Watching this stuff unfold is almost as fun as watching "college football" itself.
Thus my quotation marks around "college football". You know, the same quotation marks you used to denote sarcasm. I can use them, too, and did it first.An L of an Ag said:
There hasn't been "college football" for a couple of years now. It's all NFL-lite without the salary cap.
That's the problem it can't be pay for play so your locked in. Not saying it's all true but the contract itself can't involve any pay for play. He could be a 0 effort guy never see the field and still get whatever he was offered. The players hold all the power.Timberwolf said:
Surely there's something in there that gets them off the hook if he decides to suck halfway through the season
I worked at a funeral home and slept overnight in it.......most nights I did't get to sleep all night because we had to go pick up a body......or bodies !Class of 65 said:
I picked cotton to get thru A&M
Was friends with a girl that worked and lived at the funeral home in Bryan. We'd party in her little upstairs apartment, get off of our faces and then wandered the funeral home in the middle of the night. Used to freak us out.fightinag said:I worked at a funeral home and slept overnight in it.......most nights I did't get to sleep all night because we had to go pick up a body......or bodies !Class of 65 said:
I picked cotton to get thru A&M
I then got up early and went to classes ...... and this was with a baseball scholarship !
I thought I was blessed ......
Stone44 said:
Give the kid a break. Would you want to live in Lubbock? He's lived in that sandbox for a year and he wants out. tech has never won an outright conference championship in their history. he is their one and only five star player ever signed and there's a reason for that. Let's see what Elko can do with him.
WTAG74 said:
Micah Hudson was one of the highest rated receivers ever recruited at Tech. He was expected to have some impact in the passing game, even though a Freshman. He played in 8 games as opposed to 8 of 18 receivers that played and played in all 12 games. His average gain per reception per game was 15.38 yds and ranked 6th on the roster. In total receptions the receivers ahead of him totaled 84% of the receptions and there were 7 of them. His individual total on receptions was 2.5%. He had no TD receptions and the team had a total of 30. So, for whatever reason, he had negligible impact for the team. His speed in the 100m is in the fastest 2%, so I would not think speed is an issue. For whatever reason Tech did not keep him, I don't know. There is talk about route running, Hopefully whatever the problems that may exist, I hope Elko and his staff can help the young man and he can be productive for our team and program. God Speed Micah.
O I believe you I follow enough of recruting and football to know a player like him at tech not playing is a red flag. Most of the time smoke means fire if you see enough of it. If he was at Ohio state and had those stats i wouldnt worry but him being at Tech and being the highest paid player on the roster he had a problem somewhere. Now new staff new expectations he gets a mulligan and can try again.OBJTEX said:WTAG74 said:
Micah Hudson was one of the highest rated receivers ever recruited at Tech. He was expected to have some impact in the passing game, even though a Freshman. He played in 8 games as opposed to 8 of 18 receivers that played and played in all 12 games. His average gain per reception per game was 15.38 yds and ranked 6th on the roster. In total receptions the receivers ahead of him totaled 84% of the receptions and there were 7 of them. His individual total on receptions was 2.5%. He had no TD receptions and the team had a total of 30. So, for whatever reason, he had negligible impact for the team. His speed in the 100m is in the fastest 2%, so I would not think speed is an issue. For whatever reason Tech did not keep him, I don't know. There is talk about route running, Hopefully whatever the problems that may exist, I hope Elko and his staff can help the young man and he can be productive for our team and program. God Speed Micah.
Our maroon blinded fans wont want to beleive, but he was an attitiude problem At tech. He was dinged in spring and didnt play much but also didnt bother to learn the playbook. Came into fall ill prepared and didnt work hard.
We can hope he changes here with new scenery and a year of maturity.
But he was an attitude problem and a crappy teammate.
Level 2 source from Temple area that knows him and TTU Fb.
greg.w.h said:Yes. But the notion no person who owns a business that can benefit from marketing with the use of name, image, and likeness of a college's football player because they serve that town isn't a reasonable thing to regulate even if it clearly benefits the school.Muy said:
Does this site still have purists who think NIL is actually separate from paying to play?
It requires a collective bargaining agreement to limit this and protect the NCAA and member institutions from anti-trust lawsuits. Ted Cruz can't pull it off.
I don't doubt it. I am glad we got him but we need to make sure new staff doesn't turn into old staff and go ape-S on overpaying for talent that are terrible teammates.OBJTEX said:WTAG74 said:
Micah Hudson was one of the highest rated receivers ever recruited at Tech. He was expected to have some impact in the passing game, even though a Freshman. He played in 8 games as opposed to 8 of 18 receivers that played and played in all 12 games. His average gain per reception per game was 15.38 yds and ranked 6th on the roster. In total receptions the receivers ahead of him totaled 84% of the receptions and there were 7 of them. His individual total on receptions was 2.5%. He had no TD receptions and the team had a total of 30. So, for whatever reason, he had negligible impact for the team. His speed in the 100m is in the fastest 2%, so I would not think speed is an issue. For whatever reason Tech did not keep him, I don't know. There is talk about route running, Hopefully whatever the problems that may exist, I hope Elko and his staff can help the young man and he can be productive for our team and program. God Speed Micah.
