Alabama wins

BYU loses

equals OU at Kyle Field for the 8-9 game

Fanatic15...Drs2B! said:

---

MaroonStain said:

---

Alabama v. Oklahoma - rematch

Notre Dame v. Texas Aggies - rematch

Tulane v. Ole Miss - rematch

Great work, committee! Another waste of money on bureaucracy

---

Hard to believe that they wouldn't try to AVOID rematches!

---

Told everyone that would happen,

We get the Indiana side of the bracket!

Old Ag 95 said:

---

BraxtonW said:

---

7 seed is a night game though. Gotta look at the positives

---

Is this Fri or Sat? Where can you find that info - playoff game schedule with seeds? I only see the schedule without seeds.

---

Saturday. Let me try to find it again

Old Ag 95 said:

---

BraxtonW said:

---

7 seed is a night game though. Gotta look at the positives

---

Is this Fri or Sat? Where can you find that info - playoff game schedule with seeds? I only see the schedule without seeds.

---

Charlie 31 said:

---

We get the Indiana side of the bracket!

---

Yeah but I would rather play a conference champ and then an inept Georgia offense. Georgias D is really good, but I think we could score one more point than them. The only hangup would be their D being so good we are forced into multiple FG attempts and that's our downfall.

The Notre Dame matchup is undesirable. You never want to play a comparable team you've already beaten a second time. Plus, with Love on a tear, I don't like the matchup with our defense.

In short, we play #13 on the road…if we win, we stay undefeated and #3…if we lose we become the worst 11-1 team. Give me a break!

Meanwhile, the ******* sits there with a straight face justifying moving Bama because they beat Auburn. What a sham.

Farmer_J said:

---

Until we can actually win the big game, and not choke and collapse, we will never get the benefit of the doubt.

It's that simple

---

this is sadly… the answer.

Two words to describe this committee

Epic Fail

Agsone said:

---

Tceh loses to unranked ASU and is #4. We lose to #13 tu and are sitting at #7. Make it make sense.

---

A&M is a historical also ran who many, many media have predicted as a dark horse, for decades. The media has looked foolish in doing so. Until A&M proves otherwise, they are a a weird and generally unlikeable middle tier program.

Tech, on the other hand, is this decade's version of Oregon. They haven't burned media members year after year, they haven't been a chest thumping program with nothing to show for it. They're flashy and absolutely destroying teams, which looks good on paper for a bunch of media members that don't know much about the difference between BYU and Notre Dame or Houston and Auburn talent.

Gigemags382 said:

---

Tech is ranked way ahead of us in almost any computer rankings. Get over it. They've looked much better than us. It's not just about raw wins and losses.

---

against trash.

Why have the committee?

They just rubber stamped the polls

And why do they want to create a rematch ?

Tex117 said:

---

Farmer_J said:

---

Until we can actually win the big game, and not choke and collapse, we will never get the benefit of the doubt.

It's that simple

---

this is sadly… the answer.

---

We didn't ****ing choke or collapse. We lost to our rival, 40 million dollar roster, team knocking on the door to playoffs. The team does not deserve to be consistently mis ranked.

Justice Beaver said:

---

Horse. *****

---

If only the Aggies had beaten the sips. Nope didn't happen, so the committee put the Aggies right where we belong. Lucky it was 7 and not further up.

npc said:

---

Agsone said:

---

Tceh loses to unranked ASU and is #4. We lose to #13 tu and are sitting at #7. Make it make sense.

---

A&M is a historical also ran who many, many media have predicted as a dark horse, for decades. The media has looked foolish in doing so. Until A&M proves otherwise, they are a a weird and generally unlikeable middle tier program.

Tech, on the other hand, is this decade's version of Oregon. They haven't burned media members year after year, they haven't been a chest thumping program with nothing to show for it. They're flashy and absolutely destroying teams, which looks good on paper for a bunch of media members that don't know much about the difference between BYU and Notre Dame or Houston and Auburn talent.

---

the committee is not supposed to consider the past in their rankings. If they do they are nothing more than fans.

Lose like **** end of season and it paints the picture who you are as a team. Lucky we didn't fall further.

Losing early in the season is way better.

Emilio Fantastico said:

---

Two words to describe this committee

Epic Fail

---

You should read what the sips think about the CFP Committee right now.

I don't think that's actual game times

But 7/10 highly likely a night game

W said:

---

Alabama wins

BYU loses

equals OU at Kyle Field for the 8-9 game

---

How do we move down in that scenario?

BMX Bandit said:

---

I don't think that's actual game times

---

not saying you're wrong but why wouldn't it. It has the tv network and the time on the ESPN app.

