authoritative statement with zero clout behind it. If he starts, it's bc the backups aren't that good and the amount of money we're paying him.NavyVetAg said:
Reed will start next year.
authoritative statement with zero clout behind it. If he starts, it's bc the backups aren't that good and the amount of money we're paying him.NavyVetAg said:
Reed will start next year.
Well what were the circumstances of Casuga's INTs. I watched his ESPN game a few weeks ago where his team lost bad, but he was having to run for his life every drop back from the get-go with about sub-2-seconds to throw.phatty26 said:
i think hes more accurate than Reed spring game will be telling. I'm not sold on Casuga the time Brauny showed up to watch him play he had 5 int's.
Ag1188 said:Heineken-Ashi said:TMartin said:Heineken-Ashi said:TMartin said:DGrimesAg92 said:
6'-4" and a buck ninety five.....SEC fragile.
At least he has the frame to put on more weight/muscle. I don't think Reed weighs a buck seventy-five at the end of the year.
And how much did that matter this year, despite you mouth breathers freaking out all offseason about his weight?
Dude has been 10x healthier than beefy prototype Weigman despite running twice as much.
It's going to be fun watching you Reed devotees in 2026. The love affair with your darling may end.
I had much more fun watching you derps cry after every win.
And will do so again next year.
Not many of those wins were because of Reed. Lol we had to run the ball vs LSU all 2nd half for fear Reed would throw an INT. Passing Offense struggled for most of Florida, Auburn, Carolina, and most the other Wins.
Ag1188 said:NavyVetAg said:
Reed will start next year.
authoritative statement with zero clout behind it. If he starts, it's bc the backups aren't that good and the amount of money we're paying him.
DGrimesAg92 said:
6'-4" and a buck ninety five.....SEC fragile.