane haven't had a come-to-Jesus meeting with him. Or maybe they have and it's why Donkey is so defensive lately.

ETA - How many times lately has Yordan led off an inning...that is criminal for a guy like him.
MaxPower
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Greinke was 5 years younger, had an ERA under 3 at the time and had also logged 145 innings. JV is, well, none of those things but I don't doubt the muts are pretending like he is.
MAROON
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
f1ghtintexasaggie said:

Mr.Bond said:

I appreciate all the insight and I think we all realize Dana and his staff are working diligently that being said if we all recognize this team as it stands from a starting pitching standpoint has little to no shot at a World Series then surely the front office sees that as well. So then what do you do overpay for a World Series run or just essentially admit the fact that you don't have the starting pitching to get it done in the postseason


If we stand pat, this is essentially an admission that Crane is full of **** about wanting/planning to sustain the winning culture. His actions since this off-season have proven otherwise:

(1) chased off Click in favor of Dusty
(2) let people with no business making personnel decisions make two critical deals that will hamper our payroll flexibility moving forward, not to mention their horrid on-field performance
(3) made no move to bolster starting rotation after letting V walk
(4) claims to be willing to pay to keep the window open (which, with our depleted farm, ought to be our primary asset to offer if the owner is willing to spend), but fails to make meaningful and necessary additions at the deadline
In fairness, everyone thought we had no need to bolster the starting rotation with Valdez, Javier, Garcia, Urquidy, Brown, and McCullers set to be our six-man rotation.
What do you boys want for breakfast BBQ ?.....OK Chili.
Prosperdick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MaxPower said:

Why are we discussing the frustratingly obvious thing that will never happen?
Because this is a message board and it's cathartic.
Beerosch
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Prosperdick said:

tjack16 said:

So if Maldy is in their because the pitchers feel more comfortable with him how about this solution

- When the veterans (Framber and Javier) start, Maldonado catches
- When the rookies/replacement guys (France, Bielak, Brown, etc) start, Diaz catches

That way you get Maldy 2/5 games, and Diaz 3/5. This also allows Yordan to ease into left field on days Diaz catches and he can DH on the Maldy days.

Either way, all of these guys better get comfortable with Diaz because he's the guy next year.
I like that idea but really it should only be Framber who NEEDS Maldy given Framber's fragile psyche. You make Maldy his personal catcher but everyone else gets Diaz.

They are all professionals and can pitch really well to someone not named Maldy. Heck, Javier threw a combined no hitter in the WORLD SERIES to a guy not named Maldy.
Framber has sucked ass lately. Are we going to blame Maldy for that since he seems to get all the credit for handling him so well? This whole narrative of Maldy handling pitchers so well seems way overblown, and it's the only justification given for playing someone who hits equivalent to a pitcher when they actually used to bat. Now it's not only his hitting, but his defense is terrible now too. Diaz seems more than capable of handling all of our pitchers. The ERA of pitchers pitching to both catchers reflects that as well.
monarch
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
We HAD Korey Lee…
Peace for Ukraine!
CoachAg19
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Completely agree. My comment was in regard to the personnel and not the construction/order of the lineup. However, I believe Kalas and Blummer said in Yordan and Altuve's first game back that the decision to keep Tucker 3rd was due to a conversation between Yordan, Tucker, and Dusty where they all agreed Tucker should stay in the 3-spot. Okay, fine. Then bat Yordan 4th. I love Bregman, but he is not a clean-up hitter. Yordan and Tucker, as long as Tucker continues to rake, are interchangeable in the 3-4 spots, IMO. Play with both down the stretch and see which one works best for the team.

I also didn't understand Dubon in CF with Chas in LF. Chas has proven to be pretty dang good defensively. When he's in the lineup, and Meyers is not, he HAS to be in CF.
My ideal lineup would be:
Altuve - 2B
Pena - SS
Yordan - DH
Tucker - RF
Bregman - 3B
Abreu - 1B
Chas - CF
Diaz - C
Dubon - LF
Pena is MUCH better when you have to pitch to him. And you have to pitch to him in the 2-spot, because if you pitch around him, then you're putting runners on for Yordan and Tucker. This is why he has been so successful in the 2-spot. He isn't disciplined enough yet as a hitter, and this forces the hand of the opposing team to give him balls to put in play. IMO, if you want Yordan to play LF, you put Dubon at 1B and have Abreu be the DH. Late in games, you can sub Meyers for Dubon for defensive purposes and swap him and Chas in the outfield.
Class of 2010
tjack16
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Farmer1906 said:

Sean on 790 brought up the 2015 Royals. That's a fun comp for bullpen heavy team to win it all.


I feel like the 2021 Braves bullpen too was what led them. That and they hit the clutch HR whenever they needed it

But I remember the Braves just rolling out lefty after lefty and they always had weird arm angles and velocity
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
tjack16 said:

Farmer1906 said:

Sean on 790 brought up the 2015 Royals. That's a fun comp for bullpen heavy team to win it all.


