TexasAggie_97 said:
Teslag said:
TexasAggie_97 said:
Then why are we not getting the elite 5-star players like they are? There were at least 5 elite QBs that would have been an immediate upgrade.
Who were these 5 elite QB's in the portal that were clearly better than Reed?
I'm going to assume you're joking, but if not, feel free to go to the 247 transfer portal tracker and look for yourself. If you don't think that several of those guys would not have been an immediate upgrade, then you're either lying to yourself or just being obstinate.
I did. And I did the research.
Marcel Reed
234 of 377 (62.1%) for 3,169 yards, 25TD, 12INT, 148.2 rating
104 carries for 493 yards, 6 TD
Sam Leavitt
145 of 239 (60.7%) for 1,628 yards, 10TD, 3INT, 129.2 rating
73 carries for 306 yards, 5 TD
Brendan Soresby
207 of 366 (61.6%) for 2,800 yards, 27TD, 5INT, 155.1 rating
100 carries for 509 yards, 5 TD
DJ Lagway
213 of 337 (63.2%) for 2,264 yards, 16TD, 14INT, 127.0 rating
71 carries for 136 yards, 1 TD
Drew Mestemaker
319 of 463 (68.9%) for 4,379 yards, 34TD, 9INT, 168.7 rating
57 carries for 89 yards, 5 TD
Dylan Raiola
181 for 250 (72.4%) for 2,000 yards, 18TD, 6INT, 158.6 rating
46 caries for -87 yards, 0TD (
this is pathetic)
And Marcel did that against far better defenses than everyone but Lagway. If Reed had gone into the portal it's likely he's the #1 player overall based on metrics.
So again, I ask, which 5 QB's on real production and metrics against real competition are clearly better than Reed? Also, keep in mind, your ridiculous premise is that we aren't spending money because we didn't get a QB to replace Reed. Yet Reed makes more $ than everyone on that last except maybe Soresby. And that's a maybe.