AggieMD95 said:

---

W said:

---

Alabama wins

BYU loses

equals OU at Kyle Field for the 8-9 game

---

How do we move down in that scenario?

---

bama passes us

Charlie 31 said:

---

We get the Indiana side of the bracket!

---

Infians plays ODU on Saturday. Either Indiana wins and more up or loses and moves down. I don't see how they stay at 2

Alabama jumps to the top 4 as the SEC champion

no worse than #5

Charlie 31 said:

---

We get the Indiana side of the bracket!

---

unless Alabama jumps us.

Sterling82 said:

---

The Notre Dame matchup is undesirable. You never want to play a comparable team you've already beaten a second time. Plus, with Love on a tear, I don't like the matchup with our defense.

In short, we play #13 on the road…if we win, we stay undefeated and #3…if we lose we become the worst 11-1 team. Give me a break!

Meanwhile, the ******* sits there with a straight face justifying moving Bama because they beat Auburn. What a sham.

---

yes, the Notre Dame rushing attack vs. the A&M run defense is a very, very bad matchup for the Ags

W said:

---

Alabama jumps to the top 4 as the SEC champion

no worse than #5

---

definitely not. But a couple spots

W said:

---

Sterling82 said:

---

The Notre Dame matchup is undesirable. You never want to play a comparable team you've already beaten a second time. Plus, with Love on a tear, I don't like the matchup with our defense.

In short, we play #13 on the road…if we win, we stay undefeated and #3…if we lose we become the worst 11-1 team. Give me a break!

Meanwhile, the ******* sits there with a straight face justifying moving Bama because they beat Auburn. What a sham.

---

yes, the Notre Dame rushing attack vs. the A&M run defense is a very, very bad matchup for the Ags

---

You know what else is a bad matchup?

The Notre Dame pass defense vs the Ags pass offense.

Does ND's Pass D still suck?

Heineken-Ashi said:

---

W said:

---

Sterling82 said:

---

The Notre Dame matchup is undesirable. You never want to play a comparable team you've already beaten a second time. Plus, with Love on a tear, I don't like the matchup with our defense.

In short, we play #13 on the road…if we win, we stay undefeated and #3…if we lose we become the worst 11-1 team. Give me a break!

Meanwhile, the ******* sits there with a straight face justifying moving Bama because they beat Auburn. What a sham.

---

yes, the Notre Dame rushing attack vs. the A&M run defense is a very, very bad matchup for the Ags

---

You know what else is a bad matchup?

The Notre Dame pass defense vs the Ags pass offense.

---

Is it still though? It may have been at the beginning of the season, but ND is much improved.

Farmer_J said:

---

Until we can actually win the big game, and not choke and collapse, we will never get the benefit of the doubt.

It's that simple

---

Unless you're Texas Tech from the Big 12. Then you can pass us with a weaker record.

Admit it. It's not just about winning or who we beat. It's who we are as well.

I feel sorry for you guys that have not accepted what committees do.

Once you accept it, you gain so much more peace in your life.

Instead of complaining and worrying with the 7 seed, I'm looking forward to prime-time matchup at Kyle.

And a quarterfinal game closer to home than the Orange Bowl!

CoachLB said:

---

npc said:

---

Agsone said:

---

Tceh loses to unranked ASU and is #4. We lose to #13 tu and are sitting at #7. Make it make sense.

---

A&M is a historical also ran who many, many media have predicted as a dark horse, for decades. The media has looked foolish in doing so. Until A&M proves otherwise, they are a a weird and generally unlikeable middle tier program.

Tech, on the other hand, is this decade's version of Oregon. They haven't burned media members year after year, they haven't been a chest thumping program with nothing to show for it. They're flashy and absolutely destroying teams, which looks good on paper for a bunch of media members that don't know much about the difference between BYU and Notre Dame or Houston and Auburn talent.

---

the committee is not supposed to consider the past in their rankings. If they do they are nothing more than fans.

---

Yes. Also, yes.

I along with others told yall not to be shocked. Yet here you are.

LB12Diamond said:

---

I feel sorry for you guys that have not accepted what committees do.

Once you accept it, you gain so much more peace in your life.

Instead of complaining and worrying with the 7 seed, I'm looking forward to prime-time matchup at Kyle.

And a quarterfinal game closer to home than the Orange Bowl!

---

The scenario where A&M doesn't even host is alive and well.

Committee seems to be going out of their way to show that they don't care about ooc scheduling. We beat ND on the road and lose to #13 and drop to #7. Tech loses to Arizona State and plays a weak schedule and gets #4. If you play a 9 game SEC schedule, you'd be stupid to line up another P4 team.