I feel like the 2021 Braves bullpen too was what led them. That and they hit the clutch HR whenever they needed it

But I remember the Braves just rolling out lefty after lefty and they always had weird arm angles and velocity
They remind me more of us last year. A really good bullpen that shut teams down, but they had the starters to ride too.

Max Fried, 5 starts, 3 total ER
Ian Anderson, 4 starts, 3 total ER
Charlie Morton, 4 starts, 6 total ER (zero in WS)
Jesse Chavez, 1 start, 0 ER

Then again they rarely went deep. That speaks to the bullpen too.
EastCoastAgNc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
W
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
31 hours and counting
Beat40
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Marvin said:

As the saying goes, hope is not a strategy… but it's what we have this year so ok. Let's hope Urquidy offers more than Bielak. Let's hope Maton and Montero figure it out. Let's hope Abreu hits. Let's hope Altuve and Yordan stay healthy. Let's hope Framber and Javier dig out of these slumps. Oh, and let's hope Potato Brain plays the best players.

I'm all in. Let's reign!

Urquidy will offer more than Bielak. Always has. Much better career numbers.
Lonestar_Ag09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Huh? He was in Sugarland
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Top Trade Chips


Quote:

Astros: Jake Meyers, OF
Under club control through: 2027

Meyers appears to have fallen out of favor in Houston, sitting behind Corey Julks and Chas McCormick in the outfield mix. A strong defensive center fielder, Meyers could be used to address other needs on the Astros roster, as Houston's farm system isn't loaded with prospect capital to use in trades.

Some targets

Quote:


Mets: Justin Verlander, RHP
Under club control through: 2024 (plus vesting 2025 player option)
The Mets began to sell last week with the trade of David Robertson to the Marlins, then went into full sell mode with Saturday's night's agreement to trade Max Scherzer to the Rangers. Other players including Tommy Pham and Mark Canha are expected to be moved, but none can make the type of impact on a pennant race that Verlander would. The 40-year-old has a full no-trade clause, so he controls the situation in the end, but if Steve Cohen is willing to pay down some of his hefty salary the way he did with Scherzer, the Mets might be able to bring back more prime young talent.

Quote:

Cardinals: Jack Flaherty, RHP
Under club control through: 2023
The Cardinals declared themselves to be sellers a couple weeks ago, yet St. Louis' first moves came on Sunday, when Jordan Montgomery and Chris Stratton were dealt to Texas and Jordan Hicks to Toronto. Nolan Arenado isn't going anywhere, but Flaherty and Paul DeJong both impending free agents should be dealt by Tuesday. Given the need for starting pitching around the league, Flaherty figures to bring back the bigger return of the two.

Quote:

Pirates: David Bednar, RHP
Under club control through: 2026
While veterans Rich Hill, Ji Man Choi and Austin Hedges figure to be traded this week, the Pirates have a pair of controllable assets that would bring them back a haul of prospects if they chose to move them: Bednar and starter Mitch Keller. Bednar has three years of club control remaining compared to two for Keller, but after a pair of All-Star appearances, the closer would be an appealing option for a contender seeking controllable help in the back end of the bullpen.

Quote:

Rockies: Brent Suter, LHP
Under club control through: 2023
The Rockies have already dealt Randal Grichuk, C.J. Cron and Pierce Johnson, but Suter, fellow lefty reliever Brand Hand and outfielder Jurickson Profar figure to be on the move by Tuesday. Suter is having a strong year, posting a 2.85 ERA in 35 appearances, putting up stronger numbers against right-handed hitters (.514 OPS) than lefties (.751).

Quote:

Red Sox: James Paxton, LHP
Under club control through: 2023
The Red Sox might take a buy-and-sell approach, and given the way Paxton an impending free agent who doesn't figure into Boston's future plans beyond 2023 has pitched over the past two months, he could bring back a strong return even as a rental. Boston could look to deal for a controllable starter to take Paxton's place in the rotation, plus Chris Sale, Tanner Houck and Garrett Whitlock are due back from the IL next month, giving the Sox rotation depth in the coming weeks.

Quote:

Guardians: Aaron Civale, RHP
Under club control through: 2025
Cleveland is in the unenviable position of not knowing whether to buy or sell, but regardless of what the Guardians do, they're unlikely to part with any of their top prospects. Shane Bieber would have been in this space before his injury as he approaches his final year of control, but Civale would likely bring back the best overall return of the team's potential trade chips. He's owed just $900,000 for the rest of 2023 and is arbitration-eligible for two more years.

Quote:

Royals: Scott Barlow, RHP
Under club control through: 2024
Barlow is entering his third and final year of arbitration this offseason, making this the right time for the Royals to deal him to a contender. The 30-year-old has struggled during the past two weeks, but given his stellar 2021 and '22 seasons, teams seeking bullpen help should be willing to offer Kansas City a good return in what is proving to be a sellers' market for relievers.

