So what your saying is that other teams can benefit in the draft by turning on each other and opening pandoras box?
Teddy Perkins said:Quote:
MLB docked the Astros their regular first-round selection in this June's draft, which would have been the 30th overall pick, and their regular second-round selection, which before the sanctions was slated to be 67th overall because of the competitive balance round that is sandwiched between the first and second rounds.
This means the Astros' first 2020 draft pick will now come in the competitive balance round that follows the second round, which should fall somewhere in the 70th-75th overall range. That is the draft choice they received as compensation for losing free agent starter Gerrit Cole, who declined their one-year, $17.8 million qualifying offer a month before he signed with the Yankees for nine years and $324 million.
After the comp pick, the Astros' next selection in the 2020 draft will be their regular third-rounder, the final pick of that round, which should fall in the 105th-110th overall range. Almost as detrimental at losing the picks themselves, the Astros also forfeited the bonus pool money attached to their regular first- and second-round picks. Those values have not yet been released by MLB. But for reference, the 30th selection in the 2019 draft came with a slot value of $2.37 million and the 67th pick had a slot value of just less than $1 million.
Because of the forfeitures by the Astros, the first competitive balance round and second-round picks for the rest of the teams will move up by one selection each. Each of the other 29 teams will also have slightly more bonus pool money with which to work than they previously would have.
That will be the case in 2021, as well, when the Astros will again be without their regular first- and second-rounders. Both of those are likely to also be late-round picks given the strength of their 2020 roster. And say next offseason they were to sign a free agent who had declined a qualifying offer from his previous team, the second-round pick they would lose for the signing would push their sign-stealing forfeiture to the second round of the 2022 draft.
It will be at least two to three years before the Astros feel the effects of losing four first- and second-round selections, which means a vast majority of the players culpable in the sign-stealing scheme won't even be impacted by this particular aspect of the punishment. Nor will they feel the $5 million fine Manfred levied against the team.
I do think it's funny that so many people associate anger with effectiveness. Do you want to want to work for a boss that yells at you for mistakes? That is a bad manager.The Beef01 said:
Whatever they do, I want to see the manager be effective at working with players like Hinch...but you have the opportunity to really move forward on AJ's biggest weakness of really being a poor fundamentals and holding guys accountable for having their head out of a game. Without this stuff having happened, the thing that was going to eventually do Hinch in was a bad season with an accumulation of guys being thrown out on the bases and sloppy play as a signature of the team.
I guess what I'm saying is...for the love of God, let it be someone who might actually look pissed when someone gets thrown out by a mile trying to leg a double into a triple, etc.
Yes. Astros have been to 2 World Series and an ALCS in 3 years. Even though this is feels like a total rest, you would love to keep continuity as much as possible.CFTXAG10 said:
Initially I was against Espada, primarily because I didn't know much about the guy and judgment was a little foggy trying to sort through wtf just happened when Crane dropped Hinch and Luhnow
The more I think about it the more I like the idea of sticking with Espada at least for this year as manager:
- already has good relationships with current players/staff - can enhance the us vs. the world mentality
- has been highly sought after in interviews by other teams, most notably the Giants (called for 2nd interview)
- he is Puerto Rican, no explanation necessary
- it wouldn't be such a drastic change this close to spring training, he is a familiar face/voice the guys can rally behind
Yea, he's awful and emblematic of our journalistic times. The Chron can't afford an adult Astros beat writer, so they hired a 25 year old former LSU frat boy who did an internship there one time. His Twitter is just designed to troll Astros fans with clickbait headlines and out of context quotes. Had to stop following him. I don't consider him a source for Astros news anymore and I hope no one else on here does either.iBrad said:
Excellent job of trying to incriminate guys not named in the investigations and negatively impact their careers. What a chode.
Frok said:
Chandler Rome is milking this incident to get some click-traffic. Of course that is what most of sports media is now.
There really isn't anything left to say. He fired the manager and general manager. That is drastic and there won't be anything more significant done.
Chandler knows this but he needs something to talk about.
tjholley16 said:
I wish MLB would launch investigations into every team. I feel like they would find about 10-15 teams doing similar things as the Astros and it would take the heat off of us.
It's possible. Not likely. I mean look at all the hell that was raised in the MLB when Canseco released his steroid information. That opened a whole can of worms and indicted a lot of playersccaggie05 said:tjholley16 said:
I wish MLB would launch investigations into every team. I feel like they would find about 10-15 teams doing similar things as the Astros and it would take the heat off of us.
No way the league does that. They are still attempting to paint this as an issue that existed primarily with the Astros and the Red Sox as a result of Cora being in both places. They don't want this to be seen as a league wide issue that is only going to bring bad press and potentially decreased interest in the sport.
