Texas A&M Football
Sponsored by

Cam Coleman

112,884 Views | 414 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by OBJTEX
A. G. Pennypacker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
OBJTEX said:

rgag12 said:

If it's really between us and tu, he's going to tu.


Wrong! Cant speak for another program, but they need too many starters up front and a RB1. Cannot overpay for Coleman.

We will win if down to just.




Pretty sure we need a bunch of new starters up front too.
25Lighters
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Coleman was also committed to us at one point so he obviously likes A&M.

With Wiggins being a WR coach before OC that is another great selling point. Then just show how we used Conception last year and now with Wiggins calling the plays he is going to make sure our playmakers getting the ball even more and I like our chances.
AggieMD95
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
25Lighters said:

Coleman was also committed to us at one point so he obviously likes A&M.

With Wiggins being a WR coach before OC that is another great selling point. Then just show how we used Conception last year and now with Wiggins calling the plays he is going to make sure our playmakers getting the ball even more and I like our chances.


This should be a tell that we are in good position
MaroonStain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
LB12Diamond said:

KC last year went to A&M. And he had a great season with Reed as his QB even though you keep ragging on him.

So we do win some of these battles. Might not win this one. But we did last year.

But you guys go ahead a cry more.


These same mofos will be whining and trolling for the next 8 months.
LB12Diamond
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MaroonStain said:

LB12Diamond said:

KC last year went to A&M. And he had a great season with Reed as his QB even though you keep ragging on him.

So we do win some of these battles. Might not win this one. But we did last year.

But you guys go ahead a cry more.


These same mofos will be whining and trolling for the next 8 months.


They will cry even if we get Coleman. It's pretty amazing.
Gig ‘Em Baby!
The Collective
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Reed had more passing yards, a higher completion %, and more rushing yards than Arch. Some of you are so desperate to hate that you won't even step up from the ledge and see that just maybe just maybe our 11-1 regular season wasn't the same as being 8-4 or 7-5.
levytrousersEOY
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Collective said:

Reed had more passing yards, a higher completion %, and more rushing yards than Arch.



Yeah if only there was a way we could pit them against each other on the field to see who is better.
romanagg11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Thought A&M went all in $$ with WR1 Craver?
The Collective
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
levytrousersEOY said:

The Collective said:

Reed had more passing yards, a higher completion %, and more rushing yards than Arch.



Yeah if only there was a way we could pit them against each other on the field to see who is better.


Well, you can't. They don't play against the same defenses. They can't both play at home. I'm basing my information on an entire season of activity.
KCup17
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He is asking for $2M guaranteed. Not sure if we bite.
MaroonStain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
levytrousersEOY said:

The Collective said:

Reed had more passing yards, a higher completion %, and more rushing yards than Arch.



Yeah if only there was a way we could pit them against each other on the field to see who is better.


Shut up, sip, dam....
90ags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Prince Arch supposedly giving up $3-$4M in NIL to help pay for some top guys. Many prognosticating online services think Coleman and UF RB are done deals to tu. Sippers think having Arch as QB provides huge advantage (esp since he's improved) over any other college qb next year (and esp vs Reed they think a top WR will chose Arch and Sark offense over what we have to offer).

We were chasing Wilson (UF) as a top WR option and he just reupped back to UF. This is the one that we missed on.

Hopefully we are still in Coleman convo, but gut says probably not. Many forget he committed to Jimbo and changed to Aub when we changed HC I think.

We shall see.
______________________________________________________ Play for the name on the front of your jersey, not the back...
OBJTEX
How long do you want to ignore this user?
90ags said:

Prince Arch supposedly giving up $3-$4M in NIL to help pay for some top guys. Many prognosticating online services think Coleman and UF RB are done deals to tu. Sippers think having Arch as QB provides huge advantage (esp since he's improved) over any other college qb next year (and esp vs Reed they think a top WR will chose Arch and Sark offense over what we have to offer).

We were chasing Wilson (UF) as a top WR option and he just reupped back to UF. This is the one that we missed on.

Hopefully we are still in Coleman convo, but gut says probably not. Many forget he committed to Jimbo and changed to Aub when we changed HC I think.

We shall see.


I think we get Coleman. Tons of good RBs. Save $ and get 5th+++++ best rb.
Hill08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KCup17 said:

He is asking for $2M guaranteed. Not sure if we bite.


I miss the good ole days when you could just pay players without anyone knowing
Haricougar
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Coleman was verbally pledged to us before we fired Fisher so there is a chance for us.
Romans 12:9-11
Pichael Thompson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MaroonStain said:

LB12Diamond said:

KC last year went to A&M. And he had a great season with Reed as his QB even though you keep ragging on him.

So we do win some of these battles. Might not win this one. But we did last year.

But you guys go ahead a cry more.


These same mofos will be whining and trolling for the next 8 months.