Our maroon blinded fans wont want to beleive, but he was an attitiude problem At tech. He was dinged in spring and didnt play much but also didnt bother to learn the playbook. Came into fall ill prepared and didnt work hard.
We can hope he changes here with new scenery and a year of maturity.
But he was an attitude problem and a crappy teammate.
Level 2 source from Temple area that knows him and TTU Fb.
No one will remember the money invested in a recruit if a player of Hudsons caliber is able to get the football team to Atlanta or the CFP Finals.Wabs said:
And who cares even if it is true?? This is a professional sport now and should be treated as such.
RUGuys4Real said:
Side Question: Did an A&M AD say that we did in fact pay $30 mill for the 22' Class?
I troll another SEC Team's Forum and that's been posted several times.
Based on those numbers, his production wasn't worth even his full scholarship.WTAG74 said:
Micah Hudson was one of the highest rated receivers ever recruited at Tech. He was expected to have some impact in the passing game, even though a Freshman. He played in 8 games as opposed to 8 of 18 receivers that played and played in all 12 games. His average gain per reception per game was 15.38 yds and ranked 6th on the roster. In total receptions the receivers ahead of him totaled 84% of the receptions and there were 7 of them. His individual total on receptions was 2.5%. He had no TD receptions and the team had a total of 30. So, for whatever reason, he had negligible impact for the team. His speed in the 100m is in the fastest 2%, so I would not think speed is an issue. For whatever reason Tech did not keep him, I don't know. There is talk about route running, Hopefully whatever the problems that may exist, I hope Elko and his staff can help the young man and he can be productive for our team and program. God Speed Micah.
lol, I agree. Can't remember the last thing I bought because some 18 year old kid playing LB promoted it in some way. It is pay for play, plain and simple.Muy said:greg.w.h said:Yes. But the notion no person who owns a business that can benefit from marketing with the use of name, image, and likeness of a college's football player because they serve that town isn't a reasonable thing to regulate even if it clearly benefits the school.Muy said:
Does this site still have purists who think NIL is actually separate from paying to play?
It requires a collective bargaining agreement to limit this and protect the NCAA and member institutions from anti-trust lawsuits. Ted Cruz can't pull it off.
I'd love to see how much revenue these businesses are gaining by each "name, image and likeness" deal. That list will be pretty short to non-existent.
AngryAG said:Stone44 said:
Give the kid a break. Would you want to live in Lubbock? He's lived in that sandbox for a year and he wants out. tech has never won an outright conference championship in their history. he is their one and only five star player ever signed and there's a reason for that. Let's see what Elko can do with him.
Problem is he showed up and impressed nobody on the Tech staff. It happens every cycle to some highly rated recruits.
beerad12man said:AngryAG said:Stone44 said:
Give the kid a break. Would you want to live in Lubbock? He's lived in that sandbox for a year and he wants out. tech has never won an outright conference championship in their history. he is their one and only five star player ever signed and there's a reason for that. Let's see what Elko can do with him.
Problem is he showed up and impressed nobody on the Tech staff. It happens every cycle to some highly rated recruits.
Where do you guys get this? Literally nothing credible has said he didn't impress anyone on the tech staff. I've heard far from it. How will he do here, I have no clue. But to say he didn't impress anyone is flat out false
The closest credible report, I can find, is Bjork adamantly denying A&M Paid $30 mill.OBJTEX said:RUGuys4Real said:
Side Question: Did an A&M AD say that we did in fact pay $30 mill for the 22' Class?
I troll another SEC Team's Forum and that's been posted several times.
I heard that on xm radio from Rick Neuheisel as well. He said Ross Bjork bragged about that number to other ADs at a dinner.
RUGuys4Real said:The closest credible report, I can find, is Bjork adamantly denying A&M Paid $30 mill.OBJTEX said:RUGuys4Real said:
Side Question: Did an A&M AD say that we did in fact pay $30 mill for the 22' Class?
I troll another SEC Team's Forum and that's been posted several times.
I heard that on xm radio from Rick Neuheisel as well. He said Ross Bjork bragged about that number to other ADs at a dinner.
So Bjork Brags one moment and Deny's the next?
"I heard someone say, that someone said on the radio, that the AD said" isn't what I'm looking for.
vander54, do you have insight on this?
What do you mean?beerad12man said:
We did not pay a record price for the 2022 class.
OBJTEX said:RUGuys4Real said:
Side Question: Did an A&M AD say that we did in fact pay $30 mill for the 22' Class?
I troll another SEC Team's Forum and that's been posted several times.
I heard that on xm radio from Rick Neuheisel as well. He said Ross Bjork bragged about that number to other ADs at a dinner.