So if he takes a job next year, doesn't that reduce our buyout?
WC94 said:ffco said:
SMU
Sonny Dykes is a better coach than Jimbo.
Mark Stoops said:
Just having one natty is a pretty surface level analysis
NO. Guaranteed.Hill08 said:
So if he takes a job next year, doesn't that reduce our buyout?
No.Hill08 said:
So if he takes a job next year, doesn't that reduce our buyout?
Being pissed at things you have zero influence or control over is a winning strategy…The Zookeeper said:NO. Guaranteed.Hill08 said:
So if he takes a job next year, doesn't that reduce our buyout?
Part of reason why so many were pissed and more pissed at the extension
greg.w.h said:Being pissed at things you have zero influence or control over is a winning strategy…The Zookeeper said:NO. Guaranteed.Hill08 said:
So if he takes a job next year, doesn't that reduce our buyout?
Part of reason why so many were pissed and more pissed at the extension
StinkyPinky said:
Not sure what type of job his ego will allow. I'll be interested to see how it turns out if he lands somewhere. I suspect it's be more in a consulting roll where he can stay close to the game but less stress/work?
Emilio Fantastico said:
The biggest problem I see with hiring Jimbo after the debacle that happened here is what kind of assistants would he be able to hire.
He has no coaching tree of young up-and-comers that he helped develop into big time coaches and he was reduced to hiring old retread failed head coached here even with all our resources.
Just not something that screams future success.
well_endowed_ag said:Emilio Fantastico said:
The biggest problem I see with hiring Jimbo after the debacle that happened here is what kind of assistants would he be able to hire.
He has no coaching tree of young up-and-comers that he helped develop into big time coaches and he was reduced to hiring old retread failed head coached here even with all our resources.
Just not something that screams future success.
Agree. He is a hired gun who will put together a hired gun staff and recruit hired gun players. It can potentially work out, but there's a major risk of program instability associated with it.
Agree. Definitely there will be people who want to give him a shot. But that's my point with his ego, how small of a program is it before his ego say its beneath him.rootube said:StinkyPinky said:
Not sure what type of job his ego will allow. I'll be interested to see how it turns out if he lands somewhere. I suspect it's be more in a consulting roll where he can stay close to the game but less stress/work?
Someone looked at Les Miles and convinced themselves that he was worth a shot. Jimbo will 100% get an opportunity to be a head coach again. The only question is where and will it be in a place where he can have success.
Some were pissed ... a lot of people here sure were. Honestly I wasn't pissed. Thought it was a knee-jerk reaction and stupid.well_endowed_ag said:greg.w.h said:Being pissed at things you have zero influence or control over is a winning strategy…The Zookeeper said:NO. Guaranteed.Hill08 said:
So if he takes a job next year, doesn't that reduce our buyout?
Part of reason why so many were pissed and more pissed at the extension
Exactly. Even though I disagreed with the extension at the time, I was happy and still am. You know why? Because it wasn't my decision, and I'm not paying for it, so it makes no difference to me whatsoever.
Hamburger Dan said:
He's not doing it right. I retired two years ago from 41 years of semi successful High School coaching. I have not thought twice about it. I got paid well (not Jimbo well) but more than I ever imagined, by 2002, I never had to teach a class,. Nowadays, I play golf at a nice club 2-3 times a week. I fly fish in New Mexico / Colorado - a week to 10 days from late April thru October, and I hang out with my family. My old players and coaches checkin with me periodically, but I'm living exactly the way I thought I would at 65 years old. Best decision I ever made!
greg.w.h said:Being pissed at things you have zero influence or control over is a winning strategy…The Zookeeper said:NO. Guaranteed.Hill08 said:
So if he takes a job next year, doesn't that reduce our buyout?
Part of reason why so many were pissed and more pissed at the extension
rootube said:Mark Stoops said:
Just having one natty is a pretty surface level analysis
Really. The number of active coaches with a natty says otherwise. Please elaborate on what a better metric for success is.
rootube said:well_endowed_ag said:Emilio Fantastico said:
The biggest problem I see with hiring Jimbo after the debacle that happened here is what kind of assistants would he be able to hire.
He has no coaching tree of young up-and-comers that he helped develop into big time coaches and he was reduced to hiring old retread failed head coached here even with all our resources.
Just not something that screams future success.
Agree. He is a hired gun who will put together a hired gun staff and recruit hired gun players. It can potentially work out, but there's a major risk of program instability associated with it.
Jimbo hired Mike Elko as his DC so hopefully he does possess some ability to evaluate assistants. How would you rate that hire?
Logos Stick said:BreckCO2000 said:
Arkansas maybe?
They aren't that dumb.
well_endowed_ag said:rootube said:well_endowed_ag said:Emilio Fantastico said:
The biggest problem I see with hiring Jimbo after the debacle that happened here is what kind of assistants would he be able to hire.
He has no coaching tree of young up-and-comers that he helped develop into big time coaches and he was reduced to hiring old retread failed head coached here even with all our resources.
Just not something that screams future success.
Agree. He is a hired gun who will put together a hired gun staff and recruit hired gun players. It can potentially work out, but there's a major risk of program instability associated with it.
Jimbo hired Mike Elko as his DC so hopefully he does possess some ability to evaluate assistants. How would you rate that hire?
I would rate it as one good hire in a sea of bad hires. Jimbo's full body of work speaks for itself very loudly. Don't argue the exception as if it's the rule.
Azeew said:rootube said:Mark Stoops said:
Just having one natty is a pretty surface level analysis
Really. The number of active coaches with a natty says otherwise. Please elaborate on what a better metric for success is.
Eleven years ago.
Oh man, that was bad. I remember when that happened. Awful.TxAg76 said:
We are. Marshall