You're the only one crying on this thread
Dex_Mick_Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CoachLB said:

Coleman played at Kyle and loved the atmosphere. But so did Dallas Wilson. So grab one of those two and it is great. I saw Concepcion at NC State. I was excited when we got him. I posted about him immediately. I think he caught some of our fans by surprise. And rightfully so as most people here do not watch NC State . Get Coleman or Wilson and I am happy and we have our next Concepcion level guy. Add them to Bethel-Roman, Craver, Bussey, Williams and others and our WR room is excellent.


Have you seen Terrell Anderson (WR @ NC State) play? I heard he's pretty twitchy...
LatinAggie1997
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Our WR room was praised all year by the pundits, largely because of the combination of potential and results.
Coleman would do very well to factor more than just QB hype.
The Collective
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I thought all of Arch's NIL was going to charity…
Ag1188
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
fightinag said:

A. G. Pennypacker said:

Might come down to who has the better QB.

In that case......Welcome to Austin Cam
lol. The slackjaw inbred QB kid who can only tuck & run? Lmao
romanagg11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Without a solid OLine investment, it won't matter which WR or RB A&M gets. I'd pass on Coleman for that rate. He will be laughing to the bank like Fisher did.
Ag1188
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sq 17 said:

Sorry about being pessimistic but

He gone Even if we offer the same

Head Coach who used to be an OC better than Head Coach who used to be DC with an new and unproven OC
Other earning opportunities are better in Austin than CS
lol. You sound goofy as hell. Their WR production this year was pathetic at Sips. "earning opportunities" LOL. He'll make $2 million just in direct NIL payment from either collective/school.
Ag1188
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
levytrousersEOY said:

The Collective said:

Reed had more passing yards, a higher completion %, and more rushing yards than Arch.



Yeah if only there was a way we could pit them against each other on the field to see who is better.
Lol. Oh dork sip. Arch Manning was awful against A&M. Like 47% completion percentage. His tuck & run against our 3-star rebuilding defense was the only way he moved the chains beyond their RB.
zephyr88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Cam Coleman wasn't even the highest performing "Cam" on the Top 100 Receivers this year.

Camden Brown = 1,079 yards, 14 TD (#11)
He was a senior, so he's off the table.

Kam Perry = 976 yards, 6 TD (#23)
He was a junior, but do we want another 5'-9" receiver?

Cameron Dorner = 911 yards, 8 TD (#37)
He was a senior, so he's off the table.

Cam Coleman = 708 yards, 5 TD (#100)
He was a sophomore, but team loyalty is void with NIL.

My question is how is the #100 ranked receiver worth $2,000,000?
cevans_40
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
levytrousersEOY said:

The Collective said:

Reed had more passing yards, a higher completion %, and more rushing yards than Arch.



Yeah if only there was a way we could pit them against each other on the field to see who is better.

If only there was a way to get you to stay on Orangebloods.

$20 says you have a SFA/Sam/Texas St diploma or nothing.
AgSnacks16
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
QB play at Auburn was awful for most of the year. That offense was incredibly inept and only anchored by a great defense.

(Think A&M at the end of the year but for the whole season)
Barnacle
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
romanagg11 said:

Without a solid OLine investment, it won't matter which WR or RB A&M gets. I'd pass on Coleman for that rate. He will be laughing to the bank like Fisher did.


You never know if a big cigar steps up to the plate for a one off deal just for Coleman above and beyond their normal contributions.
TXAGGIES
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Games are won in the trenches. An average QB can win the Heisman behind a great OL coupled with a DL.
Sq 17
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EsipN prior to the tu game showed that Arch and Reed had nearly identical stats ( excluding # of Ls

Our OC is gone Our HC does not manage the offense our new OC is inexperienced to say the least

Sark is considered an excellent offensive coach
Tu receivers had plenty of catches for plenty of yards even if they didn't go over 900 yards
OBJTEX
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Idea. Let them overpay for Cam. Another starting WR for them hit the portal. Sign 1-2 of their former WRs so we can learn their offense and steal signals, etc
LarryLayman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LB12Diamond said:

KC last year went to A&M. And he had a great season with Reed as his QB even though you keep ragging on him.

So we do win some of these battles. Might not win this one. But we did last year.

But you guys go ahead a cry more.


One teams QB started out looking like total crap and finished the year very strong. The other teams QB played OK until the last two games of the year where he looked terrible. If you were a transfer receiver which looks like the better place to land?
EliteZags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
KCup17 said:

He is asking for $2M guaranteed. Not sure if we bite.

Jarrin Jay
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm good with Craver at WR1 and the up and coming WRs we have in roster such that our portal WR xfers could be Jahdae Walker types.

We have bigger needs on O, OL and TE.
EliteZags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
call me crazy but I project Madden Williams to step in and fill part of KC's production off the bat
dude plays ferocious like a Evans/JChase dominating over elite competition

also lets not forget Jerome Myles
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KCup17 said:

He is asking for $2M guaranteed. Not sure if we bite.


Wouldnt that make him the highest paid player on the team?!
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.