***** 2023 Houston Astros Season Thread *****

6,943,972 Views | 114825 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by texasaggie2015
Ag4life80
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'll take Bielak over Urquidy now that he's developed a swing and miss changeup. He repeats the same motion every pitch really well, so that change is very effective. Urquidy's short arm throwing motion will continually give him arm issues.
Ag_07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Beilak is a ticking time bomb. It's only a matter of time before the realistic numbers balance out with the expected numbers.

I don't trust that he can keep this up. Urquidy isn't gonna set the league in fire but he's consistent and you typically know what you're gonna get every start. Not su much with Bielak.
texasaggie2015
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag_07 said:

Beilak is a ticking time bomb. It's only a matter of time before the realistic numbers balance out with the expected numbers.

I don't trust that he can keep this up. Urquidy isn't gonna set the league in fire but he's consistent and you typically know what you're gonna get every start. Not su much with Bielak.
Correct. What Bielak is doing is not sustainable.
Wabs
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Been saying this for a while now, but even with Urquidy's return, I think we need to go get another SP. Doesn't need to be an ace that will break the bank. But someone that can be a strong 3/4 and/or possibly provide depth in long relief.
k20dub
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What about a rental on Alex Cobb? He's 35 but could be a good 3 or 4 to get us to October.
Harry Dunne
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mr.Bond said:

Marvin said:

Mr.Bond said:

Well....... I'm back after a 2 week ban. Who had the Oklahoma Rangers with a 132 run differential on May 31? Wtf

Welcome back!

Astros have had a great two weeks, so can we count on you in crunch time to do what's necessary?



All I have to do is mention that a slumping player likes to gurgle a certain appendage found on males and BOOM. Ban Hammer
Welcome back. I got the same.

The moderation standards are strange.
BQ2001
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Prosperdick said:

One part of the broadcast that I liked last night was when they spoke about the system they're using in AAA right now where the pitcher, catcher, and hitter all can challenge a pitch.

I assume you have around 3 challenges and lose them if you're wrong but the best part is that the pitch will be showed on the jumbotron so the entire stadium can see how awful a pitch call the ump made. We need them to feel that shame so hopefully they will "try" to do better.

It's obviously not as good as robo-umps but it's at least a start and can't get here soon enough, especially the way we've been screwed all year.
What I don't get is, why even go the challenge route in the first place? If the computers know where the pitches are, just let it go with that from the start and don't slow down the game for that BS. The ump can be back there for all the other stuff, catcher interference, tips, HBP, plays at the plate, etc.
Harry Dunne
How long do you want to ignore this user?
texasaggie2015 said:

Ag_07 said:

Beilak is a ticking time bomb. It's only a matter of time before the realistic numbers balance out with the expected numbers.

I don't trust that he can keep this up. Urquidy isn't gonna set the league in fire but he's consistent and you typically know what you're gonna get every start. Not su much with Bielak.
Correct. What Bielak is doing is not sustainable.
I agree that he can't keep this up the way he's doing it…but that doesn't mean he can't learn how to be more effective and become a legit MLB starter.

When Framber first came up all of the stats said he wasn't going to be able to keep it up, but I think there's something to be said for guys that find a way to get it done. Obviously he had great stuff and improved his command among other things… and I don't think Bielak is the next Framber, but I do think he's going to end up being a productive back end of the rotation guy.
tjack16
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag_07 said:

Beilak is a ticking time bomb. It's only a matter of time before the realistic numbers balance out with the expected numbers.

I don't trust that he can keep this up. Urquidy isn't gonna set the league in fire but he's consistent and you typically know what you're gonna get every start. Not su much with Bielak.


We thought the same thing about Abreu last year
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
tjack16 said:

Ag_07 said:

Beilak is a ticking time bomb. It's only a matter of time before the realistic numbers balance out with the expected numbers.

I don't trust that he can keep this up. Urquidy isn't gonna set the league in fire but he's consistent and you typically know what you're gonna get every start. Not su much with Bielak.


We thought the same thing about Abreu last year


I didn't.

This is a very different situation.
Post removed:
by user
Faustus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bregman's OPS is up to .719, and his bWAR is 1.1.

https://www.baseball-reference.com/players/b/bregmal01.shtml

Tuck's OPS is .786, and his bWar is .3.

https://www.baseball-reference.com/players/t/tuckeky01.shtml

For all the grief Bregman has received for the bat, he's having a better season than Tucker so far according to Baseball Reference. Breg's defense has been sparkling. Tucker's much less so, and the bats are getting close to one another.

Fangraphs thinks so too (Bregman 1.1 fWar, Tucker .7 fWar).

https://www.fangraphs.com/players/alex-bregman/17678/stats?position=3B

https://www.fangraphs.com/players/kyle-tucker/18345/stats?position=OF
Ag_07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
tjack16 said:

Ag_07 said:

Beilak is a ticking time bomb. It's only a matter of time before the realistic numbers balance out with the expected numbers.