Quote:

Tigers: Eduardo Rodriguez, LHP
Under club control through: 2026 (can opt out after 2023)
Rodriguez can shed the final three years and $49 million of his contract at the end of the season to become a free agent, which many in the industry believe he will do. E-Rod and Michael Lorenzen an impending free agent have drawn significant interest and should both be moved by Tuesday, giving the Tigers a chance to bring back young talent in return.
Ag_07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Jake as our top trade chip

Farm system isn't THAT depleted.
EastCoastAgNc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Either way, all of these guys better get comfortable with Diaz because he's the guy next year.
This needs to be repeated. Every time I hear that about the pitchers being vocal about Maldy, it irritates me. Who is in control of the team? Be a professional and do your job well regardless of who is catching.
AggiEE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MAROON said:

f1ghtintexasaggie said:

Mr.Bond said:

I appreciate all the insight and I think we all realize Dana and his staff are working diligently that being said if we all recognize this team as it stands from a starting pitching standpoint has little to no shot at a World Series then surely the front office sees that as well. So then what do you do overpay for a World Series run or just essentially admit the fact that you don't have the starting pitching to get it done in the postseason


If we stand pat, this is essentially an admission that Crane is full of **** about wanting/planning to sustain the winning culture. His actions since this off-season have proven otherwise:

(1) chased off Click in favor of Dusty
(2) let people with no business making personnel decisions make two critical deals that will hamper our payroll flexibility moving forward, not to mention their horrid on-field performance
(3) made no move to bolster starting rotation after letting V walk
(4) claims to be willing to pay to keep the window open (which, with our depleted farm, ought to be our primary asset to offer if the owner is willing to spend), but fails to make meaningful and necessary additions at the deadline
In fairness, everyone thought we had no need to bolster the starting rotation with Valdez, Javier, Garcia, Urquidy, Brown, and McCullers set to be our six-man rotation.


No, not everyone.

Urquidy isn't an ace and McCullers is not ever healthy enough to pitch a full season

There was a big glaring SP risk that Crane didn't address in the off-season and we are ridiculously lucky to have JP France try and fill that void a bit
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The fact that we still have a good SP with 3 starters out means it wasn't a glaring weakness.
Lonestar_Ag09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Farmer1906 said:

The fact that we still have a good SP with 3 starters out means it wasn't a glaring weakness.

And no one called Urquidy an ace.
CoachAg19
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AggiEE said:

MAROON said:

f1ghtintexasaggie said:

Mr.Bond said:

I appreciate all the insight and I think we all realize Dana and his staff are working diligently that being said if we all recognize this team as it stands from a starting pitching standpoint has little to no shot at a World Series then surely the front office sees that as well. So then what do you do overpay for a World Series run or just essentially admit the fact that you don't have the starting pitching to get it done in the postseason


If we stand pat, this is essentially an admission that Crane is full of **** about wanting/planning to sustain the winning culture. His actions since this off-season have proven otherwise:

(1) chased off Click in favor of Dusty
(2) let people with no business making personnel decisions make two critical deals that will hamper our payroll flexibility moving forward, not to mention their horrid on-field performance
(3) made no move to bolster starting rotation after letting V walk
(4) claims to be willing to pay to keep the window open (which, with our depleted farm, ought to be our primary asset to offer if the owner is willing to spend), but fails to make meaningful and necessary additions at the deadline
In fairness, everyone thought we had no need to bolster the starting rotation with Valdez, Javier, Garcia, Urquidy, Brown, and McCullers set to be our six-man rotation.


No, not everyone.

Urquidy isn't an ace and McCullers is not ever healthy enough to pitch a full season

There was a big glaring SP risk that Crane didn't address in the off-season and we are ridiculously lucky to have JP France try and fill that void a bit


Not many teams have multiple aces. We've been blessed to have more than one pretty much since 2017 when we got Verlander. None of those guys are "aces" except Framber. Urquidy isn't going to be a Cy Young candidate, but he can be a solid starter when healthy. That's what we were relying on. I definitely agree with you on McCullers though. His ability to stay healthy is a legit concern for the rest of his career. AND he's literally un-tradeable with his contract. Even with McCullers health being unreliable, a starting rotation of Framber, Javier, Garcia, Brown, and Urquidy was definitely something you can feel solid about in the offseason. France has been a good surprise. However, with the health issues on the staff and how the guys are performing, not going after a SP at the deadline will be a big mistake IMO.
Class of 2010
Eso si, Que es
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I still believe. We have so much playoff experience on our roster we can't be written off. It would be great to skip the wild card round just as a reset, but if that isn't in the cards then get pitching rested in September during expanded roster. Last year the teams that skipped WC round were pretty cold and tight, it seemed to be a disadvantage.

We need to figure out what our healthy roster/batting order is and let them play together fairly regularly through August. Let pitchers get comfortable with Diaz catching and roll the post season dice. Seen much worse teams go on October runs without the experience we have.
First Page Last Page
Page 1362 of 3281
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.