Now it's time for us to get the same zone when on offense. That means Maldy DONT swing
And my point stands. In order to get the 2-seed, we just need to win 2 and actually only need M's to win 1 of 2. Either would give us the division and we would be the 2-seed. There is a nice chart about 10 or so pages backBTKAG97 said:Reread what I wrote. It also includes the 6 seed though I may be wrong who needs to win in order for Texas to get the 6 seed.AlwaysNextYear89 said:Rays/Jays are irrelevant to that scenario...if we and M's win out, we win division and are 2-seedBTKAG97 said:Need Houston, Seattle, and Tampa to win out.cap-n-jack said:
So who do we want to win/lose tonight? I is so confused.
Extra credit if you can get the caliber of that necklace.
I believe this gets Houston the 2 seed, a bye, and will face the Minnesota/Texas winner.
Mathguy64 said:
Dude was out on 3 pitches and it was 2-1. And they weren't close calls.
It's like they are all wanting to stand with Angel and collectively suck so that he doesn't take all the heatf1ghtintexasaggie said:
2 innings down and this HP ump has easily already missed 10 pitches.
flashplayer said:
Do you start to trust the Rangers lead enough to go ahead and pull Verlander? Pretty much at the banks of the Rubicon with that decision now.
We don't clinch with a Seattle loss...only a W by us. If we both lose, they are still a game back and could ties us tomorrow with a win and another Astros loss which would send us fishing next week.flashplayer said:
Do you start to trust the Rangers lead enough to go ahead and pull Verlander? Pretty much at the banks of the Rubicon with that decision now.