I don't trust that he can keep this up. Urquidy isn't gonna set the league in fire but he's consistent and you typically know what you're gonna get every start. Not su much with Bielak.


We thought the same thing about Abreu last year

Not all of us. Abreu has nasty nasty stuff that absolutely plays. It wasn't hard to see that his emergence wasn't a fluke. He had the stuff and he had the confidence and attitude. It just all needed to come together and it did. It clicked for him

Not really the case with Bielak. He's producing well but I feel like he's due for a slide back down to reality.
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bregxit said:

Farmer1906 said:

tjack16 said:

Ag_07 said:

Beilak is a ticking time bomb. It's only a matter of time before the realistic numbers balance out with the expected numbers.

I don't trust that he can keep this up. Urquidy isn't gonna set the league in fire but he's consistent and you typically know what you're gonna get every start. Not su much with Bielak.


We thought the same thing about Abreu last year


I didn't.

This is a very different situation.


Is there any trend change since Bielak started using his changeup more or not enough data yet? Genuine question.
Here is his expected wOBA by game for 2023 matched up with his pitch% by game.



What I see is that his fastball (sinker) is not good. The % drops over the last 3 starts and the expected #s look a little better. The change-up itself may not be anything special, but maybe it helps out the breaking stuff. The last 2 games look like his breaking stuff is really effective after being completely **** in his games 2 and 3 of the season. The sample is still small here.

I have trying to dabble a little more into the pitch modeling data. When I compare Bielak to the rest of the pitchers on the staff, he got the worst Stuff+ on the team at 82 (100 being league avg) and near the worst when it comes to location too. Guys like Framber, Javier, & Abreu can get alow with so-so location because if their stuff. Bielak cannot.
tjack16
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Farmer1906 said:

tjack16 said:

Ag_07 said:

Beilak is a ticking time bomb. It's only a matter of time before the realistic numbers balance out with the expected numbers.

I don't trust that he can keep this up. Urquidy isn't gonna set the league in fire but he's consistent and you typically know what you're gonna get every start. Not su much with Bielak.


We thought the same thing about Abreu last year


I didn't.

This is a very different situation.


You might not have, but many posters on here didn't trust Abreu until really the ALCS.

I'm looking at our track record of finding low prospects that turn into producers and choosing to give Bielak the benefit of the doubt until proven otherwise. He has shown flashes that he could be a good 3/4 type of starter
Wabs
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So what are some potential adds via trade? Dylan Cease? Alex Cobb? Who else?
Post removed:
by user
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Farmer1906 said:

Bregxit said:

Farmer1906 said:

tjack16 said:

Ag_07 said:

Beilak is a ticking time bomb. It's only a matter of time before the realistic numbers balance out with the expected numbers.

I don't trust that he can keep this up. Urquidy isn't gonna set the league in fire but he's consistent and you typically know what you're gonna get every start. Not su much with Bielak.


We thought the same thing about Abreu last year


I didn't.

This is a very different situation.


Is there any trend change since Bielak started using his changeup more or not enough data yet? Genuine question.
Here is his expected wOBA by game for 2023 matched up with his pitch% by game.



What I see is that his fastball (sinker) is not good. The % drops over the last 3 starts and the expected #s look a little better. The change-up itself may not be anything special, but maybe it helps out the breaking stuff. The last 2 games look like his breaking stuff is really effective after being completely **** in his games 2 and 3 of the season. The sample is still small here.

I have trying to dabble a little more into the pitch modeling data. When I compare Bielak to the rest of the pitchers on the staff, he got the worst Stuff+ on the team at 82 (100 being league avg) and near the worst when it comes to location too. Guys like Framber, Javier, & Abreu can get alow with so-so location because if their stuff. Bielak cannot.
To give some perspective on what 82 Stuff+ means.

82 is currently tied for 24th lowest in the bigs (min 20 IP) out of 320 pitchers.

deGrom is 1, Pressly is 2, Abreu is 7.
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wabs said:

So what are some potential adds via trade? Dylan Cease? Alex Cobb? Who else?
Find anyone on the White Sox, Royals, As, Rockies, or Nats with <2 years of control.
redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Haven't had time to look today, but yesterday I noticed he throws 2 types of fastball, and the sinker I thought had a better run value than the 4 seam. He also has almost dumped his curve completely while increasing the chance up.

Probably the biggest thing that helps him is he has like 5 pitches he can throw at any point and 3 of them look the same.
bearkatag15
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


476 ft...
wangus12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Its still 1st inning there so I full expect some form of "Trout absolutely destroys ball for 2 run HR as Angels fall 6-2 to the White Sox"
bearkatag15
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


seems good. Maybe get him up to the big league team soon
Mr.Bond
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Harry Dunne said:

Mr.Bond said:

Marvin said:

Mr.Bond said:

Well....... I'm back after a 2 week ban. Who had the Oklahoma Rangers with a 132 run differential on May 31? Wtf

Welcome back!

Astros have had a great two weeks, so can we count on you in crunch time to do what's necessary?



All I have to do is mention that a slumping player likes to gurgle a certain appendage found on males and BOOM. Ban Hammer
Welcome back. I got the same.