In addition, there is no way in hell the league is going to willingly rope in the Yankees and Dodgers, and all the ratings and money they bring, into this scandal. It's bad enough the Red Sox are involved, but the main Astros afflicted culprit is gone (Cora) which sets up the league for a soft punishment on the Red Sox once the their investigation ends.
The only way they thing expands to other teams, like the Yankees, is if there is a national outcry that forced the league into it, as occurred with the Astros. We all know the national reporters won't do it and the Astros affiliated media are too busy trashing the team they report on to look elsewhere. The only hope is if the Boston media has a big enough bark (I'm skeptical) to force the league to look into the Yankees and other teams.
tjholley16 said:It's possible. Not likely. I mean look at all the hell that was raised in the MLB when Canseco released his steroid information. That opened a whole can of worms and indicted a lot of playersccaggie05 said:tjholley16 said:
I wish MLB would launch investigations into every team. I feel like they would find about 10-15 teams doing similar things as the Astros and it would take the heat off of us.
No way the league does that. They are still attempting to paint this as an issue that existed primarily with the Astros and the Red Sox as a result of Cora being in both places. They don't want this to be seen as a league wide issue that is only going to bring bad press and potentially decreased interest in the sport.
In addition, there is no way in hell the league is going to willingly rope in the Yankees and Dodgers, and all the ratings and money they bring, into this scandal. It's bad enough the Red Sox are involved, but the main Astros afflicted culprit is gone (Cora) which sets up the league for a soft punishment on the Red Sox once the their investigation ends.
The only way they thing expands to other teams, like the Yankees, is if there is a national outcry that forced the league into it, as occurred with the Astros. We all know the national reporters won't do it and the Astros affiliated media are too busy trashing the team they report on to look elsewhere. The only hope is if the Boston media has a big enough bark (I'm skeptical) to force the league to look into the Yankees and other teams.
Absolutely agree. Which is why the folks leaking info to journalists or just speaking from their own social media accounts need to be no holds barred.Quote:
It's going to take lots of pressure to force Manfred to act. His mindset was made clear when he said back when the Astros investigation first started that he has no reason to believe any other team is involved despite already plenty of rumors that said otherwise.
Hell, they wouldn't stay silent even if the Yankees were not involved, but since they are, the Boston media has an incentive to go all in on em. My only fear is that Manfred may try to extinguish the flames by suspending Cora and no further punishment to the BoSox in exchange for a hush hush agreement moving forward. Meaning no ratting on NY or others from their side.Quote:
That's the silver lining about the Red Sox being involved. They are one of the league's major franchises and their fan base and media will not stay silent if they feel the Yankees are getting away with something here. I just hope it's enough.
Especially after CC came out and said they were cheated out of two titles.CFTXAG10 said:
I would love for this to come around to bite the Yankees in the a** somehow. Whether it be a vengeful Cora, or some other rat, somebody needs to expose them in a way that Manfred cannot just sweep it under the rug. Same goes for any other team that thinks they are out of the woods even though there are plenty who were doing the same s***.
Maybe I'm just too invested in the Astros, but, I don't see how the Red Sox could possibly get anything less than what the Astros got (fine, draft picks, manager and GM year long suspension). From the Atheltic article, it sounds like what they did is basically the same thing as the Astros minus the trash can. Who cares if they supposedly could only use their system when a runner was on second? They still used video long after the memo came out and, importantly, after they had already been disciplined for electronic sign stealing.CFTXAG10 said:
My only fear is that Manfred may try to extinguish the flames by suspending Cora and no further punishment to the BoSox in exchange for a hush hush agreement moving forward. Meaning no ratting on NY or others from their side.
key word being: ShouldiBrad said:
It should actually be harsher because it's strike two. The Red Sox are the reason for the 2017 edict by Manfred.
Quote:
Hell, they wouldn't stay silent even if the Yankees were not involved, but since they are, the Boston media has an incentive to go all in on em. My only fear is that Manfred may try to extinguish the flames by suspending Cora and no further punishment to the BoSox in exchange for a hush hush agreement moving forward. Meaning no ratting on NY or others from their side.
Scrap iron would be a very good candidate as a 1-year fill-inagproducer said:
I wonder if Phil Garner would be on the possible managerial list. He did well with the guys in the 2000s. He had good relationships with the players, and still has ties to the Astros. The question is: could he relate to today's players and ind incorporate analytics? You know the guys respect the resumes of Biggio and Baggy. I bet they'd respect Garner's too.
Besides, Garner seems to be of the mentality of the players. He's come out publicly and called Mike Fiers a "rat."