The moderation standards are strange.




The standards are wildly inconsistent for sure.
Im looking for Ray Finkle.... and a clean pair of shorts. Im just a very big Finkle fan. This is my Graceland, sir.


MAGA

KC_Ag14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Farmer1906 said:

Wabs said:

So what are some potential adds via trade? Dylan Cease? Alex Cobb? Who else?
Find anyone on the White Sox, Royals, As, Rockies, or Nats with <2 years of control.
Giolito is intriguing to me in this scenario. Upper tier spin guy. Free agent after this season and still just 28 years old. Stros have a track record of finding guys in similar scenarios and taking them to new heights.
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Just don't look at his April #s.
W
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
speaking of Mike Trout...

his slash lines are slowing down from their 2017-2019 peak.

in fact he's having his lowest SLG and OPS season since his rookie year

doesn't walk as much either
texasaggie2015
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It was pretty apparent that Bryan Abreu had filthy stuff and if he figured things out he would be dominant. I don't see that in Bielak necessarily. I think his ceiling is a #4 starter.. which is fine, but I don't see the similarity between him and Abreu last year.
JohnnyTexAg1995
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Prosperdick said:

Harry Dunne said:

Also stuck up for the Abreu homer celebration. Said that he understands that some people took it the wrong way but that you've got to remember how much pressure he was under and what a release that was for him and at the end of the day we are playing a game and there's nothing wrong with showing the child-like Joy. I like that.

Said that the way the amp handled Peña didn't look good from up above, but said he was waiting to hear the explanation and hoped he was just trying to lean in to hear Peña better and that the optics were worse than the reality. I didn't buy it, I think he's just giving the ump an easy out and trying not to embarrass him. Which is probably the smart play.

I would've said it was another big ego ump trying to make himself the star of the show and just another reason why we can't get robots out there soon enough. And that's why it's good that I'm not the GM.
One part of the broadcast that I liked last night was when they spoke about the system they're using in AAA right now where the pitcher, catcher, and hitter all can challenge a pitch.

I assume you have around 3 challenges and lose them if you're wrong but the best part is that the pitch will be showed on the jumbotron so the entire stadium can see how awful a pitch call the ump made. We need them to feel that shame so hopefully they will "try" to do better.

It's obviously not as good as robo-umps but it's at least a start and can't get here soon enough, especially the way we've been screwed all year.
the Space Cowboys game I went to with robot umpire (not the challenge but full robot) was the most relaxing baseball game I've ever watched! You literally can't get mad at anyone but your players which is refreshing!
Beau Holder
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Faustus said:

Bregman's OPS is up to .719, and his bWAR is 1.1.

https://www.baseball-reference.com/players/b/bregmal01.shtml

Tuck's OPS is .786, and his bWar is .3.

https://www.baseball-reference.com/players/t/tuckeky01.shtml

For all the grief Bregman has received for the bat, he's having a better season than Tucker so far according to Baseball Reference. Breg's defense has been sparkling. Tucker's much less so, and the bats are getting close to one another.

Fangraphs thinks so too (Bregman 1.1 fWar, Tucker .7 fWar).

https://www.fangraphs.com/players/alex-bregman/17678/stats?position=3B

https://www.fangraphs.com/players/kyle-tucker/18345/stats?position=OF

Maybe the org knew what it was doing in arbitration.

Tuck has been pretty disappointing for a while outside of the walkoff against the Cubs. I keep thinking the turnaround has to come soon.
Harry Dunne
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Detroit traded for Marisnick yesterday and he got the start for the Tigers today (2-3 w an RBI, Tigers currently up 3-1 on Arlington).
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Beau Holder said:

Faustus said:

Bregman's OPS is up to .719, and his bWAR is 1.1.

https://www.baseball-reference.com/players/b/bregmal01.shtml

Tuck's OPS is .786, and his bWar is .3.

https://www.baseball-reference.com/players/t/tuckeky01.shtml

For all the grief Bregman has received for the bat, he's having a better season than Tucker so far according to Baseball Reference. Breg's defense has been sparkling. Tucker's much less so, and the bats are getting close to one another.

Fangraphs thinks so too (Bregman 1.1 fWar, Tucker .7 fWar).

https://www.fangraphs.com/players/alex-bregman/17678/stats?position=3B

https://www.fangraphs.com/players/kyle-tucker/18345/stats?position=OF

Maybe the org knew what it was doing in arbitration.

Tuck has been pretty disappointing for a while outside of the walkoff against the Cubs. I keep thinking the turnaround has to come soon.
Beau Holder
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Let the magic work dude
W
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
also when discussing Bregman vs. Tucker

Bregman ----> $30 MM

Tucker -------> $5 MM

different expectations
bearkatag15
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
W said:

also when discussing Bregman vs. Tucker

Bregman ----> $30 MM

Tucker -------> $5 MM

different expectations
Tucker is coming off an All-star and gold glove season... my expectation for him is pretty damn high
First Page Last Page
Page 554 of 3281
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.